Selection of HIV-1 for resistance to fifth generation protease inhibitors reveals two independent pathways to high-level resistance

  1. Ean Spielvogel
  2. Sook-Kyung Lee
  3. Shuntai Zhou
  4. Gordon J Lockbaum
  5. Mina Henes
  6. Amy Sondgeroth
  7. Klajdi Kosovrasti
  8. Ellen A Nalivaika
  9. Akbar Ali
  10. Nese Kurt Yilmaz
  11. Celia A Schiffer  Is a corresponding author
  12. Ronald Swanstrom  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  2. University of Massachusetts Medical School, United States

Abstract

Darunavir (DRV) is exceptional among potent HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) in high drug concentrations that are achived in vivo. Little is known about the de novo resistance pathway for DRV. We selected for resistance to high drug concentrations against ten PIs and their structural precursor DRV. Mutations accumulated through two pathways (anchored by protease mutations I50V or I84V). Small changes in the inhibitor P1'-equivalent position led to preferential use of one pathway over the other. Changes in the inhbitor P2'-equivalent position determined differences in potency that were retained in the resistant viruses and that impacted the selected mutations. Viral variants from the two pathways showed differential selection of compensatory mutations in Gag cleavage sites. These results reveal the high level of selective pressure that is attainable with fifth generation PIs, and how features of the inhibitor affect both the resistance pathway and the residual potency in the face of resistance.

Data availability

The sequencing data (Figure 2, 3, and 4) is available at NIH Sequencing Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject ID PRJNA853351.All source data files for enzymatic Ki and Km (Table 1, Figure 2 and 5) have been uploaded to the Carolina Digital Repository: Swanstrom, Ron, and Ean Spielvogel. Km and Ki Dataset for Selection of Hiv-1 for Resistance to Fifth Generation Protease Inhibitors Reveals Two Independent Pathways to High-level Resistance. 2022.All source data files for EC50 inhibition curves (Figure 2 and 6) have been uploaded to the Carolina Digital Repository: Swanstrom, Ron, and Ean Spielvogel. Ec50 Dataset for Selection of Hiv-1 for Resistance to Fifth Generation Protease Inhibitors Reveals Two Independent Pathways to High-level Resistance. 2022.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ean Spielvogel

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Sook-Kyung Lee

    Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Shuntai Zhou

    Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Gordon J Lockbaum

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mina Henes

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Amy Sondgeroth

    Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Klajdi Kosovrasti

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Ellen A Nalivaika

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Akbar Ali

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Nese Kurt Yilmaz

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Celia A Schiffer

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, United States
    For correspondence
    celia.schiffer@umassmed.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2270-6613
  12. Ronald Swanstrom

    Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    For correspondence
    ron_swanstrom@med.unc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7777-0773

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1P01GM109767-01A`)

  • Ean Spielvogel
  • Sook-Kyung Lee
  • Shuntai Zhou
  • Gordon J Lockbaum
  • Mina Henes
  • Amy Sondgeroth
  • Klajdi Kosovrasti
  • Ellen A Nalivaika
  • Akbar Ali
  • Nese Kurt Yilmaz
  • Celia A Schiffer
  • Ronald Swanstrom

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Spielvogel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 980
    views
  • 135
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ean Spielvogel
  2. Sook-Kyung Lee
  3. Shuntai Zhou
  4. Gordon J Lockbaum
  5. Mina Henes
  6. Amy Sondgeroth
  7. Klajdi Kosovrasti
  8. Ellen A Nalivaika
  9. Akbar Ali
  10. Nese Kurt Yilmaz
  11. Celia A Schiffer
  12. Ronald Swanstrom
(2023)
Selection of HIV-1 for resistance to fifth generation protease inhibitors reveals two independent pathways to high-level resistance
eLife 12:e80328.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80328

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80328

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Angel D'Oliviera, Xuhang Dai ... Jeffrey S Mugridge
    Research Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or Nsp5) is critical for production of viral proteins during infection and, like many viral proteases, also targets host proteins to subvert their cellular functions. Here, we show that the human tRNA methyltransferase TRMT1 is recognized and cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. TRMT1 installs the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m2,2G) modification on mammalian tRNAs, which promotes cellular protein synthesis and redox homeostasis. We find that Mpro can cleave endogenous TRMT1 in human cell lysate, resulting in removal of the TRMT1 zinc finger domain. Evolutionary analysis shows the TRMT1 cleavage site is highly conserved in mammals, except in Muroidea, where TRMT1 is likely resistant to cleavage. TRMT1 proteolysis results in reduced tRNA binding and elimination of tRNA methyltransferase activity. We also determined the structure of an Mpro-TRMT1 peptide complex that shows how TRMT1 engages the Mpro active site in an uncommon substrate binding conformation. Finally, enzymology and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that kinetic discrimination occurs during a later step of Mpro-mediated proteolysis following substrate binding. Together, these data provide new insights into substrate recognition by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that could help guide future antiviral therapeutic development and show how proteolysis of TRMT1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs both TRMT1 tRNA binding and tRNA modification activity to disrupt host translation and potentially impact COVID-19 pathogenesis or phenotypes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Qian Wang, Jinxin Liu ... Qian Liu
    Research Article

    Paramyxovirus membrane fusion requires an attachment protein for receptor binding and a fusion protein for membrane fusion triggering. Nipah virus (NiV) attachment protein (G) binds to ephrinB2 or -B3 receptors, and fusion protein (F) mediates membrane fusion. NiV-F is a class I fusion protein and is activated by endosomal cleavage. The crystal structure of a soluble GCN4-decorated NiV-F shows a hexamer-of-trimer assembly. Here, we used single-molecule localization microscopy to quantify the NiV-F distribution and organization on cell and virus-like particle membranes at a nanometer precision. We found that NiV-F on biological membranes forms distinctive clusters that are independent of endosomal cleavage or expression levels. The sequestration of NiV-F into dense clusters favors membrane fusion triggering. The nano-distribution and organization of NiV-F are susceptible to mutations at the hexamer-of-trimer interface, and the putative oligomerization motif on the transmembrane domain. We also show that NiV-F nanoclusters are maintained by NiV-F–AP-2 interactions and the clathrin coat assembly. We propose that the organization of NiV-F into nanoclusters facilitates membrane fusion triggering by a mixed population of NiV-F molecules with varied degrees of cleavage and opportunities for interacting with the NiV-G/receptor complex. These observations provide insights into the in situ organization and activation mechanisms of the NiV fusion machinery.