Antibiotic Resistance: A mobile target
The global spread of antibiotic resistance could be due to a number of factors, and not just the overuse of antibiotics in agriculture and medicine as previously thought.
- Center for Environment Sciences and Humanities, Bard College, United States
- Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, United States
Antibiotic resistance – the ability of bacteria to survive even the strongest clinical treatments – continues to be a major public health concern around the world (Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators, 2022). The overuse of antibiotics in medicine and agriculture is often thought to be the driving force behind the emergence and spread of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics (Cohen, 1992; Levy and Marshall, 2004). Overuse can certainly explain the selection for bacteria with genes for antibiotic resistance in environments that are heavily impacted by human activity (Gaze et al., 2013; Kraemer et al., 2019), but it cannot explain the widespread distribution of genes for resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics well away from hospitals and farms. Indeed, such genes have even been found in environments as remote as the Arctic permafrost (D’Costa et al., 2011; Perron et al., 2015) and Antarctica (Hwengwere et al., 2022; Marcoleta et al., 2022).
Now, in eLife, Léa Pradier and Stéphanie Bedhomme of the University of Montpellier report the results of a study that sheds light on this matter (Pradier and Bedhomme, 2023). Focusing on resistance against aminoglycoside, a widely used family of antibiotics that includes streptomycin (Davies and Wright, 1997), the researchers conducted one of the largest surveys of antibiotic resistance genes to date. They analyzed more than 160,000 bacterial genomes collected from all over the globe, focusing on 27 clusters of genes that code for aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (also known as AME genes). The bacteria were sampled between 1885–2019, although most were sampled recently, with the first example of a bacterium with an AME gene dating from 1905. In addition to the location and date of sampling, the study also considered the number of antibiotics consumed in each country, commercial trade routes, and human migration. Finally, the samples came from eleven different biomes, representing a range of environments where antibiotic resistance can be found: clinical environments (like hospitals), human habitats, domestic animals, farms, agrosystems, wild plants and animals, freshwater, seawater, sludge and waste, soil, and humans.
The researchers found that the prevalence of genes for aminoglycoside resistance increased between the 1940s and the 1980s, likely following an increase in the use of antibiotics after the discovery of streptomycin in 1943 (Schatz et al., 1944), and then remained at a prevalence of around 30%, despite an overall decrease in consumption. Crucially, they also discovered that around 40% of the resistance genes were potentially mobile, which means they can be easily exchanged between bacteria.
Pradier and Bedhomme also found that antibiotic-resistant bacteria are present in most biomes, and not just in hospitals and farms. Moreover, they found that the prevalence of aminoglycoside resistance genes varied more from biome to biome than it did with human geography or with the quantity of antibiotics used (Figure 1). This means that the antibiotic resistance found in humans in one country is more likely to be related to the antibiotic resistance found in humans in a distant country than it is to the antibiotic resistance found in the soil or animals nearby. Moreover, they also discovered that biomes such as soil and wastewater likely play a key role in spreading the genes for antibiotic resistance across different biomes.
Figure 1
Factors influencing the spread of resistance against aminoglycoside antibiotics.
Pradier and Bedhomme analyzed the variables that influence the prevalence of genes that code for aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AME genes) in a sample of 160,000 bacterial genomes collected from all over the globe. The samples were classified as belonging to one of eleven biomes (see main text). It was found that ecology (that is, which of the 11 biomes the sample was collected from) was the biggest influence, followed by human exchange (immigration and material import/export) and aminoglycoside consumption. This scatter plot for samples collected in Europe between 1997 and 2018, which is derived from Figure 5 of Pradier and Bedhomme, 2023, shows how the prevalence of 16 clusters of these genes depends on these three variables, with the thickness of each axis representing how influential that variable was overall (ecology, 80%; human exchange, 13%; aminoglycoside consumption, 7%; interactions between the variables are not included). The clusters of genes represented by circles code for N-acetyltransferases; triangles represent nucleotidyltransferases, and squares represent phosphotransferases.
