COVID-19: Locked in a pro-inflammatory state

Macrophages absorbing cells infected with viable SARS-CoV-2 particles fail to transition into an anti-inflammatory state, potentially contributing to a damaging immune reaction linked to severe forms of COVID-19.
  1. Chiu Wang Chau
  2. Ryohichi Sugimura  Is a corresponding author
  1. School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

In the last two and a half years, scientists all over the world have worked relentlessly to develop treatments and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing COVID-19. While considerable progress has been made identifying key properties of the virus, several fundamental questions remain. For example, it is still unclear why some people develop long COVID-19, or why others are asymptomatic.

Previous research has shown that some patients with COVID-19 can experience a cytokine storm, which is characterized by a high concentration of pro-inflammatory proteins called cytokines (Wong, 2021; Ragab et al., 2020). Cytokine storms can be an indicator of a poor disease prognosis, and research indicates that they contribute to long-term, and sometimes life-threatening, conditions in patients with long COVID-19 (Rai et al., 2021). Now, in eLife, Larissa Cunha and colleagues at the Universidade de São Paulo – including Ana Salina, Douglas dos-Santos, Tamara Rodrigues, and Marlon Fortes-Rocha as joint first authors – report new insights into how COVID-19 may cause cytokine storms (Salina et al., 2022).

Immune cells called macrophages are the major cell type responsible for cytokine storms in COVID-19 (Merad and Martin, 2020). Typically, they migrate to infected or damaged sites in the body, and upon contact with bacteria, viruses, or chemicals emitted by dying cells, produce proinflammatory cytokines (Figure 1). These, in turn, strengthen the response of other immune cells. Once the pathogens have been eliminated, macrophages stop producing proinflammatory cytokines and instead start releasing anti-inflammatory signals, which promote healing.

Phenotype change of macrophages in response to apoptotic cells.

An epithelial cell (shown in red) attacked by SARS-CoV-2 (white) activates immune cells, known as macrophages (yellow), via the cytokine interferon gamma (blue receptor). The macrophages then differentiate into a proinflammatory state M1 (lilac) and secrete proinflammatory cytokines to activate other immune responses. M1 macrophages also help to clear cell debris and virus particles by engulfing the infected cells, a process known as efferocytosis. Normally, absorbing apoptotic (dying) cells infected with a virus causes M1 macrophages to change into M2 macrophages (green), which secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines. These in turn, stimulate fibroblasts (brown) to help regenerate damaged tissues. However, macrophages that have engulfed viable SARS-CoV-2 particles do not change into the anti-inflammatory phenotype. They also are less able to absorb pathogens and cell debris, which leads to prolonged inflammation.

Image credit: The figure was created with biorender.com.

Previous research has shown that during this transition, macrophages change their phenotype from a proinflammatory state M1 to an anti-inflammatory one, M2 (Kohno et al., 2021). It was, however, unclear how they achieve this. To find out if the same transition happens after infection with COVID-19, Salina et al. used apoptotic lung and kidney cells (that is, cells undergoing regulated cell death) containing either viable SARS-CoV-2 particles, inactivated viral particles, or sterile culture medium. They then investigated if and how engulfing apoptotic cells, a process known as efferocytosis, affects the phenotypic change of the macrophages.

The results revealed that SARS-CoV-2 prevented M1 macrophages from changing into M2 macrophages, thereby increasing the inflammatory potential of these immune cells. In the experiments, only cells infected with viable SARS-CoV-2 blocked the M1 macrophages from changing into M2 macrophages and increased the amount of proinflammatory cytokines produced, such as IL-6. Experiments with another virus species did not achieve the same outcome, suggesting that the overproduction of IL-6 may be specific to SARS-CoV-2.

Salina et al. further tested the effect of antiviral drugs targeting the transcription process of viral RNA and found that viral RNAs appear to play a significant role in preventing macrophages changing into the anti-inflammatory state. Treating macrophages with the antiviral drug Remdesivir after they had engulfed cells with viable SARS-CoV-2 reduced the production of IL-6.

These observations indicate that viral RNAs – once taken up by macrophages – arrest the immune cells to remain in the M1 phenotype, which may contribute to the cytokine storm seen in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, absorbing cells containing viable SARS-CoV-2 reduced the number of proteins responsible for recognizing apoptotic cells. This led to a build-up of cell debris and apoptotic cells.

