Core PCP mutations affect short time mechanical properties but not tissue morphogenesis in the Drosophila pupal wing

  1. Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  2. Franz S Gruber
  3. Abhijeet Krishna
  4. Charlie Duclut
  5. Carl D Modes
  6. Marko Popović
  7. Frank Jülicher
  8. Natalie A Dye  Is a corresponding author
  9. Suzanne Eaton
  1. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany
  2. University of Dundee, United Kingdom
  3. Laboratoire Physico-Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, France
  4. Center for Systems Biology Dresden, Germany
  5. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Germany
  6. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany

Abstract

How morphogenetic movements are robustly coordinated in space and time is a fundamental open question in biology. We study this question using the wing of Drosophila melanogaster, an epithelial tissue that undergoes large-scale tissue flows during pupal stages. Previously, we showed that pupal wing morphogenesis involves both cellular behaviors that allow relaxation of mechanical tissue stress, as well as cellular behaviors that appear to be actively patterned (Etournay et al., 2015). Here, we show that these active cellular behaviors are not guided by the core planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway, a conserved signaling system that guides tissue development in many other contexts. We find no significant phenotype on the cellular dynamics underlying pupal morphogenesis in mutants of core PCP. Furthermore, using laser ablation experiments, coupled with a rheological model to describe the dynamics of the response to laser ablation, we conclude that while core PCP mutations affect the fast timescale response to laser ablation they do not significantly affect overall tissue mechanics. In conclusion, our work shows that cellular dynamics and tissue shape changes during Drosophila pupal wing morphogenesis do not require core PCP as an orientational guiding cue.

Data availability

Source data and code are provided for each figure

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Romina Piscitello-Gómez

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Franz S Gruber

    School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2008-8460
  3. Abhijeet Krishna

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9291-500X
  4. Charlie Duclut

    Laboratoire Physico-Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8595-6815
  5. Carl D Modes

    Center for Systems Biology Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Marko Popović

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Frank Jülicher

    Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4731-9185
  8. Natalie A Dye

    DFG Excellence Cluster Physics of Life, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    natalie_anne.dye@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4859-6670
  9. Suzanne Eaton

    Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Max Planck Society

  • Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  • Franz S Gruber
  • Abhijeet Krishna
  • Charlie Duclut
  • Carl D Modes
  • Marko Popović
  • Frank Jülicher
  • Natalie A Dye
  • Suzanne Eaton

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-2068-390729961)

  • Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  • Abhijeet Krishna
  • Carl D Modes
  • Frank Jülicher
  • Natalie A Dye
  • Suzanne Eaton

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1782)

  • Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  • Franz S Gruber
  • Natalie A Dye
  • Suzanne Eaton

Deutsche Krebshilfe (MSNZ-P2 Dresden)

  • Natalie A Dye

Austrian Academy of Sciences (DOC Fellowship)

  • Franz S Gruber

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-LABX-0071)

  • Charlie Duclut

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-IDEX-0001)

  • Charlie Duclut

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EA4/10-1,EA4/10-2)

  • Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  • Franz S Gruber
  • Natalie A Dye
  • Suzanne Eaton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Piscitello-Gómez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 677
    views
  • 165
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Romina Piscitello-Gómez
  2. Franz S Gruber
  3. Abhijeet Krishna
  4. Charlie Duclut
  5. Carl D Modes
  6. Marko Popović
  7. Frank Jülicher
  8. Natalie A Dye
  9. Suzanne Eaton
(2023)
Core PCP mutations affect short time mechanical properties but not tissue morphogenesis in the Drosophila pupal wing
eLife 12:e85581.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85581

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85581

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Jayanarayanan Sadanandan, Sithara Thomas ... Peeyush Kumar T
    Research Article

    The blood-brain barrier (BBB) controls the movement of molecules into and out of the central nervous system (CNS). Since a functional BBB forms by mouse embryonic day E15.5, we reasoned that gene cohorts expressed in CNS endothelial cells (EC) at E13.5 contribute to BBB formation. In contrast, adult gene signatures reflect BBB maintenance mechanisms. Supporting this hypothesis, transcriptomic analysis revealed distinct cohorts of EC genes involved in BBB formation and maintenance. Here, we demonstrate that epigenetic regulator’s histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) and polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) control EC gene expression for BBB development and prevent Wnt/β-catenin (Wnt) target genes from being expressed in adult CNS ECs. Low Wnt activity during development modifies BBB genes epigenetically for the formation of functional BBB. As a Class-I HDAC inhibitor induces adult CNS ECs to regain Wnt activity and BBB genetic signatures that support BBB formation, our results inform strategies to promote BBB repair.

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Subhradip Das, Sushmitha Hegde ... Girish S Ratnaparkhi
    Research Article

    Repurposing of pleiotropic factors during execution of diverse cellular processes has emerged as a regulatory paradigm. Embryonic development in metazoans is controlled by maternal factors deposited in the egg during oogenesis. Here, we explore maternal role(s) of Caspar (Casp), the Drosophila orthologue of human Fas-associated factor-1 (FAF1) originally implicated in host-defense as a negative regulator of NF-κB signaling. Maternal loss of either Casp or it’s protein partner, transitional endoplasmic reticulum 94 (TER94) leads to partial embryonic lethality correlated with aberrant centrosome behavior, cytoskeletal abnormalities, and defective gastrulation. Although ubiquitously distributed, both proteins are enriched in the primordial germ cells (PGCs), and in keeping with the centrosome problems, mutant embryos display a significant reduction in the PGC count. Moreover, the total number of pole buds is directly proportional to the level of Casp. Consistently, it’s ‘loss’ and ‘gain’ results in respective reduction and increase in the Oskar protein levels, the master determinant of PGC fate. To elucidate this regulatory loop, we analyzed several known components of mid-blastula transition and identify the translational repressor Smaug, a zygotic regulator of germ cell specification, as a potential critical target. We present a detailed structure-function analysis of Casp aimed at understanding its novel involvement during PGC development.