Genetic dissection of mutual interference between two consecutive learning tasks in Drosophila

  1. Jianjian Zhao
  2. Xuchen Zhang
  3. Bohan Zhao
  4. Wantong Hu
  5. Tongxin Diao
  6. Liyuan Wang
  7. Yi Zhong
  8. Qian Li  Is a corresponding author
  1. Tsinghua University, China
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, United States
  3. Scripps Research Institute, United States

Abstract

Animals can continuously learn different tasks to adapt to changing environments and therefore have strategies to effectively cope with inter-task interference, including both proactive interference (Pro-I) and retroactive interference (Retro-I). Many biological mechanisms are known to contribute to learning, memory, and forgetting for a single task, however, mechanisms involved only when learning sequential different tasks are relatively poorly understood. Here, we dissect the respective molecular mechanisms of Pro-I and Retro-I between two consecutive associative learning tasks in Drosophila. Pro-I is more sensitive to inter-task interval (ITI) than Retro-I. They occur together at short ITI (<20 min), while only Retro-I remains significant at ITI beyond 20 min. Acutely overexpressing Corkscrew (CSW), an evolutionarily conserved protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2, in mushroom body (MB) neurons reduces Pro-I, whereas acute knockdown of CSW exacerbates Pro-I. Such function of CSW is further found to rely on the γ subset of MB neurons and the downstream Raf/MAPK pathway. In contrast, manipulating CSW does not affect Retro-I as well as a single learning task. Interestingly, manipulation of Rac1, a molecule that regulates Retro-I, does not affect Pro-I. Thus, our findings suggest that learning different tasks consecutively triggers distinct molecular mechanisms to tune proactive and retroactive interference.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jianjian Zhao

    School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xuchen Zhang

    Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Bohan Zhao

    Department of Neuroscience, Scripps Research Institute, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9177-1278
  4. Wantong Hu

    School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Tongxin Diao

    School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Liyuan Wang

    School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Yi Zhong

    School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7927-5976
  8. Qian Li

    School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    For correspondence
    liqian8@tsinghua.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7317-1570

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31970955)

  • Qian Li

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32021002)

  • Yi Zhong

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Zhao et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,115
    views
  • 229
    downloads
  • 1
    citation

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jianjian Zhao
  2. Xuchen Zhang
  3. Bohan Zhao
  4. Wantong Hu
  5. Tongxin Diao
  6. Liyuan Wang
  7. Yi Zhong
  8. Qian Li
(2023)
Genetic dissection of mutual interference between two consecutive learning tasks in Drosophila
eLife 12:e83516.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83516

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83516