Clinical characteristics, racial inequities, and outcomes in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) cohort study

  1. Gayathri Nagaraj  Is a corresponding author
  2. Shaveta Vinayak
  3. Ali Raza Khaki
  4. Tianyi Sun
  5. Nicole M Kuderer
  6. David M Aboulafia
  7. Jared D Acoba
  8. Joy Awosika
  9. Ziad Bakouny
  10. Nicole B Balmaceda
  11. Ting Bao
  12. Babar Bashir
  13. Stephanie Berg
  14. Mehmet A Bilen
  15. Poorva Bindal
  16. Sibel Blau
  17. Brianne E Bodin
  18. Hala T Borno
  19. Cecilia Castellano
  20. Horyun Choi
  21. John Deeken
  22. Aakash Desai
  23. Natasha Edwin
  24. Lawrence E Feldman
  25. Daniel B Flora
  26. Christopher R Friese
  27. Matthew D Galsky
  28. Cyndi J Gonzalez
  29. Petros Grivas
  30. Shilpa Gupta
  31. Marcy Haynam
  32. Hannah Heilman
  33. Dawn L Hershman
  34. Clara Hwang
  35. Chinmay Jani
  36. Sachin R Jhawar
  37. Monika Joshi
  38. Virginia Kaklamani
  39. Elizabeth J Klein
  40. Natalie Knox
  41. Vadim S Koshkin
  42. Amit A Kulkarni
  43. Daniel H Kwon
  44. Chris Labaki
  45. Philip E Lammers
  46. Kate I Lathrop
  47. Mark A Lewis
  48. Xuanyi Li
  49. Gilbert de Lima Lopes
  50. Gary H Lyman
  51. Della F Makower
  52. Abdul-Hai Mansoor
  53. Merry-Jennifer Markham
  54. Sandeep H Mashru
  55. Rana R McKay
  56. Ian Messing
  57. Vasil Mico
  58. Rajani Nadkarni
  59. Swathi Namburi
  60. Ryan H Nguyen
  61. Taylor Kristian Nonato
  62. Tracey Lynn O'Connor
  63. Orestis A Panagiotou
  64. Kyu Park
  65. Jaymin M Patel
  66. Kanishka GopikaBimal Patel
  67. Jeffrey Peppercorn
  68. Hyma Polimera
  69. Matthew Puc
  70. Yuan James Rao
  71. Pedram Razavi
  72. Sonya A Reid
  73. Jonathan W Riess
  74. Donna R Rivera
  75. Mark Robson
  76. Suzanne J Rose
  77. Atlantis D Russ
  78. Lidia Schapira
  79. Pankil K Shah
  80. M Kelly Shanahan
  81. Lauren C Shapiro
  82. Melissa Smits
  83. Daniel G Stover
  84. Mitrianna Streckfuss
  85. Lisa Tachiki
  86. Michael A Thompson
  87. Sara M Tolaney
  88. Lisa B Weissmann
  89. Grace Wilson
  90. Michael T Wotman
  91. Elizabeth M Wulff-Burchfield
  92. Sanjay Mishra
  93. Benjamin French
  94. Jeremy L Warner
  95. Maryam B Lustberg
  96. Melissa K Accordino
  97. Dimpy P Shah  Is a corresponding author
  98. On behalf of the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
  1. Loma Linda University Cancer Center, United States
  2. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  3. University of Washington, United States
  4. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, United States
  5. Stanford University, United States
  6. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States
  7. Advanced Cancer Research Group, United States
  8. Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, United States
  9. University of Hawaii Cancer Center, United States
  10. University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, United States
  11. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, United States
  12. The University of Kansas Cancer Center, United States
  13. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States
  14. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, United States
  15. Loyola University Medical Center, United States
  16. Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, United States
  17. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, United States
  18. Northwest Medical Specialties, United States
  19. Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, United States
  20. Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, United States
  21. Inova Schar Cancer Institute, United States
  22. Mayo Clinic, United States
  23. ThedaCare Cancer Care, United States
  24. University of Illinois Hospital & Health Sciences System, United States
  25. St. Elizabeth Healthcare, United States
  26. Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, United States
  27. Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
  28. Cleveland Clinic, United States
  29. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States
  30. Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, United States
  31. Mount Auburn Hospital, United States
  32. Penn State Health St Joseph Cancer Center, United States
  33. Mays Cancer Center, The University of Texas Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
  34. Lifespan Cancer Institute, Brown University, United States
  35. Stritch School of Medicine, Loyola University, United States
  36. Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, United States
  37. Baptist Cancer Center, United States
  38. Intermountain Healthcare, United States
  39. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, United States
  40. Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
  41. Kaiser Permanente Northwest, United States
  42. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, United States
  43. Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, United States
  44. Division of Radiation Oncology, George Washington University, United States
  45. Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, United States
  46. Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, United States
  47. UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Davis, United States
  48. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  49. Virtua Health, United States
  50. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, United States
  51. Carl & Dorothy Bennett Cancer Center, Stamford Hospital, United States
  52. METAvivor, United States
  53. Aurora Cancer Care, Advocate Aurora Health, United States
  54. Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, United States

Peer review process

This article was accepted for publication as part of eLife's original publishing model.

