Reevaluation of Piezo1 as a gut RNA sensor

  1. Alec R Nickolls
  2. Gabrielle S O'Brien
  3. Sarah Shnayder
  4. Yunxiao Zhang
  5. Maximilian Nagel
  6. Ardem Patapoutian
  7. Alexander Theodore Chesler  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institutes of Health, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Scripps Research Institute, United States

Abstract

Piezo1 is a stretch-gated ion channel required for mechanosensation in many organ systems. Recent findings point to a new role for Piezo1 in the gut, suggesting that it is a sensor of microbial single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) rather than mechanical force. If true, this would redefine the scope of Piezo biology. Here, we sought to replicate the central finding that fecal ssRNA is a natural agonist of Piezo1. While we observe that fecal extracts and ssRNA can stimulate calcium influx in certain cell lines, this response is independent of Piezo1. Additionally, sterilized dietary extracts devoid of gut biome RNA show similar cell line-specific stimulatory activity to fecal extracts. Together, our data highlight potential confounds inherent to gut-derived extracts, exclude Piezo1 as a receptor for ssRNA in the gut, and support a dedicated role for Piezo channels in mechanosensing.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Sequencing data have been deposited on the GEO website.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alec R Nickolls

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Gabrielle S O'Brien

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sarah Shnayder

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yunxiao Zhang

    Department of Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Maximilian Nagel

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Ardem Patapoutian

    Department of Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0726-7034
  7. Alexander Theodore Chesler

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    alexander.chesler@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    Alexander Theodore Chesler, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3131-0728

Funding

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (Intramural funds)

  • Alexander Theodore Chesler

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Intramural funds)

  • Alexander Theodore Chesler

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (Intramural funds)

  • Alexander Theodore Chesler

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Ardem Patapoutian

National Institutes of Health (R35 NS105067)

  • Ardem Patapoutian

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Jon T Sack, University of California Davis School of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#1365) of the NINDS-IRP.

Version history

  1. Received: September 8, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: September 24, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: November 15, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: November 16, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: November 24, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,853
    views
  • 239
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alec R Nickolls
  2. Gabrielle S O'Brien
  3. Sarah Shnayder
  4. Yunxiao Zhang
  5. Maximilian Nagel
  6. Ardem Patapoutian
  7. Alexander Theodore Chesler
(2022)
Reevaluation of Piezo1 as a gut RNA sensor
eLife 11:e83346.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83346

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83346

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Bohan Zhu, Richard I Ainsworth ... Javier González-Maeso
    Research Article

    Genome-wide association studies have revealed >270 loci associated with schizophrenia risk, yet these genetic factors do not seem to be sufficient to fully explain the molecular determinants behind this psychiatric condition. Epigenetic marks such as post-translational histone modifications remain largely plastic during development and adulthood, allowing a dynamic impact of environmental factors, including antipsychotic medications, on access to genes and regulatory elements. However, few studies so far have profiled cell-specific genome-wide histone modifications in postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia subjects, or the effect of antipsychotic treatment on such epigenetic marks. Here, we conducted ChIP-seq analyses focusing on histone marks indicative of active enhancers (H3K27ac) and active promoters (H3K4me3), alongside RNA-seq, using frontal cortex samples from antipsychotic-free (AF) and antipsychotic-treated (AT) individuals with schizophrenia, as well as individually matched controls (n=58). Schizophrenia subjects exhibited thousands of neuronal and non-neuronal epigenetic differences at regions that included several susceptibility genetic loci, such as NRG1, DISC1, and DRD3. By analyzing the AF and AT cohorts separately, we identified schizophrenia-associated alterations in specific transcription factors, their regulatees, and epigenomic and transcriptomic features that were reversed by antipsychotic treatment; as well as those that represented a consequence of antipsychotic medication rather than a hallmark of schizophrenia in postmortem human brain samples. Notably, we also found that the effect of age on epigenomic landscapes was more pronounced in frontal cortex of AT-schizophrenics, as compared to AF-schizophrenics and controls. Together, these data provide important evidence of epigenetic alterations in the frontal cortex of individuals with schizophrenia, and remark for the first time on the impact of age and antipsychotic treatment on chromatin organization.

    1. Neuroscience
    Katharina Eichler, Stefanie Hampel ... Andrew M Seeds
    Research Advance

    Mechanosensory neurons located across the body surface respond to tactile stimuli and elicit diverse behavioral responses, from relatively simple stimulus location-aimed movements to complex movement sequences. How mechanosensory neurons and their postsynaptic circuits influence such diverse behaviors remains unclear. We previously discovered that Drosophila perform a body location-prioritized grooming sequence when mechanosensory neurons at different locations on the head and body are simultaneously stimulated by dust (Hampel et al., 2017; Seeds et al., 2014). Here, we identify nearly all mechanosensory neurons on the Drosophila head that individually elicit aimed grooming of specific head locations, while collectively eliciting a whole head grooming sequence. Different tracing methods were used to reconstruct the projections of these neurons from different locations on the head to their distinct arborizations in the brain. This provides the first synaptic resolution somatotopic map of a head, and defines the parallel-projecting mechanosensory pathways that elicit head grooming.