Low-level repressive histone marks fine-tune gene transcription in neural stem cells

  1. Arjun Rajan
  2. Lucas Anhezini
  3. Noemi Rives-Quinto
  4. Jay Yash Chhabra
  5. Megan C Neville
  6. Elizabeth D Larson
  7. Stephen F Goodwin
  8. Melissa M Harrison
  9. Cheng-Yu Lee  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, United States
  2. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  3. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States

Abstract

Coordinated regulation of gene activity by transcriptional and translational mechanisms poise stem cells for a timely cell-state transition during differentiation. Although important for all stemness-to-differentiation transitions, mechanistic understanding of the fine-tuning of gene transcription is lacking due to the compensatory effect of translational control. We used intermediate neural progenitor (INP) identity commitment to define the mechanisms that fine-tune stemness gene transcription in fly neural stem cells (neuroblasts). We demonstrate that the transcription factor FruitlessC (FruC) binds cis-regulatory elements of most genes uniquely transcribed in neuroblasts. Loss of fruC function alone has no effect on INP commitment but drives INP dedifferentiation when translational control is reduced. FruC negatively regulates gene expression by promoting low-level enrichment of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3 in gene cis-regulatory regions. Identical to fruC loss-of-function, reducing Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 activity increases stemness gene activity. We propose low-level H3K27me3 enrichment fine-tunes gene transcription in stem cells, a mechanism likely conserved from flies to humans.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE218257All quantifications are provided in Supplementary File 1.All analysis code used has been deposited in GitHub: https://github.com/Cheng-Yu-Lee-Lab/Rajan-et-al-2023

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arjun Rajan

    Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7043-1031
  2. Lucas Anhezini

    Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Noemi Rives-Quinto

    Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jay Yash Chhabra

    Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Megan C Neville

    Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8506-9944
  6. Elizabeth D Larson

    Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Stephen F Goodwin

    Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0552-4140
  8. Melissa M Harrison

    Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8228-6836
  9. Cheng-Yu Lee

    Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, United States
    For correspondence
    leecheng@umich.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2291-1297

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS107496)

  • Cheng-Yu Lee

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS111647)

  • Melissa M Harrison
  • Cheng-Yu Lee

Wellcome Trust (106189/Z/14/Z)

  • Stephen F Goodwin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Rajan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,057
    views
  • 195
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arjun Rajan
  2. Lucas Anhezini
  3. Noemi Rives-Quinto
  4. Jay Yash Chhabra
  5. Megan C Neville
  6. Elizabeth D Larson
  7. Stephen F Goodwin
  8. Melissa M Harrison
  9. Cheng-Yu Lee
(2023)
Low-level repressive histone marks fine-tune gene transcription in neural stem cells
eLife 12:e86127.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86127

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86127

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Thomas A Bos, Elizaveta Polyakova ... Monique RM Jongbloed
    Research Article Updated

    Human autonomic neuronal cell models are emerging as tools for modeling diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias. In this systematic review, we compared 33 articles applying 14 different protocols to generate sympathetic neurons and 3 different procedures to produce parasympathetic neurons. All methods involved the differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells, and none employed permanent or reversible cell immortalization. Almost all protocols were reproduced in multiple pluripotent stem cell lines, and over half showed evidence of neural firing capacity. Common limitations in the field are a lack of three-dimensional models and models that include multiple cell types. Sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols largely mirrored embryonic development, with the notable absence of migration, axon extension, and target-specificity cues. Parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocols may be improved by including several embryonic cues promoting cell survival, cell maturation, or ion channel expression. Moreover, additional markers to define parasympathetic neurons in vitro may support the validity of these protocols. Nonetheless, four sympathetic neuron differentiation protocols and one parasympathetic neuron differentiation protocol reported more than two-thirds of cells expressing autonomic neuron markers. Altogether, these protocols promise to open new research avenues of human autonomic neuron development and disease modeling.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sarah Y Coomson, Salil A Lachke
    Insight

    A study in mice reveals key interactions between proteins involved in fibroblast growth factor signaling and how they contribute to distinct stages of eye lens development.