Decision letter

  1. Jennifer Cullen
    Reviewing Editor; Case Western Reserve University, United States
  2. Eduardo L Franco
    Senior Editor; McGill University, Canada

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Clinical Characteristics, Racial Inequities, and Outcomes in Patients with Breast Cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Cohort Study" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by one peer reviewer who is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Senior Editor. The reviewer has opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewer and the editors have discussed the critique, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) Please address the impact that "long COVID" might have on study findings and implications.

2) Please discuss how this registry will be used to continue to monitor the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on cancer outcomes, including but not limited to breast cancer.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The current study leverages a unique and powerful consortium resource--the "COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19)" registry. This retrospective cohort study is a key study strength and has over 120 member institutions allowed researchers to examine the impact of cancer factors on COVID-19 infection severity.

The data provided are among the most robust data available to determine the associations between factors including prognostic factors, racial disparities, interventions, complications, and cancer treatment on COVID-19 severity. This study specifically focuses on adult women with either current breast cancer (BC) or a history of BC, as well as a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 from this CCC19 registry (n=1383 breast cancer cases out of 12,034 cancer cases total---an exploratory analysis of 25 male breast cancer cases is also described, separately).

The authors reveal several key findings, including that obesity was not observed to impact COVID-19 among these women. The study also provides compelling data in showing no association between anti-cancer treatments on COVID-19 severity. These findings have clear implications for treatment counseling and decision making for women with breast cancer who become COVID-19 infected.

Among study weaknesses and areas for alternative considerations, the follow-up period is still relatively short, given the recency of the pandemic. The authors should consider the possibility of "long COVID" in these patients and treatment effectiveness

Overall the study contributes confirmatory and novel information, utilizing a critical national registry effort. This registry can and should be used to continue to monitor the long term impact of COVID-19 infection on cancer outcomes, including but not limited to breast cancer.

These initial findings are quite compelling though the investigators should consider examining vaccination status and timing, booster status and timing, and longer-term follow up in the cohort. This is especially important in light of the possibility of "long COVID" for cancer patients.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82618.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) Please address the impact that "long COVID" might have on study findings and implications.

We agree with the reviewer that long COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC) in patients with cancer is a highly relevant public health problem and needs to be studied further. Long COVID was beyond the scope of our study aims since we focused only on outcomes of acute infection and presented these findings in the manuscript. While this study did not specifically look into long COVID, we conducted a separate preliminary analysis to examine PASC in patients with cancer using data from CCC19.* Patients with underlying comorbidities, worse ECOG PS, and more severe acute SARS-CoV-2 infection had higher rates of PASC and suffered more severe complications, and incurred worse outcomes; however, long-term follow-up with granular data in a larger sample are needed to make a conclusive statement about the impact of long COVID in patients with any type of cancer.

Reference: ASCO abstract for LongCOVID: DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18746 Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 16_suppl (June 01, 2022) e18746-e18746.

We have added the following sentence in the discussion/limitation section, “Given the largely unknown long-term impact of this novel virus, systematic examination of the post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in patients with breast and other cancer subtypes is warranted.”

2) Please discuss how this registry will be used to continue to monitor the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on cancer outcomes, including but not limited to breast cancer.

We are still collecting follow-up data on existing cases and will continue to monitor the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on cancer outcomes, including breast cancer. We are continually encouraging sites to keep contributing follow-up details, so that the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on cancer outcomes can be systematically monitored.

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

The current study leverages a unique and powerful consortium resource--the "COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19)" registry. This retrospective cohort study is a key study strength and has over 120 member institutions allowed researchers to examine the impact of cancer factors on COVID-19 infection severity.

The data provided are among the most robust data available to determine the associations between factors including prognostic factors, racial disparities, interventions, complications, and cancer treatment on COVID-19 severity. This study specifically focuses on adult women with either current breast cancer (BC) or a history of BC, as well as a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 from this CCC19 registry (n=1383 breast cancer cases out of 12,034 cancer cases total---an exploratory analysis of 25 male breast cancer cases is also described, separately).

The authors reveal several key findings, including that obesity was not observed to impact COVID-19 among these women. The study also provides compelling data in showing no association between anti-cancer treatments on COVID-19 severity. These findings have clear implications for treatment counseling and decision making for women with breast cancer who become COVID-19 infected.

