Landmark-based spatial navigation across the human lifespan

  1. Marcia Bécu  Is a corresponding author
  2. Denis Sheynikhovich
  3. Stephen Ramanoël
  4. Guillaume Tatur
  5. Anthony Ozier-Lafontaine
  6. Colas N Authié
  7. José-Alain Sahel
  8. Angelo Arleo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
  2. Sorbonne Université, France
  3. Streetlab, Institut de la Vision, France
  4. University of Pittsburgh, United States

Abstract

Human spatial cognition has been mainly characterized in terms of egocentric (body-centered) and allocentric (world-centered) wayfinding behavior. It was hypothesized that allocentric spatial coding, as a special high-level cognitive ability, develops later and deteriorates earlier than the egocentric one throughout lifetime. We challenged this hypothesis by testing the use of landmarks versus geometric cues in a cohort of 96 deeply-phenotyped participants, who physically navigated an equiangular Y maze, surrounded by landmarks or an anisotropic one. The results show that an apparent allocentric deficit in children and aged navigators is caused specifically by difficulties in using landmarks for navigation while introducing a geometric polarization of space made these participants as efficient allocentric navigators as young adults. This finding suggests that allocentric behavior relies on two dissociable sensory processing systems that are differentially affected by human aging. Whereas landmark processing follows an inverted-U dependence on age, spatial geometry processing is conserved, highlighting its potential in improving navigation performance across the life span.

Data availability

All data and code used in the analyses are available as an Open Science Framework deposit, accessible at https://osf.io/zhrk4.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marcia Bécu

    Kavli Institute for Systems Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
    For correspondence
    marcia.becu@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4564-1023
  2. Denis Sheynikhovich

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7737-8907
  3. Stephen Ramanoël

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4735-1097
  4. Guillaume Tatur

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Anthony Ozier-Lafontaine

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Colas N Authié

    Institut de la Vision, Streetlab, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. José-Alain Sahel

    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Angelo Arleo

    INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    angelo.arleo@inserm.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

ANR (ANR-14-CHIN-0001 ANR-14-CHIN-0002)

  • Angelo Arleo

ANR (Labex LifeSenses ANR-10-LABX-65)

  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Angelo Arleo

ANR (IHU FOReSIGHT grant ANR-18-IAHU-01)

  • José-Alain Sahel
  • Angelo Arleo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Arne Ekstrom, University of Arizona

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants were voluntary and they (or their parents in the case of children) gave an informed consent for inclusion in the study. All screening and experimental procedures were in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki, and they were approved by the Ethical Committee CPP Ile de France V (ID_RCB 2015-A01094-45, No. CPP: 16122 MSB).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: February 13, 2020 (view preprint)
  2. Received: June 22, 2022
  3. Accepted: March 11, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 13, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: March 23, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: May 11, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Bécu et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,962
    views
  • 254
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marcia Bécu
  2. Denis Sheynikhovich
  3. Stephen Ramanoël
  4. Guillaume Tatur
  5. Anthony Ozier-Lafontaine
  6. Colas N Authié
  7. José-Alain Sahel
  8. Angelo Arleo
(2023)
Landmark-based spatial navigation across the human lifespan
eLife 12:e81318.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81318

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81318

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Sandra P Cárdenas-García, Sundas Ijaz, Alberto E Pereda
    Research Article

    Most nervous systems combine both transmitter-mediated and direct cell-cell communication, known as 'chemical' and 'electrical' synapses, respectively. Chemical synapses can be identified by their multiple structural components. Electrical synapses are, on the other hand, generally defined by the presence of a 'gap junction' (a cluster of intercellular channels) between two neuronal processes. However, while gap junctions provide the communicating mechanism, it is unknown whether electrical transmission requires the contribution of additional cellular structures. We investigated this question at identifiable single synaptic contacts on the zebrafish Mauthner cells, at which gap junctions coexist with specializations for neurotransmitter release and where the contact unequivocally defines the anatomical limits of a synapse. Expansion microscopy of these single contacts revealed a detailed map of the incidence and spatial distribution of proteins pertaining to various synaptic structures. Multiple gap junctions of variable size were identified by the presence of their molecular components. Remarkably, most of the synaptic contact's surface was occupied by interleaving gap junctions and components of adherens junctions, suggesting a close functional association between these two structures. In contrast, glutamate receptors were confined to small peripheral portions of the contact, indicating that most of the synaptic area functions as an electrical synapse. Thus, our results revealed the overarching organization of an electrical synapse that operates with not one, but multiple gap junctions, in close association with structural and signaling molecules known to be components of adherens junctions. The relationship between these intercellular structures will aid in establishing the boundaries of electrical synapses found throughout animal connectomes and provide insight into the structural organization and functional diversity of electrical synapses.

    1. Neuroscience
    Alexandra L Jellinger, Rebecca L Suthard ... Steve Ramirez
    Research Article

    Negative memories engage a brain and body-wide stress response in humans that can alter cognition and behavior. Prolonged stress responses induce maladaptive cellular, circuit, and systems-level changes that can lead to pathological brain states and corresponding disorders in which mood and memory are affected. However, it is unclear if repeated activation of cells processing negative memories induces similar phenotypes in mice. In this study, we used an activity-dependent tagging method to access neuronal ensembles and assess their molecular characteristics. Sequencing memory engrams in mice revealed that positive (male-to-female exposure) and negative (foot shock) cells upregulated genes linked to anti- and pro-inflammatory responses, respectively. To investigate the impact of persistent activation of negative engrams, we chemogenetically activated them in the ventral hippocampus over 3 months and conducted anxiety and memory-related tests. Negative engram activation increased anxiety behaviors in both 6- and 14-month-old mice, reduced spatial working memory in older mice, impaired fear extinction in younger mice, and heightened fear generalization in both age groups. Immunohistochemistry revealed changes in microglial and astrocytic structure and number in the hippocampus. In summary, repeated activation of negative memories induces lasting cellular and behavioral abnormalities in mice, offering insights into the negative effects of chronic negative thinking-like behaviors on human health.