Biological brain age prediction using machine learning on structural neuroimaging data: multi-cohort validation against biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration stratified by sex

  1. Irene Cumplido-Mayoral
  2. Marina García-Prat
  3. Grégory Operto
  4. Carles Falcon
  5. Mahnaz Shekari
  6. Raffaele Cacciaglia
  7. Marta Milà-Alomà
  8. Luigi Lorenzini
  9. Silvia Ingala
  10. Alle Meije Wink
  11. Henk JMM Mutsaerts
  12. Carolina Minguillón
  13. Karine Fauria
  14. José Luis Molinuevo
  15. Sven Haller
  16. Gael Chetelat
  17. Adam Waldman
  18. Adam J Schwarz
  19. Frederik Barkhof
  20. Ivonne Suridjan
  21. Gwendlyn Kollmorgen
  22. Anna Bayfield
  23. Henrik Zetterberg
  24. Kaj Blennow
  25. Marc Suárez-Calvet
  26. Verónica Vilaplana
  27. Juan Domingo Gispert López  Is a corresponding author
  1. Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Spain
  2. Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Netherlands
  3. CIRD Centre d'Imagerie Rive Droite, Switzerland
  4. Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, France
  5. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  6. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, United States
  7. Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Switzerland
  8. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany
  9. University of Gothenburg, Sweden
  10. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain

Abstract

Brain-age can be inferred from structural neuroimaging and compared to chronological age (brain-age delta) as a marker of biological brain aging. Accelerated aging has been found in neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its validation against markers of neurodegeneration and AD is lacking. Here, imaging-derived measures from the UK Biobank dataset (N=22,661) were used to predict brain-age in 2,314 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals at higher risk of AD and mild cognitive impaired (MCI) patients from four independent cohorts with available biomarker data: ALFA+, ADNI, EPAD and OASIS. Brain-age delta was associated with abnormal amyloid-b, more advanced stages (AT) of AD pathology and APOE-e4 status. Brain-age delta was positively associated with plasma neurofilament light, a marker of neurodegeneration, and sex differences in the brain effects of this marker were found. These results validate brain-age delta as a non-invasive marker of biological brain aging in non-demented individuals with abnormal levels of biomarkers of AD and axonal injury.

Data availability

UKBiobank data availability at www.ukbiobank.ac.ukADNI data availability at https://adni.loni.usc.edu/EPAD data availability at www.ep-ad.org/ALFA: data availability through GAAIN at https://www.gaaindata.org/partners/online.htmlFully steps and instructions on data access can be found in the following links:UKBiobank: https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/enable-your-research/apply-for-accessADNI: https://adni.loni.usc.edu/data-samples/access-data/EPAD: https://ep-ad.org/open-access-data/access/ALFA: https://www.gaaindata.org/partner/ALFA

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Irene Cumplido-Mayoral

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Marina García-Prat

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Grégory Operto

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Carles Falcon

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Mahnaz Shekari

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Raffaele Cacciaglia

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Marta Milà-Alomà

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Luigi Lorenzini

    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Silvia Ingala

    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Alle Meije Wink

    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Henk JMM Mutsaerts

    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0894-0307
  12. Carolina Minguillón

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Karine Fauria

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. José Luis Molinuevo

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    José Luis Molinuevo, JL.M is currently a full-time employee of H. Lundbeck A/S and previously has served as a consultant or on advisory boards for the following for-profit companies or has given lectures in symposia sponsored by the following for-profit companies: Roche Diagnostics, Genentech, Novartis, Lundbeck, Oryzon, Biogen, Lilly, Janssen, Green Valley, MSD, Eisai, Alector, BioCross, GE Healthcare, and ProMIS Neurosciences..
  15. Sven Haller

    CIRD Centre d'Imagerie Rive Droite, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7433-0203
  16. Gael Chetelat

    Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, Caen, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Adam Waldman

    Centre for Dementia Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Adam J Schwarz

    Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9743-6171
  19. Frederik Barkhof

    Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Ivonne Suridjan

    Roche Diagnostics International Ltd, Rotkreuz, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Ivonne Suridjan, is a full-time employee and shareholder of Roche Diagnostics International Ltd.
  21. Gwendlyn Kollmorgen

    Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    Gwendlyn Kollmorgen, is a full-time employee of Roche Diagnostics GmbH.
  22. Anna Bayfield

    Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    Anna Bayfield, is a full-time employee and shareholder of Roche Diagnostics GmbH..
  23. Henrik Zetterberg

    Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  24. Kaj Blennow

    Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  25. Marc Suárez-Calvet

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    Marc Suárez-Calvet, has served as a consultant and at advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics International Ltd and has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Roche Diagnostics, S.L.U, Roche Farma, S.A and Roche Sistemas de Diagnósticos, Sociedade Unipessoal, Lda..
  26. Verónica Vilaplana

    Department of Signal Theory and Communications, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  27. Juan Domingo Gispert López

    Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
    For correspondence
    jdgispert@barcelonabeta.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6155-0642

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation (948677)

  • Marc Suárez-Calvet

Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI19/00155)

  • Marc Suárez-Calvet

La Caixa Foundation (100010434)

  • Marc Suárez-Calvet

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation (847648)

  • Marc Suárez-Calvet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Karla L Miller, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Ethics

Human subjects: ALFA ethics: All participants were enrolled in the ALFA (ALzheimer and FAmilies) study (Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01835717. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee "Parc de Salut Mar," Barcelona, and all participants gave written informed consent.

Version history

  1. Received: June 14, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: June 28, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: April 10, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: April 17, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: May 12, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Cumplido-Mayoral et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,176
    views
  • 365
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Irene Cumplido-Mayoral
  2. Marina García-Prat
  3. Grégory Operto
  4. Carles Falcon
  5. Mahnaz Shekari
  6. Raffaele Cacciaglia
  7. Marta Milà-Alomà
  8. Luigi Lorenzini
  9. Silvia Ingala
  10. Alle Meije Wink
  11. Henk JMM Mutsaerts
  12. Carolina Minguillón
  13. Karine Fauria
  14. José Luis Molinuevo
  15. Sven Haller
  16. Gael Chetelat
  17. Adam Waldman
  18. Adam J Schwarz
  19. Frederik Barkhof
  20. Ivonne Suridjan
  21. Gwendlyn Kollmorgen
  22. Anna Bayfield
  23. Henrik Zetterberg
  24. Kaj Blennow
  25. Marc Suárez-Calvet
  26. Verónica Vilaplana
  27. Juan Domingo Gispert López
(2023)
Biological brain age prediction using machine learning on structural neuroimaging data: multi-cohort validation against biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and neurodegeneration stratified by sex
eLife 12:e81067.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81067

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81067

Further reading

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Weichen Song, Yongyong Shi, Guan Ning Lin
    Tools and Resources

    We propose a new framework for human genetic association studies: at each locus, a deep learning model (in this study, Sei) is used to calculate the functional genomic activity score for two haplotypes per individual. This score, defined as the Haplotype Function Score (HFS), replaces the original genotype in association studies. Applying the HFS framework to 14 complex traits in the UK Biobank, we identified 3619 independent HFS–trait associations with a significance of p < 5 × 10−8. Fine-mapping revealed 2699 causal associations, corresponding to a median increase of 63 causal findings per trait compared with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based analysis. HFS-based enrichment analysis uncovered 727 pathway–trait associations and 153 tissue–trait associations with strong biological interpretability, including ‘circadian pathway-chronotype’ and ‘arachidonic acid-intelligence’. Lastly, we applied least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to integrate HFS prediction score with SNP-based polygenic risk scores, which showed an improvement of 16.1–39.8% in cross-ancestry polygenic prediction. We concluded that HFS is a promising strategy for understanding the genetic basis of human complex traits.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    Qianmu Yuan, Chong Tian, Yuedong Yang
    Tools and Resources

    Revealing protein binding sites with other molecules, such as nucleic acids, peptides, or small ligands, sheds light on disease mechanism elucidation and novel drug design. With the explosive growth of proteins in sequence databases, how to accurately and efficiently identify these binding sites from sequences becomes essential. However, current methods mostly rely on expensive multiple sequence alignments or experimental protein structures, limiting their genome-scale applications. Besides, these methods haven’t fully explored the geometry of the protein structures. Here, we propose GPSite, a multi-task network for simultaneously predicting binding residues of DNA, RNA, peptide, protein, ATP, HEM, and metal ions on proteins. GPSite was trained on informative sequence embeddings and predicted structures from protein language models, while comprehensively extracting residual and relational geometric contexts in an end-to-end manner. Experiments demonstrate that GPSite substantially surpasses state-of-the-art sequence-based and structure-based approaches on various benchmark datasets, even when the structures are not well-predicted. The low computational cost of GPSite enables rapid genome-scale binding residue annotations for over 568,000 sequences, providing opportunities to unveil unexplored associations of binding sites with molecular functions, biological processes, and genetic variants. The GPSite webserver and annotation database can be freely accessed at https://bio-web1.nscc-gz.cn/app/GPSite.