Delayed postglacial colonization of Betula in Iceland and the circum North Atlantic

eLife assessment

This valuable work on the paleovegetation history of Iceland has implications for the field of paleoecology, and the deglaciation history of Iceland and additional localities in Northern America and Europe via woody shrub colonization. The study uses a sedimentary ancient DNA metabarcoding approach to study this historic process. The strength of evidence is solid, with the methods (analysis of sedimentary DNA) and data analyses broadly supporting the claims.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87749.3.sa0

Significance of the findings:

Valuable: Findings that have theoretical or practical implications for a subfield

Landmark
Fundamental
Important
Valuable
Useful

Strength of evidence:

Solid: Methods, data and analyses broadly support the claims with only minor weaknesses

Exceptional
Compelling
Convincing
Solid
Incomplete
Inadequate

During the peer-review process the editor and reviewers write an eLife Assessment that summarises the significance of the findings reported in the article (on a scale ranging from landmark to useful) and the strength of the evidence (on a scale ranging from exceptional to inadequate). Learn more about eLife Assessments

Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

As the Arctic continues to warm, woody shrubs are expected to expand northward. This process, known as ‘shrubification,’ has important implications for regional biodiversity, food web structure, and high-latitude temperature amplification. While the future rate of shrubification remains poorly constrained, past records of plant immigration to newly deglaciated landscapes in the Arctic may serve as useful analogs. We provide one new postglacial Holocene sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) record of vascular plants from Iceland and place a second Iceland postglacial sedaDNA record on an improved geochronology; both show Salicaceae present shortly after deglaciation, whereas Betulaceae first appears more than 1000 y later. We find a similar pattern of delayed Betulaceae colonization in eight previously published postglacial sedaDNA records from across the glaciated circum North Atlantic. In nearly all cases, we find that Salicaceae colonizes earlier than Betulaceae and that Betulaceae colonization is increasingly delayed for locations farther from glacial-age woody plant refugia. These trends in Salicaceae and Betulaceae colonization are consistent with the plant families’ environmental tolerances, species diversity, reproductive strategies, seed sizes, and soil preferences. As these reconstructions capture the efficiency of postglacial vascular plant migration during a past period of high-latitude warming, a similarly slow response of some woody shrubs to current warming in glaciated regions, and possibly non-glaciated tundra, may delay Arctic shrubification and future changes in the structure of tundra ecosystems and temperature amplification.

Introduction

As the planet warms, the Arctic is warming at 2–4 times the global rate (Rantanen et al., 2022). This warming is impacting Arctic ecosystems through a process known as ‘shrubification,’ or the northward expansion and increased height and density of deciduous woody vegetation (Tape et al., 2006; Myers-Smith et al., 2011; Elmendorf et al., 2012; Sweet et al., 2015). Arctic shrubification alters the structure of tundra ecosystems, its regional biodiversity, food web structure, and nutrient availability (Elmendorf et al., 2012; Fauchald et al., 2017; Collins et al., 2018). Arctic shrubification also has implications for the climate system by reducing surface albedo (Sturm et al., 2005) and increasing atmospheric water vapor (Pearson et al., 2013) – both positive feedbacks that amplify high-latitude warming (Thompson et al., 2022). However, large uncertainties remain regarding the rate of future shrubification, such that the magnitude of these positive feedbacks is poorly constrained in predictive earth system models. One way to reduce future climate uncertainties is through the analysis of well-constrained paleoenvironmental records dating to warmer-than-present periods in Earth’s recent history (e.g., Tierney et al., 2020).

Traditionally, macrofossils and pollen have formed the backbone of Quaternary paleovegetation reconstructions (Birks, 2019). However, macrofossils are not consistently preserved in sedimentary records, and pollen production is restricted to seed-bearing taxa, which can be obscured by long-distant transport from sources thousands of kilometers away (Hyvärinen, 1970; Birks, 2003; Crump et al., 2019). For example, in Iceland, exotic tree pollen from taxa never reported as macrofossils since the Miocene and Pliocene (i.e., Pinus, Quercus, Corylus, Alnus, and Ulmus, Denk et al., 2011a; Denk et al., 2011b) are found in Early Holocene sedimentary records following retreat of the Icelandic Ice Sheet (Caseldine et al., 2006; Eddudóttir et al., 2015). Hence, the first appearance of pollen need not reflect local colonization of a given taxon. Recent analytical advances in sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) allow for more reliable vegetation reconstructions (e.g., Capo et al., 2021), due in part to their application in continuous lake sediment records that capture colonization times following local deglaciation. Taxa identified by DNA in lake surface sediment closely match those in catchment vegetation cover, confirming the local origin of DNA in lake sediment and improved reliability for taxa presence compared to pollen (Sjögren et al., 2017; Alsos et al., 2018). Past records of vascular plant sedaDNA can therefore provide new insight into postglacial colonization patterns (Crump et al., 2019; Alsos et al., 2022) as well as the response of vegetation to changes in temperature during prior warm periods (Clarke et al., 2020; Crump et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2021).

