Genetic Code: Expanding codon size

Engineering transfer RNAs to read codons consisting of four bases requires changes in tRNA that go beyond the anticodon sequence.
  1. Tarana Siddika
  2. Ilka U Heinemann
  3. Patrick O’Donoghue  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Biochemistry, The University of Western Ontario, Canada
  2. Department of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario, Canada

Cells use a genetic code to translate the information contained in DNA and RNA sequences into the amino-acid building blocks that make up a protein (Nirenberg et al., 1965; Söll et al., 1965). DNA molecules are chain-like structures consisting of two entwined strands that encode information using an ‘alphabet’ of four nucleotide building blocks (made up of a sugar and a phosphate group, and one of four nitrogenous bases, A, C, G and T).

Some segments of the DNA genome are instructions for making proteins, and a messenger RNA molecule (mRNA) is produced from the DNA template for each protein-coding gene. On the ribosome, molecules known as transfer RNAs (tRNAs) decode the information in mRNAs by reading it in three-letter groups, also known as codons, allowing for 64 unique triplet combinations (three of which are used as stop signals). Despite this wealth of codons, most organisms usually use just 20 amino acids, making the code redundant as several codons can code for the same amino acid.

Expanding or modifying the genetic code may enable scientists to use cells as factories for making an array of molecules, which could further therapies based on proteins, and in even grander schemes, to enable the creation of artificial life forms. Recent engineering efforts have successfully produced proteins using 22 or even 23 different amino acids, rather than the usual 20 (Wright et al., 2018; Tharp et al., 2021). However, the standard triplet codons cannot be easily reassigned into new amino acids, because even though decoding the 64 codons allows for redundancy, all codons are assigned to a specific amino acid in an organism. Reassigning a codon to a new amino acid would drastically change the organisms’ protein composition.

A quadruplet system based on four-letter codons rather than three has 256 total codons that could encode many more amino acids, independent of the natural triplet codon system. Expanding the number of protein building blocks would help to produce highly specialized proteins containing unnatural amino acids, potentially opening the door to advances in both basic biology and therapeutic applications (Hohsaka et al., 1996).

One approach to expanding the genetic code is based on a natural process called +1 frameshifting, where four rather than three nucleotide bases are effectively decoded as a single amino acid (Riyasaty and Atkins, 1968). The insertion of a single base generates a frameshift in an otherwise triplet codon gene, shifting the frame by one letter. So-called frameshift suppressor tRNAs allow protein synthesis to continue past this insertion to produce a normal full-length protein. For example, some tRNAs can read frameshift mutations, including insertions or deletions of one or two nucleotides in the mRNA. A tRNA that suppresses a +1 frameshift effectively reads or decodes a quadruplet codon (Figure 1).

Evolving tRNAs to efficiently read quadruplet codons.

The schematic illustrates the approach used by DeBenedictis et al. to evolve triplet-decoding tRNAs (left) into tRNAs with expanded anticodon loops (red dots) to decode quadruplet codons consisting of four nucleotide bases (N; middle), and ultimately into efficient quadruplet codon decoders (right). To test the efficiency of four-base translation, DeBenedictis et al. created reporter genes (such as luciferase) with a single base insertion (also referred to as +1 frameshift). The ability of a particular tRNA variant to read that +1-frameshift mutation as a four-base codon can be measured as a function of how much full length and active reporter protein (e.g., luciferase) is made in cells. DeBenedictis et al. then recorded the translation efficiency of tRNAs with simple mutations to expand the anticodon loop (middle, red dots). Next, tRNAs were evolved through various mutations into more effective quadruplet-decoding tRNAs (qtRNAs, purple dots, right). The work represents an important step towards engineering a quadruplet genetic code with 256 codons.

Image credit: Tarana Siddika, Ilka U. Heinemann, Patrick O’Donoghue (CC BY 4.0).

Translation using quadruplet codons exists in both natural and synthetic systems, so why did nature favor a triplet system overall? Now, in eLife, Erika DeBenedictis, Dieter Söll and Kevin Esvelt at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Yale University, report how tRNAs can be evolved to read quadruplet codons more efficiently (DeBenedictis et al., 2022). DeBenedictis et al. made simple mutations to several natural and synthetic tRNAs to generate various quadruplet-decoding RNAs (qtRNAs) based on the natural frameshifting variants and tested their efficiency in the bacterium Escherichia coli. This revealed that quadruplet codons only had a translation efficiency of 1%–3% compared to triplet codons. Some qtRNAs also showed significantly slowed growth rates in E. coli, while others were better tolerated despite their ability to translate quadruplet codons.

DeBenedictis et al. then tested whether tRNAs could evolve into qtRNAs through replacement of the entire anticodon (the complementary sequence to the codon located on the tRNA) with quadruplet codons using a phage-based library selection approach. This involved encoding modified qtRNAs into the genome of bacteriophages, which in turn infected the E. coli bacteria. Only functional qtRNAs enabled phages to successfully reproduce, thus highlighting effective quadruplet codon/anticodon pairs and comparing the efficiency of quadruplet decoding. Their data revealed that functional qtRNAS that can successfully decode quadruplet codons can arise through just a few mutations.

