Allorecognition: Knowing friend from foe

How does a protein at the cell wall determine if a newly encountered fungus is safe to fuse with?
  1. Magnus Hallas-Møller
  2. Katja S Johansen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Copenhagen University, Denmark

Many multicellular organisms have mechanisms in place that allow them to detect which cells belong to them, and which cells are from another organism. Being able to discriminate self from non-self, known as allorecognition, is vital for the sustainability of life. For instance, our immune system uses this mechanism to identify and attack non-self cells and tissues, which is why our bodies sometimes reject transplanted organs donated from someone else (Callemeyn et al., 2022).

Filamentous fungi – which are made up of microscopic thread-like structures called hypha – also rely on allorecognition to decide what to do when they come across hyphae from other fungi. Merging with other hyphae would allow the fungus to expand its network and access more resources that may benefit its survival. However, before this can happen, the fungus uses allorecognition to determine if a newly encountered hypha is safe to fuse to.

In the fungus Neurospora crassa, this process of allorecognition involves three checkpoints (Gonçalves et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2015). First, the hyphae release chemical signals that attract fusion compatible hyphae (Heller et al., 2016). Second, two proteins called CWR-1 and CWR-2 determine whether the cell wall surrounding the hyphae will dissolve so the cells can merge their membranes and mix their cytoplasmic content (Gonçalves et al., 2019). Once the fungi fuse, final checks are carried out, with the failure of these tests triggering the death of the newly joined hypha. Now, in eLife, Louise Glass and co-workers from the University of California, Berkeley – including Tyler Detomasi and Adriana Rico-Ramírez as joint first authors – report new insights into how the CWR-1 protein regulates the second checkpoint of allorecognition (Detomasi et al., 2022).

N. crassa have different versions, or alleles, of the genes that encode CWR-1 and CWR-2, and these can be divided in to six different ‘haplogroups’ based on their degree of similarity (Gonçalves et al., 2019). Only N. crassa with CWR-1 and CWR-2 proteins from the same haplogroup can fuse: if the gene for CWR-1 in one hypha is in a different haplogroup to the gene for CWR-2 in the other, their cells walls will remain intact and their membranes will not merge (Figure 1). This shows that variations in these two proteins determine whether or not hyphae are compatible for fusion.

The second checkpoint of allorecognition in filamentous fungi.

When hyphae from two distinct fungi come into contact, a series of checkpoints are initiated to make sure the fungi are genetically compatible. The second stage of this allorecognition process is regulated by two proteins at the cell wall called CWR-1 and CWR-2. If the two hyphae contain CWR-1 and CWR-2 proteins from the same haplogroup (left), the hyphae dissolve their cells walls, merge their membranes, and mix their cytoplasmic content together. This allows the fungi to expand their network of interconnected hyphae (bottom panel). If the two hyphae contain CWR-1 and CWR-2 proteins from different haplogroups (right), the cell wall does not dissolve and the genetically incompatible hyphae cannot proceed with fusion.

Image credit: Henning Dalhoff.

Using well-established methods, Detomasi et al. revealed that the CWR-1 protein is part of a family of copper-containing enzymes called lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases, or LPMOs for short. Similar to LPMOs found in other fungal species, the CWR-1 proteins from all six haplogroups degrade the polysaccharide chitin, a long-chain carbohydrate that maintains the structure of the cell wall and helps anchor other cell wall components in place (Brown et al., 2019). This enzymatic activity depends on the copper in the protein, which is coordinated by two amino acids in what is known known as a histidine brace (Ipsen et al., 2021). Surprisingly, Detomasi et al. found that mutating the histidine brace of CWR-1 did not stop N. crassa strains from exhibiting normal allorecognition and only fusing with genetically compatible fungi, despite the enzyme being inactive.

Through a series of clever genetic mutations, Detomasi et al. found that CWR-1 does not need its enzymatic activity or the domains of the protein that bind to chitin to carry out its role in allorecognition. It does, however, require its catalytic domain. Further mutations showed that modifying regions in the catalytic domain of CWR-1 that are predicted to interact with chitin (but are not responsible for the protein’s enzymatic activity) altered which N. crassa strains could fuse their hyphae together. This suggests that these sections of the CWR-1 protein confer the allele specificity needed for cells to pass the second checkpoint of allorecognition.

