Hemocyte differentiation to the megacyte lineage enhances mosquito immunity against Plasmodium
- Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, United States
- Instituto de Bioquímica Médica Leopoldo de Meis, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract
Activation of Toll signaling in Anopheles gambiae by silencing Cactus, a suppressor of this pathway, enhances local release of hemocyte-derived microvesicles (HdMv), promoting activation of the mosquito complement-like system, which eliminates Plasmodium ookinetes. We uncovered the mechanism of this immune enhancement. Cactus silencing triggers a Rel1-mediated differentiation of granulocytes to the megacyte lineage, a new subpopulation of giant cells, resulting in a dramatic increase in the proportion of circulating megacytes. Megacytes are very plastic cells that are massively recruited to the basal midgut surface in response to Plasmodium infection. We show that Toll signaling modulates hemocyte differentiation and that megacyte recruitment to the midgut greatly enhances mosquito immunity against Plasmodium.
Editor's evaluation
This article reveals a mechanism by which Toll pathway activation lead to protection against Plasmodium in Anopheles mosquitoes by promoting the differentiation of hemocytes.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81116.sa0eLife digest
Malaria causes hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. This devastating disease is caused by Plasmodium parasites, which are transmitted to people through female Anopheles gambiae mosquitos. Mosquitos become infected with Plasmodium when they ingest blood containing these malaria-causing parasites. However, Plasmodium must avoid the mosquito immune system to survive and spread.
The mosquito immune system is made up of several types of immune cells, including cells known as granulocytes. Granulocytes can further develop into additional cell subtypes, such as megacytes and antimicrobial granulocytes, but it is not clear how these types of cells work to protect mosquitos against infections.
In the mosquitos that transmit malaria, a cell signaling pathway called Toll helps control immune responses to disease-causing microbes, such as Plasmodium. When Toll signaling is strongly triggered in mosquitos, Plasmodium infection is eliminated because immune cell responses are enhanced – which results in lower levels of transmission to humans. But what is the underlying mechanism through which high levels of Toll signaling eradicate Plasmodium infection?
To find out, Barletta et al. collected cell samples from A. gambiae mosquitos and analyzed what happened when Toll signaling was strongly activated. They observed a large increase in the proportion of megacytes in these mosquitos (from 2% to 80% of all granulocytes). Toll signaling also caused megacytes to become bigger, cluster together, and have higher plasticity – meaning they could adopt different shapes. Barletta et al. used microscopy to show that these megacytes were releasing large mitochondria-like structures and membrane vesicles , which may be the trigger activating the mosquito’s immune system. In live mosquitos, megacytes move towards the area of the Plasmodium infection and release microvesicles. These microvesicles are known to activate a part of the the mosquito’s immune system called the complement-like system, destroying the parasites and preventing mosquito infection and disease transmission.
These findings show how strong Toll signaling triggers the mosquito immune system to eliminate Plasmodium infections. Understanding how the mosquito immune system tackles Plasmodium infection may help reveal ways to reduce or block transmission.
Introduction
Ookinete traversal of the Anopheles gambiae midgut disrupts the barriers that normally prevent bacteria of the gut microbiota from coming in direct contact with epithelial cells (Kumar et al., 2010), and this attracts hemocytes to the basal surface of the midgut (Barletta et al., 2019). Plasmodium ookinetes also cause irreversible damage to the cells they invade and trigger a strong caspase-mediated nitration response (Han et al., 2000; Oliveira et al., 2012, Trisnadi and Barillas-Mury, 2020). When hemocytes come in contact with a nitrated midgut surface, they undergo apoptosis and release hemocyte-derived microvesicles (HdMv) (Castillo et al., 2017). Local HdMv release promotes activation of thioester containing-protein 1 (TEP1) (Castillo et al., 2017), a major final effector of the mosquito complement-like system that binds to the parasite’s surface and forms a complex that lyses the ookinete (Blandin et al., 2004).
Mosquito hemocytes are classified into three cell types, prohemocytes, oenocytoids, and granulocytes, based on their morphology. However, single-cell RNA sequencing (sc-RNAseq) analysis of A. gambiae hemocytes identified several novel subpopulations of granulocytes based on their transcriptional profiles and defined molecular markers specific for hemocyte subpopulations (Raddi et al., 2020). Furthermore, Lineage analysis revealed that regular granulocytes derive from prohemocytes and can further differentiate into distinct cell types, including dividing granulocytes, and two final effector cells, megacytes and antimicrobial (AM) granulocytes (Raddi et al., 2020).
Silencing Cactus, a negative regulator of Toll signaling in A. gambiae mosquitoes, elicits a very strong TEP1-mediated immune response that eliminates Plasmodium berghei ookinetes (Frolet et al., 2006). This phenotype can be rescued by co-silencing Cactus with either TEP1 or the Rel1 transcription factor, indicating that parasite elimination is mediated by activation of Toll signaling, with TEP1 as a final effector (Frolet et al., 2006). Later studies showed that hemocytes mediate this enhanced immune response, as transfer of Cactus-silenced hemocytes into naïve mosquitoes recapitulates the phenotype of systemic Cactus silencing (Ramirez et al., 2014). Furthermore, Cactus silencing also increases HdMv release in response to ookinete midgut invasion (Castillo et al., 2017), indicating that hemocytes are more reactive to Plasmodium infection. However, the nature of the functional changes in Cactus-silenced hemocytes that enhance immunity against Plasmodium are not known. Here, we explore the effect of Cactus silencing on circulating hemocyte populations and their response to infection of mosquitoes with bacteria and Plasmodium.
Results
Effect of Cactus silencing on mRNA markers of granulocyte populations
The effect of silencing Cactus, a suppressor of Toll signaling, on hemocyte differentiation was explored. Hemocytes that adhere to glass (mostly granulocytes) or that remain in suspension (mostly prohemocytes and oenocytoids) were collected 4 days post-injection from dsLacZ control and dsCactus-injected females. Bulk sequencing of cDNA libraries generated between 16.2 and 25.3 million fragments that mapped to the A. gambiae AgamP4.9 transcriptome. Only transcripts with 10 or more reads were included in the analysis, resulting in a total of 9421 unique transcripts (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/arrayexpress/studies/E-MTAB-11252). Glass-bound and unbound hemocyte samples were analyzed together, because the differences in expression between dsLacZ versus dsCactus-silenced hemocytes explained 81% of the variance between the four experimental groups (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A and B). Differential expression (DE) analysis of Cactus-silenced hemocytes using the DESeq2 software identified 1071 differentially expressed genes (Q value <0.001), of which 407 were upregulated (log2 fold change >2), while 664 were downregulated (log2 fold change <−2) (Figure 1A).
Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
Effect of Toll pathway activation on mRNA markers of granulocyte populations.
(A) Differential expression (DE) of Cactus dsRNA knockdown. From a total of 9421 filtered genes. Volcano plot of DE genes in Cactus-silenced hemocytes compared to LacZ control filtered for log2 fold change >2 and Q value <0.001. Dark blue dots on the right represent upregulated DE genes and on the left the downregulated ones. Red dots show genes that are hemocyte-specific markers. Complete list of up- and downregulated genes is listed in Supplementary file 1 and Supplementary file 2. (B) Percentage of granulocyte subpopulation markers up- and downregulated in Cactus-silenced hemocytes. Complete list of up- and downregulated genes for each hemocyte subpopulation is in Supplementary file 1 and Supplementary file 2. Reg Gran: regular granulocytes; Div Gran: dividing granulocytes; AM Gran: antimicrobial granulocytes; Mega: megacytes.
The effect of Cactus silencing on expression of the transcripts that define the different hemocyte clusters established by sc-RNAseq (Raddi et al., 2020) was analyzed (Supplementary file 1 and Supplementary file 2), to establish whether there was a significant effect on the relative abundance of specific hemocyte subpopulations. Overall, 23 oenocytoid markers, 2 from prohemocytes, and 57 from granulocytes were differentially expressed between dsLacZ and dsCactus hemocytes (Supplementary file 1 and Supplementary file 2). Most differentially expressed oenocytoid markers 22/23 (95%) were downregulated, while one of the prohemocyte markers was upregulated and the other one was downregulated (Figure 1B). The number of downregulated granulocyte markers 28/57 (49%) was very similar to that of upregulated ones 29/57 (51%). However, detailed analysis of granulocyte subpopulations revealed that most upregulated markers 18/29 (62%) correspond to megacytes, while most downregulated markers correspond to regular granulocytes 21/28 (75%). This suggests that dsCactus silencing increases the proportion of circulating megacytes, at the expense of a reduction in regular granulocytes. As expected, expression of several genes involved in Toll signaling or final effector this pathway, such as Toll-like receptors, CLIP proteases, Serpins, C-type Lectins, and Defensin are upregulated in dsCactus hemocytes (Supplementary file 3).
Cactus silencing promotes granulocyte differentiation into megacytes
Cactus silencing did not significantly increase the proportion of total circulating granulocytes, based on hemocyte counts by light microscopy (Figure 2—figure supplement 1), suggesting that the observed enhanced immune response could be due to functional changes in hemocytes. The morphology of hemocytes perfused from Cactus-silenced females was analyzed using fluorescent probes to stain the actin cytoskeleton and the nucleus. Cactus silencing dramatically increased the proportion of large granulocytes (diameter >40 µm), presumably megacytes, from 5.3% to 79.2% (p < 0.0001, X2 test) (Figure 2A, B), in agreement with the observed increase in upregulated megacyte-specific markers in the transcriptomic analysis of Cactus-silenced hemocytes (Figure 1B). Interestingly, megacytes from Cactus-silenced mosquitoes (Figure 2A) are even larger (average diameter of 47 µm after spreading in a glass surface) than megacytes from dsLacZ controls (average diameter of 30 µm) (Figure 2C, D). In situ RNA hybridization of dsCactus granulocytes with a fluorescent probe for the megacyte-specific marker TM7318, confirmed that the proportion of TM7318-positive granulocytes was much higher (80%) in Cactus-silenced females than in dsLacZ controls (4%) (p < 0.0001, X2 test) (Figure 2E, F), providing direct evidence that overactivation of Toll signaling triggers a dramatic increase in the proportion of circulating megacytes. Expression analysis of the TM7318 marker in perfused hemocyte samples confirmed that mRNA levels were 42-fold higher in dsCactus hemocytes than the dsLacZ control group (p < 0.001, T-test) (Figure 2G), while a modest increase (2.8-fold) in FBN50 mRNA, a marker of AM effector granulocytes, was observed (p < 0.0001, T-test). Conversely, expression of FBN11228, a marker of regular granulocytes, decreased by 30-fold in circulating hemocytes of Cactus-silenced mosquitoes (Figure 2G). The changes in the relative abundance of mRNAs from cell-specific markers in dsCactus hemocytes agrees with the observed changes in hemocyte morphology and the in situ hybridization (ISH) and transcriptomic data (Figure 2G).
Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Cactus silencing promotes granulocyte differentiation into megacytes.
(A) A. gambiae hemocytes in LacZ control and Cactus attached to a glass surface. Actin is shown in green and nuclei in blue. Scale bar: 40 µm. (B) Percentage of megacytes among all granulocytes in dsLacZ and dsCactus mosquitoes. Percentages were compared using X2 test. **** = p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Megacyte in control LacZ mosquitoes (upper) and in Cactus-silenced mosquitoes (lower). Actin is showing in green, and nuclei is in blue. Scale bar: 10 µm. (D) Diameter of megacytes from LacZ control and Cactus-silenced mosquitoes. Error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Unpaired T-test. **** = p ≤ 0.0001. (E) RNA in situ hybridization for megacyte-specific marker TM7318. Actin is shown in green (phalloidin), TM7318 mRNA in red, and the nuclei in blue (Hoechst). Scale bar: 40 µm. (F) Percentage of TM7318-positive cells in LacZ and Cactus-silenced granulocytes. Percentages were compared using X2 test. **** = p ≤ 0.0001. (G) Relative mRNA expression of hemocyte-specific markers in LacZ control and Cactus hemocytes for transcriptome validation. Megacyte marker (TM7318), antimicrobial granulocytes (FBN50), and regular granulocytes (FBN11228). Gene expression was normalized using RpS7 expression. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. Unpaired T-test, ***=p ≤0.001, = p ≤ 0.0001. Two independent experiments with 3 replicates each experiment, a total of 6 pools of 15 mosquitoes each.
The relative increase in megacytes in Cactus-silenced A. gambiae females could be due to enhanced megacyte proliferation or to increased differentiation of regular granulocytes into megacytes. A total hemocyte count revealed that the number of circulating hemocytes was not significantly different between dsLacZ (mean 17,151/mosquito, n = 14) and dsCactus mosquitoes (mean 23,477/mosquito, n = 14, Mann–Whitney T-test) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A) 2 days post-injection. The mean number of total hemocytes was lower 4 days post-silencing, but there was also no significant difference between dsLacZ (mean 8725/mosquito, n = 14) and dsCactus mosquitoes (mean 10,836/mosquito, n = 14, Mann–Whitney T-test) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Furthermore, there was no difference in the proportion granulocytes at 2 days, dsLacZ (3.62%) and dsCactus females (3.48%, Mann–Whitney T-test), and 4 days, dsLacZ (3.91%) and dsCactus females (5.47%, Mann–Whitney T-test), post-injection. In contrast, a significant increase in the proportion of megacyte was already apparent 2 days post-injection in Cactus-silenced mosquitoes (2.08% of all hemocytes, p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney T-test), relative to dsLacZ controls (0.07%) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B); with a corresponding decrease in the proportion of other granulocytes from 3.5% in dsLacZ controls to 1.4% in dsCactus (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). At 4 days post-injection, the differences were more pronounced, with the proportion of megacytes reaching 3.7% in Cactus-silenced mosquitoes (p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney T-test) relative to dsLacZ controls (0.07%) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C), with a corresponding decrease in other granulocytes from 3.8% in dsLacZ to 1.8% in dsCactus mosquitoes (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). Taken together, these data indicate that, although the total number of hemocytes and the percentage of total granulocytes remained unchanged in response to dsCactus silencing, the proportion of megacytes increased at the expense of other granulocytes.
The effect of Cactus silencing on granulocyte proliferation was evaluated by quantitating the proportion of hemocytes that incorporated Bromodeoxyuridine/5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU), a thymidine analog. The proportion of BrdU+ hemocytes that adhered to glass (mostly granulocytes) in dsCactus mosquitoes (51%, n = 694 cells) is not significantly different from dsLacZ controls (52%, n = 410 cells) (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A, B). BrdU fluorescence intensity (RFU) is also not significantly different between dsLacZ and dsCactus hemocytes (Figure 2—figure supplement 2C). However, the ratio of BrdU fluorescence intensity to nuclear volume is significantly lower in dsCactus hemocytes (Figure 2—figure supplement 2D). This indicates that the increase in nuclear volume in megacytes does not involve DNA replication. However, BrdU labeling can be lost over time, making it hard to establish when DNA replication occurred. The proportion of hemocytes undergoing mitosis after Cactus silencing was directly evaluated using phospho-Histone H3 (PHH3) staining, which only labels mitotically active cells. Two days post-injection, the proportion of PHH3+ hemocytes that adhered to glass (mostly granulocytes) in dsCactus mosquitoes (0.7%, n = 896) was small, and not significantly different from dsLacZ controls (0.6%, n = 718 cells) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D). At 4 days the proportions were also similar, with very few hemocytes positive for PHH3 staining both in dsLacZ (0.5%, n = 799 cells) and dsCactus (0.3%, n = 1039) (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D). Moreover, the few hemocytes that were positive for PHH3 in dsCactus mosquitoes did not have the characteristic size or morphology of megacytes (Figure 2—figure supplement 1D). These observations, together with the increase in the proportion of megacytes in dsCactus females, at the expense of other regular granulocytes (Figures 1B and 2G), indicate that Cactus silencing promotes differentiation of granulocytes to the megacyte lineage.
Cell dynamics of mosquito granulocytes
Megacytes are about twice as large as regular granulocytes. Regular granulocytes (Figure 3A) reach an average diameter of 14.2 μm (Figure 3B) when they spread over a glass surface, while the average diameter of megacytes is 28.6 μm (p < 0.0001, unpaired T-test) (Figure 3A, B). Granulocyte cellular dynamics was evaluated by live imaging of perfused hemocytes in vitro as they adhered and spread on a glass surface. Hemocytes were labeled in vivo, through systemic injection of adult females with a red lipophilic dye (Vybrant CM-DiI) that accumulates on intracellular vesicles. After perfusion, a green, fluorescent probe (Cell Mask) was added to label the plasma membrane. Both regular granulocytes and megacytes attached to the glass surface and spread fully within 1 hr (Videos 1–4). Megacytes already have a larger cell diameter when they first attach to glass (Figure 3C, upper panel and Video 3), and exhibit a peripheral ‘halo’, corresponding to an area of extended thin cytoplasm, almost devoid of vesicles (Figure 3C, upper panel and Video 3). Lateral views revealed that, initially, megacytes have a large nucleus and a voluminous cytoplasm in the central region of the cell that flattens dramatically as the cell ‘spreads’ over the glass surface (Figure 3C, lower panel and Video 4). In contrast, the central region of regular granulocytes remains mostly unchanged (Figure 3D, lower panel and Video 2) and the periphery of the cell exhibits a modest increase in diameter as the cell spreads along the surface (Figure 3D, upper panel and Video 1).
Figure 3
Snapshots of megacyte and granulocyte cell dynamics.
(A) Regular granulocytes and megacytes from A. gambiae females spread on a glass surface. Actin, green (phalloidin) and nuclei, blue (Hoechst). Scale bar: 20 µm. (B) Granulocyte diameter of sugar-fed mosquitoes after spreading on a glass surface. Error bars represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Unpaired T-test. ****p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Live imaging time-lapse of a megacyte spreading in a glass surface for 30 min. Plasma membrane stained in green and microvesicles in red. Top (XY) and lateral view (XZ) of a megacyte. Scale bars: 10 and 5 µm, respectively. (D) Live imaging time-lapse of a granulocyte spreading on a glass surface for 30 min. Top (XY) and lateral view (XZ) of a regular granulocyte. Scale bars: 10 and 5 µm, respectively (see Videos 1–4).
Video 1
Top view (XY) of a regular granulocyte from A. gambiae mosquito female.
Showing in red is the microvesicle staining and in green the plasma membrane. Scale bar: 10 µm. Hemocyte was imaged for 1 hr in intervals of 5 min.
Video 2
Side view (XZ) of a regular granulocyte from A. gambiae mosquito female.
Showing in red is the microvesicle staining and in green the plasma membrane. Scale bar: 5 µm. Hemocyte was imaged for 1 hr in intervals of 5 min.
Video 3
Top view (XY) of a megacyte from A. gambiae mosquito female.
Showing in red is the microvesicle staining and in green the plasma membrane. Scale bar: 10 µm. Hemocyte was imaged for 1 hr in intervals of 5 min.
Video 4
Side view (XZ) of a megacyte from A. gambiae mosquito females. Showing in red is the microvesicle staining and in green the plasma membrane.
Scale bar: 5 µm. Hemocyte was imaged for 1 hr in intervals of 5 min.
Characterization of megacyte in vivo dynamics and ultrastructure
The effect of Cactus silencing on granulocyte dynamics was evaluated in vivo, through live imaging of hemocytes circulating in adult female mosquitoes. Female mosquitoes were imaged for 2 hr, 1 day after blood feeding on a healthy mouse. Hemocytes were visualized by systemic injection of Vybrant CM-DiI, a fluorescent lipophilic dye that is preferentially taken up by granulocytes. Circulating hemocytes in dsLacZ females (presumably normal granulocytes) have a smaller diameter than those of dsCactus females (Videos 5 and 6; Figure 3A, B), and they seldom come in contact with each other as they patrol the basal surface of the midgut (Video 5). Hemocytes from dsCactus females (presumably megacytes) are larger and have a spindle shape (Figure 3A, B; Videos 3 and 4). They appear to have higher plasticity, as they can readily stretch their cytoplasm and often come into contact with each other (Video 6). The plasticity of dsCactus megacytes was confirmed by in vitro live imaging of perfused hemocytes labeled by systemic injection of Vybrant CM-DiI and green Cell Mask. Some megacytes from dsCactus mosquitoes projected long thin filopodia toward other megacytes (Video 7). This process was not observed in regular granulocytes or in megacytes from the dsLacZ controls. Taken together, our live imaging data indicate that, in addition to their larger diameter (Figure 2C, D), dsCactus megacytes are also more active, have increased plasticity as they patrol the midgut (Video 6), and greater tendency to interact with each other and form clusters (Videos 6 and 7).
