Mesotrode allows chronic simultaneous mesoscale cortical imaging and subcortical or peripheral nerve spiking activity recording in mice

eLife assessment

This valuable study combines chronic widefield calcium imaging of dorsal cortex activity at the mesoscale level with electrical recording of single neurons in specific cortical and subcortical locations. This work provides compelling evidence for recording neuronal activity at multiple temporal and spatial scales by combination of optical and electrophysiological methods. This work will be of broad interest to system neuroscientists studying neural circuits.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87691.2.sa0

Significance of the findings:

Valuable: Findings that have theoretical or practical implications for a subfield

Landmark
Fundamental
Important
Valuable
Useful

Strength of evidence:

Compelling: Evidence that features methods, data and analyses more rigorous than the current state-of-the-art

Exceptional
Compelling
Convincing
Solid
Incomplete
Inadequate

During the peer-review process the editor and reviewers write an eLife Assessment that summarises the significance of the findings reported in the article (on a scale ranging from landmark to useful) and the strength of the evidence (on a scale ranging from exceptional to inadequate). Learn more about eLife Assessments

Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Brain function originates from hierarchical spatial-temporal neural dynamics distributed across cortical and subcortical networks. However, techniques available to assess large-scale brain network activity with single-neuron resolution in behaving animals remain limited. Here, we present Mesotrode that integrates chronic wide-field mesoscale cortical imaging and compact multi-site cortical/subcortical cellular electrophysiology in head-fixed mice that undergo self-initiated running or orofacial movements. Specifically, we harnessed the flexibility of chronic multi-site tetrode recordings to monitor single-neuron activity in multiple subcortical structures while simultaneously imaging the mesoscale activity of the entire dorsal cortex. A mesoscale spike-triggered averaging procedure allowed the identification of cortical activity motifs preferentially associated with single-neuron spiking. Using this approach, we were able to characterize chronic single-neuron-related functional connectivity maps for up to 60 days post-implantation. Neurons recorded from distinct subcortical structures display diverse but segregated cortical maps, suggesting that neurons of different origins participate in distinct cortico-subcortical pathways. We extended the capability of Mesotrode by implanting the micro-electrode at the facial motor nerve and found that facial nerve spiking is functionally associated with the PTA, RSP, and M2 network, and optogenetic inhibition of the PTA area significantly reduced the facial movement of the mice. These findings demonstrate that Mesotrode can be used to sample different combinations of cortico-subcortical networks over prolonged periods, generating multimodal and multi-scale network activity from a single implant, offering new insights into the neural mechanisms underlying specific behaviors.

Introduction

System-level mechanisms of cognition and action across networks of single neurons in awake, behaving mice remain largely elusive (Buzsáki, 2006; Aru et al., 2020; Roth and Ding, 2020). The difficulty comes from recording neural activity over large spatial scales but with single neuron resolution during sensory and motor processes (Alivisatos et al., 2012). In the mammalian brain, large-scale cortical network activity is dynamically sculpted by local or long-range inputs from individual neurons in various cortical or subcortical structures (Koch et al., 2016). Decoding the principles of neuronal network activity is essential for understanding brain function (Oh et al., 2014; Jiang et al., 2015). One important aspect of such understanding is mapping the functional connectivity of single neurons in relation to cortical networks. Emerging studies using in vivo electrophysiological and imaging techniques have revealed that activities of single neurons are functionally coupled to those of local microcircuits or the global cortical networks, and such connectivity is dynamically regulated depending on the behavioral state of the animal (Barson et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2013a; Xiao et al., 2017; Clancy et al., 2019). While most of the current studies only provide a snapshot of the connectivity map of a single neuron, the development of procedures where both single-unit activity and large-scale cortical network dynamics of awake-behaving mice can be chronically recorded is desirable.

Previously, chronic extracellular recordings in rodent brains were achieved most widely using bundled microwires called tetrodes, and more recently extended to the use of high-throughput recording devices such as silicon probes including Neuropixels (Bragin et al., 2000; Nguyen et al., 2009; Vandecasteele et al., 2012; Voigts et al., 2013; Delcasso et al., 2018; Juavinett et al., 2019; Steinmetz et al., 2021). In the case of conventional chronic tetrode recording setups, a common feature is the inclusion of a microdrive that provides axial control over the positioning of the electrodes which allows the electrode position to be adjusted for better recording qualities throughout the experimental periods. However, this microdrive hinders simultaneous wide-field optical imaging of the cortex, making it difficult to investigate the correlation between subcortical single-unit activation and cortical network activity. On the other hand, chronic silicon probe recordings rely on a skull-mounted probe and a large headstage, also have the same limitation of not allowing for simultaneous wide-field imaging.

To overcome these challenges, we designed the Mesotrode system where we combine in vivo electrophysiology via multi-site tetrode implants and mesoscale brain imaging to characterize the functional connectivity of individual cortical or subcortical neurons chronically. We show that these tetrode preparations can obtain high-fidelity, single-unit activity in any cortical or subcortical structure. More importantly, this setup preserves optical access to the entire cranial window of the animal which permits simultaneous functional brain imaging as well as optogenetic manipulation of neuronal activity across the whole dorsal cortex. To obtain high-resolution wide-field imaging of mouse brain activity, we chose to utilize GCaMP6, a genetically encoded Ca²⁺ indicator (GECI) widely used to optically record suprathreshold neuronal activation due to its high sensitivity and optimal signal-to-noise ratio (Chen et al., 2013b). Furthermore, it has been shown that GECIs can stably report neuronal activity over several months (Huber et al., 2012; Margolis et al., 2012; Silasi et al., 2016), making them ideal for chronic studies of cortical network dynamics. We found that neurons from various subcortical structures, including the hippocampus, thalamus, striatum, and other midbrain areas, display distinct functional connectivity patterns with the cortex. More importantly, we show that the spike-triggered maps (STMs) of recorded neurons can be stable for up to two months. Moreover, we extended Mesotrode to record facial nerve spiking activity and identified a novel cortical network that is causally involved in controlling facial movement, further highlighting the wide applicability of this technique. These results indicate that our Mesotrode can be widely exploited to investigate multiscale functional connectivity within the central nervous system of mice over an extended timescale.

Results

Chronic single-unit recording with wide-field transcranial imaging window

We developed the Mesotrode implantation procedure with the aim to make them low profile, flexible in location, minimally invasive, and yet stable while maintaining optical access to the entire dorsal cortex such that we can record chronic single neuron activity and mesoscale cortical dynamics simultaneously. Briefly, we fabricated tetrodes from tungsten wires which were then soldered to a miniature connector that was cemented onto the back of the mouse skull during surgery (see Materials and methods). The single tetrode was stiff enough to be straightly inserted into the deep brain areas through a small burr hole (<1 mm; Figure 1A). The body of the tetrode that remained outside of the brain was bent parallel to the skull and the minimal size helped preserve optical transparency during imaging sessions (Figure 1B). As the miniature connectors are low-profile, mice were group-housed after the surgery (Figure 1C), and we did not observe significant damage to the window or the connectors after long-term monitoring. The tetrodes can be flexibly implanted in almost any brain structure of interest, either cortical or subcortical. We have successfully obtained high-quality recordings in the mouse cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, striatum, and midbrain. The recording site of each tetrode is confirmed using post-hoc histological analysis (Figure 1D). We found that the single unit activity was relatively stable during 1 week, 2 weeks, and 2 months of recordings after implantation (Figure 1F and G), which is consistent with previously reported chronic tetrode recordings in mice (Tolias et al., 2007; Hong and Lieber, 2019; Kim et al., 2020; Voigts et al., 2020b).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Chronic tetrodes recording compatible with mesoscale transcranial Imaging.