We are grateful for the encouraging response by the reviewer. We agree that this is an important study with regards to its unique and vulnerable patient population facing an unprecedented crisis.

Among study weaknesses and areas for alternative considerations, the follow-up period is still relatively short, given the recency of the pandemic. The authors should consider the possibility of "long COVID" in these patients and treatment effectiveness

Overall the study contributes confirmatory and novel information, utilizing a critical national registry effort. This registry can and should be used to continue to monitor the long term impact of COVID-19 infection on cancer outcomes, including but not limited to breast cancer.

We agree with the reviewer. Due to the complete lack of information on the impact of acute infection in patients with Breast cancer, this study was urgently warranted. However, although out of scope for the current study, we acknowledge that the long-term impact of this novel virus in patients with cancer is largely unknown and this national registry should continue to follow-up with this cohort of patients.

These initial findings are quite compelling though the investigators should consider examining vaccination status and timing, booster status and timing, and longer-term follow up in the cohort. This is especially important in light of the possibility of "long COVID" for cancer patients.

Thank you for the thoughtful recommendation, and we agree with the reviewer. Vaccination status was not part of this study as vaccines were not available during the predominant time frame for this cohort and we have mentioned this in the Discussion section as a limitation. We also added a sentence mentioning the importance of studying long COVID in patients with cancer. “Given the largely unknown long-term impact of this novel virus, systematic examination of the post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 in patients with breast and other cancer subtypes is warranted.”

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82618.sa2

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Gayathri Nagaraj
  2. Shaveta Vinayak
  3. Ali Raza Khaki
  4. Tianyi Sun
  5. Nicole M Kuderer
  6. David M Aboulafia
  7. Jared D Acoba
  8. Joy Awosika
  9. Ziad Bakouny
  10. Nicole B Balmaceda
  11. Ting Bao
  12. Babar Bashir
  13. Stephanie Berg
  14. Mehmet A Bilen
  15. Poorva Bindal
  16. Sibel Blau
  17. Brianne E Bodin
  18. Hala T Borno
  19. Cecilia Castellano
  20. Horyun Choi
  21. John Deeken
  22. Aakash Desai
  23. Natasha Edwin
  24. Lawrence E Feldman
  25. Daniel B Flora
  26. Christopher R Friese
  27. Matthew D Galsky
  28. Cyndi J Gonzalez
  29. Petros Grivas
  30. Shilpa Gupta
  31. Marcy Haynam
  32. Hannah Heilman
  33. Dawn L Hershman
  34. Clara Hwang
  35. Chinmay Jani
  36. Sachin R Jhawar
  37. Monika Joshi
  38. Virginia Kaklamani
  39. Elizabeth J Klein
  40. Natalie Knox
  41. Vadim S Koshkin
  42. Amit A Kulkarni
  43. Daniel H Kwon
  44. Chris Labaki
  45. Philip E Lammers
  46. Kate I Lathrop
  47. Mark A Lewis
  48. Xuanyi Li
  49. Gilbert de Lima Lopes
  50. Gary H Lyman
  51. Della F Makower
  52. Abdul-Hai Mansoor
  53. Merry-Jennifer Markham
  54. Sandeep H Mashru
  55. Rana R McKay
  56. Ian Messing
  57. Vasil Mico
  58. Rajani Nadkarni
  59. Swathi Namburi
  60. Ryan H Nguyen
  61. Taylor Kristian Nonato
  62. Tracey Lynn O'Connor
  63. Orestis A Panagiotou
  64. Kyu Park
  65. Jaymin M Patel
  66. Kanishka GopikaBimal Patel
  67. Jeffrey Peppercorn
  68. Hyma Polimera
  69. Matthew Puc
  70. Yuan James Rao
  71. Pedram Razavi
  72. Sonya A Reid
  73. Jonathan W Riess
  74. Donna R Rivera
  75. Mark Robson
  76. Suzanne J Rose
  77. Atlantis D Russ
  78. Lidia Schapira
  79. Pankil K Shah
  80. M Kelly Shanahan
  81. Lauren C Shapiro
  82. Melissa Smits
  83. Daniel G Stover
  84. Mitrianna Streckfuss
  85. Lisa Tachiki
  86. Michael A Thompson
  87. Sara M Tolaney
  88. Lisa B Weissmann
  89. Grace Wilson
  90. Michael T Wotman
  91. Elizabeth M Wulff-Burchfield
  92. Sanjay Mishra
  93. Benjamin French
  94. Jeremy L Warner
  95. Maryam B Lustberg
  96. Melissa K Accordino
  97. Dimpy P Shah
  98. On behalf of the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium
(2023)
Clinical characteristics, racial inequities, and outcomes in patients with breast cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and cancer consortium (CCC19) cohort study
eLife 12:e82618.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82618

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82618