Landmark-based spatial navigation across the human lifespan

  1. Marcia Bécu  Is a corresponding author
  2. Denis Sheynikhovich
  3. Stephen Ramanoël
  4. Guillaume Tatur
  5. Anthony Ozier-Lafontaine
  6. Colas N Authié
  7. José-Alain Sahel
  8. Angelo Arleo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
  2. Sorbonne Université, France
  3. Streetlab, Institut de la Vision, France
  4. University of Pittsburgh, United States

Abstract

Human spatial cognition has been mainly characterized in terms of egocentric (body-centered) and allocentric (world-centered) wayfinding behavior. It was hypothesized that allocentric spatial coding, as a special high-level cognitive ability, develops later and deteriorates earlier than the egocentric one throughout lifetime. We challenged this hypothesis by testing the use of landmarks versus geometric cues in a cohort of 96 deeply-phenotyped participants, who physically navigated an equiangular Y maze, surrounded by landmarks or an anisotropic one. The results show that an apparent allocentric deficit in children and aged navigators is caused specifically by difficulties in using landmarks for navigation while introducing a geometric polarization of space made these participants as efficient allocentric navigators as young adults. This finding suggests that allocentric behavior relies on two dissociable sensory processing systems that are differentially affected by human aging. Whereas landmark processing follows an inverted-U dependence on age, spatial geometry processing is conserved, highlighting its potential in improving navigation performance across the life span.

Data availability

All data and code used in the analyses are available as an Open Science Framework deposit, accessible at https://osf.io/zhrk4.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marcia Bécu

    Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    For correspondence
    marcia.becu@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4564-1023
  2. Denis Sheynikhovich

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7737-8907
  3. Stephen Ramanoël

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4735-1097
  4. Guillaume Tatur

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anthony Ozier-Lafontaine

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Colas N Authié

    Institut de la Vision, Streetlab, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. José-Alain Sahel

    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Angelo Arleo

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    angelo.arleo@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

ANR (ANR-14-CHIN-0001 ANR-14-CHIN-0002)

  • Angelo Arleo

ANR (Labex LifeSenses ANR-10-LABX-65)

  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Angelo Arleo

ANR (IHU FOReSIGHT grant ANR-18-IAHU-01)

  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Angelo Arleo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants were voluntary and they (or their parents in the case of children) gave an informed consent for inclusion in the study. All screening and experimental procedures were in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and they were approved by the Ethical Committee CPP Ile de France V (ID_RCB 2015-A01094-45, No. CPP: 16122 MSB).

Copyright

© 2023, Bécu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,245
    views
  • 288
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marcia Bécu
  2. Denis Sheynikhovich
  3. Stephen Ramanoël
  4. Guillaume Tatur
  5. Anthony Ozier-Lafontaine
  6. Colas N Authié
  7. José-Alain Sahel
  8. Angelo Arleo
(2023)
Landmark-based spatial navigation across the human lifespan
eLife 12:e81318.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81318

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81318

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Suelen Pereira, Ivan Tomsic ... Mychael V Lourenco
    Insight

    A dysfunctional signaling pathway in the hippocampus has been linked to chronic pain-related memory impairment in mice.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ilya A Rybak, Natalia A Shevtsova ... Alain Frigon
    Research Advance

    Locomotion is controlled by spinal circuits that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs. These sensorimotor interactions are disrupted following spinal cord injury. The thoracic lateral hemisection represents an experimental model of an incomplete spinal cord injury, where connections between the brain and spinal cord are abolished on one side of the cord. To investigate the effects of such an injury on the operation of the spinal locomotor network, we used our computational model of cat locomotion recently published in eLife (Rybak et al., 2024) to investigate and predict changes in cycle and phase durations following a thoracic lateral hemisection during treadmill locomotion in tied-belt (equal left-right speeds) and split-belt (unequal left-right speeds) conditions. In our simulations, the ‘hemisection’ was always applied to the right side. Based on our model, we hypothesized that following hemisection the contralesional (‘intact’, left) side of the spinal network is mostly controlled by supraspinal drives, whereas the ipsilesional (‘hemisected’, right) side is mostly controlled by somatosensory feedback. We then compared the simulated results with those obtained during experiments in adult cats before and after a mid-thoracic lateral hemisection on the right side in the same locomotor conditions. Our experimental results confirmed many effects of hemisection on cat locomotion predicted by our simulations. We show that having the ipsilesional hindlimb step on the slow belt, but not the fast belt, during split-belt locomotion substantially reduces the effects of lateral hemisection. The model provides explanations for changes in temporal characteristics of hindlimb locomotion following hemisection based on altered interactions between spinal circuits, supraspinal drives, and somatosensory feedback.