Environmental morphing enables informed dispersal of the dandelion diaspore

  1. Madeleine Seale
  2. Oleksandr Zhdanov
  3. Merel Barbara Soons
  4. Cathal Cummins
  5. Erika Kroll
  6. Michael R Blatt
  7. Hossein Zare-Behtash
  8. Angela Busse
  9. Enrico Mastropaolo
  10. James M Bullock
  11. Ignazio Maria Viola
  12. Naomi Nakayama  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
  3. Utrecht University, Netherlands
  4. Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom
  5. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  6. UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, United Kingdom
  7. Imperial College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Animal migration is highly sensitised to environmental cues, but plant dispersal is considered largely passive. The common dandelion, Taraxacum officinale, bears an intricate haired pappus facilitating flight. The pappus enables the formation of a separated vortex ring during flight; however, the pappus structure is not static but reversibly changes shape by closing in response to moisture. We hypothesised that this leads to changed dispersal properties in response to environmental conditions. Using wind tunnel experiments for flow visualisation, particle image velocimetry, and flight tests we characterised the fluid mechanics effects of the pappus morphing. We also modelled dispersal to understand the impact of pappus morphing on diaspore distribution. Pappus morphing dramatically alters the fluid mechanics of diaspore flight. We found that when the pappus closes in moist conditions, the drag coefficient decreases and thus the falling velocity is greatly increased. Detachment of diaspores from the parent plant also substantially decreases. The change in detachment when the pappus closes increases dispersal distances by reducing diaspore release when wind speeds are low. We propose that moisture-dependent pappus-morphing is a form of informed dispersal allowing rapid responses to changing conditions.

Data availability

The Source data for all figures has been deposited to Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7038366

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madeleine Seale

    Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Oleksandr Zhdanov

    James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1742-9765
  3. Merel Barbara Soons

    Ecology and Biodiversity group, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cathal Cummins

    School of Energy, Geosciences, Infrastructure and Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erika Kroll

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8832-7208
  6. Michael R Blatt

    Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hossein Zare-Behtash

    James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Angela Busse

    James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Enrico Mastropaolo

    School of Engineering, Institute for Integrated Micro and Nano Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. James M Bullock

    UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ignazio Maria Viola

    School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3831-8423
  12. Naomi Nakayama

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    n.nakayama@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9390-3545

Funding

Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2016-255)

  • Enrico Mastropaolo
  • Ignazio Maria Viola
  • Naomi Nakayama

Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2019-424)

  • Madeleine Seale

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (P011586/1 and T006153/1)

  • Michael R Blatt

European Commission (ERC-2020-COG 101001499)

  • Ignazio Maria Viola

Royal Society (UF140640 and URF-R-201035)

  • Naomi Nakayama

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Seale et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,073
    views
  • 257
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madeleine Seale
  2. Oleksandr Zhdanov
  3. Merel Barbara Soons
  4. Cathal Cummins
  5. Erika Kroll
  6. Michael R Blatt
  7. Hossein Zare-Behtash
  8. Angela Busse
  9. Enrico Mastropaolo
  10. James M Bullock
  11. Ignazio Maria Viola
  12. Naomi Nakayama
(2022)
Environmental morphing enables informed dispersal of the dandelion diaspore
eLife 11:e81962.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81962

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81962

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Krishna Rijal, Pankaj Mehta
    Research Article

    The Gillespie algorithm is commonly used to simulate and analyze complex chemical reaction networks. Here, we leverage recent breakthroughs in deep learning to develop a fully differentiable variant of the Gillespie algorithm. The differentiable Gillespie algorithm (DGA) approximates discontinuous operations in the exact Gillespie algorithm using smooth functions, allowing for the calculation of gradients using backpropagation. The DGA can be used to quickly and accurately learn kinetic parameters using gradient descent and design biochemical networks with desired properties. As an illustration, we apply the DGA to study stochastic models of gene promoters. We show that the DGA can be used to: (1) successfully learn kinetic parameters from experimental measurements of mRNA expression levels from two distinct Escherichia coli promoters and (2) design nonequilibrium promoter architectures with desired input–output relationships. These examples illustrate the utility of the DGA for analyzing stochastic chemical kinetics, including a wide variety of problems of interest to synthetic and systems biology.

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Juken Hong, Wenzhi Xue, Teng Wang
    Research Article

    Microbial communities living in the same environment often display alternative stable states, each characterized by a unique composition of species. Understanding the origin and determinants of microbiome multistability has broad implications in environments, human health, and microbiome engineering. However, despite its conceptual importance, how multistability emerges in complex communities remains largely unknown. Here, we focused on the role of horizontal gene transfer (HGT), one important aspect mostly overlooked in previous studies, on the stability landscape of microbial populations. Combining mathematical modeling and numerical simulations, we demonstrate that, when mobile genetic elements (MGEs) only affect bacterial growth rates, increasing HGT rate in general promotes multistability of complex microbiota. We further extend our analysis to scenarios where HGT changes interspecies interactions, microbial communities are subjected to strong environmental selections and microbes live in metacommunities consisting of multiple local habitats. We also discuss the role of different mechanisms, including interspecies interaction strength, the growth rate effects of MGEs, MGE epistasis and microbial death rates in shaping the multistability of microbial communities undergoing HGT. These results reveal how different dynamic processes collectively shape community multistability and diversity. Our results provide key insights for the predictive control and engineering of complex microbiota.