1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

Conserved allosteric inhibition mechanism in SLC1 transporters

  1. Yang Dong
  2. Jiali Wang
  3. Rachel-Ann Garibsingh
  4. Keino Hutchinson
  5. Yueyue Shi
  6. Gilad Eisenberg
  7. Xiaozhen Yu
  8. Avner Schlessinger  Is a corresponding author
  9. Christof Grewer  Is a corresponding author
  1. Binghamton University, United States
  2. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83464
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Yang Dong
  2. Jiali Wang
  3. Rachel-Ann Garibsingh
  4. Keino Hutchinson
  5. Yueyue Shi
  6. Gilad Eisenberg
  7. Xiaozhen Yu
  8. Avner Schlessinger
  9. Christof Grewer
(2023)
Conserved allosteric inhibition mechanism in SLC1 transporters
eLife 12:e83464.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83464
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Excitatory Amino Acid Transporter 1 (EAAT1) is a plasma-membrane glutamate transporter belonging to the SLC1 family of solute carriers . It plays a key role in neurotransmitter transport and contributes to the regulation of the extracellular glutamate concentration in the mammalian brain. The structure of EAAT1 was determined in complex with UCPH-101, a highly potent and non-competitive inhibitor of EAAT1. Alanine Serine Cysteine Transporter 2 (ASCT2) is a neutral amino acid transporter, which regulates pools of amino acids such as glutamine, serine and alanine between intracellular and extracellular compartments in a Na+ dependent manner. ASCT2 also belongs to the SLC1 family and shares 58% sequence similarity with EAAT1. However, allosteric modulation of ASCT2 via non-competitive inhibitors is unknown. Here we explore the UCPH-101 inhibitory mechanisms of EAAT1 and ASCT2 by using rapid kinetic experiments. Our results show that UCPH-101 slows substrate translocation rather than substrate or Na+ binding, confirming a non-competitive inhibitory mechanism, but only partially inhibits wild-type ASCT2 with relatively low affinity. Guided by computational modeling using ligand docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we selected two residues involved in UCPH-101/EAAT1 interaction, which were mutated in ASCT2 (F136Y, I237M, F136Y/I237M) in the corresponding positions. We show that in the F136Y/I237M double mutant transporter, 100% of the inhibitory effect of UCPH-101 on anion current could be restored, and the apparent affinity was increased (Ki = 9.3 mM), much closer to the EAAT1 value of 0.6 mM. Finally, we identify a novel non-competitive ASCT2 inhibitor, identified through virtual screening and experimental testing against the allosteric site, further supporting its localization. Together, these data indicate that the mechanism of allosteric modulation is conserved between EAAT1 and ASCT2. Due to the difference in binding site residues between ASCT2 and EAAT1, these results raise the possibility that more potent, and potentially selective inhibitors can be designed that target the ASCT2 allosteric binding site.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. The original, source data files were uploaded as spreadsheets for figures 3-10, Table 1, and Figure supplements 3,4,5,6 and 9. The MD parametrization files for UCPH-101 are also included.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Yang Dong

    Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, Binghamton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  2. Jiali Wang

    Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, Binghamton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9520-8140

  3. Rachel-Ann Garibsingh

    Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Ney York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  4. Keino Hutchinson

    Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Yueyue Shi

    Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, Binghamton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Gilad Eisenberg

    Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, Binghamton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Xiaozhen Yu

    Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, Binghamton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Avner Schlessinger

    Department of Pharmacological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    avner.schlessinger@mssm.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4007-7814

  9. Christof Grewer

    Department of Chemistry, Binghamton University, Binghamton, United States
    For correspondence
    cgrewer@binghamton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8342-9878

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM108911)

  • Avner Schlessinger
  • Christof Grewer

National Institutes of Health (T32 CA078207)

  • Rachel-Ann Garibsingh

National Institutes of Health (R15 GM135843-01)

  • Christof Grewer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Dong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,329
    views
  • 238
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Yang Dong
  2. Jiali Wang
  3. Rachel-Ann Garibsingh
  4. Keino Hutchinson
  5. Yueyue Shi
  6. Gilad Eisenberg
  7. Xiaozhen Yu
  8. Avner Schlessinger
  9. Christof Grewer
(2023)
Conserved allosteric inhibition mechanism in SLC1 transporters
eLife 12:e83464.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83464

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83464

Categories and tags

Research organisms

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Unanticipated mechanisms of covalent inhibitor and synthetic ligand cobinding to PPARγ

    Jinsai Shang, Douglas J Kojetin
    Research Advance

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Isobaric crosslinking mass spectrometry technology for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and complexes

    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Structure of scavenger receptor SCARF1 and its interaction with lipoproteins

    Yuanyuan Wang, Fan Xu ... Yongning He
    Research Article

    SCARF1 (scavenger receptor class F member 1, SREC-1 or SR-F1) is a type I transmembrane protein that recognizes multiple endogenous and exogenous ligands such as modified low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and is important for maintaining homeostasis and immunity. But the structural information and the mechanisms of ligand recognition of SCARF1 are largely unavailable. Here, we solve the crystal structures of the N-terminal fragments of human SCARF1, which show that SCARF1 forms homodimers and its epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains adopt a long-curved conformation. Then, we examine the interactions of SCARF1 with lipoproteins and are able to identify a region on SCARF1 for recognizing modified LDLs. The mutagenesis data show that the positively charged residues in the region are crucial for the interaction of SCARF1 with modified LDLs, which is confirmed by making chimeric molecules of SCARF1 and SCARF2. In addition, teichoic acids, a cell wall polymer expressed on the surface of gram-positive bacteria, are able to inhibit the interactions of modified LDLs with SCARF1, suggesting the ligand binding sites of SCARF1 might be shared for some of its scavenging targets. Overall, these results provide mechanistic insights into SCARF1 and its interactions with the ligands, which are important for understanding its physiological roles in homeostasis and the related diseases.