Quantifying gliding forces of filamentous cyanobacteria by selfbuckling
Abstract
Filamentous cyanobacteria are one of the oldest and today still most abundant lifeforms on earth, with manifold implications in ecology and economics. Their flexible filaments, often several hundred cells long, exhibit gliding motility in contact with solid surfaces. The underlying force generating mechanism is not yet understood. Here, we demonstrate that propulsion forces and friction coefficients are strongly coupled in the gliding motility of filamentous cyanobacteria. We directly measure their bending moduli using micropipette force sensors, and quantify propulsion and friction forces by analyzing their selfbuckling behavior, complemented with analytical theory and simulations. The results indicate that slime extrusion unlikely generates the gliding forces, but support adhesionbased hypotheses, similar to the betterstudied singlecelled myxobacteria. The critical selfbuckling lengths align well with the peaks of natural length distributions, indicating the importance of selfbuckling for the organization of their collective in natural and artificial settings.
eLife assessment
This valuable paper describes innovative force measurements of the bending modulus of gliding cyanobacteria, along with measurements of the critical buckling length of the cells, which in combination lead to insight into how these cells produce the force necessary to move. Quantitative analysis convincingly shows that the propulsive force and resistive friction coefficient are strongly coupled, which supports propulsion based on adhesion forces rather than slime extrusion.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87450.3.sa0Introduction
Filamentous cyanobacteria are an omnipresent group of phototrophic prokaryotes, contributing majorly to the global fixation of atmospheric carbon dioxide. They played an important role already in the paleoclimate of our planet, having generated the atmospheric oxygen (Whitton, 2012; Sciuto and Moro, 2015) on which animal life is based. Today, giant marine and limnic blooms pose ecological and economical threats (Whitton, 2012; Sciuto and Moro, 2015; Bauer et al., 2020; Fastner et al., 2018), but also enable bioreactor applications, for instance as a renewable energy source (Whitton, 2012; Ruffing and Kallas, 2016). The long and flexible filaments contain up to several hundred, linearly stacked cells. Many species exhibit gliding motility when in contact with solid surfaces or other filaments, but no swimming motion (Burkholder, 1934). Motility enables filaments to aggregate into colonies, adapting their architecture to environmental conditions (Whitton, 2012; Khayatan et al., 2015). The force generating mechanism behind gliding is not yet understood (Halfen and Castenholz, 1971; Godwin et al., 1989; Hoiczyk and Baumeister, 1998; McBride, 2001; Gupta and Agrawal, 2006; Read et al., 2007; Koiller et al., 2010; Hanada et al., 2011; Khayatan et al., 2015; Wilde and Mullineaux, 2015). Slime extrusion (Hoiczyk and Baumeister, 1998), metachronal waves on surface fibrils (Halfen and Castenholz, 1971; Halfen, 1973; Read et al., 2007), and acoustic streaming (Koiller et al., 2010) have been proposed. A few species appear to employ a typeIVpilusrelated mechanism (Khayatan et al., 2015; Wilde and Mullineaux, 2015), similar to the betterstudied myxobacteria (Godwin et al., 1989; Mignot et al., 2007; Nan et al., 2014; Copenhagen et al., 2021; Godwin et al., 1989), which are short, rodshaped single cells that exhibit two types of motility: S (social) motility based on pilus extension and retraction, and A (adventurous) motility based on focal adhesion (Chen and Nan, 2022), for which also slime extrusion at the trailing cell pole was earlier postulated as mechanism (Wolgemuth, 2005). Yet, most gliding filamentous cyanobacteria do not exhibit visible pili and their gliding mechanism appears to be distinct from myxobacteria (Khayatan et al., 2015).
Here, we measure the bending moduli of Kamptonema animale and Oscillatoria lutea (Figure 1A and B, respectively) by micropipette force sensors (Backholm and Bäumchen, 2019). This allows us to quantify the propulsion and friction forces associated with gliding motility, by analyzing their selfbuckling behavior. SelfBuckling is an important instability for selfpropelling rodlike microorganisms to change the orientation of their motion, enabling aggregation or the escape from traps (Fily et al., 2020; Man and Kanso, 2019; IseleHolder et al., 2015; IseleHolder et al., 2016). The notion of selfbuckling goes back to work of Leonhard Euler in 1780, who described elastic columns subject to gravity (Elishakoff, 2000). Here, the principle is adapted to the selfpropelling, flexible filaments (Fily et al., 2020; Man and Kanso, 2019; Sekimoto et al., 1995) that glide onto an obstacle. Filaments buckle if they exceed a certain critical length $L}_{c}\sim (B/f{)}^{1/3$, where $B$ is the bending modulus and $f$ the propulsion force density. By recording numerous collision events, we obtain a comprehensive statistics to derive $L}_{c$. Kirchhoff beam theory provides an analytical expression for the prefactor in $L}_{c$, and we numerically calculate the evolution of the filament shape upon buckling. Comparing experiment with theory, we derive the propulsion force densities and friction coefficients of the living filaments. Force and friction are strongly coupled, which favors an adhesionbased propulsion mechanism (Khayatan et al., 2015; Wilde and Mullineaux, 2015) over the still customary slimeextrusion hypothesis (Hoiczyk and Baumeister, 1998; McBride, 2001). The critical lengths we found are close to the peak in the length distribution in freely growing colonies, indicating the importance of this quantity for their selforganization.
