1. Neuroscience

Neuroscout, a unified platform for generalizable and reproducible fMRI research

  1. Alejandro de la Vega  Is a corresponding author
  2. Roberta Rocca
  3. Ross W Blair
  4. Christopher J Markiewicz
  5. Jeff Mentch
  6. James D Kent
  7. Peer Herholz
  8. Satrajit S Ghosh
  9. Russell A Poldrack
  10. Tal Yarkoni
  1. The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  2. Aarhus University, Denmark
  3. Stanford University, United States
  4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  5. McGill University, Canada
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79277
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Alejandro de la Vega
  2. Roberta Rocca
  3. Ross W Blair
  4. Christopher J Markiewicz
  5. Jeff Mentch
  6. James D Kent
  7. Peer Herholz
  8. Satrajit S Ghosh
  9. Russell A Poldrack
  10. Tal Yarkoni
(2022)
Neuroscout, a unified platform for generalizable and reproducible fMRI research
eLife 11:e79277.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79277
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has revolutionized cognitive neuroscience, but methodological barriers limit the generalizability of findings from the lab to the real world. Here, we present Neuroscout, an end-to-end platform for analysis of naturalistic fMRI data designed to facilitate the adoption of robust and generalizable research practices. Neuroscout leverages state-of-the-art machine learning models to automatically annotate stimuli from dozens of fMRI studies using naturalistic stimuli-such as movies and narratives-allowing researchers to easily test neuroscientific hypotheses across multiple ecologically-valid datasets. In addition, Neuroscout builds on a robust ecosystem of open tools and standards to provide an easy-to-use analysis builder and a fully automated execution engine that reduce the burden of reproducible research. Through a series of meta-analytic case studies, we validate the automatic feature extraction approach and demonstrate its potential to support more robust fMRI research. Owing to its ease of use and a high degree of automation, Neuroscout makes it possible to overcome modeling challenges commonly arising in naturalistic analysis and to easily scale analyses within and across datasets, democratizing generalizable fMRI research.

Data availability

All code from our processing pipeline and core infrastructure is available online (https://www.github.com/neuroscout/neuroscout). An online supplement including all analysis code and resulting images is available as a public GitHub repository (https://github.com/neuroscout/neuroscout-paper).All analysis results are made publicly available in a public GitHub repository

The following previously published data sets were used
    1. Hanke M
    2. et al
    (2014) studyforrest
    OpenNeuro, doi:10.18112/ openneuro.ds000113 .v1.3.0.
    https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds000113.v1.3.0
    1. Nastase SA
    2. et al
    (2021) Narratives
    OpenNeuro, doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002345 .v1.1.4.
    https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds002345.v1.1.4

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alejandro de la Vega

    Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    For correspondence
    delavega@utexas.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9062-3778

  2. Roberta Rocca

    Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Ross W Blair

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Christopher J Markiewicz

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6533-164X

  5. Jeff Mentch

    McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. James D Kent

    Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Peer Herholz

    Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9840-6257

  8. Satrajit S Ghosh

    McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5312-6729

  9. Russell A Poldrack

    Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Tal Yarkoni

    Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH109682)

  • Alejandro de la Vega
  • Roberta Rocca
  • Ross W Blair
  • Christopher J Markiewicz
  • Jeff Mentch
  • James D Kent
  • Peer Herholz
  • Satrajit S Ghosh
  • Russell A Poldrack
  • Tal Yarkoni

National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH096906)

  • Alejandro de la Vega
  • James D Kent
  • Tal Yarkoni

National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH117179)

  • Peer Herholz
  • Satrajit S Ghosh

National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH117179)

  • Ross W Blair
  • Christopher J Markiewicz
  • Russell A Poldrack

Canada First Research Excellence Fund

  • Peer Herholz

Brain Canada Fondation

  • Peer Herholz

Unifying Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence - Québec

  • Peer Herholz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, de la Vega et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,286
    views
  • 229
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alejandro de la Vega
  2. Roberta Rocca
  3. Ross W Blair
  4. Christopher J Markiewicz
  5. Jeff Mentch
  6. James D Kent
  7. Peer Herholz
  8. Satrajit S Ghosh
  9. Russell A Poldrack
  10. Tal Yarkoni
(2022)
Neuroscout, a unified platform for generalizable and reproducible fMRI research
eLife 11:e79277.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79277

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79277

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    When and why does motor preparation arise in recurrent neural network models of motor control?

    Marine Schimel, Ta-Chu Kao, Guillaume Hennequin
    Research Article

    During delayed ballistic reaches, motor areas consistently display movement-specific activity patterns prior to movement onset. It is unclear why these patterns arise: while they have been proposed to seed an initial neural state from which the movement unfolds, recent experiments have uncovered the presence and necessity of ongoing inputs during movement, which may lessen the need for careful initialization. Here, we modeled the motor cortex as an input-driven dynamical system, and we asked what the optimal way to control this system to perform fast delayed reaches is. We find that delay-period inputs consistently arise in an optimally controlled model of M1. By studying a variety of network architectures, we could dissect and predict the situations in which it is beneficial for a network to prepare. Finally, we show that optimal input-driven control of neural dynamics gives rise to multiple phases of preparation during reach sequences, providing a novel explanation for experimentally observed features of monkey M1 activity in double reaching.

    1. Neuroscience

    Distractor effects in decision making are related to the individual’s style of integrating choice attributes

    Jing Jun Wong, Alessandro Bongioanni ... Bolton KH Chau
    Research Article

    Humans make irrational decisions in the presence of irrelevant distractor options. There is little consensus on whether decision making is facilitated or impaired by the presence of a highly rewarding distractor, or whether the distractor effect operates at the level of options’ component attributes rather than at the level of their overall value. To reconcile different claims, we argue that it is important to consider the diversity of people’s styles of decision making and whether choice attributes are combined in an additive or multiplicative way. Employing a multi-laboratory dataset investigating the same experimental paradigm, we demonstrated that people used a mix of both approaches and the extent to which approach was used varied across individuals. Critically, we identified that this variability was correlated with the distractor effect during decision making. Individuals who tended to use a multiplicative approach to compute value, showed a positive distractor effect. In contrast, a negative distractor effect (divisive normalisation) was prominent in individuals tending towards an additive approach. Findings suggest that the distractor effect is related to how value is constructed, which in turn may be influenced by task and subject specificities. This concurs with recent behavioural and neuroscience findings that multiple distractor effects co-exist.

    1. Neuroscience

    The subthalamic nucleus contributes causally to perceptual decision-making in monkeys

    Kathryn Branam, Joshua I Gold, Long Ding
    Research Article

    The subthalamic nucleus (STN) plays critical roles in the motor and cognitive function of the basal ganglia (BG), but the exact nature of these roles is not fully understood, especially in the context of decision-making based on uncertain evidence. Guided by theoretical predictions of specific STN contributions, we used single-unit recording and electrical microstimulation in the STN of healthy monkeys to assess its causal, computational roles in visual-saccadic decisions based on noisy evidence. The recordings identified subpopulations of STN neurons with distinct task-related activity patterns that related to different theoretically predicted functions. Microstimulation caused changes in behavioral choices and response times that reflected multiple contributions to an ‘accumulate-to-bound’-like decision process, including modulation of decision bounds and evidence accumulation, and to non-perceptual processes. These results provide new insights into the multiple ways that the STN can support higher brain function.