(A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot displays unsupervised clustering of 48,111 cells, including from control (elav-GAL4/+) and elav>tauR406W transgenic animals (elav-GAL4/+;…
Drosophila scRNAseq cell cluster annotations.
Cluster refers to the numeric ID assigned by Seurat when FindClusters resolution is set to 2, and the Annotation column notes the cell identity assignment. This table can be used to obtain cell identities of Seurat cluster IDs in the result tables below.
Cell cluster markers.
Cluster markers are obtained by MAST differential expression analysis where each cell cluster is compared against all remaining cells. Only genes with a positive log2 fold change are displayed. Log2 fold change = expression fold change between a given cluster and all remaining cells. Pct.1 = percent of cells in the given cluster with non-zero expression of the gene. Pct.2 = percent of the remaining cells (not in the cluster) that have non-zero expression of the gene. Cluster ID = Seurat assigned cluster ID. BH-adjusted p-value = Benjamini–Hochberg-corrected p-value from the MAST differential expression analysis for each cluster.
Single-cell RNA-sequencing quality control parameters.
Cell library metrics from the 10x Genomics Cell Ranger output. Sample = cell library labels. Libraries from the replication experiment are labeled with ‘rep’ behind the final underscore. See also Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Additional details on the data provided in each column can be found in 10x Genomics support materials: https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/pipelines/latest/output/gex-metrics.
Drosophila cell-type expression markers.
Table of established fly gene expression markers used as references for cell annotation. Genes = marker genes that can be used to identify a cell type. Cell type = Drosophila brain cell subpopulation. Reference = source publication used to obtain the genes.
(A) Schematic showing longitudinal study design for this study. Control (elav-GAL4/+) and elav>tauR406W transgenic animals (elav-GAL4/+; UAS-tauR406W/+) animals were aged to three timepoints: 1, 10, …
(A) Schematic shows the cell identity annotation pipeline utilized for this study. We leveraged both published scRNA-seq atlases from Davie et al., 2018 and Özel et al., 2021 as well as other …
Violin plot of general cell-type markers for all cell clusters, as described in Figure 1B.
(A) Log2-fold change (log2FC) of normalized cell counts between elav>tauR406W (elav-GAL4/+; UAS-tauR406W/+) and control (elav-GAL4/+) animals. Timepoints are pooled for each cluster. Cell clusters …
Tau-triggered cell proportion changes.
Analysis of cell abundance changes between elav>tauR406W and control animals as quantified by DESeq2. In the discovery dataset, the 1, 10, and 20-day timepoints are pooled, such that n = 3 values for each comparison. The replication dataset is comprised of n = 3 elav>tauR406W and control (elav-GAL4) animals all prepared at day 10. baseMean = mean of normalized cell counts for the given cell cluster across all samples. Log2FoldChange = log2 fold change of elav>tauR406W vs. control cell counts. lfcSE = standard error of log2 fold change value. Pvalue = p-value from Wald test of the genotype log2 fold change value. Differences in cell count are quantified by negative binomial GLM, such that count ~genotype + age. Padj = adjusted p values using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure. Experiment = denotes if data is from the discovery or replication analysis.
(A) UMAP plot showing the 69,128 cells comprising the scRNAseq replication dataset from 10-day-old control (elav-GAL4/+) and elav>tauR406W (elav-GAL4/+; UAS-tauR406W/+) flies. Cell cluster names are …
Cell proportions (y-axis) are shown for selected cell types of interest, based on analysis of bulk-tissue RNAseq from control (black, n = 2) (elav-GAL4/+) and elav>tauR406W (red, n = 3) (elav-GAL4/+;…
(A) In order to adjust for proportional changes, the log2 fold-change value for seven cell clusters (Ensheathing glia, Perineurial glia, Astrocyte-like glia, Cortex glia, Chiasm glia, Subperineurial …
(A) Aging has widespread transcriptional effects on most brain cell types. Number of aging-induced differentially expressed genes (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05) within each cell cluster is …
Tau- and aging-triggered gene expression changes.
