Atypical cognitive training-induced learning and brain plasticity and their relation to insistence on sameness in children with autism
Abstract
Children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) often display atypical learning styles, however little is known regarding learning-related brain plasticity and its relation to clinical phenotypic features. Here, we investigate cognitive learning and neural plasticity using functional brain imaging and a novel numerical problem-solving training protocol. Children with ASD showed comparable learning relative to typically developing children but were less likely to shift from rule-based to memory-based strategy. While learning gains in typically developing children were associated with greater plasticity of neural representations in the medial temporal lobe and intraparietal sulcus, learning in children with ASD was associated with more stable neural representations. Crucially, the relation between learning and plasticity of neural representations was moderated by insistence on sameness, a core phenotypic feature of ASD. Our study uncovers atypical cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying learning in children with ASD, and informs pedagogical strategies for nurturing cognitive abilities in childhood autism.
Data availability
The training sets have been provided in Supplementary Materials. All data that support the findings of this study will be available through the NIHM Data Archive (NDA)
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Institutes of Health (HD059205)
- Vinod Menon
National Institutes of Health (MH084164)
- Vinod Menon
National Institutes of Health (HD094623)
- Vinod Menon
Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute
- Jin Liu
Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute
- Hyesang Chang
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Human subjects: The informed written consent was obtained from the legal guardian of each child and all study protocols were approved by the Stanford University Review Board (IRB-11849). All participants were volunteers and were treated in accordance with the American Psychological Association 'Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct'.
Copyright
© 2023, Liu et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,824
- views
-
- 288
- downloads
-
- 4
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Citations by DOI
-
- 4
- citations for umbrella DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86035