Results
Bending measurements
The bending moduli $B$ of individual filaments of O. lutea and K. animale were measured by microscopic threepoint bending tests (Backholm et al., 2013). Filaments that glide freely across liquidimmersed surfaces decorated with micropillars (SU8 on glass) were pushed into a gap between two pillars with a Micropipette Force Sensor (MFS, see Figure 1C). The deflection of the lever arm of the micropipette is proportional to the load acting on its tip. The corresponding spring constant is obtained from independent calibration measurements (see Methods and Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). The base of the pipette was actuated with a constant speed of ±5 µm/s to increase and release the force acting on the living filament. Pipette and filament deflections were analyzed with a custommade image analysis procedure in Matlab (see Methods and Kreis et al., 2018; Kreis et al, 2019; Backholm and Bäumchen, 2019; Böddeker et al., 2020 for details).
Figure 2A shows an exemplary forcedisplacement curve, accompanied with snapshots from the experiment, for K. animale. The measured forcedistance relations were continuous, linear, largely speedindependent and free of hysteretic effects (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B and C), allowing for an analysis with standard beam theory to derive the effective bending modulus $B$ from the slopes of the forcedeflection curves.
Each individual filament was tested two to ten times at different locations along its contour (see Figure 2—figure supplement 1D for a collection of individual measurements). We observed no systematic dependence of $B$ on the length of the filament or the position along the contour, i.e., no softening or stiffening toward the ends. Stiffness variations on scales below the pillar spacing can of course not be excluded. Figure 2B shows a box plot of the bending moduli. O. lutea appears to be slightly stiffer with $B=(1.4\pm 0.4)\times {10}^{16}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{J}\mathrm{m}$ than K. animale with $B=(1.0\pm 0.3)\times {10}^{16}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{J}\mathrm{m}$.
Buckling measurements
We now turn from micropipette bending measurements to selfbuckling experiments. The buckling behavior was observed by optical microscopy in quasitwodimensional microfluidic compartments filled with liquid medium (Figure 1D, Figure 3A, and Methods). The height of the chambers was approximately 5 µm, only slightly larger than the diameter of the filaments, such that motion and buckling was confined to the $x$$y$plane. Filaments explored the entire device and occasionally entered channels that directed them onto Vshaped traps (opening angle 90°). The Vshape is not necessarily required but reduces the chance of filaments slipping sideways instead of buckling, as was observed sometimes for collisions with flat walls. For a collection of collision events with various obstacle architectures, see Figure 3—figure supplement 1. After colliding, the filaments escaped these traps, either by reversing their gliding direction or, if they buckled, due to the reorientation of their front. In total, we collected 388 collision events for O. lutea and 280 for K. animale.
The observed events were classified as buckling or nonbuckling manually by visual inspection (Figure 3A and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). We observed no systematic dependence of the buckling behavior on the shape and size of the trap, nor on the angle of incidence. The filament length $L$ as well as the free gliding velocity $v}_{0$ prior to hitting the obstacle were determined by automated image processing (see Methods). Buckling frequencies (Figure 3B and C, bars) were evaluated by binning the observations into fixed intervals of the contour length $L$. Frequently, individual filaments were observed $N$ times, and previous buckling behavior is not readily repeated. Multiple observations of an individual filament were weighted with $1/N$ to obtain an unbiased representation of the population.
The weighted events were analyzed by a logistic regression of the buckling probability
with $x=(L{L}_{c})/\mathrm{\Delta}{L}_{c}$. The median critical length $L}_{c$ and the width of its distribution $\mathrm{\Delta}{L}_{c}$ are obtained by maximum likelihood estimation (Methods). The results are depicted as the dashed curves in Figure 3B and C. For O. lutea, we find ${L}_{c}\pm \mathrm{\Delta}{L}_{c}=$ (161 ± 35) µm and for K. animale (148 ± 18) µm. The corresponding box plot is shown in Figure 3D.