Tau-induced differentially expressed genes were adjusted for aging by including a covariate in the regression model, based on comparisons of scRNAseq data elav>tauR406W vs. control (elav-GAL4) at 1, 10, and 20 days. Aging-induced differentially expressed genes are based on comparisons in control (elav-GAL4) flies, including between day 1 (d1) and day 10 (d10), and day 10 vs. day 20 (d20); comparisons are noted in age_comparisons column. The cell cluster being compared is denoted in the cluster column. Avg_logFC is the log2 fold change of gene expression between day 10 vs. day 1 or day 20 vs. day 10; in each entry, the former is the numerator, and the latter is the denominator. For tau vs. control comparisons, the numerator is tau, and the denominator is control. Pct.1 and Pct.2 refer to the percent of cells that have non-zero expression for the given gene in the numerator and denominator, respectively. P_val = uncorrected p-values from the MAST linear regression. Padj = Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p-values. Analysis = specifies either ‘control aging’ or ‘tau age-adjusted’ for the respective analyses.
Functional pathways from differential expression analysis.
Significantly enriched functional terms based on overrepresentation analysis (ORA) of cell-specific differentially expressed gene sets, including from either (i) aging (controls), (ii) tau age-adjusted (elav>tauR406W vs. control (elav-GAL4)), or the (iii) ‘tau-specific’ gene set, which is the unique subset of genes from ii not seen in i. Genes used for functional enrichment analysis have a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 in all differential expression analyses, and all functional enrichment terms listed have a hypergeometric FDR < 0.05. Analysis = source of gene set used for functional enrichment (i–iii, above). Age = relevant age groups of source comparison. Cluster = cell cluster source of gene set. Term_id = identifier of enrichment term. term = description of enriched term. FDR = FDR-corrected p-values. Database = database origin of term.
Tau-induced gene expression changes in the replication dataset.
Cross-sectional replication analysis comparing differentially expressed genes in an independent dataset from day 10 (elav >tauR406W vs. control (elav-GAL4)). The cell cluster being compared is denoted in the cluster column. Avg_log2FC is the log2 fold change of gene expression between tau vs. control comparisons, the numerator is tau, and the denominator is control. Pct.1 and Pct.2 refer to the percent of cells that have non-zero expression for the named gene in the numerator and denominator, respectively. P_val = unadjusted, raw p-values from the MAST linear regression. Padj = Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p-values.
Cell-type-specific overlaps between tau-induced differentially expressed genes.
Cell-cluster overlaps are quantified between the age-adjusted discovery data (Figure 3—source data 1) and the day 10 cross-sectional replication data (Figure 3—source data 3). Cluster = annotated cell identities or Seurat ID of unannotated clusters. ageAdj_discovery_DEG_n = number of tau-induced differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05) in the discovery dataset. d10_CS_replicate_DEG_n = number of differentially expressed genes in the replication dataset. Intersect = number of overlapping differentially expressed genes between results of the two comparisons. percent_of_original = percent of differentially expressed genes in the discovery dataset that is also observed in the replication dataset. Phyper = p-value of hypergeometric tests evaluating whether the number of overlapping genes observed is greater than by chance. tot_genes = total number of unique genes detected in each cell type and shared between datasets used for hypergeometric test.
Cross-sectional tau-induced differential expression.
Cross-sectional analysis of tau-induced changes (elav>tauR406W vs. control (elav-GAL4)) from the discovery dataset at 1, 10, and 20 days; age = the age being compared. The specific cell cluster being compared is denoted in the cluster column. Avg_log2FC is the log2 fold change of gene expression between tau vs. control comparisons, the numerator is tau, and the denominator is control. Pct.1 and Pct.2 refer to the percent of cells that have non-zero expression for the named gene in the numerator and denominator, respectively. P_val = unadjusted, raw p-values from the MAST linear regression. Padj = Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p-values.
(A) The number of tau-induced, differentially expressed genes are shown following adjustment for aging, but highlighting up- (red) versus down- (blue) regulated genes. Data presented is otherwise …
(A) Venn diagram illustrates the number of tau-induced differentially expressed genes in bulk (blue) vs. single-cell (red) RNAseq. These complementary analyses consider identical genotypes and …
Volcano plots (gene expression log2 fold change vs. -log10(FDR)) of select cell-type clusters with the most tau-induced differentially expressed genes, including (A) α'/β' Kenyon cells, (B) α/β …
(A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plot showing widespread MAPT transgene expression across in elav>tauR406W (elav-GAL4/+; UAS-tauR406W/+) animals. The pan-neuronal elav-GAL4 …
A cross-sectional visualization of differential gene expression changes for (A) astrocyte-like glia and (B) ensheathing glia demonstrating progressive, age-dependent gene expression changes. Top …
(A) Innate immune genes are expressed broadly in the adult fly brain, including both neurons and glia. Plot shows mean overall normalized expression by cell cluster among n = 236 genes belonging to …
Tau-induced expression changes in innate immune response genes.