Video 5
In vivo hemocyte patrolling activity in dsLacZ mosquitoes.
Hemocytes stained in red were imaged through the cuticle of the mosquito for 1 hr and 20 min. Scale bar: 30 µm.
Video 6
In vivo hemocyte patrolling activity in dsCactus mosquitoes.
Hemocytes stained in red were imaged through the cuticle of the mosquito for 1 hr and 20 min. Scale bar: 30 µm.
Video 7
In vitro dynamics of dsCactus megacytes.
Perfused hemocytes from dsCactus mosquitoes. Plasma membrane is showing in green, microvesicles in red, and nuclei in blue. Scale bar: 20 µm.
The detailed ultrastructure of megacytes was explored using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Hemocytes from Cactus-silenced females were collected by perfusion, fixed in suspension, and allowed to settle. As expected, the maximum diameter of hemocytes fixed while in suspension was smaller than when they were allowed to spread on a glass surface. However, regular granulocytes were still significantly smaller (6–10 µm) than megacytes (15–20 µm), with nuclei that are also proportionally smaller (Figure 4A, B). Extensive electrodense areas are observed in the nuclei of megacytes, probably corresponding to the nucleolus. Large numbers of cytoplasmic vacuoles that contain abundant amorphous material are observed, as well as an extensive mitochondrial network (Figure 4A, B). Mitochondrial organization of perfused hemocytes was further investigated using Mitotracker staining. Mitochondria of regular granulocytes have a punctate pattern with strong staining on individual organelles (Figure 4D). In contrast, megacytes exhibit a more diffuse and extensive mitochondrial network (Figure 4E). It is noteworthy that large membrane-bound mitochondria-like extracellular structures and small vesicles are often observed ‘budding off’ from the surface of dsCactus megacytes (Figure 4B, C), but not from regular granulocytes (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
Ultrastructure of megacytes in Cactus-silenced mosquitoes.
(A) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of regular granulocytes from Cactus-silenced mosquitoes. Scale bar: 2 µm. (B) TEM of megacytes from Cactus-silenced mosquitoes. Scale bar: 5 µm. (C) Extracellular giant mitochondria-like structures (black arrows). Closeup of a mitochondria-like structure (lower center). Scale bars: 2 and 1 µm. TEM images were digitally colorized, cytoplasm is shown in blue, mitochondria in red, and nuclei in golden yellow. (D) Mitotracker staining in regular granulocytes. Scale bar: 20 µm. (E) Mitochondrial staining of Cactus-silenced megacytes. Actin is stained in green (phalloidin), mitochondria in red (mitotracker), and nuclei in blue (Hoechst). Yellow arrow indicates an extracellular mitochondrion like structure outside of a megacyte. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Megacytes associate with the basal surface of the midgut in response to bacterial feeding
We have shown that direct contact of bacteria with epithelial cells, before the peritrophic matrix is formed, triggers PGE2 release and attracts hemocytes to the basal surface of the midgut (Barletta et al., 2019). Hemocyte recruitment to the midgut in dsCactus females was explored by providing a bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein meal containing bacteria. As expected, bacterial feeding attracted hemocytes to the midgut surface in both dsCactus and dsLacZ control females (Figure 5A, B). However, there are important differences in hemocyte recruitment between them. In dsLacZ females, hemocytes attach to the midgut basal lamina individually or in doublets (Figure 5A), while hemocytes from dsCactus females form large clusters on the basal midgut surface, with multiple hemocytes in very close association (Figure 5B, C). dsCactus hemocytes on the midgut surface have the characteristic morphology of megacytes, with a larger cytoplasm and nuclei than those from dsLacZ hemocytes (Figure 5B, C). Accumulation of actin was often observed in the boundaries where hemocytes from dsCactus females come in direct contact with each other as they form extensive clusters (Figure 5D).
Figure 5
Bacterial feeding increases megacyte association to the midgut basal surface.
(A) Effect of bacterial feeding in LacZ-injected controls on hemocytes associated to the midgut basal surface. (B) Effect of Cactus silencing on the hemocytes associated to the basal surface of the midgut 4 hr post-bacterial feeding. (A, B) Scale bar: 30 µm. (C, D) Hemocyte cluster attached to the midgut surface in Cactus-silenced mosquitoes 4 hr post-bacterial feeding. Scale bar: 15 µm. (A–D) Midgut actin is shown in green (phalloidin), hemocytes (stained with Vybrant CM-DiI) in red, and nuclei in blue (Hoechst). (E) Relative mRNA levels of effector hemocyte markers in the midgut 4 hr after bacterial feeding in LacZ and Cactus-silenced mosquitoes. Scale bar: 15 µm. Error bars in (E) represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Unpaired T-test, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01. Two independent experiments with 3 replicates for each experiment, a total of 6 pools of 15 mosquitoes each.
The recruitment of granulocyte subpopulations to the midgut of dsCactus females in response bacterial feeding was confirmed by quantitation of midgut-associated mRNAs transcripts of markers expressed in specific hemocyte subpopulations. TM7318 mRNA levels increased dramatically in dsCactus midguts after bacterial feeding (250-fold increase) relative to dsLacZ control (p = 0.0022, Mann–Whitney test) (Figure 5E), indicative of extensive megacyte recruitment. A significant, but more modest increase in FBN50 (fivefold) (p = 0.0152, Mann–Whitney test) a marker of AM granulocytes, was also observed (Figure 5E).
Toll signaling is required for megacyte differentiation and Plasmodium ookinete elimination in Cactus-silenced females
To establish whether differentiation of granulocytes to the megacyte lineage in dsCactus females was mediated by the Toll pathway, the effect of co-silencing the Rel1 transcription factor was evaluated. As expected, Cactus silencing dramatically increased the proportion of megacytes, from 3.5% to 76% (p < 0.0001, X2 test) (Figure 6A, B). Co-silencing Cactus and Rel1 reverted this effect, resulting in a proportion of megacytes (6.6%) not significantly different from LacZ controls (Figure 6B). This indicates that Toll signaling, through Rel1, mediates megacyte differentiation in dsCactus females.
Figure 6 with 2 supplements see all
Toll signaling is required for megacyte differentiation and Plasmodium ookinete elimination in dsCactus females.
(A) A. gambiae hemocytes in LacZ control, Cactus, Rel1, and Cactus + Rel1 attached to a glass surface. Actin is shown in green and nuclei in blue. Scale bar: 40 µm. (B) Percentage of megacytes among all granulocytes in dsLacZ, dsCactus, ds Rel1, and dsCactus + Rel1 mosquitoes. Percentages were compared using X2 test. ****p ≤ 0.0001. (C) Mosquito susceptibility to P. berghei infection after dsRNA injection for LacZ, Cactus, Rel1, and Cactus + Rel1. Each dot in C represents the number of oocysts or hemocytes, respectively, for individual midguts. The median is indicated by the red line. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) Kruskal–Wallis test, ****p ≤ 0.0001; ***p ≤ 0.001, NS, p = 0.1074. (D) Relative mRNA levels of TM7318, megacyte marker, in the midgut 26 hr post-P. berghei infection (post-invasion) in LacZ, Cactus, Rel1, and Cactus + Rel1 silenced mosquitoes. Error bars in (D) represent mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Unpaired T-test, ****p ≤ 0.0001, NS, p = 0.6238. A total of 6–7 pools of 15 mosquitoes each per condition.
We next investigated the effect of Toll signaling on the immune response to Plasmodium of dsCactus-silenced females and megacyte HdMv release. Cactus silencing drastically reduced oocyst numbers (median = 0, p < 0.0001, analysis of variance [ANOVA], Dunn’s multiple comparison test) relative to LacZ controls (median = 127) (Figure 6C), and co-silencing Cactus and Rel1 significantly increase oocyst numbers (median = 24, p = 0.0002, ANOVA, Dunn’s multiple comparison test) (Figure 6C), in agreement with previous reports (Frolet et al., 2006). A strong increase in TM7318 mRNA associated with the midgut 24 hr post-infection was detected in dsCactus infected females (13-fold increase), relative to dsLacZ (p < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test) (Figure 6D and Figure 6—figure supplement 1), indicative of midgut recruitment of megacytes. Furthermore, when Rel1 was co-silenced with Cactus, the levels of midgut-associated TM7318 mRNA decreased relative to the Cactus group and presented a nonsignificant increase in relation to dsLacZ controls. In contrast, mRNA levels of FBN11228, a marker of regular granulocytes, did not change significantly in dsCactus females or after co-silencing Rel1 and Cactus, relative to dsLacZ (Figure 6—figure supplement 2).
Discussion
We recently described specific subsets of mosquito granulocytes based on single-cell transcriptomic analysis (Raddi et al., 2020). Here, we present a functional characterization of megacytes, a newly described subpopulation of final effector granulocytes and provide direct evidence of their recruitment to the basal surface of the mosquito midgut and their participating in the mosquito immune response to ookinete midgut invasion. The almost complete elimination of P. berghei parasites by the mosquito complement system when Cactus is silenced was documented more than 15 years ago (Frolet et al., 2006). However, the mechanism by which Cactus silencing enhanced hemocyte responses to Plasmodium infection remained a mystery.
Our transcriptomic analysis indicated that Cactus silencing increased the proportion of circulating megacytes, at the expense of regular granulocytes (Figure 2). This was confirmed by morphological analysis, ISH, cell counts, and mRNA quantitation of hemocyte-specific markers, TM7318 (megacytes) and FBN11228 (regular granulocytes). We also provide direct evidence that, besides being larger, megacytes also have higher plasticity, as they can greatly extend their cytoplasm and flatten their nucleus as they spread on a glass surface (Figure 1C).
