Abstract

Differentiation of B cells into antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) is a key process to generate protective humoral immunity. A detailed understanding of the cues controlling ASC differentiation is important to devise strategies to modulate antibody formation. Here, we dissected differentiation trajectories of human naive B cells into ASCs using single-cell RNA sequencing. By comparing transcriptomes of B cells at different stages of differentiation from an in vitro model with ex vivo B cells and ASCs, we uncovered a novel pre-ASC population present ex vivo in lymphoid tissues. For the first time, a germinal-center-like population is identified in vitro from human naive B cells and possibly progresses into a memory B cell population through an alternative route of differentiation, thus recapitulating in vivo human GC reactions. Our work allows further detailed characterization of human B cell differentiation into ASCs or memory B cells in both healthy and diseased conditions.

Data availability

All raw fastq files and digital gene expression matrixes (DGE) are available at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository under accession no. GSE214265.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Niels JM Verstegen

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5732-4979
  2. Sabrina Pollastro

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0950-7583
  3. Peter-Paul A Unger

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Casper Marsman

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. George Elias

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8419-9544
  6. Tineke Jorritsma

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Marij Streutker

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. kevin bassler

    Genomics and Immunoregulation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4780-372X
  9. Kristian Haendler

    Genomics and Immunoregulation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Theo Rispens

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Joachim L Schultze

    Genomics and Immunoregulation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Anja ten Brinke

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Marc Beyer

    Genomics and Immunoregulation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Marieke SM van Ham

    Department of Immunopathology, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    m.vanham@sanquin.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1999-9494

Funding

LSBR (1609)

  • Marieke SM van Ham

PPOC (17-34/ L2263)

  • Marieke SM van Ham

German research foundation (272482170)

  • Marc Beyer

German research foundation (SFB1454-432325352)

  • Marc Beyer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All the healthy donors provided written informed consent following the protocol of the local institutional review board, the Medical Ethics Committee of Sanquin Blood Supply, and conforms to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Copyright

© 2023, Verstegen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 5,201
    views
  • 705
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Niels JM Verstegen
  2. Sabrina Pollastro
  3. Peter-Paul A Unger
  4. Casper Marsman
  5. George Elias
  6. Tineke Jorritsma
  7. Marij Streutker
  8. kevin bassler
  9. Kristian Haendler
  10. Theo Rispens
  11. Joachim L Schultze
  12. Anja ten Brinke
  13. Marc Beyer
  14. Marieke SM van Ham
(2023)
Single-cell analysis reveals dynamics of human B cell differentiation and identifies novel B and antibody-secreting cell intermediates
eLife 12:e83578.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83578

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83578

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yue Miao, Yongtao Du ... Mei Ding
    Research Article

    The spatiotemporal transition of small GTPase Rab5 to Rab7 is crucial for early-to-late endosome maturation, yet the precise mechanism governing Rab5-to-Rab7 switching remains elusive. USP8, a ubiquitin-specific protease, plays a prominent role in the endosomal sorting of a wide range of transmembrane receptors and is a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we identified that USP8 is recruited to Rab5-positive carriers by Rabex5, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rab5. The recruitment of USP8 dissociates Rabex5 from early endosomes (EEs) and meanwhile promotes the recruitment of the Rab7 GEF SAND-1/Mon1. In USP8-deficient cells, the level of active Rab5 is increased, while the Rab7 signal is decreased. As a result, enlarged EEs with abundant intraluminal vesicles accumulate and digestive lysosomes are rudimentary. Together, our results reveal an important and unexpected role of a deubiquitinating enzyme in endosome maturation.