(A) Images of skull surface during tetrode implantation. Panels depict the location of 4 tetrodes placed in skull burr holes using a micromanipulator. (B) Image showing transcranial window with tetrodes placed in the striatum, thalamus, and midbrain. (C) Chronic tetrode recording is compatible with group-housed mice. (D) Post-mortem histology is performed to confirm the tetrode location. (E) Cartoon of tetrode and local neurons. (F) Example of long-term recording using transcranial imaging window plus tetrodes. (G) Sorted spikes from (F) (brown, blue, and gray indicate 1 week, 2 weeks, and 2 months after tetrode implantation).

We implanted a total of 29 tetrodes in the midbrain, hippocampus, thalamus, striatum, and cortex of 14 mice, and recorded the activity of 110 neurons with simultaneous mesoscale cortical imaging for up to 2 months after implantation (Figure 2). We registered all the putative positions of the recorded neurons as well as the tetrode tracks to a 3D mouse brain model, which was reconstructed from an MRI scan (Egan et al., 2015; Figure 2A and B). First, we compared the firing profiles of the neurons from different brain regions. On average, we obtained 3–5 neurons per tetrode implanted, and this yield was consistent across regions (Figure 2C). The inter-spike interval (ISI) of neurons recorded from most brain regions ranged between 0.2 and 0.7 s, except for neurons of the striatum, which fires significantly less compared to neurons in other brain regions (Figure 2D, p<0.05). The coefficient of variation (CV) of ISI, a metric that indicates the consistency of the firing rate, was similar across brain regions (Figure 2E).

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Group statistics on tetrode implantation across mice.

(A) Labels corresponding to mouse IDs (n=14 mice) were registered to a 3D mouse brain model based on tetrode locations. (B) Side view of the 3D reconstruction of 29 tetrode tracks implanted in 14 mice registered to the 3D mouse brain model. (C) The mean number of well-isolated neurons recorded per tetrode implanted in different brain regions. (D) Mean inter-spike interval (ISI) of neurons recorded in different brain regions (Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test, striatum vs midbrain, p<0.01, thalamus vs midbrain, p<0.05, n=14 mice). (E) Mean coefficient of variation of ISIs of neurons across brain regions (Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test, thalamus vs hippocampus, p<0.05, n=14 mice).

Spike-triggered average mapping of the thalamus, striatum, hippocampus, and midbrain neuron-defined mesoscale cortical networks

Spike-triggered average mapping (STM) has been previously used to investigate functional connectivity between single spiking neurons and cortical networks (Barson et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2017; Clancy et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021a). However, this has only been achieved using acute preparation. To assess the functional connectivity of the chronically recorded neurons, we combined electrophysiological recordings with simultaneous mesoscale cortical imaging through a bilateral window that encompassed the entire dorsal cortex in head-fixed, awake mice (Figure 3A and B, Videos 1 and 2). To obtain STMs of the recorded neuron, we calculated the peak response of normalized Ca²⁺ activity (ΔF/F) of each pixel averaged between 3 s before and after (±3 s) the onset of each spike, which gave us a wide-field mapping of the cortical areas that were associated with spiking activity of the recorded neuron (Xiao et al., 2017). Green reflectance signals, which were recorded with the same frequency as the GCaMP6 signal, were used to correct hemodynamic artifacts (Figure 3C and D).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Recording setup and example spike-triggered average maps.

(A) Illustration of experiment setup incorporating wide-field imaging, and tetrode recording with simultaneous behavioral monitoring. (B) Example tetrodes implantation in the thalamus, BCS1, and striatum. The middle and bottom panel shows the tetrode location registered in a 3D model of the mouse brain. (C) Spike-triggered average of GCaMP6s fluorescence (left), hemodynamic signal (middle, green reflectance), and hemodynamic-subtracted cortical maps (right) of thalamic, BCS1, and striatal neurons. (D) Average traces of GCaMP6s epi-fluorescence (blue), hemodynamic signal (green reflectance), and hemodynamic-subtracted signal (red) surrounding spikes of single neurons, and random trigger average traces (black). The gray bands correspond to the standard deviation of random trigger average traces.

Video 1

Download asset

posterframe for video — Video of the 4D spatiotemporal whole-brain dynamics of mesoscale cortical calcium imaging and subcortical neuronal firing.

Brain activity data was registered in a 3D mouse brain model. Calcium dynamic intensity and neuronal firing rate of subcortical neurons (Top) were color-coded in the ROIs in the 3D mouse brain model (bottom left). The calcium dynamic was overlaid on a cortical atlas (bottom right).

Video 2

Download asset

We found that single neuron defined functional maps were stable across recording sessions and days. For example, the STM of a hippocampus neuron was associated with the RSP, BCS, and M2 region for 10 recording sessions on different days (Figure 4A and B). To better visualize the stability of STMs across recording, we used Mesonet, a machine-learning based toolbox for parcellating brain regions, to accurately align our mesoscale images to a common brain atlas (Xiao et al., 2021). We show that the STMs of a midbrain neuron were relatively stable over 2 months (Figure 4C and D). The spiking activity of the neuron on different days was highly correlated with the lower limb, upper limb, and trunk sensorimotor areas on both hemispheres of the cortex. To examine the neural correlates of different behaviors, we also incorporated a Raspberry pi camera to monitor the spontaneous behavior of the mice during brain activity recordings (Figure 4C and E). In this example, we show that the instantaneous firing rate and patterns of this midbrain neuron were highly correlated with the paw movement of the mouse, consistent with our finding that this neuron is functionally associated with the limb sensorimotor areas. These results highlight the power of this multimodal approach, in that it can link high-resolution single neuron activity with network dynamics of the entire cortex and concurrent animal behavior, which greatly improves our ability to dissect the functional role of individual neurons of any brain region.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Chronic spike-triggered average maps of hippocampus and midbrain neurons.

(A) Unfiltered brain RGB image showing the position of the tetrode (left), GCaMP6 fluorescence image (middle), and histology showing the recording site of the tetrode (right). (B) Example raw and high-pass filtered (>300 Hz) electrophysiological traces of hippocampal recording 7 days after tetrode implantation and STMs of the hippocampal neuron across recording sessions(top). Another day of hippocampal recording and STMs of the hippocampal neuron across recording sessions(bottom). (C) Unfiltered brain RGB image showing the position of the tetrode (top) and behavior video recording (bottom). (D) Top: Ca²⁺ images recorded 1 week (left), 2 weeks (middle), and 2 months (right) after tetrode implanted in the midbrain overlaid with automatically registered brain atlas using Mesonet. Bottom: STMs of the midbrain neuron recorded at the same time points as Top. (E) Synchronized traces of paw movements, instantaneous firing rate, and electrophysiological signals of the midbrain neuron are shown in (C).

To quantify the distribution of distinctively patterned STMs of neurons across brain regions, we applied a graph-based clustering algorithm, Phenograph, on z-scored STMs (Levine et al., 2015; Figure 5). In total, we included 1146 STMs of 110 neurons recorded during multiple sessions. This resulted in 10 clusters with each cluster representing a distinct STM pattern evidenced by their within-cluster averaged map (Figure 5A). Un-matched STMs that were below the similarity threshold (Pearson’s correlation <0.3) compared to any of the 10 cluster average maps were excluded (94 out of 1146 STMs). For all clusters, individual STMs within the clusters showed high similarity to the cluster average maps (Figure 5B). In order to validate the optimal number of clusters for partitioning our dataset, we evaluated the clustering effectiveness of a varied number of clusters when applying K-means clustering algorithm using Silhouette score (Rousseeuw, 1987) and confirmed that 10 clusters are most appropriate (Figure 5C). Degrees of separation between clusters were visually inspected by projecting dimensionally reduced STMs onto 3D space using t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), a commonly used statistical method for plotting high-dimensional data points onto 3D space (Figure 5D).

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Clustering STMs of cortical/subcortical neurons.