The lack of DNA replication and the concomitant reduction in the proportion of regular granulocytes indicates that circulating megacytes increase in response to Cactus silencing by promoting final differentiation of granulocytes to the megacyte lineage. Besides the dramatic increase in circulating megacytes, Cactus silencing also results in megacytes that are even larger and more plastic than megacytes from dsLacZ controls. Fine ultrastructural analysis revealed that the cytoplasm of megacytes exhibits extensive large vacuolar structures filled with amorphous material, as well as small vesicles and mitochondria-like structures that are secreted from the cell membrane. In vertebrates, mitochondrial extrusion has been recently documented as a trigger of inflammation. Activated platelets release their mitochondria, both within microparticles or as free organelles; and secreted phospholipase A2 IIA can hydrolyze the membrane, releasing inflammatory mediators, such as lysophospholipids, fatty acids, and mitochondrial DNA, that promote leukocyte activation. Furthermore, extracellular mitochondria also interact directly with neutrophils in vivo, and trigger their adhesion to the endothelial wall (Boudreau et al., 2014). Activated monocytes release mitochondria, and their proinflammatory effect on endothelial cells is determined by the activation status of the monocytes that released them. It has been proposed that free mitochondria could be important mediators of cardiovascular disease by inducing activation of type I IFN and TNF signaling (Puhm et al., 2019).
Large numbers of megacytes were recruited to the midgut of Cactus-silenced females in response to bacterial feeding, forming extensive clusters of cells in close contact with each other, indicating that Cactus silencing also results in functional differences in megacytes. Expression of midgut-associated markers of specific hemocyte subpopulations indicates that Plasmodium midgut invasion triggers strong recruitment of megacytes to the basal surface of the midgut in dsCactus females, in agreement with the documented increase in HdMv associated with epithelial cells invaded by ookinetes (Castillo et al., 2017). We also show that co-silencing the transcription factor Rel1 and Cactus disrupts the differentiation of granulocyte to the megacyte lineage observed when only Cactus is silenced, indicating that megacyte differentiation requires a functional Toll pathway. Co-silencing Rel1 and Cactus also reduced midgut recruitment of megacytes 24 hr post-infection, a critical time when ookinetes are invading the mosquito midgut, and significantly increases Plasmodium survival, relative to dsCactus females. We propose that Toll signaling promotes hemocyte differentiation into the megacyte lineage, resulting in a dramatic increase in the proportion of circulating megacytes and enhanced midgut megacyte recruitment. This response could mediate the documented increase in HdMv in Cactus-silenced females, as HdMv release is necessary for effective activation of mosquito complement (Castillo et al., 2017), which ultimately eliminates P. berghei ookinetes. The release of free mitochondria-like structures by megacytes from Cactus-silenced females raises the question of whether this is an ancient systemic danger signal that promotes immune activation.
Materials and methods
Mosquitoes and mouse feeding
Request a detailed protocolA. gambiae mosquitoes (G3 strain – CDC) were reared at 28°C, 80% humidity under a 12 hr light/dark cycle and kept with 10% Karo syrup solution during adult stages. For mosquito infections with P. berghei, we used the transgenic GFP P. berghei parasites (ANKA 2.34 strain) kept by serial passages into 3- to 4-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA) starting from frozen stocks. Mouse infectivity was evaluated before feeding by parasitemia levels from Giemsa-stained thin blood films and in vitro microgamete exflagellation counting. Briefly, 1 µl of tail blood was mixed with 9 µl of gametocyte activating medium (RPMI 1640 with 25 mM HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid) + 2 mM glutamine, sodium bicarbonate 2 g/l, 100 µM xanthurenic acid, 50 µg/ml hypoxanthine). After 10 min of incubation exflagellations were quantified using a ×40 objective by phase contrast. Four- to five-day-old mosquitoes were fed when mice reached 3–5% parasitemia and 2–3 exflagellation per field. To feed blood-fed control mosquitoes, 3- to 4-week-old uninfected mice were used. Following feeding, both control and infected mosquitoes were maintained at 19°C, 80% humidity, and 12 hr light/dark cycle until the day of dissection.
Perfused hemocytes live imaging
Request a detailed protocolThree-day-old adult females were injected with Vybrant DiI (1:10 water diluted, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) on one side of the thorax. The next day, mosquitoes were injected with 69 nl of either dsCactus or dsLacZ at 3 µg/µl on the other side of the thorax. After 4 days, hemocytes were ready for perfusion or mosquitoes were used for in vivo live imaging as described below. Mosquitoes were cold anesthetized and, using forceps, a small cut was made in the abdomen. Transfer buffer (95% Schneider media + 5% citrate buffer) was injected at the thorax and 10–15 µl of hemolymph was harvested at the cut-site. This was repeated for five to seven mosquitoes and collected in a microcentrifuge tube stored on ice. To stain the plasma membrane of hemocytes we used CellMask green plasma membrane stain stock solution (C37608, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and for the nuclei we used the Hoechst 33342 Solution (20 mM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Two microliters of fluorescent label solution (58 µl H2O + 1 µl Cell Mask stock + 1 µl Hoechst stock) was added for every 20 µl of perfusion and 100 µl of this mixture was mounted on an ibidi µ-Slide 18 Well Glass Bottom slide. Cells were allowed to settle for 30 min then imaged. Images were taken on a Leica SP5 confocal microscope using a 63 × 1.4 NA oil objective with 405 nm wavelength laser (at 3% transmission) for Hoechst, 488 nm (5%) for Cell Mask, and 561 nm (3%) for DiI. Pinhole was set to 1 AU and frame average was 12. Z intervals of 1–2 µm encompassing the full cell height was taken every 5 min for 2 hr.
Bacterial artificial feeding
Request a detailed protocolWe used a bacterial mixture obtained from the midguts of the A. gambiae G3 from our colony (Barletta et al., 2019). A preinoculum was set up in LB media from the frozen stocks containing the bacterial mixture and allow to grow overnight at 28°C, 250 rpm in a shaker incubator. At the day of the experiment, the preinoculum was diluted in fresh LB media and allowed to grow for 2 hr in the same condition described above. Briefly, after 2 hr of growth, bacteria were washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove toxins and the concentration of the culture was estimated based on the optical density (OD) of the culture. At 600 nm, 1OD was considered the equivalent of 109 bacteria/ml. Three- to four-day mosquitos were fed a sterile 10% sucrose solution containing antibiotics (penicillin, 100 U/ml and streptomycin, 100 µg/ml) for 2 days prior the bacterial feeding. Control group was fed with a sterile 10% BSA solution in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) without calcium and magnesium and the bacteria group was fed with the same solution containing 4 × 109 bacteria per feeder. Mosquitoes were dissected 6 hr post-feeding for visualization of hemocytes attached to the midgut basal surface.
Hemocyte collection, morphology staining, and quantification
Request a detailed protocolHemocytes were collected by perfusion using anticoagulant buffer (60% Schneider medium, 30% citrate buffer, pH 4.5, and 10% fetal bovine serum [FBS]), pH was adjusted to 7–7.2 after mixing all the components. After perfusion, hemocytes were placed in a µ-slide angiogenesis chamber (ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany) and were allowed to settle for 15 min. Cells were fixed for an hour at room temperature by adding 16% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution in anticoagulant buffer to a final concentration of 4%. Following fixation cells were washed with PBS 0.1% Triton and incubated for 30 min at room temperature with 1 U of phalloidin (Alexa Fluor 488, Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 20 µM Hoechst 33342 (405, Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), both diluted in PBS 0.1% Triton. Cells were then placed in mounting media for storage by adding two drops of Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For the determination of proportion of megacytes upon Cactus silencing, the hemocytes were imaged, the diameter of every cell was measured and classified as granulocytes (cell diameter >12.5–25 µm) or megacytes (cell diameter >25 µm) as mentioned before. The total number of granulocytes and megacytes obtained from hemolymph pooled from 16 to 20 mosquitoes was noted and the percentage of megacytes among granulocytes was determined for each sample. Data from three independent biological replicates were used to plot the graphs.
Measurement and categorization of the hemocytes by size
Request a detailed protocolThe mosquito hemolymph was collected and the hemocytes were allowed to attach on a coated well of 15 µm chamber slide. For each well 8–10 mosquitoes were bled and for every sample, bleeding was done in two wells with a total of 16–20 mosquitoes. Post-attachment, the hemocytes were fixed with 4% p-formaldehyde and stained with phalloidin and DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) to visualize the morphology. Images were taken for at least 10 random fields for each well and the images were used to measure the cell diameter using Imaris 9.6.0 from Bitplane. Using the ‘Pairs’ option of ‘Measurement points’ tool in the software, the largest diameter of every cell was determined. For categorizing the hemocytes into different subtypes, the following size reference was followed for every image analysis. Cells with diameter ranging from 4 to 7.5 µm were classified as prohemocytes, >7.5–12.5 µm as oenocytoids, >12.5–25 µm as granulocytes, and >25 µm as megacytes.
dsRNA synthesis
Request a detailed protocolThree- to four-day-old female A. gambiae females were cold anesthetized and injected with 69 nl of a 3 µg/µl dsCactus or dsLacZ control. Double-stranded RNA for Cactus (AGAP007938) was synthesized by in vitro transcription using the MEGAscript RNAi kit (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA templates were obtained by PCR using An.gambiae cDNA extracted from whole body sugar-fed females. A 280-bp fragment was amplified with primers containing T7 promoters (F-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTAACACTGCGCTTCATTTGG and R-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGGCCCTTTTCAATGCTGATGT), using an annealing temperature of 58°C. Double-stranded RNA for LacZ was synthetized by amplifying a 218-bp fragment from LacZ gene clones into pCRII-TOPO vector using M13 primers to generate a dsRNA control as previously described (Molina-Cruz et al., 2012). A 386-bp fragment from Rel1 gene was amplified using primers containing T7 promoters (F-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGATCAACAGCACGACGATGAG and R-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTCGAAAAAGCGCACCTTAAT) using an annealing temperature of 58°C. For double silencing experiments, 138 nl of dsRNA mixture at 3 µg/µl was injected into female A. gambiae.
