Abstract

Most studies of cohesin function consider the Stromalin Antigen (STAG/SA) proteins as core complex members given their ubiquitous interaction with the cohesin ring. Here, we provide functional data to support the notion that the SA subunit is not a mere passenger in this structure, but instead plays a key role in the localization of cohesin to diverse biological processes and promotes loading of the complex at these sites. We show that in cells acutely depleted for RAD21, SA proteins remain bound to chromatin, cluster in 3D and interact with CTCF, as well as with a wide range of RNA binding proteins involved in multiple RNA processing mechanisms. Accordingly, SA proteins interact with RNA, RNA binding proteins and R-loops, even in the absence of cohesin. Our results place SA1 on chromatin upstream of the cohesin ring and reveal a role for SA1 in cohesin loading which is independent of NIPBL, the canonical cohesin loader. We propose that SA1 takes advantage of structural R-loop platforms to link cohesin loading and chromatin structure with diverse functions. Since SA proteins are pan-cancer targets, and R-loops play an increasingly prevalent role in cancer biology, our results have important implications for the mechanistic understanding of SA proteins in cancer and disease.

Data availability

All data has been made freely available. Please see Page 21 of the manuscript for Accession numbers.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hayley Porter

    Research Department of Cancer Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yang Li

    Research Department of Cancer Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Maria Victoria  Neguembor

    Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1583-1304
  4. Manuel Beltran

    Regulatory Genomics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Wazeer Varsally

    Research Department of Cancer Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Laura Martin

    Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8801-6637
  7. Manuel Tavares Cornejo

    Regulatory Genomics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Dubravka Pezic

    Research Department of Cancer Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Amandeep Bhamra

    Proteomics Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Silvia Surinova

    Proteomics Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Richard G Jenner

    Regulatory Genomics Group, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Maria Pia Cosma

    Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4207-5097
  13. Suzana Hadjur

    Research Department of Cancer Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    s.hadjur@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3146-3118

Funding

Wellcome Trust (106985/Z/15/Z)

  • Suzana Hadjur

Cancer Research UK (PhD studentship)

  • Hayley Porter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Porter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,489
    views
  • 477
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hayley Porter
  2. Yang Li
  3. Maria Victoria  Neguembor
  4. Manuel Beltran
  5. Wazeer Varsally
  6. Laura Martin
  7. Manuel Tavares Cornejo
  8. Dubravka Pezic
  9. Amandeep Bhamra
  10. Silvia Surinova
  11. Richard G Jenner
  12. Maria Pia Cosma
  13. Suzana Hadjur
(2023)
Cohesin-independent STAG proteins interact with RNA and R-loops and promote complex loading
eLife 12:e79386.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79386

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79386

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.