(A) Average z-scored STM of each cluster. Each cluster represents a unique cortical functional network that individual neurons were associated with. STMs of the same neurons recorded during different sessions were included (1146 total STMs from 110 neurons of 14 mice). (B) Box plot showing the correlation between individual STM and average STM of its assigned cluster. (C) Silhouette coefficient of varying numbers of clusters to validate the optimal number of clusters. (D) 3D-t-SNE plot showing dimensionality reduced representation of clustered individual STMs. (E) The proportion of neurons in each cortical and subcortical region assigned to each STM cluster.

Figure 5E shows the proportions of STMs of neurons in different brain regions that were assigned to each cluster. We found that STMs in each region exhibited a stereotypical distribution pattern. For example, STMs of cortical neurons were primarily assigned to clusters #1–3 and #5–7, corresponding to motor, barrel, and primary somatosensory cortex activation patterns. These activation areas also matched the locations of the recorded cortical neurons (e.g. motor cortical neurons showed motor area activated STMs), suggesting that the functional connectivity patterns of cortical neurons were localized to cortical areas surrounding the recorded neuron, which is consistent with previous reports (Xiao et al., 2017; Clancy et al., 2019). Hippocampal neurons primarily displayed STMs with retrosplenial cortex activation (cluster#10, 59.6% of all hippocampal neuron STMs), reaffirming the dense functional connectivity between these two regions (Karimi Abadchi et al., 2020). STMs of striatal neurons were dominated by two opposing patterns, where 47.7% of them showed a global activation except for the body (limb and trunk) somatosensory regions (cluster#4) and 28.8% of them showed only activation in the body sensory regions (cluster#9). Thalamic neurons exhibited diverse STM patterns with the primary activated regions in lateral anterior cortical regions (cluster#5, 5.6%, cluster#6, 23.3%, cluster#7 26.3% of all thalamic STMs) and medial cortical regions (cluster#8, 6.5%, cluster#9, 11.6%, cluster#10, 9.9% of all thalamic STMs). This suggested that thalamic neurons had diverse functional connectivity patterns in relation to the dorsal cortex, consistent with previous studies (Xiao et al., 2017). STMs of midbrain neurons were most assigned to cluster#8 with medial frontal and somatosensory cortex activation (cluster#8, 44.6% of all midbrain STMs), but also included functional connectivity patterns with various other cortical regions (cluster#6, 10.5%, cluster#9, 12.6%, cluster#10, 11.2% of all midbrain STMs). Interestingly, we found that neurons of different subcortical origins sometimes have overlapping STMs (e.g. cluster#9, and #10 exhibited by neurons from all subcortical regions), which suggests that they may be involved in the same subcortico-cortical functional pathway (Figure 5E). Taken together, these findings highlighted the capability of Mesotrode to capture the diverse cortical functional connectivity patterns of neurons across brain regions using chronic electrodes.

Linkage of spiking peripheral nerve to specific mesoscopic cortical maps

One key advantage of using our minimally invasive micro-electrode setup is the flexibility of the location where they can be implanted and the relatively small footprint at the insertion site. This allows us to explore the functional connectivity of neurons that are otherwise difficult to study. For example, it’s difficult to simultaneously record the neural activity of the facial motor nucleus and cortex in order to investigate the cortico-brainstem motor pathways that directly innervate facial muscles that control whisker movement and facial expressions in mice (Petersen, 2014; Sreenivasan et al., 2016; Mercer Lindsay et al., 2019). Here, we implanted micro-wires on the facial motor nerve to record the spiking activity of the axonal projections from the facial motor neurons (Figure 6A and B). We obtained the STMs of facial motor nerves by simultaneous wide-field imaging of GCaMP6 mice (n=5 mice). Surprisingly, we found a distinct cortical pattern, activation in RSP, M2, and PTA areas (Table 1), associated with facial motor nerve spiking activity (Figure 6C, D and E, Figure 6—figure supplement 1, Video 3) in awake mice showing spontaneous movements. Using automated light-based mapping technology (Ayling et al., 2009), we found a broad area of the dorsal cortex, including the PTA region could evoke facial motor nerve spiking activity when optogenetically stimulated (Figure 6F, G and H, Figure 6—figure supplements 2–7, Video 4) within Thy1-ChR2 mice (n=6 mice). To further investigate causal relationships, we directly inhibited the PTA by optogenetically stimulating inhibitory neurons of the PTA region of VGAT-ChR2 mice (n=3 mice). Echoing our previous finding, inhibiting the PTA not only stopped the PTA neurons from firing but also prevented the facial movements of these mice when the blue light stimulation was on (Figure 7, Video 5). To eliminate the possibility that this observation is due to indirect inhibition of other brain areas, we simultaneously recorded neuronal activities in M1 and the barrel cortex (BCS). We confirmed that the neuron firing in these brain areas was not decreased by PTA inhibition (Figure 7A and B). More interestingly, we saw a ‘rebound effect’, a sudden increase in PTA neuron firing and facial movement, right after the stimulation is turned off (Figure 7C and D). This ‘off response’ supports the causal relationships between PTA and facial movement. These findings are consistent with the previous report that the PTA is involved in controlling active movements (Chapman et al., 2002; Cohen and Andersen, 2002; Rathelot et al., 2017; Auffret et al., 2018; Lyamzin and Benucci, 2019; Lee et al., 2022). It also underscores that our chronic tetrode implants in combination with optogenetics and optical imaging can be a powerful tool in mapping and identifying novel functional pathways.

Figure 6 with 7 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Spike-triggered and optogenetics mapping facial nerve spiking associated cortical maps.

(A) Mouse anatomy illustrates facial motor nucleus axons (facial nerve) that innervate facial muscles. Micro-wire was implanted in the facial nerve. (B) Example spiking activity recorded from facial motor nerve using the micro-wire. (C) Example calcium imaging during facial nerve recording. (D) Facial nerve spike-triggered average map temporal dynamics surrounding facial nerve spikes (t=0ms) of a single mouse (top row) or the average of 5 mice (bottom row). (E) Reference atlas (white outlines; 2004 Allen Institute for Brain Science. Allen Mouse Brain Atlas. Available from: http://mouse.brain-map.org/) (F) Illustration of automated light-based mapping of the dorsal cortex (8x8 grid) by photoactivation of Thy1-ChR2 mice. (G) Example single trial facial nerve response after light stimulation. (H) Average change of facial nerve responses of 6 mice represented on a 2D color-coded map corresponding to each stimulation coordinate overlayed on an example cortical image of Thy1-ChR2 mouse. The amplitude of the average change for each stimulation coordinate corresponds to the total variance of all the trials (>5 trials, within 200ms after stimulus) where there is no facial nerve spiking before the stimulus.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Optogenetic inhibition of the PTA area significantly reduced the facial movement of the mouse.

(A) Unfiltered brain RGB image showing the position of the tetrodes. (B) Simultaneous cellular electrophysiological recording in the cortical regions of M1, BCS, and PTA with optogenetic inhibition on the PTA region. (C) Behavioral image showing masks used for facial movement detection (top). Brain image of a VGAT-ChR2 mouse (ChR2 expressed in cortical inhibitory neurons) with laser targeting the PTA area (bottom). (D) Synchronized traces of optogenetic activation of PTA inhibitory neurons, facial movement, and LFP of the PTA region. Inhibiting the PTA region strongly inhibited facial nerve activity. Cessation of PTA inhibition reliably induced rebound PTA neuron firing and facial movements. (E) The neuronal firing of 12 trials of optogenetic inhibition in PTA. (F) Facial movements ((gradient-mean)/mean) 3 s before, 3 s during, and 3 s immediately after optogenetic inhibition in PTA for 29 trials (Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test, p<0.001, n=3 mice).

Table 1

Abbreviation used to define different cortical/sub-cortical areas.