RNA extraction and bulk RNAseq library preparation
Request a detailed protocolHemocytes were collected as previously described above. In short, A. gambiae females were perfused using anticoagulant buffer and immediately transferred to a glass tube for attachment. After 1 hr, hemocytes that did not attach to the glass tube were collected and transferred to a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge containing 800 µl of TRIZOL LS reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), that correspond to the unbound fraction enriched mainly by prohemocytes and oenocytoids. Hemocytes that attached to the glass surface were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 1 ml of TRIZOL LS reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), this corresponds to the bound fraction, mainly enriched by granulocytes. Hemocytes were then lysed in TRIZOL reagent for 15–30 min at room temperature to allow for full dissociation, then stored at 4°C overnight and then at −20°C until RNA extraction. The homogenate of hemocyte samples was transferred to Phase Lock Gel Heavy 2 ml tubes (QuantaBio, Beverly, MA, USA) that had been prespun for 1500 RCF for 1 min, and allowed to incubate for 5 min at room temperature. 100 µL of chloroform (200 µL per 1 ml TRIZOL or TRIZOL plus media) was added, the tubes capped, and then vigorously shaken for 15 s. Samples were then centrifuged for 12,000 RCF, 10 min, 4°C. If the clear, aqueous phase was still mixed with TRIZOL matrix then 100 µl more of chloroform was added, and the samples again mixed vigorously and spun as before. The aqueous phase was then transferred to a fresh 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and the RNA precipitated by adding 0.25 ml of isopropyl alcohol (500 ml per 1 ml TRIZOL reagent used). 20 µl of glycogen (5 mg/ml) was also added to aid in precipitation and pelleting. Samples were mixed by repeated inversion 10 times, incubated for 10 min at room temperature, and then spun at 12,000 RCF, 10 min, 4°C. All the supernatant was removed, and the RNA pellets washed twice with 75% ethanol (minimum 1 ml of ethanol per 1 ml of TRIZOL used). Each time the samples were mixed by vortexing and centrifuged 7500 RCF, 5 min, 4°C. At the end, the supernatant was removed and samples air-dried until almost dry, but not completely (still translucent). RNA was resuspended with 30 µl of RNAse-free water, pipetting a few times to homogenize and then incubating at 55°C for 10 min to completely resuspend. Samples were then stored at −20°C until library preparation by Bespoke Low-Throughput Team at the Wellcome Sanger institute. Total RNA quantity was assessed on a Bioanalyser and ranged from 300 to 39 ng. mRNA was then isolated with the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA magnetic isolation module. RNAseq libraries were prepared from mRNA using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs) as by the manufacturer’s instructions, except that a proprietary Sanger UDI (Unique Dual Indexes) adapters/primer system was used. Furthermore, Kapa Hifi polymerase rather than NEB Q5 was employed. For bulk RNAseq sequencing samples libraries were run on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 instrument with standard protocols using a 150-cycle kit set to a 75-bp paired-end configuration. Libraries supplied at 2.8 nM and loaded with a loading concentration of 280 pM.
Bulk RNAseq bioinformatic analysis
Request a detailed protocolSequencing reads in CRAM format were fed into a personal BASH pipeline to convert cram files to fastq using biobam’s bamtofastq program (Version 0.0.191) (Raddi et al., 2020). Forward and reverse fastq reads in paired mode were aligned to the A. gambiae AgamP4.3 reference genome using hisat2 (Version 2.0.4) and featureCounts (Version 1.5.1) with recommended settings. Count matrices were combined before downstream data processing and analysis within R version 3.5.3 (RStudio version 1.0.153). Downstream normalization, DE analysis, and visualization were done with DESeq2 R package (Version 1.18.1) (Love et al., 2014). Base factor was defined as the LacZ unbound condition. Data were normalized by making a scaling factor for each sample. First the log(e) of all the expression values were taken, then all rows (genes) were averaged (geometric average). Genes with zero counts in one or more samples were filtered out and the average log value from log (counts) for all genes was subtracted. Finally, the median of the ratios calculated as above for each sample was computed and raised to the e to make the scaling factor. Original read counts were divided by the scaling factor for each sample to get normalized counts. Then, the dispersion for each gene was estimated, and a negative binomial generalized linear model fitted. p values for the DE analysis were adjusted for multiple testing using the Bonferroni correction. Genes were considered as differentially expressed in Cactus knockdown compared to LacZ control if they had an adjusted p value <0.001 (Wald T-test) and a log2 fold change >2. Gene lists with vectorbase IDs were converted to gene annotations with g:Profiler (Raudvere et al., 2019). g:Profiler utilizes Ensembl as its primary data source and is anchored to its quarterly release cycle. g:GOSt was used to perform functional enrichment analysis on input gene lists to map the data onto enriched biological processes or pathways. In addition to Ensembl, also KEGG, Reactome, WikiPathways, miRTarBase, and TRANSFAC databases were used. Functional enrichment is evaluated with a cumulative hypergeometric test with g:SCS (Set Counts and Sizes) multiple testing correction (adjusted p value reported only <0.05). Gene lists were ordered on log fold changes. Complete dataset is available publicly in https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/arrayexpress/studies/E-MTAB-11252.
Transmission electron microscopy
Request a detailed protocolHemocytes were collected by perfusion using anticoagulant buffer, described above and they were allowed to settle on Thermanox coverslips (Ted Pella, Redding, CA) for 15 min at room temperature then fixed 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer overnight at 4°C, and then post-fixed 1 hr with 1.0% osmium tetroxide/0.8% potassium ferricyanide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, washed with buffer then stained with 1% tannic acid in dH2O for 1 hr. After additional buffer washes, the samples were further osmicated with 2% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate for 1 hr. The samples were then washed with dH2O and additionally stained overnight with 1% uranyl acetate at 4°C, dehydrated with a graded ethanol series, and embedded in Spurr’s resin. Thin sections were cut with a Leica UC7 ultramicrotome (Buffalo Grove, IL) prior to viewing at 120 kV on a FEI BT Tecnai transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher/FEI, Hillsboro, OR). Digital images were acquired with a Gatan Rio camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA).
Mitotracker staining
Request a detailed protocolHemocytes were perfused with anticoagulant buffer, described above. Cells were incubated at room temperature for 15 min for spreading. Then washed three times with 95% Schneider media, 5% citrate buffer to remove most of the serum from the cells. Hemocytes were placed with 200 nM Deep Red Mitotracker 644/665 which is retained after fixation (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted in 95% Schneider media and 5% citrate buffer. Cells were incubated for 45 min at room temperature in the dark, then washed with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Hemocytes were then counterstained with phalloidin and Hoechst as described above.
TM7318 ISH
Request a detailed protocolThe ISH protocol includes a permeabilization step with a protease treatment, which compromises the cell morphology. To evaluate the morphology of hemocytes and RNA expression by ISH, we used a two-step protocol to image morphology first and then proceed to image the probes, described in Raddi et al., 2020. Hemocytes collected by perfusion 4 days after dsCactus injection, fixed and stained with Alexa 488 phalloidin (actin) as described above. Ten random fields of each well were imaged using a tile scan ‘mark and find’ tool, where coordinates of the field are recorded and can be restored to image the same cells later. Then, hemocytes were subjected to ISH using RNAscope multiplex fluorescent reagent kit v2 assay (cat# 323110, ACDBio, Abingdon, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA)-based fluorophores Opal 4- color automation IHC kit (cat # NEL801001KT, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) was used for the development of fluorescence (Opal 620 – C3). A specific RNA probe for TM7318 (cat# 543201-C3; Aga-Transmembrane-C3) designed by ACDBio was used to stain specifically megacytes. At the end of the ISH protocol, hemocytes were placed in prolong gold and reimaged using the ‘mark and find’ tool to recall the positions of the morphology pictures. Images were merged using Imaris 9.3.1 (Bitplane, Concord, MA, USA). Each well was imaged taking 12 fields per well. Post-imaging, the cell diameter of every cell was measured by phalloidin stain as described previously and the total number of granulocytes were determined for each sample. Among the granulocytes and larger cells (cells with diameter >12.5), the number of cells positive for the TM7318 probe was counted and their percentage was determined for both the control and Cactus silencing.
Confocal microscopy and tile scan imaging
Request a detailed protocolConfocal images were captured using a Leica TCS SP8 (DM8000) confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with either a ×40 or a ×63 oil immersion objective equipped with a photomultiplier tube/hybrid detector. Hemocytes were visualized with a white light laser, using 498 nm excitation for Alexa 488 (phalloidin); 588 nm excitation for Opal620 (TM7318 probe) and Vybrant DiI (hemocytes); 644 nm excitation for Deep Red Mitotracker (Mitochondria) and a 405 nm diode laser for nuclei staining (Hoechst 33342). Images were taken using sequential mode and variable z-steps. For combined morphology and in RNA ISH, we used tile scan ‘mark and find’ tool included in LASX software to capture the same areas of the slide before and after the hybridization. Image processing and merge were performed using Imaris 9.3.1 (Bitplane, Concord, MA, USA) and Adobe Photoshop CC (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and quantitative PCR analysis
Request a detailed protocolA. gambiae hemocytes were collected as described above 4 days after dsRNA injection (dsLacZ and dsCactus). Hemolymph pools of 20 mosquitoes (5 µl/each mosquito) were placed directly into 800 µl of TRIzol LS reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For midgut RNA extraction, pools of 20 midguts were homogenized directly in 1 ml TRIzol reagent. RNA extraction was carried out as described above in the section RNA extraction and bulk RNAseq library preparation. Total extracted RNA was resuspended in nuclease-free water and 1 µg was used for cDNA synthesis using the Quantitect reverse transcription kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to measure FBN11228 (AGAP011228), TM7318 (AGAP007318), and FBN50 (AGAP005848) gene expression in hemocytes cDNA. We used the DyNamo SYBR green qPCR kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with target-specific primers and the assay ran on a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A 139-bp fragment was amplified for FBN11228 (F-CCAGCATCGGTACAACGGAA and R-AAGCTCGTGTTTTCGTGCTG). A 150-bp fragment was amplified for TM7318 (F-AAAACATCCAGAAACACGCC and R-GGATTCCGGTTAAGTCCACC). A 92-bp fragment was amplified for FBN50 (F-ATCACAAGGTTCCGGCTATG and R-CGTTGGTGTAGGTGAGCAGA). Relative expression was normalized against A. gambiae ribosomal protein S7 (RpS7) as internal standard and analyzed using the ΔΔ Ct method (ref – Livak and Schmittgen, 2001; Pfaffl, 2001). RpS7 (AGAP010592) primers sequences were: F-AGAACCAGCAGACCACCATC and R-GCTGCAAACTTCGGCTATTC. Statistical analysis of the fold change was performed using unpaired T-test (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). Each independent experiment was performed with three biological replicates (three pools of 20 mosquitoes) for each condition.
