CaMKII autophosphorylation can occur between holoenzymes without subunit exchange

  1. Iva Lučić  Is a corresponding author
  2. Léonie Héluin
  3. Pin-Lian Jiang
  4. Alejandro G Castro Scalise
  5. Cong Wang
  6. Andreas Franz
  7. Florian Heyd
  8. Markus Wahl
  9. Fan Liu
  10. Andrew J R Plested  Is a corresponding author
  1. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
  2. Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Germany
  3. Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

Abstract

The dodecameric protein kinase CaMKII is expressed throughout the body. The alpha isoform is responsible for synaptic plasticity and participates in memory through its phosphorylation of synaptic proteins. Its elaborate subunit organization and propensity for autophosphorylation allow it to preserve neuronal plasticity across space and time. The prevailing hypothesis for the spread of CaMKII activity, involving shuffling of subunits between activated and naïve holoenzymes, is broadly termed subunit exchange. In contrast to the expectations of previous work, we found little evidence for subunit exchange upon activation, and no effect of restraining subunits to their parent holoenzymes. Rather, mass photometry, crosslinking mass spectrometry, single molecule TIRF microscopy and biochemical assays identify inter-holoenzyme phosphorylation (IHP) as the mechanism for spreading phosphorylation. The transient, activity-dependent formation of groups of holoenzymes is well suited to the speed of neuronal activity. Our results place fundamental limits on the activation mechanism of this kinase.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript, supporting figures and supporting tables.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Iva Lučić

    Institute of Biology, Cellular Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    iva.lucic@hu-berlin.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8077-2195
  2. Léonie Héluin

    Institute of Biology, Cellular Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pin-Lian Jiang

    Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Alejandro G Castro Scalise

    Institute of Biology, Cellular Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Cong Wang

    Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Andreas Franz

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Florian Heyd

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9377-9882
  8. Markus Wahl

    Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2811-5307
  9. Fan Liu

    Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Andrew J R Plested

    Institute of Biology, Cellular Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    andrew.plested@hu-berlin.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6062-0832

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (798696)

  • Iva Lučić

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (272140445)

  • Andrew J R Plested

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (323514590 & 446182550)

  • Andrew J R Plested

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Takeo Saneyoshi, Kyoto University, Japan

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: August 5, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: January 10, 2023
  3. Accepted: August 10, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 11, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: August 30, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: August 31, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Lučić et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 899
    views
  • 140
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Iva Lučić
  2. Léonie Héluin
  3. Pin-Lian Jiang
  4. Alejandro G Castro Scalise
  5. Cong Wang
  6. Andreas Franz
  7. Florian Heyd
  8. Markus Wahl
  9. Fan Liu
  10. Andrew J R Plested
(2023)
CaMKII autophosphorylation can occur between holoenzymes without subunit exchange
eLife 12:e86090.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86090

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86090

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Computational and Systems Biology
    Richard Sejour, Janet Leatherwood ... Bruce Futcher
    Research Article

    Previously, Tuller et al. found that the first 30–50 codons of the genes of yeast and other eukaryotes are slightly enriched for rare codons. They argued that this slowed translation, and was adaptive because it queued ribosomes to prevent collisions. Today, the translational speeds of different codons are known, and indeed rare codons are translated slowly. We re-examined this 5’ slow translation ‘ramp.’ We confirm that 5’ regions are slightly enriched for rare codons; in addition, they are depleted for downstream Start codons (which are fast), with both effects contributing to slow 5’ translation. However, we also find that the 5’ (and 3’) ends of yeast genes are poorly conserved in evolution, suggesting that they are unstable and turnover relatively rapidly. When a new 5’ end forms de novo, it is likely to include codons that would otherwise be rare. Because evolution has had a relatively short time to select against these codons, 5’ ends are typically slightly enriched for rare, slow codons. Opposite to the expectation of Tuller et al., we show by direct experiment that genes with slowly translated codons at the 5’ end are expressed relatively poorly, and that substituting faster synonymous codons improves expression. Direct experiment shows that slow codons do not prevent downstream ribosome collisions. Further informatic studies suggest that for natural genes, slow 5’ ends are correlated with poor gene expression, opposite to the expectation of Tuller et al. Thus, we conclude that slow 5’ translation is a ‘spandrel’--a non-adaptive consequence of something else, in this case, the turnover of 5’ ends in evolution, and it does not improve translation.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Boglarka Zambo, Evelina Edelweiss ... Gergo Gogl
    Research Article

    Truncation of the protein-protein interaction SH3 domain of the membrane remodeling Bridging Integrator 1 (BIN1, Amphiphysin 2) protein leads to centronuclear myopathy. Here, we assessed the impact of a set of naturally observed, previously uncharacterized BIN1 SH3 domain variants using conventional in vitro and cell-based assays monitoring the BIN1 interaction with dynamin 2 (DNM2) and identified potentially harmful ones that can be also tentatively connected to neuromuscular disorders. However, SH3 domains are typically promiscuous and it is expected that other, so far unknown partners of BIN1 exist besides DNM2, that also participate in the development of centronuclear myopathy. In order to shed light on these other relevant interaction partners and to get a holistic picture of the pathomechanism behind BIN1 SH3 domain variants, we used affinity interactomics. We identified hundreds of new BIN1 interaction partners proteome-wide, among which many appear to participate in cell division, suggesting a critical role of BIN1 in the regulation of mitosis. Finally, we show that the identified BIN1 mutations indeed cause proteome-wide affinity perturbation, signifying the importance of employing unbiased affinity interactomic approaches.