Dysregulation of the PRUNE2/PCA3 genetic axis in human prostate cancer: from experimental discovery to validation in two independent patient cohorts
Abstract
Background: We have previously shown that the long non-coding (lnc)RNA prostate cancer associated 3 (PCA3; formerly prostate cancer antigen 3) functions as a trans-dominant negative oncogene by targeting the previously unrecognized prostate cancer suppressor gene PRUNE2 (a homolog of the Drosophila prune gene), thereby forming a functional unit within a unique allelic locus in human cells. Here we investigated the PCA3/PRUNE2 regulatory axis from early (tumorigenic) to late (biochemical recurrence) genetic events during human prostate cancer progression.
Methods: The reciprocal PCA3 and PRUNE2 gene expression relationship in paired prostate cancer and adjacent normal prostate was analyzed in two independent retrospective cohorts of clinically-annotated cases post-radical prostatectomy: a single-institution discovery cohort (n=107) and a multi-institution validation cohort (n=497). We compared the tumor gene expression of PCA3 and PRUNE2 to their corresponding expression in the normal prostate. We also serially examined clinical/pathological variables including time to disease recurrence.
Results: We consistently observed increased expression of PCA3 and decreased expression of PRUNE2 in prostate cancer compared with the adjacent normal prostate across all tumor grades and stages. However, there was no association between the relative gene expression levels of PCA3 or PRUNE2 and time to disease recurrence, independent of tumor grades and stages.
Conclusions: We concluded that upregulation of the lncRNA PCA3 and targeted downregulation of the protein-coding PRUNE2 gene in prostate cancer could be early (rather than late) molecular events in the progression of human prostate tumorigenesis but are not associated with biochemical recurrence. Further studies of PCA3/PRUNE2 dysregulation are warranted.
Funding: We received support from the Human Tissue Repository and Tissue Analysis Shared Resource from the Department of Pathology of the University of New Mexico School of Medicine and a pilot award from the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center. RP and WA were supported by awards from the Levy-Longenbaugh Donor-Advised Fund and the Prostate Cancer Foundation. EDN reports research fellowship support from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Brazil, and the Associação Beneficente Alzira Denise Hertzog Silva (ABADHS), Brazil. This work has been funded in part by the NCI Cancer Center Support Grants (CCSG; P30) to the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center (CA118100) and the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (CA072720).
Data availability
For the discovery cohort, all data generated or analyzed are included in the manuscript and source data files, except for patient-level ethnicity data. Patient-level ethnicity data is not included due to the potential for identifiability. However detailed summary ethnicity data is presented in the manuscript and in Table 1. Requests to access the patient level ethnicity data should be directed to the corresponding author with a project proposal. Source codes are also available in the supplemental source code file. For the Validation Cohort, clinicopathological patient characteristics and gene level transcription data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were accessed from the UCSC Xena Resource.
-
TCGA prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) gene expression by RNAseq (polyA+ IlluminaHiSeq)TCGA Prostate Cancer (PRAD) TCGA.PRAD.sampleMap/HiSeqV2.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Cancer Institute (P30CA118100)
- Richard C Lauer
National Cancer Institute (P30CA072720)
- Renata Pasqualini
- Wadih Arap
Levy-Longenbaugh Donor-Advised Fund
- Renata Pasqualini
- Wadih Arap
Prostate Cancer Foundation
- Renata Pasqualini
- Wadih Arap
Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
- Emmanuel Dias-Neto
Associação Beneficente Alzira Denise Hertzog Silva
- Emmanuel Dias-Neto
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Human subjects: For the discovery cohort, there was University of New Mexico Health Sciences Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval (HRRC15-138), and the study was carried out in accordance with the United States Common Rule. As the discovery cohort involved secondary use of archival biospecimens, the IRB waived the requirement for informed consent .
Copyright
© 2023, Lauer et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 698
- views
-
- 123
- downloads
-
- 3
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Citations by DOI
-
- 3
- citations for umbrella DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81929