Mechanosensing Dendrites: The elegance of prickly sensations

Neurons sensing harmful mechanical forces in the larvae of fruit flies have a striking architecture of dendrites that are optimized to detect pointy objects.
  1. Bibi Nusreen Imambocus
  2. Peter Soba  Is a corresponding author
  1. LIMES Institute, Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, University of Bonn, Germany
  2. Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany

How do we distinguish between being poked by something benign like a cotton swab and a sharp nail that could harm us? This is achieved through neurons lying beneath our skin called nociceptors which are tuned to detect painful, or noxious, stimuli (Basbaum et al., 2009). A lot of what is known about nociceptors comes from studying cells called class IV dendritic arborization neurons (or cd4a neurons for short) in larvae of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (Grueber et al., 2002).

Protruding from the cell body of c4da neurons is a mesh of branches known as dendrites, which can sense noxious environmental cues (Tracey, 2017). This includes the ovipositor of parasitic wasps, a needle-like structure used to lay eggs in live hosts. When the larvae feel the mechanical pressure of the ovipositor poking their skin, they react by rolling away to escape being punctured by the wasp (Figure 1A). However, it is poorly understood how these sensory neurons with their astounding architecture can capture such potentially life-threatening mechanical forces.

Sensing noxious touch in Drosophila larvae.

(A) Schematic of a Drosophila larva with nociceptive cells called c4da neurons covering its entire body. The cd4a neurons can sense noxious touch (here provided by a small diameter probe) resulting in the larva undergoing a rolling escape response. (B) Schematic side view of c4da neurons in the larval body sandwiched between the epidermal cell layer (beige) and the extracellular matrix (green). The noxious touch of the probe deforms the body wall including c4da dendrites and generates perpendicular and lateral forces (indicated by arrows) (C) The force applied by the probe (yellow-blue color code) activates c4da neurons by triggering two mechanosensory channels – Ppk1/Ppk26 (cyan) and Piezo (red) – located on its dendrites. Voltage-gated calcium channels (grey) then allow information to reach the soma so they can elicit a response in the c4da neuron soma.

As shown by the famous drawings of the neuroscientist Santiago Ramón y Cajal, cells in the nervous system come in a range of shapes and sizes. One might therefore wonder whether the elegant structure of c4da neurons allows them to perform their sophisticated mechanosensing role. Now, in eLife, Xin Liang and colleagues from Tsinghua University – including Zhen Liu and Meng-Hua Wu as joint first authors – report that c4da dendrites are pressure sensors which are shaped and tuned to maximize detection of local mechanical forces (Liu et al., 2022).

The team designed and built an experimental setup to monitor the activity of c4da neurons in semi-intact preparations preserving the ‘skin’ of the larvae (containing the epithelial cell layer, sensory neurons and muscle cells) as well as their nervous system. The c4da neurons were then imaged to see how they responded to different sized probes that were applied with varying force to dendrites that were either close (proximal) to the cell body of the neuron (the soma) or were far away (distal) from the soma, of the neuron. This revealed that c4da dendrites were more sensitive to small probes (30µm), which could even be sensed by dendrites outside the local area of where the force was applied.

To find out if the dendritic architecture of c4da neurons is required for sensing localized forces, the team studied larvae lacking the gene for cut, a transcription factor that gives the neurons their complex structure. The c4da neurons of the mutant larvae were less responsive to small probes applied to their distal dendrites, and the larvae displayed reduced rolling escape behavior.

Using mathematical simulations, Liu et al. showed that their probe exerted both a perpendicular pressure at its its tip, and lateral forces up to 40µm away (Figure 1B). If neurons can sense both these lateral and perpendicular forces, this means more of their dendrites will be activated by the probe, leading to enhanced neuronal sensitivity.

To test this possibility, Liu et al. studied two mechanosensitive channels present on the membrane of c4da dendrites called Piezo and Ppk1/Ppk26 (Kim et al., 2012b; Gorczyca et al., 2014; Guo et al., 2014; Mauthner et al., 2014). Different forces with smaller or larger probes were applied to proximal and distal dendritic regions of larvae lacking the genes for Piezo and/or Ppk1/Ppk26. This revealed that both channels contribute to sensing lateral forces. In addition, Ppk1/Ppk26 is required for the overall mechanosensitivity of c4da neurons, and Piezo particularly enhances sensitivity to probes with small diameters.

Mechanosensitive channels are crucial for sensing the local stimuli applied to dendritic branches, but how is this information reaching the cell body of the neuron? Liu et al. found that voltage-gated calcium channels – which when open permit an influx of calcium – play a critical role in this process. In their experiments, low doses of a drug that inhibits these voltage-gated calcium channels strongly affected calcium responses in the neurons when the mechanical stimulus targeted dendrites further away from the soma, suggesting decreased information flow. Further experiments revealed a specific voltage-gated calcium channel called Ca-α1D is required for the mechanosensory signal to reach the soma, which also correlated with reduced escape behavior in fruit fly larvae that lacked Ca-α1D (Figure 1C).