Differential expression of the immune response coexpression module (magenta, Mangleburg et al., 2020), based on comparisons of elav>tauR406W and control (elav-GAL4) animals, adjusting for age. Cluster = cell cluster identity. lrt.pvalues = uncorrected p-values from likelihood ratio test. lrt.padj = Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p-value. log2FC = log2 fold change of mean immune module expression between tau and controls for each cell cluster.
Regulon coexpression networks.
183 regulons and member genes are denoted with the (+) notation, indicating that genes within these modules are positively co-expressed.
Differential regulon expression analysis.
Regulon expression per cell was defined as the mean expression of regulon member genes. For each cell type, regulon expression across all cells was regressed on genotype [elav>tauR406W vs. control (elav-GAL4)] and age, and a likelihood ratio test was performed against a reduced model with age only. Cluster = cell identity. Regulons = regulon used in statistical testing. lrt.pvalues = unadjusted p-values from likelihood ratio test. lrt.padj = Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p-values. log2FC = log2 fold change of mean regulon expression between tau and control.
Predictors of tau-triggered cell proportion changes.
Comprehensive list of retained, non-zero coefficients from the elastic net regression models considering expanded list of 2993 predictor variables and cell clusters showing significant, tau-induced reductions in cell abundance. Term = a variable in the elastic net multiple regression. Elastic net coefficient = the coefficient for the specified variable in the final regression model.
Previously published bulk-tissue RNAseq data from Mangleburg et al., 2020 showing age-dependent increases in innate immune module expression in both tauWT and tauR406W transgenic Drosophila. Module …
(A) Plots showing mean expression of the immune response gene coexpression module (n = 236 genes), based on analyses of scRNAseq data stratified by genotype (control vs. elav>tauR406W) or age (1, …
Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots show gene expression changes for several published, tau-triggered gene coexpression modules. Color scale shows mean gene expression changes …
(A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) plots show relationships among 48,111 cells based on 183 regulons (cell-level regulon activity scores). (B) Cell-specific expression of brain …
Select-cell clusters where the Rel regulon is differentially expressed in at least one time point while also demonstrating age-progressive change. Y-axis denotes log2 fold change of the Rel regulon …
Whole-mount immunofluorescence of adult brains from Rel-GFP flies, in which the endogenous Relish protein harbors an amino-terminal GFP tag in homozygosity in an otherwise wildtype genetic …
(A) Schematic showing analytic strategy to identify regulon expression networks that predict tau-triggered cell loss. We implemented elastic net regression to examine the relation between regulon …
(A) elav>tauR406W (elav-GAL4/+; UAS-tauR406W/+) flies show age-dependent neurodegeneration compared with controls (elav-GAL4/+), based on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections from 10-day-old …
(A) Heatmap shows Pearson correlation of gene expression (5630 conserved, orthologous genes) between annotated cell clusters from Drosophila (rows) and human postmortem brain (column). Human brain …
Cell-type-specific, Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-associated gene expression changes from human brain.
snRNAseq data from human postmortem brain tissues (Mathys et al., 2019) was analyzed for differentially expressed genes in AD neuropathological cases versus controls without AD pathology. Cell subcluster (subcluster) labels are as defined by the original publication. Pct.1 and Pct.2 refer to the percent of cells that have non-zero expression for the given gene in the numerator and denominator, respectively. Avg_log2FC is the log2 fold change of gene expression between AD vs. control comparisons; the numerator is AD, and the denominator is control. P_val = unadjusted p-values from the MAST linear regression analysis. Padj = Benjamini–Hochberg-adjusted p-values.