Mop (M1)	Primary motor area
Mos (M2)	Secondary motor area
SSp-m	Primary somatosensory area, mouse
SSp-ul	Primary somatosensory area, upper limb
SSp-ll	Primary somatosensory area, lower limb
SSp-n	Primary somatosensory area, nose
SSp-bfd	Primary somatosensory area, barrel field
SSp-tr	Primary somatosensory area, trunk
VISp	Primary visual area
VISa	Anterior visual area
VISam	Anteromedial visual area
VISpm	Posteromedial visual area
VISrl	Rostrolateral visual area
VISal	Anterolateral visual area
VISI	Lateral visual area
RSP	Retrosplenial area
AUD	Auditory areas
PTA	Parietal association area
HPF	Hippocampal formation
VTA	Ventral tegmental area

Video 3

Download asset

Video 4

Download asset

Video 5

Download asset

Discussion

How activities of individual neurons contribute to brain-wide population dynamics remains poorly understood (Brecht et al., 2004; Rancz et al., 2007; Houweling and Brecht, 2008; Packer et al., 2015). It is additionally challenging to study long-range connectivities (e.g. those between subcortical and cortical structures) given the extraordinary complexity of neuronal wiring between brain regions. Non-invasive methods such as fMRI have generated important connectivity models, such as the default mode network (DMN) model, which advanced our understanding of how distinct brain regions communicate with each other during different behavioral contexts (White et al., 2011; Gutierrez-Barragan et al., 2022). However, these methods typically lack the spatial and temporal resolution to understand the connectivity patterns of individual neurons. On the other hand, for more invasive techniques such as viral tracing, although they often provide detailed characterizations of the anatomical patterns between brain areas, the nature of the preparation for these techniques precludes gaining insights into the dynamic nature of the connectivity rules. In this study, we developed the Mesotrode that combined chronic tetrode recording with mesoscale Ca²⁺ imaging to characterize mesoscale connectivity patterns of individual neurons. We showed that the functional connectivity patterns of individual neurons are relatively stable in the same behavioral state, and neurons from different brain regions display distinct distributions of these patterns. We further showcased the utility of our procedure by recording from the facial motor nerve and found a distinct cortical activation associated with facial nerve activity. Additionally, Mesotrode provides a wide-field access window for optogenetic stimulations. We showed a causal link between PTA activity and facial movement in mice. These findings established that our multimodal recordings combining chronic electrophysiology, mesoscale imaging, optogenetics, and behavioral characterization can be widely applied to further our understanding of neuronal connectivity and behaviors.

Compared to other chronic recording setups

Our work employs compact tetrode electrodes that permit simultaneous resolution of single units and mesoscale GCAMP activity. It is conceivable that improvements in spike sorting fidelity could be made by switching to more densely spaced silicon probes. While this is an obvious advantage, these probes do not have a compact footprint and would interfere with regional imaging. Our approach adds to the plethora of techniques previously described to characterize long-range functional connectivity by combining single-neuron activity recording and mesoscale cortical imaging. These techniques typically differ in how and where the individual neurons’ activities are recorded. For instance, Barson et.al used two-photon imaging to record individual cortical neurons’ activities, which allows differentiation of different neuronal types through genetic manipulation (Barson et al., 2018), but it has lower temporal resolution and is restricted to recording cortical neurons. Xiao et.al, Clancy et.al, Peters et.al, and Liu et.al all used either silicon probes or neuropixel probes to record large populations of cortical or subcortical neurons (Xiao et al., 2017; Clancy et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2021b; Peters et al., 2021), but it remains difficult to use these setups to track activities of the same neurons over days. In addition to these approaches, we can use our chronic tetrode implantation to track neuronal activities at multiple brain regions over long periods of time to better describe the dynamic nature of global neuronal affiliations; however, the number of neurons that can be recorded per tetrode is limited which does reduce our data acquisition throughput.

Compared to most of the previously reported chronic tetrodes setups with the inclusion of a microdrive, our approach has the unique advantages that setting up the apparatus and implanting the tetrodes is a lot more straightforward, mini-connector enables group housing and it is compatible with overhead cameras which permits simultaneous optical interrogation of neuronal circuits (Battaglia et al., 2009; Nguyen et al., 2009; Voigts et al., 2013; Billard et al., 2018; Delcasso et al., 2018; Voigts and Harnett, 2020a). However, it does come with the price that the tetrode cannot be moved after it is implanted, which means that the implant would fail if the health of the neuron deteriorates too much over time. Albeit, since our goal is to record the activity of the same neurons, we deemed it a worthy tradeoff for our purpose. Future studies could include experiments that would take advantage of bilateral symmetry by placing high-resolution silicon probes in one hemisphere and then reading out mesoscale maps in the other.

Variability of spike-triggered average maps in different brain regions

Activities of cortical pyramidal neurons are known to be coupled to local network activity; as such, STMs of these neurons often display activity motifs localized to the cortical regions they reside, indicating that their functional connections are mostly involved in local networks (Xiao et al., 2017; Clancy et al., 2019). On the other hand, subcortical neurons (i.e. thalamic neurons) can display more diverse and distal connectivity patterns with cortical networks that are less confined by their locations (Xiao et al., 2017). Here, we extended these characterizations to more subcortical regions (i.e. striatum, hippocampus, and midbrain), and found that these neurons, similar to thalamic neurons, generate functionally diverse STMs. This can be attributed to the diverse cell types within these structures (Phillips and Irvine, 1979; Cembrowski et al., 2016). Furthermore, by classifying these STMs, we found that the connectivity patterns of neurons in different subcortical structures are varied. For instance, STMs of midbrain neurons can be primarily categorized into 4 classes, with each class having distinct activity motifs, which is in contrast to the striatum neurons, the STMs of which are grouped into only two main classes. More interestingly, STMs of different subcortical regions display low levels of overlap, suggesting that neurons of different subcortical origins form their own distinct connectivity pattern to the cortex.

The spike-triggered average map associated with specific brain function

The single neuron defined functional maps (STMs) can reveal functional cortical architecture related to the activity of individual cortical and subcortical-cortical neurons (Xiao et al., 2017). The distinct STM patterns indicate that single neuron embedded large-scale subcortico-cortical networks may be associated with specific brain functions (Pessoa, 2014; Liu et al., 2021a; Amunts et al., 2022). To explore this possibility, for the first time, we simultaneously record the output spiking activity of the facial motor nucleus and wide-field calcium dynamics of the cortex, which enable us to investigate the cortico-brainstem motor pathways that directly control facial movements in mice. Interestingly, we found that facial nerve spike-triggered average map functionally associated with active facial movements, and the causal relationship can be tested by optogenetic stimulation or inhibition of the PTA area. Previous studies using anterograde virus tracing have revealed that the motor cortex sends few direct projections to the facial nucleus while the most prominent projections from the motor, somatosensory, and association cortex are polysynaptic, presumably through nuclei in the brainstem (Grinevich et al., 2005; Matyas et al., 2010; Rathelot et al., 2017). Studies in humans and monkeys have identified parietal-eye-field and reach-specific areas that involve voluntary control of eye or hand movement (Lynch, 1980; Andersen, 1989; Sakata et al., 1997; Chapman et al., 2002; Konen and Kastner, 2008; Archambault et al., 2009; Pouget, 2015; Rathelot et al., 2017). Our findings suggest that the PTA region is also involved in facial movements in mice, and supplement the current understanding of the functional connectivity between cortex and facial nucleus motor neurons.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated that our minimally invasive, flexible, low profile, low cost, chronically implanted Mesotrode can be readily applied to interrogating the functional connectivity between single neurons and large-scale cortical networks, and the causal relationship can be tested by optogenetic stimulation.

