LGG-1/GABARAP lipidation is not required for autophagy and development in Caenorhabditis elegans

  1. Romane Leboutet
  2. Céline Largeau
  3. Leonie Müller
  4. Magali Prigent
  5. Grégoire Quinet
  6. Manuel S Rodriguez
  7. Marie-Hélène Cuif
  8. Thorsten Hoppe
  9. Emmanuel Culetto
  10. Christophe Lefebvre
  11. Renaud Legouis  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, France
  2. University of Cologne, Germany
  3. Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination (LCC), CNRS, France

Abstract

The ubiquitin-like proteins Atg8/LC3/GABARAP are required for multiple steps of autophagy, such as initiation, cargo recognition and engulfment, vesicle closure and degradation. Most of LC3/GABARAP functions are considered dependent on their post-translational modifications and their association with the autophagosome membrane through a conjugation to a lipid, the phosphatidyl-ethanolamine. Contrarily to mammals, C. elegans possesses single homologs of LC3 and GABARAP families, named LGG-2 and LGG-1. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we inhibited the conjugation of LGG-1 to the autophagosome membrane and generated mutants that express only cytosolic forms, either the precursor or the cleaved protein. LGG-1 is an essential gene for autophagy and development in C. elegans, but we discovered that its functions could be fully achieved independently of its localization to the membrane. This study reveals an essential role for the cleaved form of LGG-1 in autophagy but also in an autophagy-independent embryonic function. Our data question the use of lipidated GABARAP/LC3 as the main marker of autophagic flux and highlight the high plasticity of autophagy.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to the corresponding author, Renaud Legouis (renaud.legouis@i2bc.paris-saclay.fr).

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Romane Leboutet

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Céline Largeau

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Leonie Müller

    Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Magali Prigent

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Grégoire Quinet

    Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination (LCC), CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Manuel S Rodriguez

    Laboratoire de Chimie de Coordination (LCC), CNRS, Toulouse, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Marie-Hélène Cuif

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Thorsten Hoppe

    Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4734-9352
  9. Emmanuel Culetto

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4725-2654
  10. Christophe Lefebvre

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Renaud Legouis

    Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    For correspondence
    renaud.legouis@i2bc.paris-saclay.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2699-2584

Funding

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (ECO20170637554)

  • Romane Leboutet

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (project EAT,ANR-12-BSV2-018)

  • Renaud Legouis

Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (SFI20111203826)

  • Renaud Legouis

Ligue Contre le Cancer (M29506)

  • Renaud Legouis

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Leboutet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,430
    views
  • 239
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Romane Leboutet
  2. Céline Largeau
  3. Leonie Müller
  4. Magali Prigent
  5. Grégoire Quinet
  6. Manuel S Rodriguez
  7. Marie-Hélène Cuif
  8. Thorsten Hoppe
  9. Emmanuel Culetto
  10. Christophe Lefebvre
  11. Renaud Legouis
(2023)
LGG-1/GABARAP lipidation is not required for autophagy and development in Caenorhabditis elegans
eLife 12:e85748.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85748

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85748

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    Yue Miao, Yongtao Du ... Mei Ding
    Research Article

    The spatiotemporal transition of small GTPase Rab5 to Rab7 is crucial for early-to-late endosome maturation, yet the precise mechanism governing Rab5-to-Rab7 switching remains elusive. USP8, a ubiquitin-specific protease, plays a prominent role in the endosomal sorting of a wide range of transmembrane receptors and is a promising target in cancer therapy. Here, we identified that USP8 is recruited to Rab5-positive carriers by Rabex5, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rab5. The recruitment of USP8 dissociates Rabex5 from early endosomes (EEs) and meanwhile promotes the recruitment of the Rab7 GEF SAND-1/Mon1. In USP8-deficient cells, the level of active Rab5 is increased, while the Rab7 signal is decreased. As a result, enlarged EEs with abundant intraluminal vesicles accumulate and digestive lysosomes are rudimentary. Together, our results reveal an important and unexpected role of a deubiquitinating enzyme in endosome maturation.