The substrate contact requires lubrication from polysaccharide slime to enable bacteria to glide (Khayatan et al., 2015). Thus we assume an overdamped motion with colinear friction, for which the propulsion force $f$ and the free gliding velocity $v}_{0$ of a filament are related by $f=\eta \phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}{v}_{0}$, with a friction coefficient $\eta$. In this scenario, $f$ can be inferred both from the observed $L}_{c}\sim (f/B{)}^{1/3$ and, up to the proportionality coefficient $\eta$, from the observed free gliding velocity. Thus, by combining the two relations, one may expect also a strong correlation between $L}_{c$ and $v}_{0$. In order to test this relation for consistency with our data, we include $v}_{0$ as a second regressor, by setting $x=(L{L}_{c}({v}_{0}))/\mathrm{\Delta}{L}_{c}$ in Equation 1, with $L}_{c}({v}_{0})=(\eta \phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}{v}_{0}/(30.5722\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}B){)}^{1/3$, to reflect our expectation from theory (see below). Now, $\eta$ rather than $f$ is the only unknown, and its ensemble distribution will be determined in the regression. Figure 3E and F show the buckling behavior as color code in terms of the filament length $L$ and the free gliding velocity $v}_{0$ prior to hitting the obstacle. From maximum likelihood estimation of ${L}_{c}({v}_{0})$ (black lines), we obtain $\eta =(0.6\pm 0.4)\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{N}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{s}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mu {\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ for O. lutea and $\eta =(0.8\pm 0.6)\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{N}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{s}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mu {\mathrm{m}}^{2}$ for K. animale. In Figure 3G, we compare ${L}_{c}({v}_{0})$ for both species, and the results from the oneparameter regression, placed at the mean velocity $\overline{v}$.
Within the characteristic range of observed velocities (1–3 µm s^{–1}), the median $L}_{c$ depends only mildly on $v}_{0$, as compared to its rather broad distribution, indicated by the bands in Figure 3G. Thus a possible correlation between $f$ and $v}_{0$ would only mildly alter $L}_{c$. The natural length distribution (Figure 3—figure supplement 2), however, is very broad, and we conclude that growth rather than velocity or force distributions most strongly impacts the buckling propensity of cyanobacterial colonies. Also, we hardly observed short and fast filaments of K. animale, which might be caused by physiological limitations (Burkholder, 1934).
Buckling theory
In the classical selfbuckling theory by Euler, the critical length for a vertical column, clamped at its lower end and free at its upper end, of uniform bending modulus $B$, subject to a gravitational force density $f}_{g$, is given by $L}_{c}={\left(7.837B/{f}_{g}\right)}^{1/3$(Elishakoff, 2000). The buckling of gliding filaments differs in two aspects: the propulsion forces are oriented tangentially instead of vertically, and the front end is supported instead of clamped. Therefore, with $L<{L}_{c}$ all initial orientations are indifferently stable, while for $L>{L}_{c}$, buckling induces curvature and a resultant torque on the head, leading to rotation (Fily et al., 2020; Chelakkot et al., 2014; Sekimoto et al., 1995). Buckling under concentrated tangential endloads has also been investigated in literature (De Canio et al., 2017; Wolgemuth, 2005), but leads to substantially different shapes of buckled filaments.
Following existing literature (Fily et al., 2020; Chelakkot et al., 2014; Sekimoto et al., 1995), we use classical Kirchhoff theory for a uniform beam of length $L$ and bending modulus $B$, subject to a force density $\overrightarrow{b}=f\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\overrightarrow{t}\eta \phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\overrightarrow{v}$, with an effective active force density $f$ along the tangent $\overrightarrow{t}$, and an effective friction proportional to the local velocity $\overrightarrow{v}$. Presumably, this friction is dominated by the lubrication drag from the contact with the substrate, filled by a thin layer of secreted polysaccharide slime which is much more viscous than the surrounding bulk fluid. Speculatively, the motility mechanism might also comprise adhering elements like pili (Khayatan et al., 2015) or foci (Mignot et al., 2007) that increase the overall friction (Pompe et al., 2011). Thus, the drag due to the surrounding bulk fluid can be neglected (Man and Kanso, 2019), and friction is assumed to be isotropic, a common assumption in motility models (Fei et al., 2020; Tchoufag et al., 2019; Wada et al., 2013). We assume a homogeneous and constant distribution of an effectively tangential active force along the filament. Since many cells contribute simultaneously to the gliding force, one may expect noise and fluctuations on the length scale of the individual cell, far below the filament length, which we thus neglect. Based on our observations, we assume a planar configuration and a vanishing twist. Thus we also neglect any helical components of active force or friction, since these appear to merely add rigidbody rotation during free gliding. We parametrize the beam by its orientational angle $\varphi (s)$ as a function of the contour coordinate $s$ (see Figure 1D), to obtain the Kirchhoff equation (Audoly and Pomeau, 2018)