In vivo live imaging
Request a detailed protocolMosquitoes were prepared the same way for imaging of perfused hemocytes and injected with Vybrant DiI cell labelling (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for both dsCactus and dsLacZ. After 4 days, mosquitoes were starved in the morning and then fed on a BALB/c mouse in the afternoon. Imaging took place the next day at 18–20 hr post-bloodmeal. Mosquitoes were imaged as previously described (Trisnadi and Barillas-Mury, 2020). Briefly, 5–10 mosquitoes with legs and head removed were placed between a coverslip and glass slide with craft putty as a spacer. Images were taken on a Leica SP5 confocal microscope using a 40 × 1.25 NA oil objective with 561 nm (3%) for Vybrant DiI. A z-stack with 1 µm intervals was taken to include hemocytes circulating in the hemolymph to the midgut lumen. The z-stack was taken every 1 min for 1–2 hr.
Visualizing hemocytes attached to the midgut basal lamina
Request a detailed protocolTo preserve hemocyte–midgut bound, midguts were quick fixed using a higher concentration of fixative injected straight into the hemolymph of the mosquito (207 nl of 16% PFA). To stain hemocytes, the day before the dsRNA treatment (dsLacZ and dsCactus), 3- to 4-day-old mosquitoes were injected with 69 nl of a 100 µM solution Vybrant CM-DiI cell labelling solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), final concentration in the hemolymph (approximately 3.5 µM). Engorged mosquitoes fed with 10% BSA solution containing bacteria were anesthetized and injected with 207 nl of 16% PFA, rested 40 s before midgut dissection in 4% PFA solution. After dissected, midguts were placed in ice-cold PBS and opened longitudinally, and the bolus was removed. Clean opened tissues were then fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% PFA. The following day, midguts were washed twice with PBS, blocked for 40 min with PBS containing 1% BSA and washed twice with the same solution. For actin and nuclei staining, midguts were incubated for 30 min at room temperature with 1 U of phalloidin (Alexa Fluor 488, Molecular Probes, Waltham, MA, USA) and 20 µM Hoechst 33342 (405, Molecular Probes, Waltham, MA, USA), both diluted in PBS. Tissues were mounted in microscope slides using Prolong Gold Antifade mounting media (Molecular Probes, Waltham, MA, USA). Hemocytes were visualized by confocal microscopy and the number of hemocytes per midgut in each biological condition was also analyzed.
PHH3+ + BrdU staining
For BrdU staining, A. gambiae females injected with dsRNA were treated for 3 days with a sugar solution containing 1 mg/ml bromodeoxyuridine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). At day 4 post-dsRNA injection, hemocytes were collected with anticoagulant buffer (70% Schneider media, 30% citrate buffer, and 10% FBS) pH 7.4. Hemocytes were allowed to settle on an ibidi µ-Slide 18 Well Glass Bottom slide (Gräfelfing, Germany) for 15 min at room temperature and then fixed for 30 min with 4% PFA followed by a permeabilization step with PBS 0.5% Triton for 20 min. Hemocytes were washed twice with PBS with 1% BSA before treatment with 2 N HCl for 40 min to denature the DNA. Cells were neutralized with 0.1 M sodium borate (pH 8.5) for 3 min, washed four times with PBS and then blocked with PBS 2% BSA for 1 hr at room temperature. Cells were then incubated with murine anti-BrdU antibody monoclonal (1:100; Invitrogen, MoBU-1, stock 0.1 mg/ml) in blocking buffer overnight in the cold room. Next day, hemocytes were washed twice with PBS 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with Alexa 594 Goat-anti-mouse (1:2000) in blocking buffer for 2 hr at room temperature. Hemocytes were washed three times with blocking buffer and counterstained with 20 µM Hoechst 33342 (405, Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and then mounted by adding two drops of Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
For PHH3 staining, hemocytes were collected and fixed as described above. Following fixation, hemocytes were washed three times with PBS 0.1% triton and then blocked with PBS 2% BSA and 20% goat serum for 1–2 hr at room temperature. Hemocytes were then incubated with Anti-phospho-Histone H3 (Ser10) Antibody, Mitosis Marker (1:500, Millipore Sigma, # 06-570) in blocking buffer overnight in a cold room. Next day, hemocytes were washed with blocking buffer three times and then placed in a solution containing Alexa 594 goat anti-rabbit (1:2000) in blocking buffer for 2 hr at room temperature. Hemocytes were washed three times with PBS 0.1% triton and then counterstained with 1 U of phalloidin (Alexa Fluor 488, Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 20 µM Hoechst 33342 (405, Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), both diluted in PBS 0.1% Triton at room temperature. Cells were then placed in mounting media for storage by adding 2 drops of Prolong Gold Antifade Mountant (Molecular Probes, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Oocyst counting in the midgut
Request a detailed protocolP. berghei infections were evaluated by counting oocyst numbers after feeding on an infected mouse. Infected mosquitoes were kept at 20°C for 10 days after feeding when they were dissected, and their midgut fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min at room temperature. After washing with PBS three times, midguts were mounted in a slide and counted under a fluorescence microscope, where live oocysts were identified by their GFP expression.
Data availability
Sequencing data have been deposited in ArrayExpress under this link https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/arrayexpress/studies/E-MTAB-11252.
-
Array ExpressID E-MTAB-11252. Bulk RNAseq of Anopheles gambiae hemocytes upon Toll pathway overactivation.
References
-
The role of hemocytes in Anopheles gambiae antiplasmodial immunityJournal of Innate Immunity 6:119–128.https://doi.org/10.1159/000353765
-
G:profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update)Nucleic Acids Research 47:W191–W198.https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz369
Decision letter
-
Bruno LemaitreReviewing Editor; École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
-
Dominique Soldati-FavreSenior Editor; University of Geneva, Switzerland
-
Bruno LemaitreReviewer; École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.
Decision letter after peer review:
[Editors’ note: the authors submitted for reconsideration following the decision after peer review. What follows is the decision letter after the first round of review.]
Thank you for submitting the paper "Toll signaling enhances mosquito antiplasmodial immunity by promoting differentiation of hemocytes to the Megacyte lineage" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and a Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.
Editorial Comments to the Authors:
We are sorry to say that, after consultation with the reviewers, we have decided that this work will not be considered further for publication by eLife. Although there are discrepancies between the two reviewers, the overall feeling is that the claims should be better supported by the data. But both reviewers feel that the work is important and that if the claims can be strengthened the paper would be suitable for ELife. I would recommend to look carefully at review 1's suggestions. If you can address the most important critics, we will be happy to consider your article as a new submission and handle it as a revision. If you choose this course of action please submit a separate cover letter detailing the changes you have made.
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
In this manuscript, Barletta Ferreira and colleagues focus on the impact of Toll signaling on hemocyte differentiation and its impact on antiplasmodial immunity. This manuscript follows earlier demonstration by the authors that megacytes are a new type of hemocytes that appear during infection. The title of the paper suggests that the authors will put together everything in a biologically relevant context. However, the title of the paper is misleading, as there is no formal demonstration of the antiplasmodial role of this phenomenon, neither is there a clear demonstration of a direct differentiation of hemocytes. Instead, the authors demonstrate that Toll induction results in accumulation of megacytes in the mosquito host. If the message of the paper was fully substantiated, I would be very enthusiast for this manuscript. However, because this study repeats experiments already published, and just present data accumulated using RNAi mediated overactivation of Toll pathway, the message of this paper seems rather incremental. I feel there is the need for a number of additional experiments to tie things together to the level of what the title claims, and this would require extensive work.
Some of the problems I detected are:
1. Contrary to what is let thought, there is no biological relevance demonstrated in this paper. The antiplasmodial part is not covered here. Instead, gain of function toll activity is what is studied. This is interesting per se, but does not convincingly put things in context. I would have preferred loss of functions in the context of plasmodium infection for instance. If the authors want to back up their claim, I think both dependency and sufficiency of Toll need to be tested and this all put together in one coherent story.
2. The demonstration of differentiation upon Toll activation is partial. It relies mostly on the absence of EdU positive cells, leading them to conclude that proliferation is not involved and therefore it is differentiation. I have many problems with that. First EdU can be eliminated from cells, and they do not check whether their late timepoint could be affected by this. We do not have timecourse experiment, so it is hard to say. Also, no pH3 staining is performed. More importantly, there is no clear demonstration of which cells would differentiate into which cells. The data only show a final timepoint, and are based mostly on proportions. We at least need to see hemocyte and megacyte numbers to understand whether the numbers increase, decrease, whether this is compatible with a differentiation without proliferation. Even this would be fairly indirect, but at least would build some strong and convergent arguments. Ideally, could an ex vivo experiment be done to demonstrate hemocytes convert into megacytes for instance?
3. We do not have enough controls for the main experiment which is the Toll induction. Can we have documentation that cactus RNAi leads to Toll and Toll only induction? To what levels? Are these levels biologically relevant? As the paper relies mostly on this RNAi, we need the data. Maybe the authors have these data already in their RNAseq? But earlier timepoints would be important, especially as we do not know the kinetic of the described phenotype.
4. In figure 5, we lack unchallenged controls, which would really help interpret this figure.
Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):
This manuscript describes the effect on hemocyte differentiation of activation of the Toll pathway, which is a known antagonist of Plasmodium ookinetes. RNAseq analysis after silencing of Cactus and DNA replication analysis by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation indicated that the total hemocyte granulocyte population declined while megacytes increased, even though the number of granulocytes did not change, consistent with differentiation of a portion of the granulocytes into megacytes. Several diagnostic measurements and a marker were consistent with a Toll activation effect on increased megacyte size and relative abundance. Toll-activated megacytes can issue filopodia-like structures that may interact with other megacytes, and also appear to generate extracellular vesicles containing mitochondrion-like structures. Hemocytes were attracted to the midgut after a bacterial or malaria bloodmeal, but in Toll-activated mosquitoes megacytes were enriched and they formed clusters.
