Environmental morphing enables informed dispersal of the dandelion diaspore

  1. Madeleine Seale
  2. Oleksandr Zhdanov
  3. Merel Barbara Soons
  4. Cathal Cummins
  5. Erika Kroll
  6. Michael R Blatt
  7. Hossein Zare-Behtash
  8. Angela Busse
  9. Enrico Mastropaolo
  10. James M Bullock
  11. Ignazio Maria Viola
  12. Naomi Nakayama  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  2. University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
  3. Utrecht University, Netherlands
  4. Heriot-Watt University, United Kingdom
  5. University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  6. UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, United Kingdom
  7. Imperial College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Animal migration is highly sensitised to environmental cues, but plant dispersal is considered largely passive. The common dandelion, Taraxacum officinale, bears an intricate haired pappus facilitating flight. The pappus enables the formation of a separated vortex ring during flight; however, the pappus structure is not static but reversibly changes shape by closing in response to moisture. We hypothesised that this leads to changed dispersal properties in response to environmental conditions. Using wind tunnel experiments for flow visualisation, particle image velocimetry, and flight tests we characterised the fluid mechanics effects of the pappus morphing. We also modelled dispersal to understand the impact of pappus morphing on diaspore distribution. Pappus morphing dramatically alters the fluid mechanics of diaspore flight. We found that when the pappus closes in moist conditions, the drag coefficient decreases and thus the falling velocity is greatly increased. Detachment of diaspores from the parent plant also substantially decreases. The change in detachment when the pappus closes increases dispersal distances by reducing diaspore release when wind speeds are low. We propose that moisture-dependent pappus-morphing is a form of informed dispersal allowing rapid responses to changing conditions.

Data availability

The Source data for all figures has been deposited to Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7038366

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madeleine Seale

    Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Oleksandr Zhdanov

    James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1742-9765
  3. Merel Barbara Soons

    Ecology and Biodiversity group, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cathal Cummins

    School of Energy, Geosciences, Infrastructure and Environment, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Erika Kroll

    School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8832-7208
  6. Michael R Blatt

    Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biophysics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Hossein Zare-Behtash

    James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Angela Busse

    James Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Enrico Mastropaolo

    School of Engineering, Institute for Integrated Micro and Nano Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. James M Bullock

    UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ignazio Maria Viola

    School of Engineering, Institute for Energy Systems, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3831-8423
  12. Naomi Nakayama

    Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    n.nakayama@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9390-3545

Funding

Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2016-255)

  • Enrico Mastropaolo
  • Ignazio Maria Viola
  • Naomi Nakayama

Leverhulme Trust (ECF-2019-424)

  • Madeleine Seale

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (P011586/1 and T006153/1)

  • Michael R Blatt

European Commission (ERC-2020-COG 101001499)

  • Ignazio Maria Viola

Royal Society (UF140640 and URF-R-201035)

  • Naomi Nakayama

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Seale et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,959
    views
  • 232
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madeleine Seale
  2. Oleksandr Zhdanov
  3. Merel Barbara Soons
  4. Cathal Cummins
  5. Erika Kroll
  6. Michael R Blatt
  7. Hossein Zare-Behtash
  8. Angela Busse
  9. Enrico Mastropaolo
  10. James M Bullock
  11. Ignazio Maria Viola
  12. Naomi Nakayama
(2022)
Environmental morphing enables informed dispersal of the dandelion diaspore
eLife 11:e81962.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81962

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81962

Further reading

    1. Physics of Living Systems
    Tommaso Amico, Samuel Toluwanimi Dada ... Amos Maritan
    Research Article

    Many proteins have been recently shown to undergo a process of phase separation that leads to the formation of biomolecular condensates. Intriguingly, it has been observed that some of these proteins form dense droplets of sizeable dimensions already below the critical concentration, which is the concentration at which phase separation occurs. To understand this phenomenon, which is not readily compatible with classical nucleation theory, we investigated the properties of the droplet size distributions as a function of protein concentration. We found that these distributions can be described by a scale-invariant log-normal function with an average that increases progressively as the concentration approaches the critical concentration from below. The results of this scaling analysis suggest the existence of a universal behaviour independent of the sequences and structures of the proteins undergoing phase separation. While we refrain from proposing a theoretical model here, we suggest that any model of protein phase separation should predict the scaling exponents that we reported here from the fitting of experimental measurements of droplet size distributions. Furthermore, based on these observations, we show that it is possible to use the scale invariance to estimate the critical concentration for protein phase separation.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Physics of Living Systems
    Ju Kang, Shijie Zhang ... Xin Wang
    Research Article

    Explaining biodiversity is a fundamental issue in ecology. A long-standing puzzle lies in the paradox of the plankton: many species of plankton feeding on a limited variety of resources coexist, apparently flouting the competitive exclusion principle (CEP), which holds that the number of predator (consumer) species cannot exceed that of the resources at a steady state. Here, we present a mechanistic model and demonstrate that intraspecific interference among the consumers enables a plethora of consumer species to coexist at constant population densities with only one or a handful of resource species. This facilitated biodiversity is resistant to stochasticity, either with the stochastic simulation algorithm or individual-based modeling. Our model naturally explains the classical experiments that invalidate the CEP, quantitatively illustrates the universal S-shaped pattern of the rank-abundance curves across a wide range of ecological communities, and can be broadly used to resolve the mystery of biodiversity in many natural ecosystems.