with $\kappa ={\mathrm{\partial}}_{s}\varphi$, the curvature and $\overrightarrow{n}$, the unit normal vector. The head of the filament ($s=0$) is subject to a localized force $\overrightarrow{P}$ that balances the load integral and thereby fixes its position. The tail ($s=L$) is naturally forcefree, and the two boundary conditions are vanishing torques at the head and tail of the filament:
The local velocity is expressed through
Inserting Equation 4 into Equation 2 and changing the order of integration, the inner integral can be evaluated to obtain
Equation 5 is solved by the method of lines (see Methods and Figure 4—figure supplement 2).
To derive the critical selfbuckling length, Equation 5 can be linearized for two scenarios that lead to the same $L}_{c$: earlytime small amplitude buckling and latetime stationary rotation at small and constant curvature (Fily et al., 2020; Chelakkot et al., 2014; Sekimoto et al., 1995). Scaling $s$ by $L$ and $t$ by ${t}_{0}={L}^{4}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\eta /B$, a single dimensionless parameter remains, the activity coefficient $\mathrm{\Gamma}={L}^{3}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}f/B$, reminiscent of the flexure number typically used in statistical physics of active polymers (IseleHolder et al., 2015; IseleHolder et al., 2016). Seeking stationary rotor solutions $\varphi (s,t)=\varphi (s)+\omega \phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}t$, rotating with angular frequency $\omega$, Equation 5 reduces to (in scaled units) (Chelakkot et al., 2014; Fily et al., 2020; Sekimoto et al., 1995)
This second order ordinary differential equation is subject to three boundary conditions, ${\kappa }_{s=0}={\kappa }_{s=1}={{\mathrm{\partial}}_{s}\kappa }_{s=1}=0$, hence fixing $\omega (\mathrm{\Gamma})$. The trivial solution $\kappa \equiv 0$ with $\omega =0$ is amended by a first nontrivial branch of buckled filaments at $\mathrm{\Gamma}\approx 30.5722$, the root of a combination of hypergeometric functions which is given in Methods and was first found by Sekimoto et al., 1995. Thus, in physical units, the critical length is given by $L}_{c}={\left(30.5722\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}B/f\right)}^{1/3$, which is reproduced in particlebased simulations (Figure 3—figure supplement 3) analogous to those in IseleHolder et al., 2015; IseleHolder et al., 2016.
Inserting the population median and quartiles of the distributions of bending modulus and critical length, we can now quantify the distribution of the active force density for the filaments in the ensemble from the buckling measurements. We obtain nearly identical values for both species, $f\sim (1.0\pm 0.6)\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{N}/\mu \mathrm{m}$, where the uncertainty represents a wide distribution of $f$ across the ensemble rather than a measurement error.
Profile analysis
We will now compare the evolution of theoretical profiles from Equation 5 to the evolution of the experimental buckling contours. The latter were extracted from the micrographs with an inhouse trained convolutional neural network with modified UNet architecture (Ronneberger et al., 2015) (see Figure 4A, green contour) and tracked from the moment of impact until parts other than the head made contact with the confining walls. This limitation narrows down the available data substantially because buckling frequently induced contact with the channel walls. Figure 4A shows a representative time series of a buckling filament, together with the extracted contour and the fitted solution of Equation 5 (see Methods for details of the fitting procedure). From the fit, we calculate $f$ and $\eta$ of individual filaments, using the median bending modulus of the respective species (Figure 4B and C). The dashed line on each panel indicates the value from the logistic regression, representative of the population. Filaments below the critical length do not buckle and no values can be derived from profile fitting: this region is indicated in gray. The light gray zone corresponds to the central quartiles of the critical length distribution, where data are biased toward larger forces because only part of the population can buckle. Indeed, here we record the strongest filaments. This bias is not present in the logistic regression, which is most sensitive in the transition region but equally accounts for buckling and nonbuckling outcomes.
Discussion
Remarkably, the median active forces for the two species match almost perfectly. The logistic regression gives a good estimate for the population average, and the distributions derived from individual profile fits are centered around this median. The similarity between the two species indicates a potential homology of their gliding apparati.
