Viruses: How avian influenza viruses spill over to mammals
The H3N2 canine influenza virus – which originally came from birds – is evolving to become more transmissible between dogs.
- University of Colorado Boulder, United States
- University of Georgia, United States
Picture your local lake covered with migrating geese, ducks or other waterfowl. Even though you don’t hear any coughing, you might well be witnessing ‘flu season’ for birds. Influenza viruses cause gastrointestinal infections in birds, and are spread when birds defecate in water that other birds then drink (Caliendo et al., 2020). Sometimes, however, avian influenza viruses make their way into mammals, including humans, and cause respiratory infections: how does this happen?
Waterfowl are the main natural reservoir for influenza viruses, and influenza viruses that infect humans and other mammals originally came from birds. This spillover can happen in two ways. The first way involves special mammalian hosts (like pigs) that can be infected by both avian and mammalian influenza viruses (Figure 1A). Occasionally, an individual from one of these species becomes simultaneously infected with both types of virus, and the two viruses exchange gene segments to form a novel virus that retains the ability to infect mammals. This process – which is known as gene reassortment – is what happened to start human influenza pandemics in 1957 and 1968 (Harrington et al., 2021).
Figure 1
How avian influenza viruses adapt to mammals.
(A) One way that avian viruses can adapt to mammals is through virus reassortment, as shown here. The avian virus (red) reassorts with another influenza virus that is already adapted to mammals (green), yielding a new mammalian-adapted virus. For this to happen, a single individual must be infected by both viruses simultaneously. (B) The other way that avian viruses can adapt to mammals is by direct infection and subsequent adaptation, as is illustrated here. As an avian virus (red) starts to spread between individuals in a mammalian population, it can acquire mutations that make it better at infecting mammals (an evolutionary intermediate is shown in blue). Eventually it may become well-adapted to infecting mammals (green). (C) Chen at al. isolated H3N2 canine influenza viruses from samples collected between 2012 and 2019 (middle columns), and tested them for a range of phenotypic properties that are associated with influenza viruses being able to infect mammals (rows). As controls, they included avian H3N2 (left column) and human H3N2 (right column) viruses. They found that, over time, the canine H3N2 virus gained multiple properties that make it compatible with mammals (green squares), with several of the key adaptations occurring around or after 2016/2017. Yellow squares indicate intermediate phenotypes. A blank square indicates that the test was not performed.
The second way that spillover can happen involves a mammal getting directly infected with a bird virus (Figure 1B). This individual then transmits this bird virus to others in its same species. If infection of the new species is sustained over time and within many individuals, the avian virus will experience natural selection for genetic mutations that make it more and more compatible with the mammalian species (Lipsitch et al., 2016).
Now, in eLife, Yipeng Sun (Chinese Agricultural University) and co-workers – including Mingyue Chen and Yanli Lyu as joint first authors – report the results of experiments which shed light on how a virus that normally infects birds is spreading and evolving in dogs around the world via this second form of spillover (Chen et al., 2023). It is important to understand how this happens, because there are avian viruses currently adapting to several different mammalian species via this direct bird-to-mammal pathway (Meng et al., 2022). Each of these ongoing evolution experiments could, at least in theory, yield a human-adapted virus.
There are only a small number of influenza viruses that humans live with, and these constitute our seasonal influenza virus repertoire. The same is true for dogs, and there are just two influenza viruses that dogs transmit consistently between each other – H3N2 and H3N8. The H3N2 canine influenza virus was first found in 2006 in Guangdong Province in China, and research revealed that its genome was closely related to that of the H3N2 influenza viruses found in birds (Li et al., 2010). The virus has since spread out of Asia and was first identified in dogs in the United States in 2015.
To study the evolution of H3N2 in dogs, Chen et al. collected 4174 tracheal swab samples from sick dogs in veterinary hospitals and kennels. The oldest sample dated back to 2012 and the most recent was from 2019. In addition to sequencing the viruses in these samples and analyzing them phylogenetically, the researchers also tested the viruses from a subset of the samples for a range of phenotypic properties that are associated with bird influenza viruses being able to infect mammals (Lipsitch et al., 2016). They found that the H3N2 canine influenza viruses have gained a number of these phenotypic properties since 2012, making them more and more adapted to mammals as time goes by (Figure 1C). To draw these conclusions, Chen et al. performed infections in dogs and ferrets, and also examined the ability of these viruses to infect human cells in tissue culture.
The researchers were also able to map some of the adaptions to specific sets of genetic changes in the virus genome. Some of these adaptations of avian H3N2 to dogs had been observed before, but prior studies focused on strains from 2017 or earlier (Martinez-Sobrido et al., 2020; Tangwangvivat et al., 2022). The remarkable experimental virology demonstrated in these studies is laborious, but critical for assessing the danger that animal viruses pose to humans (Warren and Sawyer, 2023).
