Evolutionary shaping of human brain dynamics
- Monash University, Australia
- Emory University, United States
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
Abstract
The human brain is distinct from those of other species in terms of size, organization, and connectivity. How do structural evolutionary differences drive patterns of neural activity enabling brain function? Here, we combine brain imaging and biophysical modeling to show that the anatomical wiring of the human brain distinctly shapes neural dynamics. This shaping is characterized by a narrower distribution of dynamic ranges across brain regions compared with that of chimpanzees, our closest living primate relatives. We find that such a narrow dynamic range distribution supports faster integration between regions, particularly in transmodal systems. Conversely, a broad dynamic range distribution as seen in chimpanzees facilitates brain processes relying more on neural interactions within specialized local brain systems. These findings suggest that human brain dynamics have evolved to foster rapid associative processes in service of complex cognitive functions and behavior.
Data availability
All source data and MATLAB codes to perform sample simulations, analyze results, and generate the main and supplementary figures of this study are openly available at https://github.com/jchrispang/evolution-brain-tuning.
-
The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overviewhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041.
-
A macaque connectome for large-scale network simulations in TheVirtualBrainhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0129-z.
-
Open access resource for cellular-resolution analyses of corticocortical connectivity in the marmoset monkeyhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14858-0.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Health and Medical Research Council (11144936)
- James A Roberts
National Health and Medical Research Council (1145168)
- James A Roberts
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ALWOP.179)
- Martijn van den Heuvel,
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VIDI (452-16-015))
- Martijn van den Heuvel,
European Research Council (Consolidator grant 101001062)
- Martijn van den Heuvel,
National Health and Medical Research Council (1138711)
- Luca Cocchi
National Health and Medical Research Council (2001283)
- Luca Cocchi
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All data were taken from previously published studies and were approved by the respective oversighting ethics committees. Procedures were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Yerkes National Primate Research Center and the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (YER-2001206).
Human subjects: All data were taken from previously published studies and were approved by the respective oversighting ethics committees. Procedures were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Yerkes National Primate Research Center and the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (YER-2001206). All humans were recruited as healthy volunteers with no known neurological conditions and provided informed consent (IRB00000028).
Copyright
© 2022, Pang et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,061
- views
-
- 377
- downloads
-
- 7
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Evolutionary shaping of human brain dynamics
eLife 11:e80627.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80627
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.
-
- Neuroscience
During rest and sleep, memory traces replay in the brain. The dialogue between brain regions during replay is thought to stabilize labile memory traces for long-term storage. However, because replay is an internally-driven, spontaneous phenomenon, it does not have a ground truth - an external reference that can validate whether a memory has truly been replayed. Instead, replay detection is based on the similarity between the sequential neural activity comprising the replay event and the corresponding template of neural activity generated during active locomotion. If the statistical likelihood of observing such a match by chance is sufficiently low, the candidate replay event is inferred to be replaying that specific memory. However, without the ability to evaluate whether replay detection methods are successfully detecting true events and correctly rejecting non-events, the evaluation and comparison of different replay methods is challenging. To circumvent this problem, we present a new framework for evaluating replay, tested using hippocampal neural recordings from rats exploring two novel linear tracks. Using this two-track paradigm, our framework selects replay events based on their temporal fidelity (sequence-based detection), and evaluates the detection performance using each event's track discriminability, where sequenceless decoding across both tracks is used to quantify whether the track replaying is also the most likely track being reactivated.
