Competing neural representations of choice shape evidence accumulation in humans

  1. Krista Alexandria Marie Bond  Is a corresponding author
  2. Javier Rasero Daparte
  3. Raghav Madan
  4. Jyotika Bahuguna
  5. Jonathan E Rubin
  6. Timothy Verstynen  Is a corresponding author
  1. Carnegie Mellon University, United States
  2. University of Washington, United States
  3. University of Pittsburgh, United States

Abstract

Making adaptive choices in dynamic environments requires flexible decision policies. Previously, we showed how the evidence accumulation process that drives decisions shifts when outcome contingencies change (1). Using in silico experiments, here we show how the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic (CBGT) circuits can feasibly implement shifts in the evidence accumulation process. When action contingencies change, dopaminergic plasticity redirects the balance of power, both within and between action representations, to divert the flow of evidence from one option to another. This model predicts that when competition between action representations is highest, the rate of evidence accumulation is lowest. This prediction was validated in in vivo experiments on human subjects, using fMRI, which showed that 1) evoked hemodynamic responses can reliably predict trialwise choices and 2) competition between action representations, measured using a classifier model, tracked with changes in the rate of evidence accumulation. These results paint a holistic picture of how CBGT circuits manage and adapt the evidence accumulation process in mammals.

Data availability

Behavioral data and computational derivatives are publically available here: https://github.com/kalexandriabond/competing-representations-shape-evidence-accumulation. Raw and preprocessed hemodynamic data, in addition to physiological measurements collected for quality control, are available here: https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds004283/versions/1.0.3.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Krista Alexandria Marie Bond

    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    For correspondence
    kbond@andrew.cmu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1492-6798
  2. Javier Rasero Daparte

    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Raghav Madan

    Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9790-393X
  4. Jyotika Bahuguna

    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2858-5325
  5. Jonathan E Rubin

    Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1513-1551
  6. Timothy Verstynen

    Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, United States
    For correspondence
    timothyv@andrew.cmu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4720-0336

Funding

Air Force Research Laboratory (180119)

  • Timothy Verstynen

National Institutes of Health (CRCNS: R01DA053014)

  • Timothy Verstynen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All procedures were approved by the Carnegie Mellon University Institutional Review Board (Approval Code: 2018_00000195).All research participants provided informed consent to participate in the study and consent to publish any research findings based on their provided data.

Copyright

© 2023, Bond et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 797
    views
  • 105
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Krista Alexandria Marie Bond
  2. Javier Rasero Daparte
  3. Raghav Madan
  4. Jyotika Bahuguna
  5. Jonathan E Rubin
  6. Timothy Verstynen
(2023)
Competing neural representations of choice shape evidence accumulation in humans
eLife 12:e85223.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85223

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85223

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Franziska Auer, Katherine Nardone ... David Schoppik
    Research Article

    Cerebellar dysfunction leads to postural instability. Recent work in freely moving rodents has transformed investigations of cerebellar contributions to posture. However, the combined complexity of terrestrial locomotion and the rodent cerebellum motivate new approaches to perturb cerebellar function in simpler vertebrates. Here, we adapted a validated chemogenetic tool (TRPV1/capsaicin) to describe the role of Purkinje cells — the output neurons of the cerebellar cortex — as larval zebrafish swam freely in depth. We achieved both bidirectional control (activation and ablation) of Purkinje cells while performing quantitative high-throughput assessment of posture and locomotion. Activation modified postural control in the pitch (nose-up/nose-down) axis. Similarly, ablations disrupted pitch-axis posture and fin-body coordination responsible for climbs. Postural disruption was more widespread in older larvae, offering a window into emergent roles for the developing cerebellum in the control of posture. Finally, we found that activity in Purkinje cells could individually and collectively encode tilt direction, a key feature of postural control neurons. Our findings delineate an expected role for the cerebellum in postural control and vestibular sensation in larval zebrafish, establishing the validity of TRPV1/capsaicin-mediated perturbations in a simple, genetically tractable vertebrate. Moreover, by comparing the contributions of Purkinje cell ablations to posture in time, we uncover signatures of emerging cerebellar control of posture across early development. This work takes a major step towards understanding an ancestral role of the cerebellum in regulating postural maturation.

    1. Neuroscience
    Gáspár Oláh, Rajmund Lákovics ... Gábor Tamás
    Research Article

    Human-specific cognitive abilities depend on information processing in the cerebral cortex, where the neurons are significantly larger and their processes longer and sparser compared to rodents. We found that, in synaptically connected layer 2/3 pyramidal cells (L2/3 PCs), the delay in signal propagation from soma to soma is similar in humans and rodents. To compensate for the longer processes of neurons, membrane potential changes in human axons and/or dendrites must propagate faster. Axonal and dendritic recordings show that the propagation speed of action potentials (APs) is similar in human and rat axons, but the forward propagation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and the backward propagation of APs are 26 and 47% faster in human dendrites, respectively. Experimentally-based detailed biophysical models have shown that the key factor responsible for the accelerated EPSP propagation in human cortical dendrites is the large conductance load imposed at the soma by the large basal dendritic tree. Additionally, larger dendritic diameters and differences in cable and ion channel properties in humans contribute to enhanced signal propagation. Our integrative experimental and modeling study provides new insights into the scaling rules that help maintain information processing speed albeit the large and sparse neurons in the human cortex.