The comparison with Kirchhoff theory allows us to measure active forces and friction coefficients on an individual basis, going beyond the population mean. Thus it allows for a more insightful analysis, correlating, for instance, these values with length and free gliding speeds. We see no significant correlation between $L$ or $v}_{0$ and $f$ or $\eta$, but the observed values of $f$ and $\eta$ cover a wide range (Figure 4B and C and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). This is consistent with the logistic regression, where using $v}_{0$ as a second regressor did not significantly reduce the width of the distribution of critical lengths or active forces. The two estimates of the friction coefficient, from logistic regression and individual profile fits, are measured in (predominantly) orthogonal directions: tangentially for the logistic regression where the free gliding velocity was used, and transversely for the evolution of the buckling profiles. Thus, we plot $f/v$ over $\eta$ in Figure 4D, finding nearly identical values over about two decades. Since $f$ and $\eta$ are not correlated with $v}_{0$, this is due to a correlation between $f$ and $\eta$. This relation is remarkable in two aspects: On the one hand, it indicates that friction is mainly isotropic. This suggests that friction is governed by an isotropic process like bond friction or lubrication from the slime layer in the contact with the substrate, the latter being consistent with the observation that mutations deficient in slime secretion do not glide but exogenous addition of slime restores motility (Khayatan et al., 2015). In contrast, hydrodynamic drag from the surrounding bulk fluid (Man and Kanso, 2019), or the internal friction of the gliding apparatus would be expected to generate strongly anisotropic friction. If the latter was dominant, a snappinglike transition into the buckling state would be expected, rather than the continuously growing amplitude that is observed in experiments. On the other hand, it indicates that friction and propulsion forces, despite being quite variable, correlate strongly. Thus, generating more force comes, inevitably, at the expense of added friction. For lubricated contacts, the friction coefficient is proportional to the thickness of the lubricating layer (Snoeijer et al., 2013), and we conjecture active force and drag both increase due to a more intimate contact with the substrate. This supports mechanisms like focal adhesion (Mignot et al., 2007) or a modified typeIV pilus (Khayatan et al., 2015), which generate forces through contact with extracellular surfaces, as the underlying mechanism of the gliding apparatus of filamentous cyanobacteria: more contacts generate more force, but also closer contact with the substrate, thereby increasing friction to the same extent. Force generation by slime extrusion (Hoiczyk and Baumeister, 1998), in contrast, would lead to the opposite behavior: More slime generates more propulsion, but also reduces friction. Besides fundamental fluidmechanical considerations (Snoeijer et al., 2013), this is rationalized by two experimental observations: i. gliding velocity correlates positively with slime layer thickness (Dhahri et al., 2013) and ii. motility in slimesecretion deficient mutants is restored upon exogenous addition of polysaccharide slime. Still, we emphasize that many other possibilities exist. One could, for instance, postulate a regulation of the generated forces to the experienced friction, to maintain some preferred or saturated velocity.
Finally, we remark that the distribution of $L}_{c$ aligns well with the peak of natural length distributions (see Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Dwelling in soil or as floating aggregates, natural colonies experience less ideal geometries than in our experiments. Nonetheless, we expect a similar buckling behavior since gliding requires contact with a surface or other filaments. As a consequence, small changes in the propulsion force density or the length distribution determine whether the majority of the filaments in a colony is able to buckle or not. This, in turn, has dramatic consequences on the exploration behavior and the emerging patterns (IseleHolder et al., 2015; IseleHolder et al., 2016; Abbaspour et al., 2023; Duman et al., 2018; Prathyusha et al., 2018; Jung et al., 2020): $(L/{L}_{c}{)}^{3}$ is, up to a numerical prefactor, identical to the flexure number (IseleHolder et al., 2015; IseleHolder et al., 2016; Duman et al., 2018; Winkler et al., 2017), the ratio of the Péclet number and the persistence length of active polymer melts. Thus, the ample variety of nonequilibrium phases in such materials (IseleHolder et al., 2015; IseleHolder et al., 2016; Prathyusha et al., 2018; Abbaspour et al., 2023) may well have contributed to the evolutionary success of filamentous cyanobacteria.
Methods
Cell cultivation
Species Oscillatoria lutea (SAG 1459–3) and Kamptonema animale (SAG 1459–6) were obtained from The Culture Collection of Algae at Göttingen University and seeded in T175 culture flask with standard BG11 nutrition solution. The culture medium was exchanged for fresh BG11 every four weeks. Cultures were kept in an incubator with an automated 12 hr day (30% light intensity (∼20 µE), 18°C) and 12 hr night (0% light intensity, 14°C) cycle, with a continuous 2 hr transition. All experiments were performed at a similar daytime to ensure comparable phases in their circadian rhythm. The night cycle began at 11 a.m. so experiments could typically be started in the morning towards the end of the bacteria’s day.
Bending measurements
Rectangular arrays of cylindrical micropillars (base diameter 35 µm and pitch of 80 µm in both directions) were fabricated using standard SU8 photolithography on transparent glass wafers. A liquid sample chamber was made by placing a rectangular microscope glass slide on top of the pillardecorated substrate, using an Oring cut into two pieces as spacers. After filling the chamber with standard BG11 nutrient solution, a small fragment from the cyanobacterial cultures is introduced into the chamber with a syringe.
