Osteonecrosis in Gaucher Disease in the era of multiple therapies: biomarker set for risk stratification from a tertiary referral center

  1. Mohsen Basiri
  2. Mohammad E Ghaffari
  3. Jiapeng Ruan
  4. Vagishwari Murugesan
  5. Nathaniel Kleytman
  6. Glenn Belinsky
  7. Amir Akhavan
  8. Andrew Lischuk
  9. Lilu Guo
  10. Katherine Klinger
  11. Pramod K Mistry  Is a corresponding author
  1. Yale University, United States
  2. Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran
  3. University of Toronto, Canada
  4. University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, United States
  5. Sanofi, United States

Abstract

Background: A salutary effect of treatments for Gaucher disease (GD) has been reduction in the incidence of avascular osteonecrosis (AVN). However, there are reports of AVN in patients receiving enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), and it is not known whether it is related to individual treatments, GBA genotypes, phenotypes, biomarkers of residual disease activity or anti-drug antibodies.

Objective: Prompted by development of AVN in several patients receiving ERT, we aimed to delineate the determinants of AVN in patients receiving ERT or eliglustat substrate reduction therapy (SRT) during 20 years in a tertiary referral center.

Methods: Longitudinal follow-ups of 155 GD patients between 2001 and 2021, were analyzed for episodes of AVN on therapy, type of therapy, GBA1 genotype, spleen status, biomarkers, and other disease indicators. We applied mixed-effects logistic model to delineate the independent correlates of AVN while receiving treatment.

Results: The patients received cumulative 1382 years of treatment. There were 16 episodes of AVN in 14 patients, with two episodes, each occurring in two patients. Heteroallelic p.Asn409Ser GD1 patients were 10 times (95% CI,1.5 - 67.2) more likely than p.Asn409Ser homozygous patients to develop osteonecrosis during treatment. History of AVN prior to treatment initiation was associated with 4.8-fold increased risk of AVN on treatment (95% CI, 1.5-15.2). The risk of AVN among patients receiving velaglucerase ERT was 4.68 times higher compared to patients receiving imiglucerase ERT (95% CI,1.67-13). No patient receiving eliglustat SRT suffered AVN. There was a significant correlation between GlcSph levels and AVN. Together, these biomarkers reliably predicted risk of AVN during therapy (ROC AUC 0.894, p<0.001).

Conclusions: There is a low, but significant risk of AVN in GD in the era of ERT/SRT. We found increased risk of AVN was related to GBA genotype, history of AVN prior to treatment initiation, residual serum GlcSph level, and the type of ERT. No patient receiving SRT developed AVN. These findings exemplify a new approach to biomarker applications in a rare inborn error of metabolism to evaluate clinical outcomes in comprehensively followed patients and will aid identification of GD patients at higher risk of AVN who will benefit from closer monitoring and treatment optimization.

Funding: LSD Training Fellowship from Sanofi to MB.

Data availability

This observational study is approved by Yale University IRB and each patient provided informed consent. The patients have not provided consent to sharing their data with other investigators. Interested academic, non-commercial researchers can contact the Senior Corresponding author, Dr Pramod Mistry at Pramod.mistry@yale.edu to discuss the request to access original data. They do not need to apply or submit a project proposal. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS version 28 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). MedCalc version 20.026 was used for ROC curve analysis and graphs were plotted by GraphPad Prism version 9.3.1.We do not have consent to share individual patient data. Even de-identified data risks identification through age and GBA genotype information, thus violating HIPPA patient confidentiality. Upon request to the Senior Corresponding author, the PI, we will share processed version of datasets.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mohsen Basiri

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9592-4059
  2. Mohammad E Ghaffari

    Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Islamic Republic of Iran
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Jiapeng Ruan

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Vagishwari Murugesan

    Department of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Nathaniel Kleytman

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Glenn Belinsky

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Amir Akhavan

    Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Andrew Lischuk

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Lilu Guo

    Translational Sciences, Sanofi, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Lilu Guo, is an employee of Sanofi and may hold stocks..
  10. Katherine Klinger

    Translational Sciences, Sanofi, Framingham, United States
    Competing interests
    Katherine Klinger, is an employee of Sanofi and may hold stocks..
  11. Pramod K Mistry

    Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    For correspondence
    pramod.mistry@yale.edu
    Competing interests
    Pramod K Mistry, Reviewing editor, eLifePKM receives a research grant from Sanofi and has received travel support from Sanofi..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3447-6421

Funding

Sanofi Genzyme (LSD Training Fellowship from Sanofi to MB)

  • Mohsen Basiri

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants were enrolled in our observational studies approved by Yale's IRB. Patients also were provided with verbal explanations and their data were collected after signing consent forms.HIC#0209021074HIC#1005006783

