Silencing long-descending inter-enlargement propriospinal neurons improves hindlimb stepping after contusive spinal cord injuries

Abstract

Spinal locomotor circuitry is comprised of rhythm generating centers, one for each limb, that are interconnected by local and long-distance propriospinal neurons thought to carry temporal information necessary for interlimb coordination and gait control. We showed previously that conditional silencing of the long ascending propriospinal neurons (LAPNs) that project from the lumbar to the cervical rhythmogenic centers (L1/L2 to C6), disrupts right-left alternation of both the forelimbs and hindlimbs without significantly disrupting other fundamental aspects of interlimb and speed-dependent coordination (Pocratsky et al., 2020). Subsequently, we showed that silencing the LAPNs after a moderate thoracic contusive spinal cord injury (SCI) resulted in better recovered locomotor function (Shepard et al., 2021). In this research advance, we focus on the descending equivalent to the LAPNs, the long descending propriospinal neurons (LDPNs) that have cell bodies at C6 and terminals at L2. We found that conditional silencing of the LDPNs in the intact adult rat resulted in disrupted alternation of each limb pair (forelimbs and hindlimbs) and after a thoracic contusion SCI significantly improved locomotor function. These observations lead us to speculate that the LAPNs and LDPNs have similar roles in the exchange of temporal information between the cervical and lumbar rhythm generating centers, but that the partial disruption of the pathway after SCI limits the independent function of the lumbar circuitry. Silencing the LAPNs or LDPNs effectively permits or frees-up the lumbar circuitry to function independently.

Data availability

All source data for the main figures have been provided.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Courtney T Shepard

    Interdisciplinary Program in Translational Neuroscience, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Brandon L Brown

    Interdisciplinary Program in Translational Neuroscience, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Morgan A Van Rijswijck

    Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Rachel M Zalla

    Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Darlene A Burke

    Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Johnny R Morehouse

    Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Amberly S Riegler

    Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Scott R Whittemore

    Interdisciplinary Program in Translational Neuroscience, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6437-7200
  9. David SK Magnuson

    Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
    For correspondence
    dsmagn01@louisville.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3816-3676

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS112304-01)

  • Scott R Whittemore
  • David SK Magnuson

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS089324)

  • Scott R Whittemore
  • David SK Magnuson

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31 NS116935)

  • Brandon L Brown

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Christopher Cardozo, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#19644) of the University of Louisville. All surgery was performed under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia supplemented with isoflurane, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Version history

  1. Received: August 30, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: September 1, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: December 13, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 15, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: January 9, 2024 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Shepard et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 331
    views
  • 85
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Courtney T Shepard
  2. Brandon L Brown
  3. Morgan A Van Rijswijck
  4. Rachel M Zalla
  5. Darlene A Burke
  6. Johnny R Morehouse
  7. Amberly S Riegler
  8. Scott R Whittemore
  9. David SK Magnuson
(2023)
Silencing long-descending inter-enlargement propriospinal neurons improves hindlimb stepping after contusive spinal cord injuries
eLife 12:e82944.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82944

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82944

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jingjing Liu, Yuedong Wang ... Yao Tian
    Research Article

    Axon projection is a spatial- and temporal-specific process in which the growth cone receives environmental signals guiding axons to their final destination. However, the mechanisms underlying changes in axonal projection direction without well-defined landmarks remain elusive. Here, we present evidence showcasing the dynamic nature of axonal projections in Drosophila’s small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs). Our findings reveal that these axons undergo an initial vertical projection in the early larval stage, followed by a subsequent transition to a horizontal projection in the early-to-mid third instar larvae. The vertical projection of s-LNv axons correlates with mushroom body calyx expansion, while the s-LNv-expressed Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam1) interacts with Netrins to regulate the horizontal projection. During a specific temporal window, locally newborn dorsal clock neurons secrete Netrins, facilitating the transition of axonal projection direction in s-LNvs. Our study establishes a compelling in vivo model to probe the mechanisms of axonal projection direction switching in the absence of clear landmarks. These findings underscore the significance of dynamic local microenvironments in the complementary regulation of axonal projection direction transitions.

    1. Neuroscience
    David J Herzfeld
    Insight

    Abnormal activity in the cerebellar nuclei can be used to predict motor symptoms and induce them experimentally, pointing to potential therapeutic strategies.