Fast rule switching and slow rule updating in a perceptual categorization task

  1. Flora Bouchacourt
  2. Sina Tafazoli
  3. Marcelo Mattar
  4. Timothy J Buschman
  5. Nathaniel D Daw  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. University of California, San Diego, United States

Abstract

To adapt to a changing world, we must be able to switch between rules already learned and, at other times, learn rules anew. Often we must do both at the same time, switching between known rules while also constantly re-estimating them. Here, we show these two processes, rule switching and rule learning, rely on distinct but intertwined computations, namely fast inference and slower incremental learning. To this end, we studied how monkeys switched between three rules. Each rule was compositional, requiring the animal to discriminate one of two features of a stimulus and then respond with an associated eye movement along one of two different response axes. By modeling behavior we found the animals learned the axis of response using fast inference (rule switching) while continuously re-estimating the stimulus-response associations within an axis (rule learning). Our results shed light on the computational interactions between rule switching and rule learning, and make testable neural predictions for these interactions.

Data availability

Codes and data supporting the findings of this study is available on GitHub (https://github.com/buschman- lab/FastRuleSwitchingSlowRuleUpdating).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Flora Bouchacourt

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8893-0143
  2. Sina Tafazoli

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Marcelo Mattar

    Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Timothy J Buschman

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1298-2761
  5. Nathaniel D Daw

    Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    ndaw@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5029-1430

Funding

U.S. Army Research Office (ARO W911NF-16-1-047)

  • Nathaniel D Daw

NIMH (R01MH129492)

  • Timothy J Buschman

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. David Badre, Brown University, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures were approved by Princeton University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #3055) and were in accordance with the policies and procedures of the National Institutes of Health.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: January 30, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: August 8, 2022
  3. Accepted: November 13, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 14, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 24, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Bouchacourt et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,999
    views
  • 314
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Flora Bouchacourt
  2. Sina Tafazoli
  3. Marcelo Mattar
  4. Timothy J Buschman
  5. Nathaniel D Daw
(2022)
Fast rule switching and slow rule updating in a perceptual categorization task
eLife 11:e82531.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82531

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82531

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Qianli Yang
    Insight

    Subpopulations of neurons in the subthalamic nucleus have distinct activity patterns that relate to the three hypotheses of the Drift Diffusion Model.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jakub Onysk, Nicholas Gregory ... Flavia Mancini
    Research Article

    The placebo and nocebo effects highlight the importance of expectations in modulating pain perception, but in everyday life we don’t need an external source of information to form expectations about pain. The brain can learn to predict pain in a more fundamental way, simply by experiencing fluctuating, non-random streams of noxious inputs, and extracting their temporal regularities. This process is called statistical learning. Here, we address a key open question: does statistical learning modulate pain perception? We asked 27 participants to both rate and predict pain intensity levels in sequences of fluctuating heat pain. Using a computational approach, we show that probabilistic expectations and confidence were used to weigh pain perception and prediction. As such, this study goes beyond well-established conditioning paradigms associating non-pain cues with pain outcomes, and shows that statistical learning itself shapes pain experience. This finding opens a new path of research into the brain mechanisms of pain regulation, with relevance to chronic pain where it may be dysfunctional.