(A) Heatmap shows Pearson correlation of gene expression (5630 conserved, orthologous genes in total) between cell clusters from Drosophila (rows) and human postmortem brain (columns; Mathys et al., …
Heatmap shows Pearson correlation of gene expression between annotated wildtype Drosophila cell clusters from Davie et al., 2018 (rows) and cell clusters from control postmortem brain tissue …
Rel regulon differential expression is computed from scRNAseq pseudobulk counts of MAPTP301L mice (n = 3) and non-transgenic controls (n = 2) published in Lee et al., 2021. Conserved genes from the …
Reagent type (species) or resource | Designation | Source or reference | Identifiers | Additional information |
---|---|---|---|---|
Antibody | Rabbit polyclonal anti-GFP | GeneTex | Cat#GTX113617; RRID:AB_1950371 | IF(1:500) |
Antibody | Alexa 647 goat polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | Cat#111-605-003 | IF(1:500) |
Antibody | CyTM3 AffiniPure goat polyclonal anti-mouse (H+L) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | Cat#115-165-003 | IF(1:500) |
Antibody | Alexa Fluor 488 donkey polyclonal anti-mouse IgG (H+L) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | Cat#715-545-150 | IF(1:500) |
Antibody | Cy3TM3 AffiniPure goat polyclonal anti-rat IgG (H+L) | Jackson ImmunoResearch | Cat#112-165-003 | IF(I:500) |
Antibody | Mouse monoclonal anti-repo | DSHB | Cat#8D12 | IF(1:500) – glial counting IF(1:50) – Rel costain |
Antibody | Rat monoclonal anti-Elav | DSHB | Cat#7E8A10; RRID:AB_528218 | IF(1:100) |
Antibody | Mouse monoclonal anti-Rel | DSHB | Cat#21F3; RRID:AB_1553772 | IF(1:500) |
Chemical compound, reagent | Conjugated A488-Phalloidin | Thermo Fisher | Cat#A12379 | IF(1:500) |
Chemical compound, drug | Dispase | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat#D4818; | |
Chemical compound, drug | Collagenase I | Invitrogen | Cat#17100-100 | |
Chemical compound, drug | NucBlue and Propidium iodide | Invitrogen | Cat#R37610 | |
Chemical compound, drug | Vectashield antifade mounting medium | Vector Laboratories | Cat#H-1000-10 | |
Commercial assay or kit | Chromium Single Cell Gene Expression 3’ v3.1 | 10x Genomics | Cat#PN-1000268 | |
Genetic reagent (Drosophila melanogaster) | elavC155-GAL4 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | BDSC:458 | |
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster) | w1118; UAS-TauR406W | Lab: Dr. Mel B. Feany, PMID:11408621 | N/A | Wittmann et al., 2001 |
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster) | Rel-GFP | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | BDSC:81268 | y1 w*; PBac{GFP.FPTB-Rel}VK00037 |
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster) | UAS-Rel.RNAi-2 | Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center | BDSC:33661 | y1; P{TRiP.HMS00070}attP2 |
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster) | UAS-Rel.RNAi-1 | Vienna Drosophila Resource Center | VDRC:49414 | P{GD1199}v49414 |
Software, algorithm | Imaris Microscopy Image Analysis Software 9.9.1 | https://imaris.oxinst.com/ | Oxford Instruments | |
Software, algorithm | Prism 9.4.1 | https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/ | GraphPad | |
Software, algorithm | ImageJ | https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ | NIH | |
Software, algorithm | Cell Ranger 4.0.0 | https://support.10xgenomics.com/single-cell-gene-expression/software/pipelines/latest/what-is-cell-ranger | 10x Genomics | |
Software, algorithm | Seurat v3 | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 | Stuart et al., 2019 | |
Software, algorithm | DoubletFinder 2.0.3 | https://github.com/chris-mcginnis-ucsf/DoubletFinder | McGinnis et al., 2019 | |
Software, algorithm | Scmap 1.9.3 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/scmap.html | Kiselev et al., 2018 | |
Software, algorithm | Optic lobe neural network classifier | https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-020-2879-3/MediaObjects/41586_2020_2879_MOESM7_ESM.zip | Özel et al., 2021, Supplementary Data Appendix 1, Python/R code | |
Software, algorithm | pySCENIC 0.12.0 | https://github.com/aertslab/pySCENIC | Van de Sande et al., 2020 | |
Software, algorithm | DESeq2 1.34.0 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html | Love et al., 2014 | |
Software, algorithm | MuSiC 0.1.1 | https://github.com/xuranw/MuSiC | Wang et al., 2019 | |
Software, algorithm | MAST 1.20.0 | https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/MAST.html | Finak et al., 2015 | |
Software, algorithm | WEBGESTALTR 0.4.4 | https://github.com/bzhanglab/WebGestaltR | Wang et al., 2013 | |
Software, algorithm | Glmnet 4.1-4 | https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/glmnet/index.html | Friedman et al., 2010 | |
Software, algorithm | Caret 6.0-92 | https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caret/index.html | Kuhn, 2008 | |
Software, algorithm | DRSC Integrated Ortholog Prediction Tool (DIOPT) | https://www.flyrnai.org/diopt | Hu et al., 2011 | |
Software, algorithm | gProfiler2 0.2.1 | https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gprofiler2/index.html | Raudvere et al., 2019 | |
Software, algorithm | SCTransform 0.3.3 | https://github.com/satijalab/sctransform | Stuart et al., 2019 |