Prolonged partner separation erodes nucleus accumbens transcriptional signatures of pair bonding in male prairie voles

  1. Julie M Sadino
  2. Xander G Bradeen
  3. Conor J Kelly
  4. Liza E Brusman
  5. Deena M Walker
  6. Zoe R Donaldson  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Colorado Boulder, United States
  2. Oregon Health and Science University Hospital, United States

Abstract

The loss of a spouse is often cited as the most traumatic event in a person's life. However, for most people, the severity of grief and its maladaptive effects subside over time via an understudied adaptive process. Like humans, socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) form opposite-sex pair bonds, and upon partner separation, show stress phenotypes that diminish over time. We test the hypothesis that extended partner separation diminishes pair bond-associated behaviors and causes pair bond transcriptional signatures to erode. Pairs were cohoused for 2 weeks and then either remained paired or were separated for 48hrs or 4wks before collecting fresh nucleus accumbens tissue for RNAseq. In a separate cohort, we assessed partner-directed affiliation at these time points. We found that these behaviors persist despite prolonged separation in both same-sex and opposite-sex paired voles. Opposite-sex pair bonding led to changes in accumbal transcription that were stably maintained while animals remained paired but eroded following prolonged partner separation. Eroded genes are associated with gliogenesis and myelination, suggesting a previously undescribed role for glia in pair bonding and loss. Further, we pioneered neuron-specific translating ribosomal affinity purification in voles. Neuronally-enriched transcriptional changes revealed dopaminergic-, mitochondrial-, and steroid hormone signaling-associated gene clusters sensitive to acute pair bond disruption and loss adaptation. Our results suggest that partner separation erodes transcriptomic signatures of pair bonding despite core behavioral features of the bond remaining intact, revealing potential molecular processes priming a vole to be able to form a new bond.

Data availability

All sequencing data is available on GEO (GSE192661). All lab specific code is available on the Donaldson Lab GitHub (https://github.com/donaldsonlab) and all metadata including comprehensive statistical analyses, animal information, differential gene expression, gene sets, and IPA analyses are available on the Donaldson lab Figshare (DOIs in Supplemental) . The vole optimized DIO-eGFP-RPL10a vector will be made available on Addgene.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Julie M Sadino

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xander G Bradeen

    Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Conor J Kelly

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2410-7892
  4. Liza E Brusman

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Deena M Walker

    Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health and Science University Hospital, Portland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Zoe R Donaldson

    Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
    For correspondence
    zoe.donaldson@colorado.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6699-7905

Funding

National Institutes of Health (T32 GM008759-17/18)

  • Julie M Sadino

Dana Foundation

  • Zoe R Donaldson

Whitehall Foundation

  • Zoe R Donaldson

National Institutes of Health (DP2OD026143)

  • Zoe R Donaldson

National Institutes of Health (R01MH125423)

  • Zoe R Donaldson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Margaret M McCarthy, University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were performed in accordance with standard ethical guidelines (National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals) and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Colorado Boulder (protocol #2435). For stereotaxic surgery, adult prairie voles were anesthetized using isoflurane (3% induction, 1-2.5% maintenance) and depth of anesthesia was monitored by breathing and toe pinch reflex.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: July 14, 2021 (view preprint)
  2. Received: May 24, 2022
  3. Accepted: February 27, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: February 28, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 22, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 23, 2023 (version 3)
  7. Version of Record published: April 18, 2023 (version 4)

Copyright

© 2023, Sadino et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,486
    views
  • 197
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Julie M Sadino
  2. Xander G Bradeen
  3. Conor J Kelly
  4. Liza E Brusman
  5. Deena M Walker
  6. Zoe R Donaldson
(2023)
Prolonged partner separation erodes nucleus accumbens transcriptional signatures of pair bonding in male prairie voles
eLife 12:e80517.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80517

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80517

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Marcos Moreno-Aguilera, Alba M Neher ... Carme Gallego
    Research Article Updated

    Alternative RNA splicing is an essential and dynamic process in neuronal differentiation and synapse maturation, and dysregulation of this process has been associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Recent studies have revealed the importance of RNA-binding proteins in the regulation of neuronal splicing programs. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in the control of these splicing regulators are still unclear. Here, we show that KIS, a kinase upregulated in the developmental brain, imposes a genome-wide alteration in exon usage during neuronal differentiation in mice. KIS contains a protein-recognition domain common to spliceosomal components and phosphorylates PTBP2, counteracting the role of this splicing factor in exon exclusion. At the molecular level, phosphorylation of unstructured domains within PTBP2 causes its dissociation from two co-regulators, Matrin3 and hnRNPM, and hinders the RNA-binding capability of the complex. Furthermore, KIS and PTBP2 display strong and opposing functional interactions in synaptic spine emergence and maturation. Taken together, our data uncover a post-translational control of splicing regulators that link transcriptional and alternative exon usage programs in neuronal development.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Kenneth Chiou, Noah Snyder-Mackler
    Insight

    Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the extent to which marmosets carry genetically distinct cells from their siblings.