Evolutionary shaping of human brain dynamics

  1. James C Pang  Is a corresponding author
  2. James K Rilling
  3. James A Roberts
  4. Martijn van den Heuvel,
  5. Luca Cocchi  Is a corresponding author
  1. Monash University, Australia
  2. Emory University, United States
  3. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia
  4. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

The human brain is distinct from those of other species in terms of size, organization, and connectivity. How do structural evolutionary differences drive patterns of neural activity enabling brain function? Here, we combine brain imaging and biophysical modeling to show that the anatomical wiring of the human brain distinctly shapes neural dynamics. This shaping is characterized by a narrower distribution of dynamic ranges across brain regions compared with that of chimpanzees, our closest living primate relatives. We find that such a narrow dynamic range distribution supports faster integration between regions, particularly in transmodal systems. Conversely, a broad dynamic range distribution as seen in chimpanzees facilitates brain processes relying more on neural interactions within specialized local brain systems. These findings suggest that human brain dynamics have evolved to foster rapid associative processes in service of complex cognitive functions and behavior.

Data availability

All source data and MATLAB codes to perform sample simulations, analyze results, and generate the main and supplementary figures of this study are openly available at https://github.com/jchrispang/evolution-brain-tuning.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. James C Pang

    Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
    For correspondence
    James.Pang1@monash.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2461-2760
  2. James K Rilling

    Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. James A Roberts

    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Queensland, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Martijn van den Heuvel,

    Department of Complex Traits Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Luca Cocchi

    Systems Neuroscience Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
    For correspondence
    Luca.Cocchi@qimrberghofer.edu.au
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3651-2676

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (11144936)

  • James A Roberts

National Health and Medical Research Council (1145168)

  • James A Roberts

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ALWOP.179)

  • Martijn van den Heuvel,

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VIDI (452-16-015))

  • Martijn van den Heuvel,

European Research Council (Consolidator grant 101001062)

  • Martijn van den Heuvel,

National Health and Medical Research Council (1138711)

  • Luca Cocchi

National Health and Medical Research Council (2001283)

  • Luca Cocchi

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All data were taken from previously published studies and were approved by the respective oversighting ethics committees. Procedures were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Yerkes National Primate Research Center and the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (YER-2001206).

Human subjects: All data were taken from previously published studies and were approved by the respective oversighting ethics committees. Procedures were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Yerkes National Primate Research Center and the Emory University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (YER-2001206). All humans were recruited as healthy volunteers with no known neurological conditions and provided informed consent (IRB00000028).

Copyright

© 2022, Pang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,169
    views
  • 394
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. James C Pang
  2. James K Rilling
  3. James A Roberts
  4. Martijn van den Heuvel,
  5. Luca Cocchi
(2022)
Evolutionary shaping of human brain dynamics
eLife 11:e80627.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80627

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80627

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sean McCracken, Liam McCoy ... Josh L Morgan
    Research Article

    In albino mice and EphB1 knockout mice, mistargeted retinal ganglion cell axons form dense islands of axon terminals in the dorsal lateral geniculate nuclei (dLGN). The formation of these islands of retinal input depends on developmental patterns of spontaneous retinal activity. We reconstructed the microcircuitry of the activity-dependent islands and found that the boundaries of the island represent a remarkably strong segregation within retinogeniculate connectivity. We conclude that when sets of retinal input are established in the wrong part of the dLGN, the developing circuitry responds by forming a synaptically isolated subcircuit within the otherwise fully connected network. The fact that there is a developmental starting condition that can induce a synaptically segregated microcircuit has important implications for our understanding of the organization of visual circuits and our understanding of the implementation of activity-dependent development.

    1. Neuroscience
    Donald Iain MacDonald, Monessha Jayabalan ... Alexander Theodore Chesler
    Research Article

    The neuropeptides Substance P and CGRPα have long been thought important for pain sensation. Both peptides and their receptors are expressed at high levels in pain-responsive neurons from the periphery to the brain making them attractive therapeutic targets. However, drugs targeting these pathways individually did not relieve pain in clinical trials. Since Substance P and CGRPα are extensively co-expressed, we hypothesized that their simultaneous inhibition would be required for effective analgesia. We therefore generated Tac1 and Calca double knockout (DKO) mice and assessed their behavior using a wide range of pain-relevant assays. As expected, Substance P and CGRPα peptides were undetectable throughout the nervous system of DKO mice. To our surprise, these animals displayed largely intact responses to mechanical, thermal, chemical, and visceral pain stimuli, as well as itch. Moreover, chronic inflammatory pain and neurogenic inflammation were unaffected by loss of the two peptides. Finally, neuropathic pain evoked by nerve injury or chemotherapy treatment was also preserved in peptide-deficient mice. Thus, our results demonstrate that even in combination, Substance P and CGRPα are not required for the transmission of acute and chronic pain.