As filaments dispersed into the pillardecorated surface autonomously by their gliding motility, a small region with sparsely distributed individual filaments is chosen for bending measurements. Then, a filament is bent between two pillars (about 6 orders of magnitude stiffer than the filament) with the nozzle of the Lbent glass micropipette force sensor (spring constant 9.5 ± 0.3 nN/µm), mounted on a motorized linear actuator (Newport Corporation, LTAHS). The speed at which the nozzle moves as well as the amplitude of its displacement is set by the actuator. A detailed procedure for the micropipette fabrication and calibration can be found in Backholm and Bäumchen, 2019. In brief, the micropipette is calibrated by measuring the corresponding cantilever deflection under the applied weight of an evaporating water droplet hanging at the pipette nozzle (see Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). The corresponding error on the pipette spring constant is given by the standard deviation after independent subsequent calibration measurements. We note that this calibration method provides the spring constant of the micropipette in the direction of the nozzle, while during the bending measurements, a sideways deflection is used. We assume that the elastic properties of the pipette cantilever are isotropic, and therefore consider the spring constant of sideways deflection to be equal to the calibration direction.
Image sequences of deflections were recorded at 20× magnification and 40 fps with an Olympus IX83 inverted microscope and a scientific CMOS camera (PCO Edge 4.2). The images were then analyzed with a custommade image analysis procedure in Matlab, to determine the deflections of the filament and the pipette simultaneously. The deflection of the micropipette is obtained by subtracting the timedependent position of the piezo controller, which is actuating the base of the pipette, from the nozzle position in the image. The force exerted by the pipette is given by its spring constant times its deflection (Hooke’s law, see Backholm and Bäumchen, 2019). We note that no torsion of the micropipette cantilever was observed while bending the filament, thus, we assume that torsional modes do not play a significant role in the micropipette deflection analysis. The obtained data of the applied force and filament deflection results in a linear plot as shown in Figure 2A.
We derived the bending modulus according to standard beam theory, through $B=\frac{\mathrm{\Delta}{x}^{3}}{48}\phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}\mathrm{\partial}P/\mathrm{\partial}d$, where $\mathrm{\Delta}x$ is the distance between the pillars, $P$ is the force provided through the pipette, at the center between the two pillars, and $d$ is the deflection of the filament. Our values are comparable but slightly larger than values recently derived from crossflow drag experiments (Faluweki and Goehring, 2022).
Figure 2—figure supplement 1 shows results for different speeds, increasing and decreasing force, as well as a set of exemplary forcedistance curves.
Buckling experiments
We prepared microfluidic devices according to standard procedures of SU8 cleanroom photolithography, followed by PDMSbased soft lithography (Fujii, 2002), binding the cured PDMS imprints to rectangular glass coverslip by plasma activation (Electronic Diener Pico plasma system, air, 50% exposure, 30 s). Prior to binding, two 1 mm holes for flushing the device with BG11 medium, and one 2 mm hole for loading cyanobacteria to the device, were punched in the PDMS, keeping the punchouts for sealing the chip later on. Four different device architectures, each with 20 µm and 40 µm wide channels, with heights of ∼ 5 µm were used.
The devices were first flushed with approximately 5 µL of conditioned BG11 medium, through one of the small ports. Then, about 1mm^{3} of bluegreenish cyanobacteria were loaded into the device through the large port. Finally, the device was sealed with the cylindrical stoppers retained from the punching, and covered by a small round cover slip to minimize evaporation from the device during the experiment.
Buckling experiments were observed by a Nikon Ti2E inverted microscope on a passive antivibration table, with transmitted illumination at about 20 µE illumination intensity. Microscopy images were taken at 6x or 10xmagnification with time intervals of either 1 s, 10 s, and 30 s for a couple of hours at a resolution of 4096 × 4096 pixels with a CMOS camera (Dalsa Genie Nano XL).
Image analysis of buckling events
Regions of interest were cropped from the image sequences for each of the manually detected collision events, from 50 s before to 50 s after the collision, and analyzed further. The length of each filament was obtained by manually adding a path on top of the images in a standard image editor (Gimp). The decision of whether a filament buckles or not is made manually by watching the video of each event. The velocity is determined by extracting the position of the head of a filament prior to hitting the obstacle for up to six snapshots, and taking the mean traveled distance over this period.