Materials and methods

Mice

Animal protocols (A13-0336-A22-0054 and A14-0266-A22-0258) were approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee and conformed to the Canadian Council on Animal Care and Use guidelines and animals were housed in a vivarium on a 12 h daylight cycle (7 AM lights on). Most experiments were performed toward the end of the mouse light cycle. Transgenic GCaMP6s mice (males, 2–4 months of age, weighing 20–30 g; n=19) were produced by crossing Emx1-cre (B6.129S2-Emx1^tm1(cre)Krj/J, Jax #005628), CaMK2-tTA (B6.Cg-Tg(Camk2a-tTA)1Mmay/DboJ, Jax #007004) and TITL-GCaMP6s (Ai94;B6.Cg-Igs7^{tm94.1(tetO-GCaMP6s)Hze}/J, Jax #024104) strain. The presence of GCaMP expression was determined by genotyping each animal before each surgical procedure with PCR amplification. These crossings are expected to produce a stable expression of the calcium indicator (Chen et al., 2013b) specifically within all excitatory neurons across all layers of the cortex (Vanni and Murphy, 2014). Channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice (Arenkiel et al., 2007) (n=6) were obtained from the Jackson Labs (line 18, stock 007612, strain B6.Cg-Tg(Thy1-COP4/EYFP)18Gfng/J). Neuronal activity was driven by optically activating inhibitory neurons targeted in VGAT-ChR2-YFP expressing mice (Zhao et al., 2011; n=3). No method of randomization was used since all mice belonged to the same sample group. Samples sizes were chosen based on previous studies using similar approaches (Mohajerani et al., 2013; Vanni and Murphy, 2014). Given the use of automated acquisition and analysis procedures, we did not employ blinding.

Tetrode fabrication

Request a detailed protocol

Polyimide insulated, tungsten wire (40 cm long, diameter 25 μm, Stablohm 650, California Fine Wire, USA) was folded into four wires and clamped together with the modified alligator clip. The loop of wires was hung over the horizontal bar. The alligator clip was placed into the motorized stage. Eighty clockwise twists were applied and followed by forty counter clock-wise twists to the wire bundle over the course of approximately three minutes. After tetrode twisting was completed, the wires were fused together by heating from three different angles with a heat gun (420 °C or 790 °F), using medium-low flow. For each angle, begin 1–2 cm below where the wire bundle splits, the heat gun was held 2 cm away from the wire and moved periodically over the length of the wire for about 5 s. The tetrode was removed from the twisting apparatus by gently lifting the alligator clip to relieve tension on the tetrode, and cutting the tetrode near the alligator clip. At the other end, the loop was cut off such that there were four non-bonded strands of wire of equal length. The tetrode was then soldered to a miniature connector using a fine-tip soldering iron (Thermaltronics M8MF375 Micro Fine 0.25 mm).

Surgical procedures

Request a detailed protocol

Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (4% for induction and 1.5% for maintenance in air). The eyes were covered with eye lubricant (Lacrilube; https://www.well.ca/) and body temperature was maintained at 37 °C with a heating pad with feedback regulation. Mice were then placed in a stereotaxic frame and received an injection of Lidocaine (0.1 ml, 0.2%) under the scalp. Mice also received a 0.5 ml subcutaneous injection of a saline solution containing buprenorphine (2 mg/ml), atropine (3 μg/ml), and glucose (20 mM). Respiration rate and response to toe pinch were checked every 10–15 min to maintain the surgical anesthetic plane. A skin flap extending over both hemispheres approximately 8 mm in diameter (3 mm anterior to bregma to the posterior end of the skull and down lateral to eye level) was cut and removed. Fascia or connective tissue is lightly scraped away from the skull and small (<1 mm diameter) holes are drilled through the skull, using a high-speed dental drill with a sterile bit, over the cortex. Tetrode was directed toward the center of the hole and placed in the target using a motorized micromanipulator (MP-225, Sutter Instrument Company). Miniature connectors (2x2 x 2 mm) are cemented to the skull (with dental adhesive) around the imaging window (the total weight is <1 gm). Ground and reference electrodes are fixed into place on the surface of the posterior skull.

After tetrode implantation, the chronic transcranial window was implanted as previously described (Silasi et al., 2016). Briefly, the skin between the ears and the eyes was properly cleaned with Betadine dissolved in water and ethanol. The skin covering the occipital, parietal, and frontal bones was cut away. The fascia and any connective tissue on the skull surface were gently wiped off. C&B-Metabond transparent dental cement (Parkell, Edgewood NY, USA; Product: C&B Metabond) was prepared in a ceramic bowl and used to glue a head-fixing titanium bar to the cerebellar plate or a 4/40 stainless steel setscrew slightly angled posteriorly (~120° relative to skull). With the bar or the setscrew in place, a thick layer of dental adhesive was applied to the skull. A coverglass (Marien-feld, Lauda-Konigshofen, Germany; Cat n: 0111520) previously cut to the size of the final cranial window (~8 mm diameter), was placed on top of the dental cement before it solidified, preventing the formation of bubbles. The cement remains transparent after it solidifies and the surface vasculature should be readily seen through the final result.

For facial nerve recordings, peripheral nerve activity was measured by fine wire recording directly from the nerves subserving the whisker. During surgery, mice will be anesthetized and positioned on a warming pad connected to a rectal probe and temperature maintained at 37 °C. A skin incision was made, exposing a small part of the buccal branch of the left facial nerve. Magnification of the surgical field with a dissecting microscope allowed a careful dissection of a nerve branch with minimum disruption of the tissues and blood supply surrounding the nerve. The appropriate site of exposure was determined by using two projection lines: a vertical line running downward, posterior from the outer corner of the eye, and a horizontal line running in caudal direction, starting at the whisker E-row. Then two insulated fine wires (about 25 µm tips) were hooked and placed around the nerve separated about 2 mm from one another. The insulation at the ends of the wires was removed and a knot was made on each wire to prevent it from slipping. The opposite ends of each wire were soldered to a mini connector attached by dental cement to the skull. Finally, 6–0 silk sutures were used to close the skin incisions.

Recovery and post-operative monitoring

Request a detailed protocol

At the end of the surgical procedures, mice received a subcutaneous injection of saline (0.5 ml) with 20 mM of glucose and were allowed to recover in their home cages with an overhead heat lamp. The activity level of mice that underwent the procedure was monitored hourly for the first 4 hr and every 4–8 hr thereafter. Mice are allowed to recover for 7 days from the window implantation before performing electrophysiology recording.

Electrophysiology data acquisition

Request a detailed protocol

For Electrophysiology recordings, a custom adapter was connected to the miniature connector. The tetrode signals were amplified using a 16-channel data acquisition system (20 kHz, USB-ME16-FAI-System, Multi-Channel Systems) and recorded for at least 30 min every day.

Raw extracellular traces were imported into Spike2 (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK) or SpikeSorter software (Swindale and Spacek, 2014; Swindale et al., 2021) for spike sorting and analysis. Briefly, data were high pass-filtered at 1 kHz, and excitatory spikes were detected using a threshold of 4.5 times the median of the standard deviation over 0.675. Sorting was carried out by an automated method previously described (Swindale and Spacek, 2014) and followed by manual visual inspection of units.

Wide-field calcium imaging

Request a detailed protocol

All mice were habituated for 1 week prior to data collection. Awake mice were head-fixed and placed on a wheel in a dark imaging chamber for data collection. A behavioral camera (Raspberry Pi camera) and an infrared light were placed inside the imaging chamber to monitor active behaviors, such as running or whisking. A Pantera 1M60 CCD camera (Dalsa) was equipped with two front-to-front lenses (50 mm, f ¼ 1.435 mm, f ¼ 2; Nikon Nikkor) and a bandpass emission filter (525/36 nm, Chroma). The 12-bit images were captured at a frame rate of 120 Hz (exposure time of 7ms) with 8×8 on-chip spatial binning using EPIX XCAP v3.8 imaging software. The cortex was sequentially illuminated with alternating blue and green LEDs (Thorlabs). Blue light (473 nm) with a bandpass filter (467–499 nm) was used to excite calcium indicators and green light (525 nm) with a bandpass filter (525/50 nm) was used to observe changes in cerebral blood volume. The blue and green LEDs were sequentially activated and synchronized to the start of each frame’s exposure period with transistor-transistor logic such that each frame collected only fluorescence or reflectance signals at 60 Hz each. This LED strobe frequency of 60 Hz exceeded the critical flicker fusion frequency for mice, which marks the highest temporal frequency that an observer can resolve flicker before it becomes indistinguishable from constant light and was likely imperceptible to the mice. Reflectance signals were subtracted from fluorescence signals to mitigate the contribution of hemodynamics to fluorescence signals.

