O-GlcNAc glycosylation orchestrates fate decision and niche function of bone marrow stromal progenitors

  1. Zengdi Zhang
  2. Zan Huang
  3. Mohamed Awad
  4. Mohammed Elsalanty
  5. James Cray
  6. Lauren E Ball
  7. Jason C Maynard
  8. Alma L Burlingame
  9. Hu Zeng
  10. Kim C Mansky
  11. Hai-Bin Ruan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Minnesota, United States
  2. Nanjing Agricultural University, China
  3. Western University of Health Sciences, United States
  4. The Ohio State University, United States
  5. University of South Carolina, United States
  6. University of California, San Francisco, United States
  7. Mayo Clinic, United States

Abstract

In mammals, interactions between the bone marrow (BM) stroma and hematopoietic progenitors contribute to bone-BM homeostasis. Perinatal bone growth and ossification provide a microenvironment for the transition to definitive hematopoiesis; however, mechanisms and interactions orchestrating the development of skeletal and hematopoietic systems remain largely unknown. Here, we establish intracellular O-linked β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) modification as a posttranslational switch that dictates the differentiation fate and niche function of early BM stromal cells (BMSCs). By modifying and activating RUNX2, O-GlcNAcylation promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and stromal IL-7 expression to support lymphopoiesis. In contrast, C/EBPβ-dependent marrow adipogenesis and expression of myelopoietic stem cell factor (SCF) is inhibited by O-GlcNAcylation. Ablating O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) in BMSCs leads to impaired bone formation, increased marrow adiposity, as well as defective B-cell lymphopoiesis and myeloid overproduction in mice. Thus, the balance of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of BMSCs is determined by reciprocal O-GlcNAc regulation of transcription factors, which simultaneously shapes the hematopoietic niche.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. Supplemental tables have been provided for Mass spectrometry, primer sequences, and antibody list.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zengdi Zhang

    Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Zan Huang

    Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mohamed Awad

    Department of Medical Anatomical Sciences, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Mohammed Elsalanty

    Department of Medical Anatomical Sciences, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. James Cray

    Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Lauren E Ball

    6Department of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Jason C Maynard

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Alma L Burlingame

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Hu Zeng

    Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kim C Mansky

    Department of Developmental and Surgical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Hai-Bin Ruan

    Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States
    For correspondence
    hruan@umn.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3858-1272

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170847)

  • Zan Huang

National Institutes of Health (R01 AI162678)

  • Hu Zeng

National Institutes of Health (R01 AI139420)

  • Hai-Bin Ruan

National Institutes of Health (R01 AI162791)

  • Hai-Bin Ruan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Yunlei Yang, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of the University of Minnesota (protocol # 2112-39682A).

Version history

  1. Received: December 8, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: December 21, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: March 1, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 2, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: March 22, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,369
    views
  • 262
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zengdi Zhang
  2. Zan Huang
  3. Mohamed Awad
  4. Mohammed Elsalanty
  5. James Cray
  6. Lauren E Ball
  7. Jason C Maynard
  8. Alma L Burlingame
  9. Hu Zeng
  10. Kim C Mansky
  11. Hai-Bin Ruan
(2023)
O-GlcNAc glycosylation orchestrates fate decision and niche function of bone marrow stromal progenitors
eLife 12:e85464.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85464

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85464

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Natalia E Ketaren, Fred D Mast ... John D Aitchison
    Research Advance

    To date, all major modes of monoclonal antibody therapy targeting SARS-CoV-2 have lost significant efficacy against the latest circulating variants. As SARS-CoV-2 omicron sublineages account for over 90% of COVID-19 infections, evasion of immune responses generated by vaccination or exposure to previous variants poses a significant challenge. A compelling new therapeutic strategy against SARS-CoV-2 is that of single-domain antibodies, termed nanobodies, which address certain limitations of monoclonal antibodies. Here, we demonstrate that our high-affinity nanobody repertoire, generated against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Mast et al., 2021), remains effective against variants of concern, including omicron BA.4/BA.5; a subset is predicted to counter resistance in emerging XBB and BQ.1.1 sublineages. Furthermore, we reveal the synergistic potential of nanobody cocktails in neutralizing emerging variants. Our study highlights the power of nanobody technology as a versatile therapeutic and diagnostic tool to combat rapidly evolving infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV-2.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Benjamin R Duewell, Naomi E Wilson ... Scott D Hansen
    Research Article

    Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) beta (PI3Kβ) is functionally unique in the ability to integrate signals derived from receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), G-protein coupled receptors, and Rho-family GTPases. The mechanism by which PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with various membrane-tethered signaling inputs, however, remains unclear. Previous experiments did not determine whether interactions with membrane-tethered proteins primarily control PI3Kβ localization versus directly modulate lipid kinase activity. To address this gap in our knowledge, we established an assay to directly visualize how three distinct protein interactions regulate PI3Kβ when presented to the kinase in a biologically relevant configuration on supported lipid bilayers. Using single molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy, we determined the mechanism controlling PI3Kβ membrane localization, prioritization of signaling inputs, and lipid kinase activation. We find that auto-inhibited PI3Kβ prioritizes interactions with RTK-derived tyrosine phosphorylated (pY) peptides before engaging either GβGγ or Rac1(GTP). Although pY peptides strongly localize PI3Kβ to membranes, stimulation of lipid kinase activity is modest. In the presence of either pY/GβGγ or pY/Rac1(GTP), PI3Kβ activity is dramatically enhanced beyond what can be explained by simply increasing membrane localization. Instead, PI3Kβ is synergistically activated by pY/GβGγ and pY/Rac1 (GTP) through a mechanism consistent with allosteric regulation.