To find out how defective efferocytosis affects the pathogenesis of COVID-19, Salina et al. stained lung tissue samples from COVID-19 patients with immunofluorescent dyes and assessed the expression of efferocytosis receptor proteins. This revealed that lung samples had a lower level of gene expression linked to efferocytosis, which lead to a reduced clearance of cell debris. It also showed that the production of cytokines was dysfunctional, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 over-activates macrophages in the lungs. This in turn, led to severe inflammation and impaired tissue regeneration. Furthermore, the residual cell debris induced signaling molecules that activated a type of immune cells, called monocytes, to become M1 macrophages. Combined, these changes could increase inflammation even further and may prolong a dysfunctional immune response long after recovery, potentially leading to long COVID-19 syndromes.

While many questions around COVID-19 and its long-term effects warrant further research, the study of Salina et al. provides valuable insights into the complex mechanisms of cytokine storms and may open new avenues for developing treatment plans for patients with severe COVID-19 (Misra et al., 2021; Gracia-Ramos et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2022; Batlle et al., 2022; Yeung et al., 2021).

References

    1. Wong RSY
    (2021)
    Inflammation in COVID-19: from pathogenesis to treatment
    International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology 14:831–844.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chiu Wang Chau

    Chiu Wang Chau is in the School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7778-3491
  2. Ryohichi Sugimura

    Ryohichi Sugimura is in the School of Biomedical Sciences, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    For correspondence
    rios@hku.hk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5701-3628

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: July 7, 2022 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2022, Wang Chau and Sugimura

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,455
    views
  • 252
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chiu Wang Chau
  2. Ryohichi Sugimura
(2022)
COVID-19: Locked in a pro-inflammatory state
eLife 11:e80699.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80699

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Bing Li, Prasanna Suresh ... David Klenerman
    Research Article

    The Myddosome is a key innate immune signalling platform. It forms at the cell surface and contains MyD88 and IRAK proteins which ultimately coordinate the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signals via the Myddosome when triggered by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or amyloid-beta (Aβ) aggregates but the magnitude and time duration of the response are very different for reasons that are unclear. Here, we followed the formation of Myddosomes in live macrophages using local delivery of TLR4 agonist to the cell surface and visualisation with 3D rapid light sheet imaging. This was complemented by super-resolution imaging of Myddosomes in fixed macrophages to determine the size of the signalling complex at different times after triggering. Myddosomes formed more rapidly after LPS than in response to sonicated Aβ 1–42 fibrils (80 vs 372 s). The mean lifetimes of the Myddosomes were also shorter when triggered by LPS compared to sonicated Aβ fibrils (170 and 220 s), respectively. In both cases, a range of Myddosome of different sizes (50–500 nm) were formed. In particular, small round Myddosomes around 100 nm in size formed at early time points, then reduced in proportion over time. Collectively, our data suggest that compared to LPS the multivalency of Aβ fibrils leads to the formation of larger Myddosomes which form more slowly and, due to their size, take longer to disassemble. This explains why sonicated Aβ fibrils results in less efficient triggering of TLR4 signalling and may be a general property of protein aggregates.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Thomas Morgan Li, Victoria Zyulina ... Theresa T Lu
    Research Article

    The autoimmune disease lupus erythematosus (lupus) is characterized by photosensitivity, where even ambient ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure can lead to development of inflammatory skin lesions. We have previously shown that Langerhans cells (LCs) limit keratinocyte apoptosis and photosensitivity via a disintegrin and metalloprotease 17 (ADAM17)-mediated release of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ligands and that LC ADAM17 sheddase activity is reduced in lupus. Here, we sought to understand how the lupus skin environment contributes to LC ADAM17 dysfunction and, in the process, differentiate between effects on LC ADAM17 sheddase function, LC ADAM17 expression, and LC numbers. We show through transcriptomic analysis a shared IFN-rich environment in non-lesional skin across human lupus and three murine models: MRL/lpr, B6.Sle1yaa, and imiquimod (IMQ) mice. IFN-I inhibits LC ADAM17 sheddase activity in murine and human LCs, and IFNAR blockade in lupus model mice restores LC ADAM17 sheddase activity, all without consistent effects on LC ADAM17 protein expression or LC numbers. Anti-IFNAR-mediated LC ADAM17 sheddase function restoration is associated with reduced photosensitive responses that are dependent on EGFR signaling and LC ADAM17. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a known mediator of ADAM17 activity; we show that UVR-induced LC ROS production is reduced in lupus model mice, restored by anti-IFNAR, and is cytoplasmic in origin. Our findings suggest that IFN-I promotes photosensitivity at least in part by inhibiting UVR-induced LC ADAM17 sheddase function and raise the possibility that anifrolumab ameliorates lupus skin disease in part by restoring this function. This work provides insight into IFN-I-mediated disease mechanisms, LC regulation, and a potential mechanism of action for anifrolumab in lupus.