Optogenetic stimulation protocols

Request a detailed protocol

Inhibitory neurons in the cortex were optogenetically manipulated separately in VGAT-ChR2 mice. A 473 nm laser (Crystal Laser BCL-473–050, Reno, NV, USA) was connected to a fiber optic patch cable (0.22 NA, 200 µm gauge; Thorlabs FG200UCC, USA). During the experiment, 1 mW (measured from the end of the cable) of optical stimulation was delivered for an overall time of 10 s. For automated Thy1-ChR2-based facial motor mapping, we chose a relatively collimated 473 nm laser targeted through a simple microscope. The laser was moved in random order to each of the predefined stimulation locations (8x8 grid) and delivered a flash of laser light (10ms, 2.0 mW) to each point while collecting facial motor nerve response.

Spike-triggered average maps (STM) Clustering

Request a detailed protocol

We employed an unsupervised clustering algorithm, PhenoGraph (Levine et al., 2015), to categorize STMs. The graph was built in 2 steps: (1) it finds k nearest neighbors for N input vectors (4096 dimensions for 64x64 STMs) using Euclidean distance, resulting in N sets of k nearest neighbors, (2) a weighted graph is built where the edge weight between pairs of nodes depends on the number of neighbors they share. We then perform Louvain community detection (Blondel et al., 2008) on this graph to partition the graph that maximizes modularity. This algorithm only requires one input parameter which is k, the number of nearest neighbors to be found for each input vector, and the resulting number of clusters (10) is relatively insensitive to the k chosen over the range of typically chosen values. We also performed k-means clustering using the same input and compared clustering effectiveness using the Silhouette score and found that 10 clusters were optimal. We then performed a cluster identity refinement step, where an individual STM whose similarity (Pearson correlation value) with the cluster average STM of the assigned cluster was lower than 0.3 was manually reassigned if its similarity with group average STMs of any other clusters was higher than 0.3; otherwise, that STM was excluded. A total of 94 out of 1146 STMs (8.2%) were excluded.

Histology

Request a detailed protocol

At the end of each experiment, animals were killed with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (24 mg). Mice were transcardially perfused with PBS followed by chilled 4% PFA in PBS. Coronal or sagittal brain sections (50 µm thickness) were cut on a vibratome (Leica VT1000S). Images of brain tissues with counter-stained DAPI were acquired using confocal microscopy (Zeiss LSM510) to reveal the electrode track and help identify the approximate cortical/subcortical location of recorded cells.

Statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism, Version 9. Statistical tests and results are reported in the figure legends. More than two groups were compared using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test comparing experimental flies to each control. All graphs represent mean ± SEM. Sample sizes are listed in the figure legends. No explicit power analyses were used to determine sample sizes prior to experimentation. Minimum sample sizes were decided prior to experimentation based on previous experience or pilot experiments revealing how many samples are typically sufficient to detect reasonable effect sizes.

Data availability

Code used for data analysis and data generated in this study have been deposited in Open Science Framework repositories https://osf.io/67p3s/ and https://osf.io/ke6fg/.

The following data sets were generated

1. Xiao D
2. Yan Y
3. Murphy TH
(2023) Open Science Framework
Mesotrode.

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/67P3S
1. Xiao D
2. Yan Y
3. Murphy TH
(2023) Open Science Framework
Mesotrode2.

https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KE6FG

References

1. Alivisatos AP
2. Chun M
3. Church GM
4. Greenspan RJ
5. Roukes ML
6. Yuste R
(2012) The brain activity map project and the challenge of functional connectomics
Neuron 74:970–974.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.006
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Amunts K
2. DeFelipe J
3. Pennartz C
4. Destexhe A
5. Migliore M
6. Ryvlin P
7. Furber S
8. Knoll A
9. Bitsch L
10. Bjaalie JG
11. Ioannidis Y
12. Lippert T
13. Sanchez-Vives MV
14. Goebel R
15. Jirsa V
(2022) Linking brain structure, activity, and cognitive function through computation
eNeuro 9:ENEURO.0316-21.2022.

https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0316-21.2022
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Andersen RA
(1989) Visual and eye movement functions of the posterior parietal cortex
Annual Review of Neuroscience 12:377–403.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.002113
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Cortical mechanisms for online control of hand movement trajectory: the role of the posterior parietal cortex
Cerebral Cortex 19:2848–2864.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp058
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Arenkiel BR
2. Peca J
3. Davison IG
4. Feliciano C
5. Deisseroth K
6. Augustine GJ
7. Ehlers MD
8. Feng G
(2007) In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2
Neuron 54:205–218.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.03.005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Aru J
2. Suzuki M
3. Larkum ME
(2020) Cellular mechanisms of conscious processing
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24:814–825.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.07.006
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Optogenetic stimulation of cortex to map evoked whisker movements in awake head-restrained mice
Neuroscience 368:199–213.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.004
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Automated light-based mapping of motor cortex by photoactivation of channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice
Nature Methods 6:219–224.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1303
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Preprint
1. Barson D
2. Hamodi A
3. Shen X
4. Lur G
5. Constable R
6. Cardin J
7. Crair M
8. Higley M
(2018) Simultaneous Mesoscopic and Two-Photon Imaging of Neuronal Activity in Cortical Circuits
bioRxiv.

https://doi.org/10.1101/468348
- Google Scholar
1. Battaglia FP
2. Kalenscher T
3. Cabral H
4. Winkel J
5. Bos J
6. Manuputy R
7. van Lieshout T
8. Pinkse F
9. Beukers H
10. Pennartz C
(2009) The Lantern: an ultra-light micro-drive for multi-tetrode recordings in mice and other small animals
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 178:291–300.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.12.024
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) The systemdrive: A multisite, multiregion microdrive with independent drive axis angling for chronic multimodal systems neuroscience recordings in freely behaving animals
eNeuro 5:ENEURO.0261-18.2018.

https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0261-18.2018
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2008) Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Journal of Statistical Mechanics 2008:10008.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
- Google Scholar
1. Bragin A
2. Hetke J
3. Wilson CL
4. Anderson DJ
5. Engel J Jr
6. Buzsáki G
(2000) Multiple site silicon-based probes for chronic recordings in freely moving rats: implantation, recording and histological verification
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 98:77–82.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00193-x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2004) Whisker movements evoked by stimulation of single pyramidal cells in rat motor cortex
Nature 427:704–710.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02266
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Buzsáki G
(2006) Rhythms of the Brain
Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301069.001.0001
- Google Scholar
(2016) Hipposeq: a comprehensive RNA-seq database of gene expression in hippocampal principal neurons
eLife 5:e14997.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14997
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Chapman H
2. Gavrilescu M
3. Wang H
4. Kean M
5. Egan G
6. Castiello U
(2002) Posterior parietal cortex control of reach-to-grasp movements in humans
The European Journal of Neuroscience 15:2037–2042.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02021.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013a) Behaviour-dependent recruitment of long-range projection neurons in somatosensory cortex
Nature 499:336–340.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12236
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Chen TW
2. Wardill TJ
3. Sun Y
4. Pulver SR
5. Renninger SL
6. Baohan A
7. Schreiter ER
8. Kerr RA
9. Orger MB
10. Jayaraman V
11. Looger LL
12. Svoboda K
13. Kim DS
(2013b) Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity
Nature 499:295–300.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12354
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Locomotion-dependent remapping of distributed cortical networks
Nature Neuroscience 22:778–786.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-019-0357-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Cohen YE
2. Andersen RA
(2002) A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex
Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 3:553–562.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn873
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Hope: Hybrid-drive combining optogenetics, pharmacology and electrophysiology
Frontiers in Neural Circuits 12:41.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00041
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
Website
1. Egan GF
2. Reutens D
3. Bartlett PF
4. Galloway GJ
5. Paxinos G
6. Petrou S
(2015) Average wild-type C57BL/6J mouse 3D MRI brain image
Accessed November 8, 2023.