The work presents important new insight into the mechanism of Toll pathway immunity in Anopheles, specifically that Toll activation leads to the differentiation and maturation of a hemocyte lineage to generate megacytes. The megacytes are further stimulated by activated Toll to bind to the midgut, form clusters potentially linked by filopodia, and extrude mitochondrin-like membrane-bound structures that may function as a pro-inflammatory danger signal.
This is an excellent piece of work that fills in important new details about Toll pathway function and Anopheles immunity against Plasmodium, leading up to the function of the hemocyte-derived microvesicles. In my opinion it is suitable for publication with minor revision.
Scientific revision: The only part of the work that could be improved relates to the interpretation of the work represented by figure 5 E & F. Hemocyte markers were measured 4 h after bacterial treatment, or 26 h after malaria infection. Thus, the two assays are not directly comparable, and it is not possible to interpret whether the Plasmodium response is simply the bacterial response delayed by 22 additonal hours, or whether there is any particular specificity of the response caused by the presence of malaria parasites as compared to bacteria alone. By relative expression, the induction of megacyte binding after bacteria appears to be a log-fold higher than after Plasmodium but displayed equivalent levels of significance in bacteria or malaria treatments, whereas the relative expression of the granulocyte marker appears to be a similar value after bacteria or malaria, but the difference is more significant in the Plasmodium case. Why? Basically, because of the time difference of the assays, it is not possible to clearly interpret whether these results mean that bacteria induce a stronger megacyte binding response, or whether the response had simply decayed by 22 h later. Similarly, does the greater significance of granulocyte binding after malaria mean that this is a malaria-specific response, or would the bacterial treatment display the same outcome at 26 h instead of 4 h after treatment? Responding to this comment does not require new experimental work. At least, the authors should address this point in the interpretation of the result in the text, including whether they believe there is an effect in quantity or quality due to Plasmodium presence over bacteria alone. However, if the authors already have data after bacterial treatment at the same 26 h time point as malaria, it would be useful to present this, possibly as a supplementary figure, because this data would be directly comparable to Plasmodium treatment.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81116.sa1Author response
[Editors’ note: the authors resubmitted a revised version of the paper for consideration. What follows is the authors’ response to the first round of review.]
Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):
In this manuscript, Barletta Ferreira and colleagues focus on the impact of Toll signaling on hemocyte differentiation and its impact on antiplasmodial immunity. This manuscript follows earlier demonstration by the authors that megacytes are a new type of hemocytes that appear during infection. The title of the paper suggests that the authors will put together everything in a biologically relevant context. However, the title of the paper is misleading, as there is no formal demonstration of the antiplasmodial role of this phenomenon, neither is there a clear demonstration of a direct differentiation of hemocytes. Instead, the authors demonstrate that Toll induction results in accumulation of megacytes in the mosquito host. If the message of the paper was fully substantiated, I would be very enthusiast for this manuscript. However, because this study repeats experiments already published, and just present data accumulated using RNAi mediated overactivation of Toll pathway, the message of this paper seems rather incremental. I feel there is the need for a number of additional experiments to tie things together to the level of what the title claims, and this would require extensive work.
We have modified the title of the manuscript to better reflect our main findings and it now reads “Hemocyte Differentiation to the Megacyte Lineage Enhances Mosquito Immunity Against Plasmodium”. The authors would like to clarify that we are not repeating experiments already published. Although it has been known for many years that silencing Cactus results in almost complete elimination of P. berghei parasites, no one had been able to elucidate the molecular mechanism mediating this response. To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence that activation of a signaling pathway promotes differentiation of hemocytes to a specific subpopulation of cells and that this greatly enhances antiplasmodial immunity. We have conducted a series of experiments to address each of the concerns raised by the reviewer.
Some of the problems I detected are:
1. Contrary to what is let thought, there is no biological relevance demonstrated in this paper. The antiplasmodial part is not covered here. Instead, gain of function toll activity is what is studied. This is interesting per se, but does not convincingly put things in context. I would have preferred loss of functions in the context of plasmodium infection for instance. If the authors want to back up their claim, I think both dependency and sufficiency of Toll need to be tested and this all put together in one coherent story.
Point well taken. We had not presented the effect of co-silencing Rel1 and Cactus on Plasmodium infection because it had been previously shown to significantly increase parasite survival, relative to dsCactus females. We agree with the reviewer that we had not demonstrated that differentiation of granulocytes to the Megacyte lineage in dsCactus females was mediated by activation of Toll signaling. In the revised manuscript we show that, while Cactus silencing dramatically increased the proportion of 2 megacytes, from 3.5% to 76% (p<0.0001, X test) (Figure 6A and B), cosilencing of Cactus and Rel1 reverts this effect, resulting in a proportion of megacytes (6.6%) not significantly different from LacZ controls (Figure 6B). This provides direct evidence that Toll signaling, through Rel1, mediates differentiation of granulocytes to the Megacyte lineage in dsCactus females.
We also show that the dramatic decrease in oocyst numbers in dsCactus females (median=0, p< 0.0001, ANOVA, Dunn’s multiple comparison test) relative to LacZ controls (median=127) (Figure 6C), is also associated with a strong and highly significant increase (13-fold) in TM7318 mRNA associated with the midgut of dsCactus infected females, relative to dsLacZ (p=0.0001, Mann-Whitney test) 24 h post-infection (Figure 6D), indicative Megacyte recruitment to the midgut.
Furthermore, co-silencing Cactus and Rel1 significantly increased oocyst numbers (median = 24, p=0.0002, ANOVA, Dunn’s multiple comparison test) relative to dsCactus females, and reduced TM7318 mRNA associated with the midgut to levels not significantly different from those of dsLacZ controls (Figure 6C). In contrast, FBN11228 mRNA levels, a marker expressed in regular granulocytes, did not increase in significantly in dsCactus females and levels after co-silencing Rel1 and Cactus were also not significantly different from dsLacZ (Figure S5). We conclude that cosilencing Rel1 disrupts granulocyte differentiation to the megacyte lineage in dsCactus females, decreases the association of Megacytes with the mosquito midgut at 24 h post-infection, a time of peak ookinete midgut invasion, and increases Plasmodium survival.
2. The demonstration of differentiation upon Toll activation is partial. It relies mostly on the absence of EdU positive cells, leading them to conclude that proliferation is not involved and therefore it is differentiation. I have many problems with that. First EdU can be eliminated from cells, and they do not check whether their late timepoint could be affected by this. We do not have timecourse experiment, so it is hard to say. Also, no pH3 staining is performed. More importantly, there is no clear demonstration of which cells would differentiate into which cells. The data only show a final timepoint, and are based mostly on proportions. We at least need to see hemocyte and megacyte numbers to understand whether the numbers increase, decrease, whether this is compatible with a differentiation without proliferation. Even this would be fairly indirect, but at least would build some strong and convergent arguments. Ideally, could an ex vivo experiment be done to demonstrate hemocytes convert into megacytes for instance?
We agree with the reviewer that BrdU can be lost over time, and therefore it is difficult to determine whether a cell proliferated earlier and the BrdU got diluted after several cell divisions. As suggested, the proportion of hemocytes undergoing mitosis after Cactus silencing was also directly evaluated using phospho-Histone 3 (PHH3) staining. Two days post injection, the proportion of PHH3+ hemocytes that adhered to glass (mostly granulocytes) in dsCactus mosquitoes (0.7%, n=896) was small, and not significantly different from dsLacZ controls (0.6%, n=718 cells) (Figure S2C). At four days the proportions were also similar, with very few hemocytes positive for PHH3 staining both in dsLacZ (0.5%, n=799 cells) and dsCactus (0.3%, n=1039) (Figure S2C). Moreover, the few hemocytes that were positive for PHH3 in dsCactus mosquitoes did not have the size or morphology characteristic of megacytes (Figure S2C). We conclude that megacytes are not proliferating 2 or 4 days after dsCactus silencing.
A total hemocyte count was done to determine if the observed increase in megacytes upon Cactus silencing could be due to an overall increase in number of circulating hemocytes. The total number of circulating hemocytes was not significantly different between dsLacZ (mean 17,151/mosquito, n=14) and dsCactus mosquitoes (mean 23,477/mosquito, n=14, Mann Whitney T-test) (Figure S2A) 2 days post injection. Overall, the mean number of total hemocyes was lower at 4 days post-silencing, but there was also no significant difference between dsLacZ (mean 8,725/mosquito, n=14) and dsCactus mosquitoes (mean 10,836 /mosquito, n=14, Mann Whitney T-test) (Figure S2A). There was also no difference in the proportion of total granulocytes at 2 days, dsLacZ (3.62%) and dsCactus females (3.48%, Mann Whitney T-test), or 4 days post-injection, dsLacZ (3.91%) and dsCactus females (5.47%, Mann Whitney T-test).
In contrast, a significant increase in the proportion of megacyte was already apparent 2 days post-injection in Cactus-silenced mosquitoes (2.08% of all hemocytes, p<0.0001, Mann Whitney T-test), relative to dsLacZ controls (0.07%) (Figure S2B); with a corresponding decrease in the proportion of other granulocytes from 3.5% in dsLacZ controls to 1.4% in dsCactus (Figure S2B). At four days post-injection, the differences were more pronounced, with the proportion of megacytes reaching 3.7% in Cactus silenced mosquitoes (p<0.0001, Mann Whitney T-test) relative to dsLacZ controls (0.07%), again with a corresponding decrease in other granulocytes from 3.8% in dsLacZ to 1.8% in dsCactus mosquitoes (Figure S2B). Taken together, these data indicate that, although the total number of hemocytes and the percent of total granulocytes remained unchanged in response to dsCactus silencing, the proportion of megacytes increased at the expense of other granulocytes and no proliferation of megacytes was observed, based on both BrdU and PHH3 staining. All our findings indicate that Cactus silencing promotes differentiation of granulocytes to the megacyte lineage, and this differentiation requires Rel1-mediated activation of the Toll pathway.
3. We do not have enough controls for the main experiment which is the Toll induction. Can we have documentation that cactus RNAi leads to Toll and Toll only induction? To what levels? Are these levels biologically relevant? As the paper relies mostly on this RNAi, we need the data. Maybe the authors have these data already in their RNAseq? But earlier timepoints would be important, especially as we do not know the kinetic of the described phenotype.