Profiles were extracted only for selected events in which no additional collisions of the filament with the confining walls were observed for at least 10 s after the first contact of the head with the obstacle. First, the microscopy images were processed by an inhouse trained, modified UNet to detect their midlines (contours). These contour representations of the images were then vectorized into subpixelaccurate $x$$y$coordinates, to obtain the green contour from Figure 4A.
Logistic regression
We perform a logistic regression on the individual (weighted) buckling events with a maximum likelihood estimation. This classification algorithm approximates the probability distribution by a logistic function; see Equation 1. By maximizing the loglikelihood, we find the parameters that best predict the buckling probability. The likelihood of correctly predicting the buckling ($y=1$) or nonbuckling ($y=0$) behavior of a filament of known length $L$ is given by
with two parameters $L}_{c$ and $\mathrm{\Delta}{L}_{c}$ that describe the median critical length and the width of the distribution, respectively. Each individual $i$ with length $L}_{i$ is observed $N}_{i$ times to determine the buckling outcomes $y}_{i,j$. The loglikelihood for representing all the data by a logistic distribution is then given by
where the weight of each observation is given by $1/{N}_{i}$, the number of observations of individual $i$, to yield an unbiased estimate for the subsample of the population. Maximal $\mathcal{L}$ requires vanishing derivatives of $\mathrm{log}\mathcal{L}$ with respect to the parameters $L}_{c$, $\mathrm{\Delta}{L}_{c}$. For the regression with two explanatory variables $L$ and $v}_{0$ i.e., $L}_{c}({v}_{0})=(\alpha \phantom{\rule{thinmathspace}{0ex}}{v}_{0}{)}^{1/3$, the same procedure is used, adding the derivative with respect to $\alpha$ to the minimization criteria.
Numerics and fitting
The evolution of the contour shapes according to Equation 5 was derived for 30 different values of $\mathrm{\Gamma}$, ranging from just above the critical length up to $L/{L}_{c}\sim 9$, by a numerical solution of Equation 5. Equation 5 was discretized into $n=64$ segments, defining the discrete $\varphi}_{i$ on the midpoints of the intervals. Second order polynomial interpolation was then used to evaluate differential and integral terms. Time integration was performed with the method of lines, initialized with a solution to the linearized smallamplitude equation. Snapshots of the solution were stored for 64 times, ranging from small amplitude to head angles $\varphi (s=0)\sim {90}^{\circ}$. These profiles were linearly interpolated in $s$ and $t$ to obtain a continuous function for fitting to the experimental contours.
As the residual for fitting theoretical profiles to the experiments, we used the square distance between the experimental and theoretical profiles, integrated along the contour. The activity coefficient $\mathrm{\Gamma}$ and time scale $t}_{0$, together with a rotational and two translational degrees of freedom, were then adapted to minimize the sum of the residuals. First, the theoretical profile with the smallest mean square distance is determined individually for each frame in an experimental time series, with simulation time, $L}_{c$, rotation, and translation as free parameters. The average over these individual fit results were then used as initial parameters for a global fit, where the sum of the residuals of all time steps was minimized simultaneously to derive a global parameter set, containing the time scale $t}_{0$, a time offset, the critical length $L}_{c$, rotation, and translation. In order to estimate the error of the fit, we applied a very coarse bootstrapping, repeating the fit 20 times with randomly chosen subsets of the time steps.
For molecular dynamics simulations of buckling, the filaments were discretized as chains of $N$ beads with diameter $\sigma$ and a distance $\sigma /2$ between consecutive beads. Flexibility is implemented with a harmonic bending potential, $U}_{b}=\frac{{\kappa}_{b}}{2}\sum _{j=2}^{N1}({\theta}_{j}\pi {)}^{2$, where $\theta}_{j$ is the angle between consecutive beads $i1,i,i+1$, and selfpropulsion by an active force $F}_{a$ on each bead, oriented tangentially along the chain (Abbaspour et al., 2023). The parameters $\kappa}_{b$ and $f}_{a$ are related to the measured parameters $B$ and $f$ via $B\approx \sigma {\kappa}_{b}/2$ and $f\approx 2{F}_{a}/\sigma$. Buckling is induced by steric interaction using a WCA potential (Abbaspour et al., 2023) with a Vshaped obstacle. The dynamics of the chain is given by an overdamped Langevin equation and simulated with the molecular dynamics software HOOMDblue (Anderson et al., 2020).
Critical length
To derive an analytical expression for the critical $\mathrm{\Gamma}$ in Equation 6, we first solve the homogeneous equation by
with $r=s1$, and give a particular solution to the inhomogeneous equation:
where the $p{F}_{q}$ are the generalized hypergeometric functions. The parameters $c}_{1$ and $c}_{2$ are determined by the torque boundary conditions. Then, $\mathrm{\Gamma}$ is found from the remaining force boundary condition, which boils down to the roots of
The smallest root is $k\approx 30.5722$.
Data availability
All data and relevant source code have been made publicly available here https://doi.org/10.17617/3.QYENUE.

