Protein compactness and interaction valency define the architecture of a biomolecular condensate across scales

  1. Anton A Polyansky  Is a corresponding author
  2. Laura D Gallego
  3. Roman G Efremov
  4. Alwin Köhler
  5. Bojan Zagrovic  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Vienna, Austria
  2. Medical University of Vienna, Austria
  3. Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation

Abstract

Non-membrane-bound biomolecular condensates have been proposed to represent an important mode of subcellular organization in diverse biological settings. However, the fundamental principles governing the spatial organization and dynamics of condensates at the atomistic level remain unclear. The S. cerevisiae Lge1 protein is required for histone H2B ubiquitination and its N-terminal intrinsically disordered fragment (Lge11-80) undergoes robust phase separation. This study connects single- and multi-chain all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of Lge11-80 with the in vitro behavior of Lge11-80 condensates. Analysis of modelled protein-protein interactions elucidates the key determinants of Lge11-80 condensate formation and links configurational entropy, valency and compactness of proteins inside the condensates. A newly derived analytical formalism, related to colloid fractal cluster formation, describes condensate architecture across length scales as a function of protein valency and compactness. In particular, the formalism provides an atomistically resolved model of Lge11-80 condensates on the scale of hundreds of nanometers starting from individual protein conformers captured in simulations. The simulation-derived fractal dimensions of condensates of Lge11-80 and its mutants agree with their in vitro morphologies. The presented framework enables a multiscale description of biomolecular condensates and embeds their study in a wider context of colloid self-organization.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files (Supplementary Files 1 and 2); source data files have been provided for Figure 2 (Figure 2 -source data 1), Figure 1-figure supplement 1 (Figure 1-figure supplement 1-source data 2), Figure 1-figure supplement 2 (Figure 1-figure supplement 2-source data 1), Figure 5-figure supplement 2 (Figure 5-figure supplement 2-source data 1); compressed folders containing source data files have been provided for Figure 1 (Figure 1 -source data 1), Figure 2 (Figure 2 -source data 2), Figure 3 (Figure 3 -source data 1), Figure 4 (Figure 4 -source data 1), Figure 5 (Figure 5 -source data 1), Figure 6 (Figure 6 -source data 1), Figure 1-figure supplement 1 (Figure 1-figure supplement 1-source data 1), Figure 2-figure supplement 1 (Figure 2-figure supplement 1-source data 1), Figure 3-figure supplement 1 (Figure 3-figure supplement 1-source data 1), Figure 4-figure supplement 1 (Figure 4-figure supplement 1-source data 1), Figure 6-figure supplement 1 (Figure 6-figure supplement 1-source data 1). These source files contain the numerical data used to generate the figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Anton A Polyansky

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    anton.polyansky@univie.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1011-2706
  2. Laura D Gallego

    Max F Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Roman G Efremov

    Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alwin Köhler

    Max F Perutz Laboratories, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Bojan Zagrovic

    Department of Structural and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    bojan.zagrovic@univie.ac.at
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (P 30550)

  • Bojan Zagrovic

Austrian Science Fund (P 30680-B21)

  • Bojan Zagrovic

NOMIS Stiftung (Pioneering Research Grant)

  • Alwin Köhler

Austrian Science Fund (F79)

  • Alwin Köhler

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Rohit V Pappu, Washington University in St Louis, United States

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: February 19, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 6, 2022
  3. Accepted: July 18, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: July 20, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 7, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: August 16, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Polyansky et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,216
    views
  • 202
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Anton A Polyansky
  2. Laura D Gallego
  3. Roman G Efremov
  4. Alwin Köhler
  5. Bojan Zagrovic
(2023)
Protein compactness and interaction valency define the architecture of a biomolecular condensate across scales
eLife 12:e80038.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80038

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80038

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Taegon Chung, Iksoo Chang, Sangyeol Kim
    Research Article

    Locomotion is a fundamental behavior of Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans). Previous works on kinetic simulations of animals helped researchers understand the physical mechanisms of locomotion and the muscle-controlling principles of neuronal circuits as an actuator part. It has yet to be understood how C. elegans utilizes the frictional forces caused by the tension of its muscles to perform sequenced locomotive behaviors. Here, we present a two-dimensional rigid body chain model for the locomotion of C. elegans by developing Newtonian equations of motion for each body segment of C. elegans. Having accounted for friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment, elastic constants of C. elegans, and its kymogram from experiments, our kinetic model (ElegansBot) reproduced various locomotion of C. elegans such as, but not limited to, forward-backward-(omega turn)-forward locomotion constituting escaping behavior and delta-turn navigation. Additionally, ElegansBot precisely quantified the forces acting on each body segment of C. elegans to allow investigation of the force distribution. This model will facilitate our understanding of the detailed mechanism of various locomotive behaviors at any given friction-coefficients of the surrounding environment. Furthermore, as the model ensures the performance of realistic behavior, it can be used to research actuator-controller interaction between muscles and neuronal circuits.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Giulio Facchini, Alann Rathery ... Andrea Perna
    Research Article

    Termites build complex nests which are an impressive example of self-organization. We know that the coordinated actions involved in the construction of these nests by multiple individuals are primarily mediated by signals and cues embedded in the structure of the nest itself. However, to date there is still no scientific consensus about the nature of the stimuli that guide termite construction, and how they are sensed by termites. In order to address these questions, we studied the early building behavior of Coptotermes gestroi termites in artificial arenas, decorated with topographic cues to stimulate construction. Pellet collections were evenly distributed across the experimental setup, compatible with a collection mechanism that is not affected by local topography, but only by the distribution of termite occupancy (termites pick pellets at the positions where they are). Conversely, pellet depositions were concentrated at locations of high surface curvature and at the boundaries between different types of substrate. The single feature shared by all pellet deposition regions was that they correspond to local maxima in the evaporation flux. We can show analytically and we confirm experimentally that evaporation flux is directly proportional to the local curvature of nest surfaces. Taken together, our results indicate that surface curvature is sufficient to organize termite building activity and that termites likely sense curvature indirectly through substrate evaporation. Our findings reconcile the apparently discordant results of previous studies.