Point well taken. It is not possible to establish whether only the Toll pathway is activated when we silence Cactus. However, the RNAseq analysis revealed that expression of several genes involved in Toll signaling or final effector this pathway, such as Toll-like receptors, CLIP proteases, Serpins, C-type Lectins and Defensin are upregulated in dsCactus hemocytes (see Table S3 in the revised manuscript). Furthermore, co-silencing Rel1 and Cactus prevented the dramatic increase in the proportion of megacytes that is observed when Cactus alone is silenced, indicating that the differentiation response requires activation of Toll signaling through Rel1.
4. In figure 5, we lack unchallenged controls, which would really help interpret this figure.
We have previously shown that bacterial feeding significantly increases granulocytes recruitment to the midgut surface of wild type mosquitoes (that have not been injected with dsRNA) (Barletta et al. 2019, iScience). In this manuscript (Figure 5), we evaluated whether there was a difference in hemocyte midgut recruitment between dsLacZ and dsCactus females. We observed a qualitative difference, as individual or pairs of hemocytes were observed in dsLacZ, while hemocytes formed large clusters in dsCactus females (Figure 5 A-D). Using markers for specific hemocyte subpopulations we also show that there is massive recruitment of megacytes in dsCactus females, with a 250-fold increase in midgut-associated TM7318 mRNA levels, a megacyte-specific marker, relative to dsLacZ controls (Figure 5E).
Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):
This is an excellent piece of work that fills in important new details about Toll pathway function and Anopheles immunity against Plasmodium, leading up to the function of the hemocyte-derived microvesicles. In my opinion it is suitable for publication with minor revision.
We thank the reviewer for his insight on the contribution of our work.
Scientific revision:
The only part of the work that could be improved relates to the interpretation of the work represented by figure 5 E & F. Hemocyte markers were measured 4 h after bacterial treatment, or 26 h after malaria infection. Thus, the two assays are not directly comparable, and it is not possible to interpret whether the Plasmodium response is simply the bacterial response delayed by 22 additonal hours, or whether there is any particular specificity of the response caused by the presence of malaria parasites as compared to bacteria alone. By relative expression, the induction of megacyte binding after bacteria appears to be a log-fold higher than after Plasmodium but displayed equivalent levels of significance in bacteria or malaria treatments, whereas the relative expression of the granulocyte marker appears to be a similar value after bacteria or malaria, but the difference is more significant in the Plasmodium case. Why? Basically, because of the time difference of the assays, it is not possible to clearly interpret whether these results mean that bacteria induce a stronger megacyte binding response, or whether the response had simply decayed by 22 h later. Similarly, does the greater significance of granulocyte binding after malaria mean that this is a malaria-specific response, or would the bacterial treatment display the same outcome at 26 h instead of 4 h after treatment? Responding to this comment does not require new experimental work. At least, the authors should address this point in the interpretation of the result in the text, including whether they believe there is an effect in quantity or quality due to Plasmodium presence over bacteria alone. However, if the authors already have data after bacterial treatment at the same 26 h time point as malaria, it would be useful to present this, possibly as a supplementary figure, because this data would be directly comparable to Plasmodium treatment.
Point well taken. The blood meal ingested by a mosquito is surrounded by the peritrophic matrix, and bacteria in the gut microbiota proliferate extensively when more nutrients become available as the meal undergoes digestion. The peak of ookinete midgut invasion occurs between 24-26h post-feeding. As the invade the midgut, ookinetes break the barriers, such as the peritrophic matrix, that normally prevent direct contact between the gut microbiota and epithelial cells. As a result, midgut epithelial cells come in direct contact with bacteria from the microbiota and with the immune elicitors they release, and this triggers prostaglandin (PGE2) release by the midgut. PGE2, in turn, attracts hemocytes to the midgut basal lamina (Barletta et al. 2019). Thus, the response of hemocytes to ookinete invasion requires both the presence of bacteria in the bolus and a breach of barriers by the invading parasites. If hemocytes come in contact with a nitrated surface, they undergo apoptosis and release microvesicles in close proximity to the invaded cells. Fortunately, we can still detect hemocyte mRNAs markers of specific hemocyte subpopulations in the cell remnants that remain associated with the midgut after hemocytes undergo apoptosis. In Figure 6 of the revised manuscript we show that midgut-associated mRNA levels of TM7318, a megacyte marker, increase significantly in dsCactus hemocytes, and goes back to levels similar to dsLacZ controls when the transcription factor Rel1 is cosilenced with Cactus. We have previously shown that hemocytes are also attracted to the midgut in the dsLacZ control, but here we show that silencing Cactus greatly enhances the recruitment of megacytes.
We have previously shown that bacterial feeding significantly increases granulocytes recruitment to the midgut surface of wild-type mosquitoes (that have not been injected with dsRNA) (Barletta et al. 2019, iScience).
In these experiments, instead of a sterile blood meal, females are fed a BSA meal containing bacteria from the gut microbiota that were cultured in vitro. As a result, bacteria immediately come in direct contact with epithelial cells, because the peritrophic matrix has not formed yet. This treatment triggers strong PGE2 release and circulating hemocytes are attracted to the basal surface of the midgut. We analyze the midgut 4 hours after feeding and we can observe intact hemocytes, because there has been no midgut invasion and the basal lamina is not nitrated, so hemocytes do not undergo apoptosis. As a result, we can visualize hemocytes directly associated with the basal surface of the midgut and we can easily detect mRNAs from specific hemocytes subpopulations.
When we evaluated whether there was a difference in hemocyte midgut recruitment between dsLacZ and dsCactus females in response to bacteria (Figure 5). We observed a qualitative difference, as individual or pairs of hemocytes were observed in dsLacZ controls, while hemocytes formed large clusters in dsCactus females (Figure 5 A-D). Using markers for specific hemocyte subpopulations we also show that there is massive recruitment of megacytes in dsCactus females, with a 250-fold increase in midgut associated TM7318 mRNA levels, a megacyte-specific marker, relative to dsLacZ controls (Figure 5E).
For clarity, those experiments involving bacterial feeding are now shown separately (Figure 5) from those involving midgut invasion by P. berghei ookinetes (Figure 6) in the revised manuscript. The following information has also been added:
“We have shown that the direct contact of bacteria with epithelial cells, before the peritrophic matrix is formed, triggers PGE2 release and attracts hemocytes to the basal surface of the midgut (Barletta et al., 2019). Hemocyte recruitment to the midgut in dsCactus females was explored by providing a BSA protein meal containing bacteria. As expected, bacterial feeding attracted hemocytes to the midgut surface in both dsCactus and dsLacZ control females (Figure 5A and B).”
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81116.sa2Article and author information
Author details
Ana Beatriz F Barletta
Octavio AC Talyuli
Carolina Barillas-Mury
Funding
No external funding was received for this work.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Intramural Research Z01AI000947, NIAID, National Institutes of Health. We thank Kevin Lee, Yonas Gebremicale, and André Laughinghouse for insectary support, and Asher Kantor for editorial assistance.
Ethics
Public Health Service Animal Welfare Assurance #A4149-01 guidelines were followed according to the National Institutes of Health Animal (NIH) Office of Animal Care and Use (OACU). These studies were done according to the NIH animal study protocol (ASP) approved by the NIH Animal Care and User Committee (ACUC), with approval ID ASP-LMVR5.
Senior Editor
- Dominique Soldati-Favre, University of Geneva, Switzerland
Reviewing Editor
- Bruno Lemaitre, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Reviewer
- Bruno Lemaitre, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
Publication history
- Preprint posted: December 24, 2021 (view preprint)
- Received: June 16, 2022
- Accepted: September 1, 2022
- Accepted Manuscript published: September 2, 2022 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: October 6, 2022 (version 2)
Copyright
This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Metrics
-
- 1,199
- Page views
-
- 294
- Downloads
-
- 1
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Hemocyte differentiation to the megacyte lineage enhances mosquito immunity against Plasmodium
eLife 11:e81116.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81116
Further reading
-
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
tRNAs in bacteriophage genomes are widespread across bacterial host genera, but their exact function has remained unclear for more than 50 years. Several hypotheses have been proposed, and the most widely accepted one is codon compensation, which suggests that phages encode tRNAs that supplement codons that are less frequently used by the host. Here, we combine several observations and propose a new hypothesis that phage-encoded tRNAs counteract the tRNA-depleting strategies of the host using enzymes such as VapC, PrrC, Colicin D, and Colicin E5 to defend from viral infection. Based on mutational patterns of anticodon loops of tRNAs encoded by phages, we predict that these tRNAs are insensitive to host tRNAses. For phage-encoded tRNAs targeted in the anticodon itself, we observe that phages typically avoid encoding these tRNAs. Further supporting the hypothesis that phage tRNAs are selected to be insensitive to host anticodon nucleases. Altogether our results support the hypothesis that phage-encoded tRNAs have evolved to be insensitive to host anticodon nucleases.
-
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Iron-sulfur clusters (FeS) are ancient and ubiquitous protein cofactors that play fundamental roles in many aspects of cell biology. These cofactors cannot be scavenged or trafficked within a cell and thus must be synthesized in any subcellular compartment where they are required. We examined the FeS synthesis proteins found in the relict plastid organelle, called the apicoplast, of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Using a chemical bypass method, we deleted four of the FeS pathway proteins involved in sulfur acquisition and cluster assembly and demonstrated that they are all essential for parasite survival. However, the effect that these deletions had on the apicoplast organelle differed. Deletion of the cysteine desulfurase SufS led to disruption of the apicoplast organelle and loss of the organellar genome, whereas the other deletions did not affect organelle maintenance. Ultimately, we discovered that the requirement of SufS for organelle maintenance is not driven by its role in FeS biosynthesis, but rather, by its function in generating sulfur for use by MnmA, a tRNA modifying enzyme that we localized to the apicoplast. Complementation of MnmA and SufS activity with a bacterial MnmA and its cognate cysteine desulfurase strongly suggests that the parasite SufS provides sulfur for both FeS biosynthesis and tRNA modification in the apicoplast. The dual role of parasite SufS is likely to be found in other plastid-containing organisms and highlights the central role of this enzyme in plastid biology.