https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:370299
(2005) Monosynaptic pathway from rat vibrissa motor cortex to facial motor neurons revealed by lentivirus-based axonal tracing
The Journal of Neuroscience 25:8250–8258.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2235-05.2005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Gutierrez-Barragan D
2. Singh NA
3. Alvino FG
4. Coletta L
5. Rocchi F
6. De Guzman E
7. Galbusera A
8. Uboldi M
9. Panzeri S
10. Gozzi A
(2022) Unique spatiotemporal fMRI dynamics in the awake mouse brain
Current Biology 32:631–644.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.12.015
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hong G
2. Lieber CM
(2019) Author Correction: Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings
Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 20:376.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-019-0169-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Houweling AR
2. Brecht M
(2008) Behavioural report of single neuron stimulation in somatosensory cortex
Nature 451:65–68.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06447
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Huber D
2. Gutnisky DA
3. Peron S
4. O’Connor DH
5. Wiegert JS
6. Tian L
7. Oertner TG
8. Looger LL
9. Svoboda K
(2012) Multiple dynamic representations in the motor cortex during sensorimotor learning
Nature 484:473–478.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11039
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jiang X
2. Shen S
3. Cadwell CR
4. Berens P
5. Sinz F
6. Ecker AS
7. Patel S
8. Tolias AS
(2015) Principles of connectivity among morphologically defined cell types in adult neocortex
Science 350:aac9462.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac9462
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Chronically implanted Neuropixels probes enable high-yield recordings in freely moving mice
eLife 8:e47188.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47188
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) Spatiotemporal patterns of neocortical activity around hippocampal sharp-wave ripples
eLife 9:e51972.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51972
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) The DMCdrive: practical 3D-printable micro-drive system for reliable chronic multi-tetrode recording and optogenetic application in freely behaving rodents
Scientific Reports 10:11838.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68783-9
- Google Scholar
1. Koch C
2. Massimini M
3. Boly M
4. Tononi G
(2016) Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 17:307–321.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.22
- Google Scholar
1. Konen CS
2. Kastner S
(2008) Representation of eye movements and stimulus motion in topographically organized areas of human posterior parietal cortex
The Journal of Neuroscience 28:8361–8375.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1930-08.2008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lee JJ
2. Krumin M
3. Harris KD
4. Carandini M
(2022) Task specificity in mouse parietal cortex
Neuron 110:2961–2969.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.07.017
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Levine JH
2. Simonds EF
3. Bendall SC
4. Davis KL
5. Amir ED
6. Tadmor MD
7. Litvin O
8. Fienberg HG
9. Jager A
10. Zunder ER
11. Finck R
12. Gedman AL
13. Radtke I
14. Downing JR
15. Pe’er D
16. Nolan GP
(2015) Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis
Cell 162:184–197.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Liu X
2. Leopold DA
3. Yang Y
(2021a) Single-neuron firing cascades underlie global spontaneous brain events
PNAS 118:e2105395118.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105395118
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Liu Xin
2. Ren C
3. Lu Y
4. Liu Y
5. Kim J-H
6. Leutgeb S
7. Komiyama T
8. Kuzum D
(2021b) Multimodal neural recordings with Neuro-FITM uncover diverse patterns of cortical-hippocampal interactions
Nature Neuroscience 24:886–896.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-021-00841-5
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lyamzin D
2. Benucci A
(2019) The mouse posterior parietal cortex: Anatomy and functions
Neuroscience Research 140:14–22.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2018.10.008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lynch JC
(1980) The functional organization of posterior parietal association cortex
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:485–499.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00006324
- Google Scholar
1. Margolis DJ
2. Lütcke H
3. Schulz K
4. Haiss F
5. Weber B
6. Kügler S
7. Hasan MT
8. Helmchen F
(2012) Reorganization of cortical population activity imaged throughout long-term sensory deprivation
Nature Neuroscience 15:1539–1546.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3240
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Matyas F
2. Sreenivasan V
3. Marbach F
4. Wacongne C
5. Barsy B
6. Mateo C
7. Aronoff R
8. Petersen CCH
(2010) Motor control by sensory cortex
Science 330:1240–1243.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195797
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Orofacial movements involve parallel corticobulbar projections from motor cortex to trigeminal premotor nuclei
Neuron 104:765–780.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.08.032
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Mohajerani MH
2. Chan AW
3. Mohsenvand M
4. LeDue J
5. Liu R
6. McVea DA
7. Boyd JD
8. Wang YT
9. Reimers M
10. Murphy TH
(2013) Spontaneous cortical activity alternates between motifs defined by regional axonal projections
Nature Neuroscience 16:1426–1435.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3499
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Nguyen DP
2. Layton SP
3. Hale G
4. Gomperts SN
5. Davidson TJ
6. Kloosterman F
7. Wilson MA
(2009) Micro-drive array for chronic in vivo recording: tetrode assembly
Journal of Visualized Experiments 22:1098.

https://doi.org/10.3791/1098
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Oh SW
2. Harris JA
3. Ng L
4. Winslow B
5. Cain N
6. Mihalas S
7. Wang Q
8. Lau C
9. Kuan L
10. Henry AM
11. Mortrud MT
12. Ouellette B
13. Nguyen TN
14. Sorensen SA
15. Slaughterbeck CR
16. Wakeman W
17. Li Y
18. Feng D
19. Ho A
20. Nicholas E
21. Hirokawa KE
22. Bohn P
23. Joines KM
24. Peng H
25. Hawrylycz MJ
26. Phillips JW
27. Hohmann JG
28. Wohnoutka P
29. Gerfen CR
30. Koch C
31. Bernard A
32. Dang C
33. Jones AR
34. Zeng H
(2014) A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain
Nature 508:207–214.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13186
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2015) Simultaneous all-optical manipulation and recording of neural circuit activity with cellular resolution in vivo
Nature Methods 12:140–146.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3217
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Pessoa L
(2014) Understanding brain networks and brain organization
Physics of Life Reviews 11:400–435.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2014.03.005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Striatal activity topographically reflects cortical activity
Nature 591:420–425.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03166-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Petersen CCH
(2014) Cortical control of whisker movement
Annual Review of Neuroscience 37:183–203.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170344
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Phillips DP
2. Irvine DR
(1979) Acoustic input to single neurons in pulvinar-posterior complex of cat thalamus
Journal of Neurophysiology 42:123–136.

https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1979.42.1.123
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Pouget P
(2015) The cortex is in overall control of “voluntary” eye movement
Eye 29:241–245.

https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.284
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Rancz EA
2. Ishikawa T
3. Duguid I
4. Chadderton P
5. Mahon S
6. Häusser M
(2007) High-fidelity transmission of sensory information by single cerebellar mossy fibre boutons
Nature 450:1245–1248.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05995
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2017) Posterior parietal cortex contains a command apparatus for hand movements
PNAS 114:4255–4260.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608132114
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Roth RH
2. Ding JB
(2020) From neurons to cognition: Technologies for precise recording of neural activity underlying behavior
BME Frontiers 2020:1–20.

