Abstract

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a blood cancer characterized by dysregulated production of maturing myeloid cells driven by the product of the Philadelphia chromosome, the BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have proved effective in treating CML but there is still a cohort of patients who do not respond to TKI therapy even in the absence of mutations in the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain that mediate drug resistance. To discover novel strategies to improve TKI therapy in CML, we developed a nonlinear mathematical model of CML hematopoiesis that incorporates feedback control and lineage branching. Cell-cell interactions were constrained using an automated model selection method together with previous observations and new in vivo data from a chimeric BCR-ABL1 transgenic mouse model of CML. The resulting quantitative model captures the dynamics of normal and CML cells at various stages of the disease and exhibits variable responses to TKI treatment, consistent with those of CML patients. The model predicts that an increase in the proportion of CML stem cells in the bone marrow would decrease the tendency of the disease to respond to TKI therapy, in concordance with clinical data and confirmed experimentally in mice. The model further suggests that, under our assumed similarities between normal and leukemic cells, a key predictor of refractory response to TKI treatment is an increased maximum probability of self-renewal of normal hematopoietic stem cells. We use these insights to develop a clinical prognostic criterion to predict the efficacy of TKI treatment and to design strategies to improve treatment response. The model predicts that stimulating the differentiation of leukemic stem cells while applying TKI therapy can significantly improve treatment outcomes.

Data availability

Modelling code and parameter set data are available in a Github repository. Patient data is unavailable publicly as it could be used to potentially identify the patients. Deidentified raw patient transcript data will be made available to qualified researchers (academic or industry) upon request to Dr. Van Etten at vanetten@hs.uci.edu.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jonathan Rodriguez

    Graduate Program in Mathematical, Computational and Systems Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6414-0526
  2. Abdon Iniguez

    Graduate Program in Mathematical, Computational and Systems Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Nilamani Jena

    Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Prasanthi Tata

    Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Joan Liu

    Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Arthur D Lander

    Department of Developmental and Cell Biology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4380-5525
  7. John Lowengrub

    Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    lowengrb@math.uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1759-0900
  8. Richard A Van Etten

    Center for Complex Biological Systems, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    vanetten@hs.uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

National Institutes of Health (1U54CA217378-01A1)

  • Arthur D Lander
  • John Lowengrub
  • Richard A Van Etten

National Institutes of Health (P30CA062203)

  • Arthur D Lander
  • John Lowengrub
  • Richard A Van Etten

National Institutes of Health (R01 CA090576)

  • Richard A Van Etten

National Science Foundation (DMS-1763272)

  • Arthur D Lander
  • John Lowengrub

National Science Foundation (DMS-1936833)

  • John Lowengrub

National Science Foundation (DMS-1953410)

  • John Lowengrub

National Science Foundation (GRFP 16-588)

  • Abdon Iniguez

Simons Foundation (594598QN)

  • Arthur D Lander
  • John Lowengrub

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM136624)

  • Jonathan Rodriguez

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocol (AUP-19-159) of the University of California, Irvine.

Copyright

© 2023, Rodriguez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 469
    views
  • 94
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jonathan Rodriguez
  2. Abdon Iniguez
  3. Nilamani Jena
  4. Prasanthi Tata
  5. Joan Liu
  6. Arthur D Lander
  7. John Lowengrub
  8. Richard A Van Etten
(2023)
Predictive nonlinear modeling of malignant myelopoiesis and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy
eLife 12:e84149.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84149

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84149

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Medicine
    Anastasia D Komarova, Snezhana D Sinyushkina ... Marina V Shirmanova
    Research Article

    Heterogeneity of tumor metabolism is an important, but still poorly understood aspect of tumor biology. Present work is focused on the visualization and quantification of cellular metabolic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer using fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) of redox cofactor NAD(P)H. FLIM-microscopy of NAD(P)H was performed in vitro in four cancer cell lines (HT29, HCT116, CaCo2 and CT26), in vivo in the four types of colorectal tumors in mice and ex vivo in patients’ tumor samples. The dispersion and bimodality of the decay parameters were evaluated to quantify the intercellular metabolic heterogeneity. Our results demonstrate that patients’ colorectal tumors have significantly higher heterogeneity of energy metabolism compared with cultured cells and tumor xenografts, which was displayed as a wider and frequently bimodal distribution of a contribution of a free (glycolytic) fraction of NAD(P)H within a sample. Among patients’ tumors, the dispersion was larger in the high-grade and early stage ones, without, however, any association with bimodality. These results indicate that cell-level metabolic heterogeneity assessed from NAD(P)H FLIM has a potential to become a clinical prognostic factor.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Chelsea L Hansen, Cécile Viboud, Lone Simonsen
    Research Article

    Cancer is considered a risk factor for COVID-19 mortality, yet several countries have reported that deaths with a primary code of cancer remained within historic levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we further elucidate the relationship between cancer mortality and COVID-19 on a population level in the US. We compared pandemic-related mortality patterns from underlying and multiple cause (MC) death data for six types of cancer, diabetes, and Alzheimer’s. Any pandemic-related changes in coding practices should be eliminated by study of MC data. Nationally in 2020, MC cancer mortality rose by only 3% over a pre-pandemic baseline, corresponding to ~13,600 excess deaths. Mortality elevation was measurably higher for less deadly cancers (breast, colorectal, and hematological, 2–7%) than cancers with a poor survival rate (lung and pancreatic, 0–1%). In comparison, there was substantial elevation in MC deaths from diabetes (37%) and Alzheimer’s (19%). To understand these differences, we simulated the expected excess mortality for each condition using COVID-19 attack rates, life expectancy, population size, and mean age of individuals living with each condition. We find that the observed mortality differences are primarily explained by differences in life expectancy, with the risk of death from deadly cancers outcompeting the risk of death from COVID-19.