Brain Organoids: Getting the right cells
Brain organoids, also known as brain spheroids, are three-dimensional cultures of neural cells derived from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) that mimic the brain’s organization, development, and activity in a dish (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014). The technology available to develop brain organoids has advanced considerably in recent years, providing an unprecedented opportunity to examine brain development and disease (Pasca, 2018). However, existing brain organoids still have limitations: most notably, they do not contain vascular cells, immune cells and other non-neural cells.
The neurovascular system is responsible for the delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the brain, the growth and development of neural tissue, and allowing the brain to perform its roles normally (Jin et al., 2002). Thus, a functional vasculature is critical to obtaining brain organoids with an architecture similar to the mature brain, and cells that have differentiated appropriately.
Several strategies have been devised to generate vascularized brain organoids (Figure 1). The simplest and most straightforward method is to co-culture brain organoids with endothelial cells which line blood vessels (Pham et al., 2018). Another approach is to genetically induce blood vessels by expressing a transcription factor that converts PSCs into endothelial cells as the brain organoids develop (Cakir et al., 2019). Yet another way to obtain vascularized brain organoids is to fuse PSC-derived brain organoids with endothelial cell organoids (Song et al., 2019).
Similar strategies have been applied to add microglia, another non-neural cell type, to brain organoids (Abud et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2021; Cakir et al., 2022). Although each method has its limitations, all aim to incorporate a single type of non-neural cells into brain organoids. Now, in eLife, Zhen-Ge Luo from ShanghaiTech University, Xiang-Chun Ju from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and co-workers – including Xin-Yao Sun as first author – report on the generation of fusion vessel brain organoids (fVBOrs) with both vascular- and microglia-like cells obtained by fusing vessel organoids with brain organoids (Sun et al., 2022).
Sun et al. first focused on generating vessel organoids. To do this, they activated Wnt signaling in embryonic bodies made of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). The Wnt signaling pathway triggers hESCs to differentiate into mesodermal cells, which give rise to muscles, blood vessels, and connective tissue during development. Once the cells in the embryoid bodies had differentiated into the mesoderm, Sun et al. added vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to further differentiate them into endothelial cells.
At this point, the embryoid bodies were embedded in Matrigel, a culture substrate containing many extracellular matrix components that cells encounter in vivo. Next, Sun et al. added neurotrophic factors – molecules that promote the growth and maturation of neurons – to the embryoid bodies to reproduce the brain trophic environment and facilitate the differentiation of the vessel organoids into brain vessels. As a result, the vessel organoids acquired complex vascular structures.
The next step was to characterize these vessel organoids by performing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). The results showed that the vessel organoids have characteristics unique to the vascular system, including the expression of groups of genes that are match the ones active in endothelial cells, vascular progenitors, fibroblasts, pericytes, and smooth muscle cells. Interestingly, a type of immune cells in the brain called microglia was also detected in these vessel organoids, likely due to the neurotrophic factors in the maturation media.
Once the vessel organoids had been developed and characterized, Sun et al. applied a co-culture approach to develop brain organoids with vascular systems (Figure 1). First, they made brain organoids using unguided protocols of intrinsic neuroectoderm differentiation, where hESCs are cultured together in signal-free media and spontaneously differentiate into neural cells (Lancaster and Knoblich, 2014). In previous studies, a single brain organoid had been fused with a single vessel organoid to achieve vascularization (Song et al., 2019). In the current study, however, each brain organoid was fused with two vessel organoids within Matrigel to generate ffVBOrs by entirely surrounding the neural tissue with the invading vascular structures.
Notably, neural tissue from these fVBOrs also contained functional microglia-like cells, which take part in the maturation of neural networks by engulfing synapses and regulating neuronal activity. Therefore, incorporating vascular and immune cells into the brain organoids might further promote the survival of neuronal progenitors by providing them with the growth factors they need. However, the spontaneous and stochastic differentiation of mesodermal progenitors into different cell types in vessel organoids can lead to high variability in the generation of microglia in fVBOrs, which could become an issue.
Despite the potential limitations, the fVBOrs reported by Sun et al. offer an excellent opportunity to examine the interaction between neural tissue and vascular structures during early brain development. Notably, this model differs from previously published approaches by acquiring endothelial and immune cells, the major non-neural cells missing in brain organoids. In the future, this study could be extended into other organoid models that mimic specific regions of the human brain and require a greater cellular diversity.
Article and author information
- Version of Record published: June 30, 2022 (version 1)
© 2022, Cakir and Park
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
- Page views
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
When forming a memory of an experience that is unfolding over time, we can use our schematic knowledge about the world (constructed based on many prior episodes) to predict what will transpire. We developed a novel paradigm to study how the development of a complex schema influences predictive processes during perception and impacts sequential memory. Participants learned to play a novel board game ('4-in-a-row') across six training sessions, and repeatedly performed a memory test in which they watched and recalled sequences of moves from the game. We found that participants gradually became better at remembering sequences from the game as their schema developed, driven by improved accuracy for schema-consistent moves. Eye tracking revealed that increased predictive eye movements during encoding, which were most prevalent in expert players, were associated with better memory. Our results identify prediction as a mechanism by which schematic knowledge can improve episodic memory.
Pattern separation, or the process by which highly similar stimuli or experiences in memory are represented by non-overlapping neural ensembles, has typically been ascribed to processes supported by the hippocampus. Converging evidence from a wide range of studies, however, suggests that pattern separation is a multistage process supported by a network of brain regions. Based on this evidence, considered together with related findings from the interference resolution literature, we propose the ‘cortico-hippocampal pattern separation’ (CHiPS) framework, which asserts that brain regions involved in cognitive control play a significant role in pattern separation. Particularly, these regions may contribute to pattern separation by (1) resolving interference in sensory regions that project to the hippocampus, thus regulating its cortical input, or (2) directly modulating hippocampal processes in accordance with task demands. Considering recent interest in how hippocampal operations are modulated by goal states likely represented and regulated by extra-hippocampal regions, we argue that pattern separation is similarly supported by neocortical–hippocampal interactions.