Copyright

© 2023, Basiri et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,282
    views
  • 268
    downloads
  • 2
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mohsen Basiri
  2. Mohammad E Ghaffari
  3. Jiapeng Ruan
  4. Vagishwari Murugesan
  5. Nathaniel Kleytman
  6. Glenn Belinsky
  7. Amir Akhavan
  8. Andrew Lischuk
  9. Lilu Guo
  10. Katherine Klinger
  11. Pramod K Mistry
(2023)
Osteonecrosis in Gaucher Disease in the era of multiple therapies: biomarker set for risk stratification from a tertiary referral center
eLife 12:e87537.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87537

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87537

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Medicine
    Anastasia D Komarova, Snezhana D Sinyushkina ... Marina V Shirmanova
    Research Article

    Heterogeneity of tumor metabolism is an important, but still poorly understood aspect of tumor biology. Present work is focused on the visualization and quantification of cellular metabolic heterogeneity of colorectal cancer using fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) of redox cofactor NAD(P)H. FLIM-microscopy of NAD(P)H was performed in vitro in four cancer cell lines (HT29, HCT116, CaCo2 and CT26), in vivo in the four types of colorectal tumors in mice and ex vivo in patients’ tumor samples. The dispersion and bimodality of the decay parameters were evaluated to quantify the intercellular metabolic heterogeneity. Our results demonstrate that patients’ colorectal tumors have significantly higher heterogeneity of energy metabolism compared with cultured cells and tumor xenografts, which was displayed as a wider and frequently bimodal distribution of a contribution of a free (glycolytic) fraction of NAD(P)H within a sample. Among patients’ tumors, the dispersion was larger in the high-grade and early stage ones, without, however, any association with bimodality. These results indicate that cell-level metabolic heterogeneity assessed from NAD(P)H FLIM has a potential to become a clinical prognostic factor.

    1. Medicine
    Sindre Lee-Ødegård, Marit Hjorth ... Kåre Inge Birkeland
    Research Article

    Background:

    Physical activity has been associated with preventing the development of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, our understanding of the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these effects remains incomplete and good biomarkers to objectively assess physical activity are lacking.

    Methods:

    We analyzed 3072 serum proteins in 26 men, normal weight or overweight, undergoing 12 weeks of a combined strength and endurance exercise intervention. We estimated insulin sensitivity with hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, maximum oxygen uptake, muscle strength, and used MRI/MRS to evaluate body composition and organ fat depots. Muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies were used for mRNA sequencing. Additional association analyses were performed in samples from up to 47,747 individuals in the UK Biobank, as well as using two-sample Mendelian randomization and mice models.

    Results:

    Following 12 weeks of exercise intervention, we observed significant changes in 283 serum proteins. Notably, 66 of these proteins were elevated in overweight men and positively associated with liver fat before the exercise regimen, but were normalized after exercise. Furthermore, for 19.7 and 12.1% of the exercise-responsive proteins, corresponding changes in mRNA expression levels in muscle and fat, respectively, were shown. The protein CD300LG displayed consistent alterations in blood, muscle, and fat. Serum CD300LG exhibited positive associations with insulin sensitivity, and to angiogenesis-related gene expression in both muscle and fat. Furthermore, serum CD300LG was positively associated with physical activity and negatively associated with glucose levels in the UK Biobank. In this sample, the association between serum CD300LG and physical activity was significantly stronger in men than in women. Mendelian randomization analysis suggested potential causal relationships between levels of serum CD300LG and fasting glucose, 2 hr glucose after an oral glucose tolerance test, and HbA1c. Additionally, Cd300lg responded to exercise in a mouse model, and we observed signs of impaired glucose tolerance in male, but not female, Cd300lg knockout mice.

    Conclusions:

    Our study identified several novel proteins in serum whose levels change in response to prolonged exercise and were significantly associated with body composition, liver fat, and glucose homeostasis. Serum CD300LG increased with physical activity and is a potential causal link to improved glucose levels. CD300LG may be a promising exercise biomarker and a therapeutic target in type 2 diabetes.

    Funding:

    South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Simon Fougners Fund, Diabetesforbundet, Johan Selmer Kvanes’ legat til forskning og bekjempelse av sukkersyke. The UK Biobank resource reference 53641. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (APP2017942). Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Award (DE220101226). Research Council of Norway (Project grant: 325640 and Mobility grant: 287198). The Medical Student Research Program at the University of Oslo. Novo Nordisk Fonden Excellence Emerging Grant in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2023 (NNF23OC0082123).

    Clinical trial number:

    clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01803568.