Just because the H3N2 canine influenza virus is perfecting itself for dogs does not mean that it will infect humans. Once an avian influenza virus has perfected itself for a particular mammalian species, such as dogs, we don’t know the details of what then dictates its transmission to a different mammalian species, such as humans (Warren and Sawyer, 2019). Thankfully, there have been no reports to date of humans being infected with canine influenza virus.
References
-
The evolution and future of influenza pandemic preparednessExperimental & Molecular Medicine 53:737–749.https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00603-0
-
Avian-origin H3N2 canine influenza A viruses in Southern ChinaInfection, Genetics and Evolution 10:1286–1288.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2010.08.010
-
Characterizing emerging canine H3 influenza virusesPLOS Pathogens 16:e1008409.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008409
-
How host genetics dictates successful viral zoonosisPLOS Biology 17:e3000217.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000217
Article and author information
Author details
Arturo Barbachano-Guerrero
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Barbachano-Guerrero et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,689
- views
-
- 262
- downloads
-
- 5
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Viruses: How avian influenza viruses spill over to mammals
eLife 12:e86051.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86051
Further reading
-
- Epidemiology and Global Health
Background:
Biological aging exhibits heterogeneity across multi-organ systems. However, it remains unclear how is lifestyle associated with overall and organ-specific aging and which factors contribute most in Southwest China.
Methods:
This study involved 8396 participants who completed two surveys from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort (CMEC) study. The healthy lifestyle index (HLI) was developed using five lifestyle factors: smoking, alcohol, diet, exercise, and sleep. The comprehensive and organ-specific biological ages (BAs) were calculated using the Klemera–Doubal method based on longitudinal clinical laboratory measurements, and validation were conducted to select BA reflecting related diseases. Fixed effects model was used to examine the associations between HLI or its components and the acceleration of validated BAs. We further evaluated the relative contribution of lifestyle components to comprehension and organ systems BAs using quantile G-computation.
Results:
About two-thirds of participants changed HLI scores between surveys. After validation, three organ-specific BAs (the cardiopulmonary, metabolic, and liver BAs) were identified as reflective of specific diseases and included in further analyses with the comprehensive BA. The health alterations in HLI showed a protective association with the acceleration of all BAs, with a mean shift of –0.19 (95% CI −0.34, –0.03) in the comprehensive BA acceleration. Diet and smoking were the major contributors to overall negative associations of five lifestyle factors, with the comprehensive BA and metabolic BA accounting for 24% and 55% respectively.
Conclusions:
Healthy lifestyle changes were inversely related to comprehensive and organ-specific biological aging in Southwest China, with diet and smoking contributing most to comprehensive and metabolic BA separately. Our findings highlight the potential of lifestyle interventions to decelerate aging and identify intervention targets to limit organ-specific aging in less-developed regions.
Funding:
This work was primarily supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82273740) and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province, Grant No. 2024NSFSC0552). The CMEC study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0907305, 2017YFC0907300). The sponsors had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of this article.
-
- Epidemiology and Global Health
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Background:
In many settings, a large fraction of the population has both been vaccinated against and infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Hence, quantifying the protection provided by post-infection vaccination has become critical for policy. We aimed to estimate the protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection of an additional vaccine dose after an initial Omicron variant infection.
Methods:
We report a retrospective, population-based cohort study performed in Shanghai, China, using electronic databases with information on SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccination history. We compared reinfection incidence by post-infection vaccination status in individuals initially infected during the April–May 2022 Omicron variant surge in Shanghai and who had been vaccinated before that period. Cox models were fit to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).
Results:
275,896 individuals were diagnosed with real-time polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in April–May 2022; 199,312/275,896 were included in analyses on the effect of a post-infection vaccine dose. Post-infection vaccination provided protection against reinfection (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.85). For patients who had received one, two, or three vaccine doses before their first infection, hazard ratios for the post-infection vaccination effect were 0.84 (0.76–0.93), 0.87 (0.83–0.90), and 0.96 (0.74–1.23), respectively. Post-infection vaccination within 30 and 90 days before the second Omicron wave provided different degrees of protection (in aHR): 0.51 (0.44–0.58) and 0.67 (0.61–0.74), respectively. Moreover, for all vaccine types, but to different extents, a post-infection dose given to individuals who were fully vaccinated before first infection was protective.
Conclusions:
In previously vaccinated and infected individuals, an additional vaccine dose provided protection against Omicron variant reinfection. These observations will inform future policy decisions on COVID-19 vaccination in China and other countries.
Funding:
This study was funded the Key Discipline Program of Pudong New Area Health System (PWZxk2022-25), the Development and Application of Intelligent Epidemic Surveillance and AI Analysis System (21002411400), the Shanghai Public Health System Construction (GWVI-11.2-XD08), the Shanghai Health Commission Key Disciplines (GWVI-11.1-02), the Shanghai Health Commission Clinical Research Program (20214Y0020), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (22ZR1414600), and the Shanghai Young Health Talents Program (2022YQ076).