https://doi.org/10.34133/2020/7190517
- Google Scholar
1. Rousseeuw PJ
(1987) Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis
Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20:53–65.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
- Google Scholar
1. Sakata H
2. Taira M
3. Kusunoki M
4. Murata A
5. Tanaka Y
(1997) The TINS Lecture. The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action
Trends in Neurosciences 20:350–357.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01067-9
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Silasi G
2. Xiao D
3. Vanni MP
4. Chen ACN
5. Murphy TH
(2016) Intact skull chronic windows for mesoscopic wide-field imaging in awake mice
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 267:141–149.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.04.012
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2016) Movement initiation signals in mouse whisker motor cortex
Neuron 92:1368–1382.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.001
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Steinmetz NA
2. Aydin C
3. Lebedeva A
4. Okun M
5. Pachitariu M
6. Bauza M
7. Beau M
8. Bhagat J
9. Böhm C
10. Broux M
11. Chen S
12. Colonell J
13. Gardner RJ
14. Karsh B
15. Kloosterman F
16. Kostadinov D
17. Mora-Lopez C
18. O’Callaghan J
19. Park J
20. Putzeys J
21. Sauerbrei B
22. van Daal RJJ
23. Vollan AZ
24. Wang S
25. Welkenhuysen M
26. Ye Z
27. Dudman JT
28. Dutta B
29. Hantman AW
30. Harris KD
31. Lee AK
32. Moser EI
33. O’Keefe J
34. Renart A
35. Svoboda K
36. Häusser M
37. Haesler S
38. Carandini M
39. Harris TD
(2021) Neuropixels 2.0: A miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings
Science 372:eabf4588.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf4588
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Swindale NV
2. Spacek MA
(2014) Spike sorting for polytrodes: a divide and conquer approach
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 8:6.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00006
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Swindale NV
2. Rowat P
3. Krause M
4. Spacek MA
5. Mitelut C
(2021) Voltage distributions in extracellular brain recordings
Journal of Neurophysiology 125:1408–1424.

https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00633.2020
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) Recording chronically from the same neurons in awake, behaving primates
Journal of Neurophysiology 98:3780–3790.

https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00260.2007
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Vandecasteele M
2. M S
3. Royer S
4. Belluscio M
5. Berényi A
6. Diba K
7. Fujisawa S
8. Grosmark A
9. Mao D
10. Mizuseki K
11. Patel J
12. Stark E
13. Sullivan D
14. Watson B
15. Buzsáki G
(2012) Large-scale recording of neurons by movable silicon probes in behaving rodents
Journal of Visualized Experiments 4:e3568.

https://doi.org/10.3791/3568
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Vanni MP
2. Murphy TH
(2014) Mesoscale transcranial spontaneous activity mapping in GCaMP3 transgenic mice reveals extensive reciprocal connections between areas of somatomotor cortex
The Journal of Neuroscience 34:15931–15946.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1818-14.2014
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2013) The flexDrive: an ultra-light implant for optical control and highly parallel chronic recording of neuronal ensembles in freely moving mice
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7:8.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Voigts J
2. Harnett MT
(2020a) Somatic and Dendritic encoding of Spatial variables in Retrosplenial Cortex differs during 2D Navigation
Neuron 105:237–245.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.016
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020b) An easy-to-assemble, robust, and lightweight drive implant for chronic tetrode recordings in freely moving animals
Journal of Neural Engineering 17:026044.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ab77f9
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. White BR
2. Bauer AQ
3. Snyder AZ
4. Schlaggar BL
5. Lee J-M
6. Culver JP
(2011) Imaging of functional connectivity in the mouse brain
PLOS ONE 6:e16322.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016322
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Xiao D
2. Vanni MP
3. Mitelut CC
4. Chan AW
5. LeDue JM
6. Xie Y
7. Chen AC
8. Swindale NV
9. Murphy TH
(2017) Mapping cortical mesoscopic networks of single spiking cortical or sub-cortical neurons
eLife 6:e19976.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19976
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Xiao D
2. Forys BJ
3. Vanni MP
4. Murphy TH
(2021) MesoNet allows automated scaling and segmentation of mouse mesoscale cortical maps using machine learning
Nature Communications 12:5992.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26255-2
- Google Scholar
1. Zhao S
2. Ting JT
3. Atallah HE
4. Qiu L
5. Tan J
6. Gloss B
7. Augustine GJ
8. Deisseroth K
9. Luo M
10. Graybiel AM
11. Feng G
(2011) Cell type–specific channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice for optogenetic dissection of neural circuitry function
Nature Methods 8:745–752.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1668
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Dongsheng Xiao
1. University of British Columbia, Department of Psychiatry, Kinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research, Vancouver, Canada
2. Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Contribution
Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1669-0021
Yuhao Yan
1. University of British Columbia, Department of Psychiatry, Kinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research, Vancouver, Canada
2. Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Contribution
Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Timothy H Murphy
1. University of British Columbia, Department of Psychiatry, Kinsmen Laboratory of Neurological Research, Vancouver, Canada
2. Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Contribution
Resources, Software, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
thmurphy@mail.ubc.ca

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0093-4490

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-180631)

Timothy H Murphy

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN-143209)

Timothy H Murphy

Brain Canada Neurophotonics Platform

Timothy H Murphy

Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (Grant in aid)

Timothy H Murphy

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (2022-03723)

Timothy H Murphy

Leducq Foundation

Timothy H Murphy

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Foundation Grant FDN-143209 and project grant to THM and the UBC Institute of Mental Health Marshall Scholars and Fellowship program. THM was also supported by the Brain Canada Neurophotonics Platform, a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada grant in aid, National Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC; GPIN-2022–03723), and a Leducq Foundation grant. This work was supported by resources made available through the Dynamic Brain Circuits cluster and the NeuroImaging and NeuroComputation Centre at the UBC Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health (RRID SCR_019086) and made use of the DataBinge forum. DX was supported by the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. We thank Pumin Wang, and Cindy Jiang for surgical assistance, Jamie D Boyd for technical assistance. We thank Hongkui Zeng and Allen Brain Institute for providing transgenic mice.

Ethics

Version history

Preprint posted: February 3, 2023
Sent for peer review: April 1, 2023
Reviewed Preprint version 1: May 31, 2023
Version of Record published: November 14, 2023
Version of Record updated: November 15, 2023

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87691. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

803

views
81

downloads
3

citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Mendeley

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Dongsheng Xiao
Yuhao Yan
Timothy H Murphy

(2023)

Mesotrode allows chronic simultaneous mesoscale cortical imaging and subcortical or peripheral nerve spiking activity recording in mice

eLife 12:RP87691.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87691.2

Categories and tags

Research organism

Mouse

Share this article

Cite this article

Chronic tetrodes recording compatible with mesoscale transcranial Imaging.

Group statistics on tetrode implantation across mice.

Recording setup and example spike-triggered average maps.

Video of the 4D spatiotemporal whole-brain dynamics of mesoscale cortical calcium imaging and subcortical neuronal firing.

Simultaneous recording of behavior video (left), L-VTA neuronal firing (middle), and wide-field calcium imaging (right) in a behaving mouse.

Chronic spike-triggered average maps of hippocampus and midbrain neurons.

Clustering STMs of cortical/subcortical neurons.

Spike-triggered and optogenetics mapping facial nerve spiking associated cortical maps.

Optogenetic inhibition of the PTA area significantly reduced the facial movement of the mouse.

Abbreviation used to define different cortical/sub-cortical areas.

Simultaneous recording of behavior video (left), facial nerve spiking activity (middle), and wide-field calcium imaging (right) during mouse whiskering.

Video of the facial response after optogenetic stimulation (blue laser, 10ms) of PTA in a Thy1-ChR2 mouse.

Video of the facial response after optogenetic inhibition (blue laser, 10 s) of PTA in a VGAT-ChR2 mouse.

Author details

Dongsheng Xiao

Contribution

Competing interests

Yuhao Yan

Contribution

Competing interests

Timothy H Murphy

Contribution

For correspondence

Competing interests

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading