Environment as a limiting factor of the historical global spread of mungbean

  1. Pei-Wen Ong
  2. Ya-Ping Lin
  3. Hung-Wei Chen
  4. Cheng-Yu Lo
  5. Marina Burlyaeva
  6. Thomas Noble
  7. Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair
  8. Roland Schafleitner
  9. Margarita Vishnyakova
  10. Eric Bishop-von-Wettberg
  11. Maria G Samsonova
  12. Sergey Nuzhdin
  13. Chau-Ti Ting
  14. Cheng-Ruei Lee  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Taiwan University, Taiwan
  2. AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, Taiwan
  3. N.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry, Russian Federation
  4. Queensland University of Technology, Australia
  5. AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, India
  6. University of Vermont, United States
  7. Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russian Federation
  8. University of Southern California, United States

Abstract

While the domestication process has been investigated in many crops, the detailed route of cultivation range expansion and factors governing this process received relatively little attention. Here using mungbean (Vigna radiata var. radiata) as a test case, we investigated the genomes of more than one thousand accessions to illustrate climatic adaptation’s role in dictating the unique routes of cultivation range expansion. Despite the geographical proximity between South and Central Asia, genetic evidence suggests mungbean cultivation first spread from South Asia to Southeast, East, and finally reached Central Asia. Combining evidence from demographic inference, climatic niche modeling, plant morphology, and records from ancient Chinese sources, we showed that the specific route was shaped by the unique combinations of climatic constraints and farmer practices across Asia, which imposed divergent selection favoring higher yield in the south but short-season and more drought-tolerant accessions in the north. Our results suggest that mungbean did not radiate from the domestication center as expected purely under human activity, but instead the spread of mungbean cultivation is highly constrained by climatic adaptation, echoing the idea that human commensals are more difficult to spread through the south-north axis of continents.

Data availability

Sequences generated in this study are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA809503. Accession names, GPS coordinates, and NCBI accession numbers of the Vavilov Institute accessions are available under Supplementary file 1. Plant trait data are available at Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d7wm37q3h. Sequences and accession information of the World Vegetable Centre mini-core and the Australian Diversity Panel collections were obtained from the NCBI BioProject PRJNA645721(Breria et al., 2020) and PRJNA963182 (Noble et al., 2018).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pei-Wen Ong

    Institute of Plant Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Ya-Ping Lin

    AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, Tainan, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Hung-Wei Chen

    Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Cheng-Yu Lo

    Institute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Marina Burlyaeva

    N.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3708-2594
  6. Thomas Noble

    Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7731-5559
  7. Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair

    AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, Patancheru, India
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2787-8396
  8. Roland Schafleitner

    AVRDC - The World Vegetable Center, Tainan, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Margarita Vishnyakova

    N.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Eric Bishop-von-Wettberg

    Department of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2724-0317
  11. Maria G Samsonova

    Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Sergey Nuzhdin

    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Chau-Ti Ting

    Department of Life Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Cheng-Ruei Lee

    Institute of Plant Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
    For correspondence
    chengrueilee@ntu.edu.tw
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1913-9964

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (107-2923-B-002-004-MY3)

  • Chau-Ti Ting
  • Cheng-Ruei Lee

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (110-2628-B-002-027)

  • Cheng-Ruei Lee

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (CROP-2019-144)

  • Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair
  • Roland Schafleitner

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (110-2313-B-125-001-MY3)

  • Ya-Ping Lin

Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (CIM-2014-079)

  • Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair
  • Roland Schafleitner

U.S. Department of Agriculture (Multistate Hatch NE1710)

  • Eric Bishop-von-Wettberg

Russian Science Foundation (18-46-08001)

  • Eric Bishop-von-Wettberg
  • Maria G Samsonova

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (075-15-2020-934)

  • Eric Bishop-von-Wettberg
  • Maria G Samsonova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Ong et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,380
    views
  • 350
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pei-Wen Ong
  2. Ya-Ping Lin
  3. Hung-Wei Chen
  4. Cheng-Yu Lo
  5. Marina Burlyaeva
  6. Thomas Noble
  7. Ramakrishnan Madhavan Nair
  8. Roland Schafleitner
  9. Margarita Vishnyakova
  10. Eric Bishop-von-Wettberg
  11. Maria G Samsonova
  12. Sergey Nuzhdin
  13. Chau-Ti Ting
  14. Cheng-Ruei Lee
(2023)
Environment as a limiting factor of the historical global spread of mungbean
eLife 12:e85725.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85725

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85725

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Lucy A Winder, Mirre JP Simons, Terry Burke
    Research Article

    Life-history theory, central to our understanding of diversity in morphology, behaviour, and senescence, describes how traits evolve through the optimisation of trade-offs in investment. Despite considerable study, there is only minimal support for trade-offs within species between the two traits most closely linked to fitness – reproductive effort and survival – questioning the theory’s general validity. We used a meta-analysis to separate the effects of individual quality (positive survival/reproduction correlation) from the costs of reproduction (negative survival/reproduction correlation) using studies of reproductive effort and parental survival in birds. Experimental enlargement of brood size caused reduced parental survival. However, the effect size of brood size manipulation was small and opposite to the effect of phenotypic quality, as we found that individuals that naturally produced larger clutches also survived better. The opposite effects on parental survival in experimental and observational studies of reproductive effort provide the first meta-analytic evidence for theory suggesting that quality differences mask trade-offs. Fitness projections using the overall effect size revealed that reproduction presented negligible costs, except when reproductive effort was forced beyond the maximum level observed within species, to that seen between species. We conclude that there is little support for the most fundamental life-history trade-off, between reproductive effort and survival, operating within a population. We suggest that within species the fitness landscape of the reproduction–survival trade-off is flat until it reaches the boundaries of the between-species fast–slow life-history continuum. Our results provide a quantitative explanation as to why the costs of reproduction are not apparent and why variation in reproductive effort persists within species.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Gülnihal Kavaklioglu, Alexandra Podhornik ... Christian Seiser
    Research Article

    Repression of retrotransposition is crucial for the successful fitness of a mammalian organism. The domesticated transposon protein L1TD1, derived from LINE-1 (L1) ORF1p, is an RNA-binding protein that is expressed only in some cancers and early embryogenesis. In human embryonic stem cells, it is found to be essential for maintaining pluripotency. In cancer, L1TD1 expression is highly correlative with malignancy progression and as such considered a potential prognostic factor for tumors. However, its molecular role in cancer remains largely unknown. Our findings reveal that DNA hypomethylation induces the expression of L1TD1 in HAP1 human tumor cells. L1TD1 depletion significantly modulates both the proteome and transcriptome and thereby reduces cell viability. Notably, L1TD1 associates with L1 transcripts and interacts with L1 ORF1p protein, thereby facilitating L1 retrotransposition. Our data suggest that L1TD1 collaborates with its ancestral L1 ORF1p as an RNA chaperone, ensuring the efficient retrotransposition of L1 retrotransposons, rather than directly impacting the abundance of L1TD1 targets. In this way, L1TD1 might have an important role not only during early development but also in tumorigenesis.