Effects of smoking on genome-wide DNA methylation profiles: A study of discordant and concordant monozygotic twin pairs

  1. Jenny van Dongen  Is a corresponding author
  2. Gonneke Willemsen
  3. BIOS Consortium
  4. Eco JC de Geus
  5. Dorret I Boomsma
  6. Michael C Neale
  1. VU Amsterdam, Netherlands
  2. Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

Abstract

Background: Smoking-associated DNA methylation levels identified through epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) are generally ascribed to smoking-reactive mechanisms, but the contribution of a shared genetic predisposition to smoking and DNA methylation levels is typically not accounted for.

Methods: We exploited a strong within-family design, i.e., the discordant monozygotic twin design, to study reactiveness of DNA methylation in blood cells to smoking and reversibility of methylation patterns upon quitting smoking. Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip data were available for 769 monozygotic twin pairs (mean age=36 years,range=18-78, 70% female), including pairs discordant or concordant for current or former smoking.

Results: In pairs discordant for current smoking, 13 differentially methylated CpGs were found between current smoking twins and their genetically identical co-twin who never smoked. Top sites include multiple CpGs in CACNA1D and GNG12, which encode subunits of a calcium voltage-gated channel and G protein, respectively. These proteins interact with the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, suggesting that methylation levels at these CpGs might be reactive to nicotine exposure. All 13 CpGs have been previously associated with smoking in unrelated individuals and data from monozygotic pairs discordant for former smoking indicated that methylation patterns are to a large extent reversible upon smoking cessation. We further showed that differences in smoking level exposure for monozygotic twins who are both current smokers but differ in the number of cigarettes they smoke are reflected in their DNA methylation profiles.

Conclusions: In conclusion, by analysing data from monozygotic twins, we robustly demonstrate that DNA methylation level in human blood cells is reactive to cigarette smoking.

Funding: We acknowledge funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse grant DA049867, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO): Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure (BBMRI–NL, NWO 184.033.111) and the BBRMI-NL-financed BIOS Consortium (NWO 184.021.007), NWO Large Scale infrastructures X-Omics (184.034.019), Genotype/phenotype database for behavior genetic and genetic epidemiological studies (ZonMw Middelgroot 911-09-032); Netherlands Twin Registry Repository: researching the interplay between genome and environment (NWO-Groot 480-15-001/674); the Avera Institute, Sioux Falls (USA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH R01 HD042157-01A1, MH081802, Grand Opportunity grants 1RC2 MH089951 and 1RC2 MH089995); epigenetic data were generated at the Human Genomics Facility (HuGe-F) at ErasmusMC Rotterdam. Cotinine assaying was sponsored by the Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam. DIB acknowledges the Royal Netherlands Academy of Science Professor Award (PAH/6635).

Data availability

The HumanMethylation450 BeadChip data from the NTR are available as part of the Biobank-based Integrative Omics Studies (BIOS) Consortium in the European Genome phenome Archive (EGA), under the accession code EGAD00010000887. They are also available upon request via the BBMRI-NL BIOS consortium (https://www.bbmri.nl/acquisition-use-analyze/bios). All NTR data can be requested by bona fida researchers (https://ntr-data-request.psy.vu.nl/). Because of the consent given by study participants the data cannot be made publicly available.The pipeline for DNA methylation-array analysis developed by the Biobank-based Integrative Omics Study (BIOS) consortium is available here: https://molepi.github.io/DNAmArray_workflow/ (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3355292). The code for the EWAS analysis in monozygotic twin pairs is included in additional file 9

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jenny van Dongen

    Department of Biological Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    j.van.dongen@vu.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2063-8741
  2. Gonneke Willemsen

    Department of Biological Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. BIOS Consortium

  4. Eco JC de Geus

    Department of Biological Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Dorret I Boomsma

    Department of Biological Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael C Neale

    Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA049867)

  • Michael C Neale

ZonMw (NWO-Groot 480-15-001/674)

  • Gonneke Willemsen
  • Eco JC de Geus

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Melinda Aldrich, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was approved by the Central Ethics Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects of the VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, an Institutional Review Board certified by the U.S. Office of Human Research Protections (IRB number IRB00002991 under Federal-wide Assurance- FWA00017598; IRB/institute codes, NTR 03-180).

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: August 19, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: September 6, 2022
  3. Accepted: August 8, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 10, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: September 14, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, van Dongen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,249
    views
  • 191
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jenny van Dongen
  2. Gonneke Willemsen
  3. BIOS Consortium
  4. Eco JC de Geus
  5. Dorret I Boomsma
  6. Michael C Neale
(2023)
Effects of smoking on genome-wide DNA methylation profiles: A study of discordant and concordant monozygotic twin pairs
eLife 12:e83286.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83286

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83286

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Xiaoxin Yu, Roger S Zoh ... David B Allison
    Review Article

    We discuss 12 misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes concerning the use of covariates in observational or nonrandomized research. Additionally, we offer advice to help investigators, editors, reviewers, and readers make more informed decisions about conducting and interpreting research where the influence of covariates may be at issue. We primarily address misperceptions in the context of statistical management of the covariates through various forms of modeling, although we also emphasize design and model or variable selection. Other approaches to addressing the effects of covariates, including matching, have logical extensions from what we discuss here but are not dwelled upon heavily. The misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes we discuss include accurate representation of covariates, effects of measurement error, overreliance on covariate categorization, underestimation of power loss when controlling for covariates, misinterpretation of significance in statistical models, and misconceptions about confounding variables, selecting on a collider, and p value interpretations in covariate-inclusive analyses. This condensed overview serves to correct common errors and improve research quality in general and in nutrition research specifically.

    1. Ecology
    2. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Emilia Johnson, Reuben Sunil Kumar Sharma ... Kimberly Fornace
    Research Article

    Zoonotic disease dynamics in wildlife hosts are rarely quantified at macroecological scales due to the lack of systematic surveys. Non-human primates (NHPs) host Plasmodium knowlesi, a zoonotic malaria of public health concern and the main barrier to malaria elimination in Southeast Asia. Understanding of regional P. knowlesi infection dynamics in wildlife is limited. Here, we systematically assemble reports of NHP P. knowlesi and investigate geographic determinants of prevalence in reservoir species. Meta-analysis of 6322 NHPs from 148 sites reveals that prevalence is heterogeneous across Southeast Asia, with low overall prevalence and high estimates for Malaysian Borneo. We find that regions exhibiting higher prevalence in NHPs overlap with human infection hotspots. In wildlife and humans, parasite transmission is linked to land conversion and fragmentation. By assembling remote sensing data and fitting statistical models to prevalence at multiple spatial scales, we identify novel relationships between P. knowlesi in NHPs and forest fragmentation. This suggests that higher prevalence may be contingent on habitat complexity, which would begin to explain observed geographic variation in parasite burden. These findings address critical gaps in understanding regional P. knowlesi epidemiology and indicate that prevalence in simian reservoirs may be a key spatial driver of human spillover risk.