Maximizing CRISPRi efficacy and accessibility with dual-sgRNA libraries and optimal effectors

  1. Joseph M Replogle
  2. Jessica L Bonnar
  3. Angela N Pogson
  4. Christina R Liem
  5. Nolan K Maier
  6. Yufang Ding
  7. Baylee J Russell
  8. Xingren Wang
  9. Kun Leng
  10. Alina Guna
  11. Thomas M Norman
  12. Ryan A Pak
  13. Daniel M Ramos
  14. Michael Emmerson Ward
  15. Luke A Gilbert
  16. Martin Kampmann
  17. Jonathan S Weissman  Is a corresponding author
  18. Marco Jost  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  2. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, United States
  3. Harvard Medical School, United States
  4. National Institutes of Health, United States
  5. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, United States

Abstract

CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) enables programmable, reversible, and titratable repression of gene expression (knockdown) in mammalian cells. Initial CRISPRi-mediated genetic screens have showcased the potential to address basic questions in cell biology, genetics, and biotechnology, but wider deployment of CRISPRi screening has been constrained by the large size of single guide RNA (sgRNA) libraries and challenges in generating cell models with consistent CRISPRi-mediated knockdown. Here, we present next-generation CRISPRi sgRNA libraries and effector expression constructs that enable strong and consistent knockdown across mammalian cell models. First, we combine empirical sgRNA selection with a dual-sgRNA library design to generate an ultra-compact (1-3 elements per gene), highly active CRISPRi sgRNA library. Next, we compare CRISPRi effectors to show that the recently published Zim3-dCas9 provides an excellent balance between strong on-target knockdown and minimal nonspecific effects on cell growth or the transcriptome. Finally, we engineer a suite of cell lines with stable expression of Zim3-dCas9 and robust on-target knockdown. Our results and publicly available reagents establish best practices for CRISPRi genetic screening.

Data availability

Sequencing data are available on NCBI GEO under accession number GSE205310 (Perturb-seq) and GSE205147 (bulk RNA-seq). sgRNA counts from CRISPRi screens are included as supplemental tables. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Joseph M Replogle

    Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Joseph M Replogle, consults for Maze Therapeutics and Waypoint Bio.
  2. Jessica L Bonnar

    Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Angela N Pogson

    Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Christina R Liem

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Nolan K Maier

    Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6103-6726
  6. Yufang Ding

    Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Baylee J Russell

    Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Xingren Wang

    Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Kun Leng

    Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Alina Guna

    Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Thomas M Norman

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Thomas M Norman, consults for Maze Therapeutics. The Regents of the University of California with TMN, MJ, LAG, and JSW as inventors have filed patent applications related to CRISPRi/a screening and Perturb-seq..
  12. Ryan A Pak

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Daniel M Ramos

    Center for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Michael Emmerson Ward

    National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5296-8051
  15. Luke A Gilbert

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Luke A Gilbert, declares outside interest in Chroma Medicine. The Regents of the University of California with TMN, MJ, LAG, and JSW as inventors have filed patent applications related to CRISPRi/a screening and Perturb-seq. LAG, MK, and JSW are inventors on US Patent 11,254,933 related to CRISPRi/a screening..
  16. Martin Kampmann

    Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    Martin Kampmann, serves on the Scientific Advisory Boards of Engine Biosciences, Casma Therapeutics, Cajal Neuroscience, and Alector, and is an advisor to Modulo Bio and Recursion Therapeutics. LAG, MK, and JSW are inventors on US Patent 11,254,933 related to CRISPRi/a screening..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3819-7019
  17. Jonathan S Weissman

    Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States
    For correspondence
    weissman@wi.mit.edu
    Competing interests
    Jonathan S Weissman, declares outside interest in 5 AM Venture, Amgen, Chroma Medicine, KSQ Therapeutics, Maze Therapeutics, Tenaya Therapeutics, Tessera Therapeutics, and Third Rock Ventures. The Regents of the University of California with TMN, MJ, LAG, and JSW as inventors have filed patent applications related to CRISPRi/a screening and Perturb-seq. LAG, MK, and JSW are inventors on US Patent 11,254,933 related to CRISPRi/a screening..
  18. Marco Jost

    Department of Microbiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    marco_jost@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Marco Jost, consults for Maze Therapeutics and Gate Bioscience. The Regents of the University of California with TMN, MJ, LAG, and JSW as inventors have filed patent applications related to CRISPRi/a screening and Perturb-seq..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1369-4908