EdmondQuantifying gliding forces of filamentous cyanobacteria by selfbuckling.https://doi.org/10.17617/3.QYENUE
References

Effects of direction reversals on patterns of active filamentsPhysical Review Research 5:013171.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013171

HOOMDblue: A Python package for highperformance molecular dynamics and hard particle Monte Carlo simulationsComputational Materials Science 173:109363.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109363

BookElasticity and Geometry: From Hair Curls to the NonLinear Response of ShellsOxford University Press.

Dynamic force measurements on swimming Chlamydomonas cells using micropipette force sensorsJournal of the Royal Society, Interface 17:20190580.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0580

Movement in the CyanophyceaeThe Quarterly Review of Biology 9:438–459.https://doi.org/10.1086/394470

Flagellar dynamics of a connected chain of active, polar, Brownian particlesJournal of the Royal Society, Interface 11:20130884.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2013.0884

Flagellar motor transformed: biophysical perspectives of the Myxococcus xanthus gliding mechanismFrontiers in Microbiology 13:891694.https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.891694

Spontaneous oscillations of elastic filaments induced by molecular motorsJournal of the Royal Society, Interface 14:20170491.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0491

Collective dynamics of selfpropelled semiflexible filamentsSoft Matter 14:4483–4494.https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM00282G

A closedform solution for the generalized Euler problemProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A 456:2409–2417.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2000.0618

Structural mechanics of filamentous cyanobacteriaJournal of the Royal Society, Interface 19:20220268.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2022.0268

Buckling instabilities and spatiotemporal dynamics of active elastic filamentsJournal of the Royal Society, Interface 17:20190794.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0794

PDMSbased microfluidic devices for biomedical applicationsMicroelectronic Engineering 61–62:907–914.https://doi.org/10.1016/S01679317(02)00494X

Motility inOscillatoria salina as affected by different factorsFolia Microbiologica 51:565–571.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931621

Gliding motility in the blue‐green alga oscillatoria princeps ^{1}Journal of Phycology 7:133–145.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15298817.1971.tb01492.x

Dynamics of selfpropelled filaments pushing a loadSoft Matter 12:8495–8505.https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM01094F

Morphological transitions of axiallydriven microfilamentsSoft Matter 15:5163–5173.https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sm02397b

Bacterial gliding motility: multiple mechanisms for cell movement over surfacesAnnual Review of Microbiology 55:49–75.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.49

Bacteria that glide with helical tracksCurrent Biology 24:R169–R173.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.034

Frictioncontrolled traction force in cell adhesionBiophysical Journal 101:1863–1870.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.027

BookUNet: Convolutional networks for biomedical image SegmentationIn: Ronneberger O, editors. Medical Image Computing and ComputerAssisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. Springer. pp. 234–241.https://doi.org/10.1007/9783319245744_28

BookEditorial: Cyanobacteria: The Green E. coliFrontiers Media SA.https://doi.org/10.3389/9782889198122

Cyanobacteria: the bright and dark sides of a charming groupBiodiversity and Conservation 24:711–738.https://doi.org/10.1007/s1053101508984

Symmetry breaking instabilities of an in vitro biological systemPhysical Review Letters 75:172–175.https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.172

Similarity theory of lubricated Hertzian contactsPhysics of Fluids 25:4826981.https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4826981

Motility in cyanobacteria: polysaccharide tracks and Type IV pilus motorsMolecular Microbiology 98:998–1001.https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13242

Active polymers — emergent conformational and dynamical properties: a brief reviewJournal of the Physical Society of Japan 86:101014.https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.86.101014

Force and flexibility of flailing myxobacteriaBiophysical Journal 89:945–950.https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.062513
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (M526300)
 Leila Abbaspour
 Stefan Klumpp
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. Open access funding provided by Max Planck Society.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Algae Culture Collection (SAG) in Göttingen, Germany, for providing the cyanobacteria species O. lutea (SAG 1459–3) and K. animale (SAG 1459–6), and technical support. We also thank D Strüver, M Benderoth, W Keiderling, and K Hantke for their technical assistance, culture maintenance, and discussions. We further thank D Qian for assistance with the microfluidic devices. The work of L A and S Kl was done within the Max Planck School Matter to Life, supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in collaboration with the Max Planck Society. We gratefully acknowledge discussions with M Prakash, R Golestanian, A Vilfan, K R Prathyusha, and F Papenfuß.
Version history
 Sent for peer review: March 22, 2023
 Preprint posted: April 27, 2023 (view preprint)
 Preprint posted: October 6, 2023 (view preprint)
 Preprint posted: May 1, 2024 (view preprint)
 Version of Record published: June 12, 2024 (version 1)
Cite all versions
You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87450. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.
Copyright
© 2023, Kurjahn et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics

 637
 views

 63
 downloads

 0
 citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading

 Cell Biology
 Physics of Living Systems
An influx of water molecules can help immune cells called neutrophils to move to where they are needed in the body.

 Cell Biology
 Physics of Living Systems
While the involvement of actin polymerization in cell migration is wellestablished, much less is known about the role of transmembrane water flow in cell motility. Here, we investigate the role of water influx in a prototypical migrating cell, the neutrophil, which undergoes rapid, directed movement to sites of injury, and infection. Chemoattractant exposure both increases cell volume and potentiates migration, but the causal link between these processes are not known. We combine singlecell volume measurements and a genomewide CRISPR screen to identify the regulators of chemoattractantinduced neutrophil swelling, including NHE1, AE2, PI3Kgamma, and CA2. Through NHE1 inhibition in primary human neutrophils, we show that cell swelling is both necessary and sufficient for the potentiation of migration following chemoattractant stimulation. Our data demonstrate that chemoattractantdriven cell swelling complements cytoskeletal rearrangements to enhance migration speed.