To our knowledge, this is the first time a LPMO protein has been shown to have a function that does not involve the degradation of polysaccharides. However, LPMO-like proteins which do not catalyze the breakdown of carbohydrates have been found in other fungal species (Garcia-Santamarina et al., 2020; Labourel et al., 2020). While these proteins look like LMPOs based on their amino acid sequence, a closer inspection reveals that their copper-binding sites are slightly different than expected. These LPMO-like proteins have been shown to be important for copper import in the fungal species Cryptococcus neoformans, and for establishing a symbiosis relationship between the fungus Laccaria bicolor and plant roots.

This work is a major step towards understanding allorecognition in fungi, but several questions remain. As Detomasi et al. point out, future work is needed to probe how CWR-1 and CWR-2 mechanically block cell fusion. Furthermore, it is still unclear if and how CWR-1, which binds to chitin in the cell wall, gets in to contact with the CWR-2 protein on the membrane of the neighboring hypha despite there being two layers of cell wall between them. Finally, while initial investigations suggest that the CWR-1/CWR-2 model likely occurs in other species (Gonçalves et al., 2019), it is still uncertain how widespread this mechanism is across the fungal kingdom.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Magnus Hallas-Møller

    Magnus Hallas-Møller is in the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0900-2315
  2. Katja S Johansen

    Katja S Johansen is in the Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark

    For correspondence
    ksj@ign.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7587-5990

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: October 7, 2022 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2022, Hallas-Møller and Johansen

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 473
    Page views
  • 80
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Magnus Hallas-Møller
  2. Katja S Johansen
(2022)
Allorecognition: Knowing friend from foe
eLife 11:e83121.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83121

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Pianpian Zhao, Zhifeng Sheng ... Hou-Feng Zheng
    Research Article

    The ‘diabetic bone paradox’ suggested that type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients would have higher areal bone mineral density (BMD) but higher fracture risk than individuals without T2D. In this study, we found that the genetically predicted T2D was associated with higher BMD and lower risk of fracture in both weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. We also identified ten genomic loci shared between T2D and fracture, with the top signal at SNP rs4580892 in the intron of gene RSPO3. And the higher expression in adipose subcutaneous and higher protein level in plasma of RSPO3 were associated with increased risk of T2D, but decreased risk of fracture. In the prospective study, T2D was observed to be associated with higher risk of fracture, but BMI mediated 30.2% of the protective effect. However, when stratified by the T2D-related risk factors for fracture, we observed that the effect of T2D on the risk of fracture decreased when the number of T2D-related risk factors decreased, and the association became non-significant if the T2D patients carried none of the risk factors. In conclusion, the genetically determined T2D might not be associated with higher risk of fracture. And the shared genetic architecture between T2D and fracture suggested a top signal around RSPO3 gene. The observed effect size of T2D on fracture risk decreased if the T2D-related risk factors could be eliminated. Therefore, it is important to manage the complications of T2D to prevent the risk of fracture.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Songyuan Wu, Xiaoling Tong ... Fangyin Dai
    Research Article

    The color pattern of insects is one of the most diverse adaptive evolutionary phenotypes. However, the molecular regulation of this color pattern is not fully understood. In this study, we found that the transcription factor Bm-mamo is responsible for black dilute (bd) allele mutations in the silkworm. Bm-mamo belongs to the BTB zinc finger family and is orthologous to mamo in Drosophila melanogaster. This gene has a conserved function in gamete production in Drosophila and silkworms and has evolved a pleiotropic function in the regulation of color patterns in caterpillars. Using RNAi and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology, we showed that Bm-mamo is a repressor of dark melanin patterns in the larval epidermis. Using in vitro binding assays and gene expression profiling in wild-type and mutant larvae, we also showed that Bm-mamo likely regulates the expression of related pigment synthesis and cuticular protein genes in a coordinated manner to mediate its role in color pattern formation. This mechanism is consistent with the dual role of this transcription factor in regulating both the structure and shape of the cuticle and the pigments that are embedded within it. This study provides new insight into the regulation of color patterns as well as into the construction of more complex epidermal features in some insects.