Overall, Liu et al. show that the mechanosensing capability of c4da neurons is elegantly implemented through its dendritic structure as well as mechanosensory and voltage-gated calcium channels which maximize responsiveness to pointy objects. However, these findings bring up other questions. For one, nociceptors do not work in isolation; a mechanical force applied to a larval body wall or to mammalian skin acts on the entire tissue. In larvae, this includes an epidermal cell layer and the extracellular matrix sandwiching the mesh of c4da dendrites (Figure 1B; Han et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2012a).

Epidermal cells have a concerted influence on the mechanosensation and stability of c4da neurons (Jiang et al., 2019). Indeed, Piezo1 is present in cells of the mouse epidermis and they actively participate in sensing of mechanical stimuli (Mikesell et al., 2022). It is therefore possible that Drosophila epidermal cells could also aid c4da neurons. Moreover, many nociceptors (including c4da neurons) are polymodal, meaning they can detect different noxious stimuli, and they can become hypersensitive upon injury and inflammation to protect the affected body regions from further harm (Basbaum et al., 2009; Tracey, 2017). How integration of all these diverse roles is optimized by nociceptors and their surrounding tissue is certainly an exciting area for future studies.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Bibi Nusreen Imambocus

    Bibi Nusreen Imambocus is in the LIMES Institute, Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5068-9967
  2. Peter Soba

    Peter Soba is in the LIMES Institute, Department of Molecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany and in the Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

    For correspondence
    peter.soba@fau.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6163-4686

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2022, Imambocus and Soba

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 688
    views
  • 56
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Bibi Nusreen Imambocus
  2. Peter Soba
(2022)
Mechanosensing Dendrites: The elegance of prickly sensations
eLife 11:e84161.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84161

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Andrew E Worthy, Joanna T Anderson ... Francisco J Alvarez
    Research Article

    Spinal cord interneurons play critical roles shaping motor output, but their precise identity and connectivity remain unclear. Focusing on the V1 interneuron cardinal class we defined four major V1 subsets in the mouse according to neurogenesis, genetic lineage-tracing, synaptic output to motoneurons, and synaptic inputs from muscle afferents. Sequential neurogenesis delineates different V1 subsets: two early born (Renshaw and Pou6f2) and two late born (Foxp2 and Sp8). Early born Renshaw cells and late born Foxp2-V1 interneurons are tightly coupled to motoneurons, while early born Pou6f2-V1 and late born Sp8-V1 interneurons are not, indicating that timing of neurogenesis does not correlate with motoneuron targeting. V1 clades also differ in cell numbers and diversity. Lineage labeling shows that the Foxp2-V1 clade contains over half of all V1 interneurons, provides the largest inhibitory input to motoneuron cell bodies, and includes subgroups that differ in birthdate, location, and proprioceptive input. Notably, one Foxp2-V1 subgroup, defined by postnatal Otp expression, is positioned near the LMC and receives substantial input from proprioceptors, consistent with an involvement in reciprocal inhibitory pathways. Combined tracing of ankle flexor sensory afferents and interneurons monosynaptically connected to ankle extensors confirmed placement of Foxp2-V1 interneurons in reciprocal inhibitory pathways. Our results validate previously proposed V1 clades as unique functional subtypes that differ in circuit placement, with Foxp2-V1 cells forming the most heterogeneous subgroup. We discuss how V1 organizational diversity enables understanding of their roles in motor control, with implications for their diverse ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins.

    1. Neuroscience
    Kiichi Watanabe, Hui Chiu, David J Anderson
    Tools and Resources

    Monitoring neuronal activity at single-cell resolution in freely moving Drosophila engaged in social behaviors is challenging because of their small size and lack of transparency. Extant methods, such as Flyception, are highly invasive. Whole-brain calcium imaging in head-fixed, walking flies is feasible but the animals cannot perform the consummatory phases of social behaviors like aggression or mating under these conditions. This has left open the fundamental question of whether neurons identified as functionally important for such behaviors using loss- or gain-of-function screens are actually active during the natural performance of such behaviors, and if so during which phase(s). Here, we perform brain-wide mapping of active cells expressing the Immediate Early Gene hr38 using a high-sensitivity/low background fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) amplification method called HCR-3.0. Using double-labeling for hr38 mRNA and for GFP, we describe the activity of several classes of aggression-promoting neurons during courtship and aggression, including P1a cells, an intensively studied population of male-specific interneurons. Using HI-FISH in combination with optogenetic activation of aggression-promoting neurons (opto-HI-FISH), we identify candidate downstream functional targets of these cells in a brain-wide, unbiased manner. Finally, we compare the activity of P1a neurons during sequential performance of courtship and aggression, using intronic vs. exonic hr38 probes to differentiate newly synthesized nuclear transcripts from cytoplasmic transcripts synthesized at an earlier time. These data provide evidence suggesting that different subsets of P1a neurons may be active during courtship vs. aggression. HI-FISH and associated methods may help to fill an important lacuna in the armamentarium of tools for neural circuit analysis in Drosophila.