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R00GM130964)

  • Marco Jost

National Institutes of Health (T32AI132120)

  • Baylee J Russell

Human Frontier Science Program (2019L/LT000858)

  • Alina Guna

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (Ben Barres Early Career Acceleration Award)

  • Martin Kampmann

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Investigator)

  • Jonathan S Weissman

National Institutes of Health (RM1HG009490-01)

  • Jonathan S Weissman

Springer Nature Global Grant for Gut Health (1772808)

  • Marco Jost

Charles H. Hood Foundation (Child Health Research Award)

  • Marco Jost

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011-19-2-0007)

  • Jonathan S Weissman

Ludwig Center for Molecular Oncology (NA)

  • Jonathan S Weissman

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (NA)

  • Jonathan S Weissman

National Institutes of Health (F31NS115380)

  • Joseph M Replogle

National Institutes of Health (F30AG066418)

  • Kun Leng

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 18,245
    views
  • 1,762
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Joseph M Replogle
  2. Jessica L Bonnar
  3. Angela N Pogson
  4. Christina R Liem
  5. Nolan K Maier
  6. Yufang Ding
  7. Baylee J Russell
  8. Xingren Wang
  9. Kun Leng
  10. Alina Guna
  11. Thomas M Norman
  12. Ryan A Pak
  13. Daniel M Ramos
  14. Michael Emmerson Ward
  15. Luke A Gilbert
  16. Martin Kampmann
  17. Jonathan S Weissman
  18. Marco Jost
(2022)
Maximizing CRISPRi efficacy and accessibility with dual-sgRNA libraries and optimal effectors
eLife 11:e81856.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81856

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81856

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Dániel Molnár, Éva Viola Surányi ... Judit Toth
    Research Article

    The sustained success of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a pathogen arises from its ability to persist within macrophages for extended periods and its limited responsiveness to antibiotics. Furthermore, the high incidence of resistance to the few available antituberculosis drugs is a significant concern, especially since the driving forces of the emergence of drug resistance are not clear. Drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can emerge through de novo mutations, however, mycobacterial mutation rates are low. To unravel the effects of antibiotic pressure on genome stability, we determined the genetic variability, phenotypic tolerance, DNA repair system activation, and dNTP pool upon treatment with current antibiotics using Mycobacterium smegmatis. Whole-genome sequencing revealed no significant increase in mutation rates after prolonged exposure to first-line antibiotics. However, the phenotypic fluctuation assay indicated rapid adaptation to antibiotics mediated by non-genetic factors. The upregulation of DNA repair genes, measured using qPCR, suggests that genomic integrity may be maintained through the activation of specific DNA repair pathways. Our results, indicating that antibiotic exposure does not result in de novo adaptive mutagenesis under laboratory conditions, do not lend support to the model suggesting antibiotic resistance development through drug pressure-induced microevolution.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Sanjarbek Hudaiberdiev, Ivan Ovcharenko
    Research Article

    Enhancers and promoters are classically considered to be bound by a small set of transcription factors (TFs) in a sequence-specific manner. This assumption has come under increasing skepticism as the datasets of ChIP-seq assays of TFs have expanded. In particular, high-occupancy target (HOT) loci attract hundreds of TFs with often no detectable correlation between ChIP-seq peaks and DNA-binding motif presence. Here, we used a set of 1003 TF ChIP-seq datasets (HepG2, K562, H1) to analyze the patterns of ChIP-seq peak co-occurrence in combination with functional genomics datasets. We identified 43,891 HOT loci forming at the promoter (53%) and enhancer (47%) regions. HOT promoters regulate housekeeping genes, whereas HOT enhancers are involved in tissue-specific process regulation. HOT loci form the foundation of human super-enhancers and evolve under strong negative selection, with some of these loci being located in ultraconserved regions. Sequence-based classification analysis of HOT loci suggested that their formation is driven by the sequence features, and the density of mapped ChIP-seq peaks across TF-bound loci correlates with sequence features and the expression level of flanking genes. Based on the affinities to bind to promoters and enhancers we detected five distinct clusters of TFs that form the core of the HOT loci. We report an abundance of HOT loci in the human genome and a commitment of 51% of all TF ChIP-seq binding events to HOT locus formation thus challenging the classical model of enhancer activity and propose a model of HOT locus formation based on the existence of large transcriptional condensates.