Next, the positions surrounding the anticodon were mutated across a large library of different qtRNAs (Figure 1). These experiments identified qtRNA variants that displayed up to 40-fold improvement in quadruplet decoding efficiency compared to unmutated quadruplet decoding tRNAs. Finally, mass spectrometry was used to show how some qtRNAs provided ‘high-fidelity’ four-base decoding and inserted just a single type of amino acid in response to a quadruplet codon. Other qtRNAs were less selective and the same four-base codon was ‘read’ with multiple different amino acids, revealing ambiguity as a potential limitation in quadruplet decoding.

Overall, the findings highlight the potential and limitations of a genetic code based on quadruplet codons. Quadruplet codons can be used to produce highly specialized proteins with new functionalities, but low translation fidelity and limited efficiency remain challenges in the field. DeBenedictis et al. use multiple approaches to mutagenize tRNAs, and they generated many improved qtRNA variants that represent a full palate of starting points to reassign quadruplet codons to new amino acids. The researchers demonstrated the power of tRNA variations on their own, and significant improvements in quadruplet decoding by engineering tRNAs alone. Combining qtRNAs with engineered tRNA synthetases to improve incorporation of unnatural amino acids (reviewed in Kim et al., 2022) or with genetically modified ribosomes to enhance 4-base translation (Dunkelmann et al., 2021) could further improve efficiency and decrease ambiguity in translating proteins with an increased codon size, thus vastly expanding the genetic code.

The work of DeBenedictis et al. points towards several areas worth further investigation to improve translation efficiency and fidelity with quadruplet codons and they show that in-roads can be made in both areas though tRNA engineering. Together with recent efforts to use quadruplet codons to encode synthetic amino acids (DeBenedictis et al., 2021; Dunkelmann et al., 2021), the current study suggests that the expansion of the genetic code with the help of quadruplet codons may be within reach.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Tarana Siddika

    Tarana Siddika is in the Department of Biochemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  2. Ilka U Heinemann

    Ilka U Heinemann is in the Department of Biochemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1721-1667
  3. Patrick O’Donoghue

    Patrick O’Donoghue is in the Department of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada

    For correspondence
    patrick.odonoghue@uwo.ca
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9500-8640

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: May 11, 2022 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2022, Siddika et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,006
    Page views
  • 137
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Tarana Siddika
  2. Ilka U Heinemann
  3. Patrick O’Donoghue
(2022)
Genetic Code: Expanding codon size
eLife 11:e78869.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78869
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Sarah R Hansen et al.
    Research Article

    In eukaryotes, splice sites define the introns of pre-mRNAs and must be recognized and excised with nucleotide precision by the spliceosome to make the correct mRNA product. In one of the earliest steps of spliceosome assembly, the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) recognizes the 5' splice site (5' SS) through a combination of base pairing, protein-RNA contacts, and interactions with other splicing factors. Previous studies investigating the mechanisms of 5' SS recognition have largely been done in vivo or in cellular extracts where the U1/5' SS interaction is difficult to deconvolute from the effects of trans-acting factors or RNA structure. In this work we used co-localization single-molecule spectroscopy (CoSMoS) to elucidate the pathway of 5' SS selection by purified yeast U1 snRNP. We determined that U1 reversibly selects 5' SS in a sequence-dependent, two-step mechanism. A kinetic selection scheme enforces pairing at particular positions rather than overall duplex stability to achieve long-lived U1 binding. Our results provide a kinetic basis for how U1 may rapidly surveil nascent transcripts for 5' SS and preferentially accumulate at these sequences rather than on close cognates.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Layla Drwesh et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Signal-anchored (SA) proteins are anchored into the mitochondrial outer membrane (OM) via a single transmembrane segment at their N-terminus while the bulk of the proteins is facing the cytosol. These proteins are encoded by nuclear DNA, translated on cytosolic ribosomes, and are then targeted to the organelle and inserted into its OM by import factors. Recently, research on the insertion mechanisms of these proteins into the mitochondrial OM have gained a lot of attention. In contrast, the early cytosolic steps of their biogenesis are unresolved. Using various proteins from this category and a broad set of in vivo, in organello, and in vitro assays, we reconstituted the early steps of their biogenesis. We identified a subset of molecular (co)chaperones that interact with newly synthesized SA proteins, namely, Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones and co-chaperones from the Hsp40 family like Ydj1 and Sis1. These interactions were mediated by the hydrophobic transmembrane segments of the SA proteins. We further demonstrate that interfering with these interactions inhibits the biogenesis of SA proteins to a various extent. Finally, we could demonstrate direct interaction of peptides corresponding to the transmembrane segments of SA proteins with the (co)chaperones and reconstitute in vitro the transfer of such peptides from the Hsp70 chaperone to the mitochondrial Tom70 receptor. Collectively, this study unravels an array of cytosolic chaperones and mitochondrial import factors that facilitates the targeting and membrane integration of mitochondrial SA proteins.