MLL3 regulates the CDKN2A tumor suppressor locus in liver cancer

  1. Changyu Zhu
  2. Yadira M Soto-Feliciano  Is a corresponding author
  3. John P Morris 4th
  4. Chun-Hao Huang
  5. Richard P Koche
  6. Yu-jui Ho
  7. Ana Banito
  8. Chun-Wei (David) Chen
  9. Aditya Shroff
  10. Sha Tian
  11. Geulah Livshits
  12. Chi-Chao Chen
  13. Myles Fennell
  14. Scott A Armstrong
  15. C David Allis
  16. Darjus F Tschaharganeh  Is a corresponding author
  17. Scott W Lowe  Is a corresponding author
  1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  3. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
  4. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  5. The Rockefeller University, United States
  6. German Cancer Research Center, Germany

Abstract

Mutations in genes encoding components of chromatin modifying and remodeling complexes are among the most frequently observed somatic events in human cancers. For example, missense and nonsense mutations targeting the mixed lineage leukemia family member 3 (MLL3, encoded by KMT2C) histone methyltransferase occur in a range of solid tumors, and heterozygous deletions encompassing KMT2C occur in a subset of aggressive leukemias. Although MLL3 loss can promote tumorigenesis in mice, the molecular targets and biological processes by which MLL3 suppresses tumorigenesis remain poorly characterized. Here we combined genetic, epigenomic, and animal modeling approaches to demonstrate that one of the mechanisms by which MLL3 links chromatin remodeling to tumor suppression is by co-activating the Cdkn2a tumor suppressor locus. Disruption of Kmt2c cooperates with Myc overexpression in the development of murine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in which MLL3 binding to the Cdkn2a locus is blunted, resulting in reduced H3K4 methylation and low expression levels of the locus-encoded tumor suppressors p16/Ink4a and p19/Arf. Conversely, elevated KMT2C expression increases its binding to the CDKN2A locus and co-activates gene transcription. Endogenous Kmt2c restoration reverses these chromatin and transcriptional effects and triggers Ink4a/Arf-dependent apoptosis. Underscoring the human relevance of this epistasis, we found that genomic alterations in KMT2C and CDKN2A were associated with similar transcriptional profiles in human HCC samples. These results collectively point to a new mechanism for disrupting CDKN2A activity during cancer development and, in doing so, link MLL3 to an established tumor suppressor network.

Data availability

Source files of all original gels and Western Blots were provided for the following figures:Figure 1-figure supplement 2B;Figure 4-figure supplement 1A, C, D, E;Figure 5-figure supplement 2B, F, G.RNA sequencing and ChIP sequencing data files that support the findings of this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession code GSE85055, as well as in the Dryad digital repository (doi:10.5061/dryad.7pvmcvdwm; doi:10.5061/dryad.f1vhhmh0h).All other data supporting the findings of this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Changyu Zhu

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3583-3638
  2. Yadira M Soto-Feliciano

    Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    ysoto@mit.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8523-7917
  3. John P Morris 4th

    Department of Pharmacology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Chun-Hao Huang

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Richard P Koche

    Center for Epigenetics Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6820-5083
  6. Yu-jui Ho

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Ana Banito

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2188-0003
  8. Chun-Wei (David) Chen

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8737-6830
  9. Aditya Shroff

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Sha Tian

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Geulah Livshits

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  12. Chi-Chao Chen

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Myles Fennell

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Scott A Armstrong

    Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9099-4728
  15. C David Allis

    Laboratory of Chromatin Biology and Epigenetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    C David Allis, is a co founder of Chroma Therapeutics and Constellation Pharmaceuticals and a Scientific Advisory Board member of EpiCypher..
  16. Darjus F Tschaharganeh

    German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
    For correspondence
    d.tschaharganeh@dkfz.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Scott W Lowe

    Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    lowes@mskcc.org
    Competing interests
    Scott W Lowe, is an advisor for and has equity in the following biotechnology companies: ORIC Pharmaceuticals, Faeth Therapeutics, Blueprint Medicines, Geras Bio, Mirimus Inc., and PMV Pharmaceuticals. S.W.L. also acknowledges receiving funding and research support from Agilent Technologies and Calico, for the purposes of massively parallel oligo synthesis and single-cell analytics, respectively..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5284-9650

Funding

National Cancer Institute (P01 CA013106)

  • Scott W Lowe

National Cancer Institute (R01 CA233944)

  • Scott W Lowe

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1K99GM140265-01)

  • Yadira M Soto-Feliciano

National Cancer Institute (1F32CA257103)

  • Changyu Zhu

American Cancer Society (PF-14-066-01-TBE)

  • John P Morris 4th

Helmholtz foundation (VH-NG-1114)

  • Darjus F Tschaharganeh

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol 11-06-011). Animals were monitored for signs of ill-health by veterinary staff at the Research Animal Resource Center (RARC) at MSKCC and efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2023, Zhu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,694
    views
  • 226
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Changyu Zhu
  2. Yadira M Soto-Feliciano
  3. John P Morris 4th
  4. Chun-Hao Huang
  5. Richard P Koche
  6. Yu-jui Ho
  7. Ana Banito
  8. Chun-Wei (David) Chen
  9. Aditya Shroff
  10. Sha Tian
  11. Geulah Livshits
  12. Chi-Chao Chen
  13. Myles Fennell
  14. Scott A Armstrong
  15. C David Allis
  16. Darjus F Tschaharganeh
  17. Scott W Lowe
(2023)
MLL3 regulates the CDKN2A tumor suppressor locus in liver cancer
eLife 12:e80854.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80854

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80854

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Arman Angaji, Michel Owusu ... Johannes Berg
    Research Article

    In growing cell populations such as tumours, mutations can serve as markers that allow tracking the past evolution from current samples. The genomic analyses of bulk samples and samples from multiple regions have shed light on the evolutionary forces acting on tumours. However, little is known empirically on the spatio-temporal dynamics of tumour evolution. Here, we leverage published data from resected hepatocellular carcinomas, each with several hundred samples taken in two and three dimensions. Using spatial metrics of evolution, we find that tumour cells grow predominantly uniformly within the tumour volume instead of at the surface. We determine how mutations and cells are dispersed throughout the tumour and how cell death contributes to the overall tumour growth. Our methods shed light on the early evolution of tumours in vivo and can be applied to high-resolution data in the emerging field of spatial biology.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Susanne Tilk, Judith Frydman ... Dmitri A Petrov
    Research Article

    In asexual populations that don’t undergo recombination, such as cancer, deleterious mutations are expected to accrue readily due to genome-wide linkage between mutations. Despite this mutational load of often thousands of deleterious mutations, many tumors thrive. How tumors survive the damaging consequences of this mutational load is not well understood. Here, we investigate the functional consequences of mutational load in 10,295 human tumors by quantifying their phenotypic response through changes in gene expression. Using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), we find that high mutational load tumors up-regulate proteostasis machinery related to the mitigation and prevention of protein misfolding. We replicate these expression responses in cancer cell lines and show that the viability in high mutational load cancer cells is strongly dependent on complexes that degrade and refold proteins. This indicates that the upregulation of proteostasis machinery is causally important for high mutational burden tumors and uncovers new therapeutic vulnerabilities.