These findings raise important questions about the mechanisms underlying the spread of antibiotic resistance. What factors promote the spread of antibiotic resistance in environments not impacted by human activities? Can we extrapolate these results from the aminoglycosides to all other classes of antibiotics? Is it possible that antibiotic resistance results from interactions with local microbial communities more than exposure to commercial antibiotics? Do the genes for antibiotic resistance spread in the pathogenic bacteria responsible for human and animal infections in the same way as they spread in non-pathogenic bacteria? Given the extent of the selective pressure exerted by human pollution, what limits the spread of antibiotic-resistance genes between biomes, especially given the large proportion of genes on mobile elements?
It may well be that consumption still has a paramount role when it comes to resistance to the antibiotics that are used to treat infection, especially in humans and clinical biomes. Nevertheless, it is clear that we need to pay more attention to the role of the environment when formulating plans to combat antibiotic resistance on a global scale.
References
-
Bacterial resistance to aminoglycoside antibioticsTrends in Microbiology 5:234–240.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-842X(97)01033-0
-
Influence of humans on evolution and mobilization of environmental antibiotic resistomeEmerging Infectious Diseases 19:e120871.https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1907.120871
-
Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responsesNature Medicine 10:S122–S129.https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1145
-
The highly diverse Antarctic Peninsula soil microbiota as a source of novel resistance genesScience of the Total Environment 810:152003.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152003
-
Streptomycin, a substance exhibiting antibiotic activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteriaExperimental Biology and Medicine 55:66–69.https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-55-14461
Article and author information
Author details
Carolina Oliveira de Santana
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Oliveira de Santana, Spealman et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,491
- views
-
- 182
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Antibiotic Resistance: A mobile target
eLife 12:e86697.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86697
Further reading
-
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
Organisms require dietary macronutrients in specific ratios to maximize performance, and variation in macronutrient requirements plays a central role in niche determination. Although it is well recognized that development and body size can have strong and predictable effects on many aspects of organismal function, we lack a predictive understanding of ontogenetic or scaling effects on macronutrient intake. We determined protein and carbohydrate intake throughout development on lab populations of locusts and compared to late instars of field populations. Self-selected protein:carbohydrate targets declined dramatically through ontogeny, due primarily to declines in mass-specific protein consumption rates which were highly correlated with declines in specific growth rates. Lab results for protein consumption rates partly matched results from field-collected locusts. However, field locusts consumed nearly double the carbohydrate, likely due to higher activity and metabolic rates. Combining our results with the available data for animals, both across species and during ontogeny, protein consumption scaled predictably and hypometrically, demonstrating a new scaling rule key for understanding nutritional ecology.
-
- Ecology
Advances in tracking technologies have revealed the diverse migration patterns of birds, which are critical for range mapping and population estimation. Population trends are usually estimated in breeding ranges where birds remain stationary, but for species that breed in remote areas like the Arctic, these trends are often assessed in over-wintering ranges. Assessing population trends during the wintering season is challenging due to the extensive movements of birds in these ranges, which requires a deep understanding of the movement dynamics. However, these movements remain understudied, particularly in the mid-latitudes, where many Arctic breeders overwinter, increasing uncertainty in their ranges and numbers. Here, we show that the Arctic breeding raptor Rough-legged buzzard, which overwinters in the mid-latitudes, has a specific wintering strategy. After migrating ca. 1500 km from the Arctic to mid-latitudes, the birds continue to move throughout the entire over-wintering period, traveling another 1000 km southwest and then back northeast as the snowline advances. This continuous movement makes their wintering range dynamic throughout the season. In essence, this movement represents an extension of the quick migration process, albeit at a slower pace, and we have termed this migration pattern ‘foxtrot migration’, drawing an analogy to the alternating fast and slow movements of the foxtrot dance. These results highlight the potential errors in range mapping from single mid-winter surveys and emphasize the importance of this migration pattern in assessing the conservation status of bird species. Understanding this migration pattern could help to correctly estimate bird populations in over-wintering ranges, which is especially important for species that nest in hard-to-reach regions such as the Arctic.
