A low-cost, open-source evolutionary bioreactor and its educational use

  1. Vishhvaan Gopalakrishnan
  2. Dena Crozier
  3. Kyle J Card
  4. Lacy D Chick
  5. Nikhil P Krishnan
  6. Erin McClure
  7. Julia Pelesko
  8. Drew FK Williamson
  9. Daniel Nichol
  10. Soumyajit Mandal
  11. Robert A. Bonomo
  12. Jacob G Scott  Is a corresponding author
  1. Cleveland Clinic, United States
  2. Hawken School, United States
  3. Case Western Reserve University, United States
  4. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  5. Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
  6. Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, United States

Abstract

A morbidostat is a bioreactor that uses antibiotics to control the growth of bacteria, making it well-suited for studying the evolution of antibiotic resistance. However, morbidostats are often too expensive to be used in educational settings. Here we present a low-cost morbidostat called the EVolutionary biorEactor (EVE) that can be built by students with minimal engineering and programming experience. We describe how we validated EVE in a real classroom setting by evolving replicate Escherichia coli populations under chloramphenicol challenge, thereby enabling students to learn about bacterial growth and antibiotic resistance.

Data availability

We provide the materials to build an EVE on our Github: https://github.com/vishhvaan/eve-pi. We have also included the data to generate figure 2 on the Github.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vishhvaan Gopalakrishnan

    Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0532-7710
  2. Dena Crozier

    Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1841-0011
  3. Kyle J Card

    Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0462-2777
  4. Lacy D Chick

    Hawken School, Gates Mills, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3059-4300
  5. Nikhil P Krishnan

    Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Erin McClure

    Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6604-1273
  7. Julia Pelesko

    Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Drew FK Williamson

    Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1745-8846
  9. Daniel Nichol

    Centre for Evolution and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2662-1836
  10. Soumyajit Mandal

    Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Robert A. Bonomo

    Department of Medicine, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jacob G Scott

    Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, United States
    For correspondence
    scottj10@ccf.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2971-7673

Funding

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,500
    views
  • 195
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vishhvaan Gopalakrishnan
  2. Dena Crozier
  3. Kyle J Card
  4. Lacy D Chick
  5. Nikhil P Krishnan
  6. Erin McClure
  7. Julia Pelesko
  8. Drew FK Williamson
  9. Daniel Nichol
  10. Soumyajit Mandal
  11. Robert A. Bonomo
  12. Jacob G Scott
(2022)
A low-cost, open-source evolutionary bioreactor and its educational use
eLife 11:e83067.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83067

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Rebecca D Tarvin, Jeffrey L Coleman ... Richard W Fitch
    Research Article

    Understanding the origins of novel, complex phenotypes is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae have evolved the novel ability to acquire alkaloids from their diet for chemical defense at least three times. However, taxon sampling for alkaloids has been biased towards colorful species, without similar attention paid to inconspicuous ones that are often assumed to be undefended. As a result, our understanding of how chemical defense evolved in this group is incomplete. Here, we provide new data showing that, in contrast to previous studies, species from each undefended poison frog clade have measurable yet low amounts of alkaloids. We confirm that undefended dendrobatids regularly consume mites and ants, which are known sources of alkaloids. Thus, our data suggest that diet is insufficient to explain the defended phenotype. Our data support the existence of a phenotypic intermediate between toxin consumption and sequestration — passive accumulation — that differs from sequestration in that it involves no derived forms of transport and storage mechanisms yet results in low levels of toxin accumulation. We discuss the concept of passive accumulation and its potential role in the origin of chemical defenses in poison frogs and other toxin-sequestering organisms. In light of ideas from pharmacokinetics, we incorporate new and old data from poison frogs into an evolutionary model that could help explain the origins of acquired chemical defenses in animals and provide insight into the molecular processes that govern the fate of ingested toxins.

    1. Computational and Systems Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Pierre Barrat-Charlaix, Richard A Neher
    Research Article

    As pathogens spread in a population of hosts, immunity is built up, and the pool of susceptible individuals are depleted. This generates selective pressure, to which many human RNA viruses, such as influenza virus or SARS-CoV-2, respond with rapid antigenic evolution and frequent emergence of immune evasive variants. However, the host’s immune systems adapt, and older immune responses wane, such that escape variants only enjoy a growth advantage for a limited time. If variant growth dynamics and reshaping of host-immunity operate on comparable time scales, viral adaptation is determined by eco-evolutionary interactions that are not captured by models of rapid evolution in a fixed environment. Here, we use a Susceptible/Infected model to describe the interaction between an evolving viral population in a dynamic but immunologically diverse host population. We show that depending on strain cross-immunity, heterogeneity of the host population, and durability of immune responses, escape variants initially grow exponentially, but lose their growth advantage before reaching high frequencies. Their subsequent dynamics follows an anomalous random walk determined by future escape variants and results in variant trajectories that are unpredictable. This model can explain the apparent contradiction between the clearly adaptive nature of antigenic evolution and the quasi-neutral dynamics of high-frequency variants observed for influenza viruses.