In this study, we present one new Icelandic record (Stóra Viðarvatn) and update the age model of a second previously published record from Iceland (Alsos et al., 2021). For these two lakes, we also compare existing pollen and sedaDNA datasets to highlight the ability of sedaDNA in pinpointing the timing of each taxon’s first appearance. We then compare sedaDNA records from eight other published North Atlantic lakes that track local vegetation assemblages since deglaciation, with particular attention to postglacial colonization patterns of two woody plant families, Salicaceae and Betulaceae. Collectively, the North Atlantic vascular plant DNA datasets demonstrate that Salicaceae colonized deglaciated lands quickly, whereas Betulaceae was delayed by up to several thousand years. As these colonization patterns took place during a period of high-latitude warming, our datasets suggest that ongoing warming may also lead to different northward expansion rates of woody shrubs in glaciated regions, and possibly tundra regions as well. As a result, the rate of Arctic shrubification may be delayed, with important consequences for high-latitude ecosystems and temperature amplification.

Results

Stóra Viðarvatn, Iceland

Stóra Viðarvatn (#4, Table 1, Figure 1) is a large lake (surface area: 2.4 km², depth: 48 m) in northeast Iceland, with no preexisting records of Holocene vegetation change. In winter 2020, we recovered sediment core 20SVID-02 from 17.4 m water depth near the center of the lake. The core contains 893 cm of sediment, collected in 1.5 m increments. The basal 20 cm are laminated, clay-rich sediment, transitioning to organic gyttja by 873 cm depth, which characterizes the remainder of the record, interbedded with tephra (volcanic ash) deposits. The chronology of the Early to Middle Holocene portion of the record is based on five tephra layers (see ‘Materials and methods’), of which the lowest, at 886.5 cm depth, is identified as the Askja S tephra (10,830 ± 57 BP, Bronk Ramsey et al., 2015), and the highest, at 334 cm depth, as Hekla 4 (4200 ± 42 BP, Dugmore et al., 1995). Because the sedimentation rate between the six tephra layers is essentially linear, we extrapolate that rate from the Askja S tephra layer 7 cm to the base of the sediment core at 893.5 cm depth, which provides a minimum deglaciation age of ~10,950 BP (Figure 2A).

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Overview map of the North Atlantic.

Lake sedimentary ancient DNA (*sed*aDNA) sites with vascular plant histories since local deglaciation shown in yellow (see Table 1 for site information). The extent of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) ice sheets is delineated in blue (Batchelor et al., 2019).

Figure 2

Download asset Open asset

Lake sediment age models used in this study.

(A) Stóra Viðarvatn’s age model (this study), (B) Torfdalsvatn’s pollen and macrofossil age model modified from Rundgren, 1995; Rundgren, 1998 (see Geirsdóttir et al., 2020), and (C) Torfdalsvatn’s sedimentary ancient DNA (*sed*aDNA) age model modified from Alsos et al., 2021. Green points reflect tephra layers and blue points reflect calibrated ¹⁴C ages using IntCal20 (Reimer et al., 2020).

Figure 2—source data 1 Major oxide composition of tephra layers (mean and standard deviation) used for age control in the Stóra Viðarvatn lake sediment record.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/87749/elife-87749-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx
Download elife-87749-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx

Table 1

Lake site information.

Site #	Lake name	Region	Latitude (°)	Longitude (°)	Reference
1	Lake Qaupat	Baffin Island	63.68	–68.20	Crump et al., 2019
2	Bliss Lake	Greenland	83.52	–28.35	Epp et al., 2015
3	Torfdalsvatn	Iceland	66.06	–20.38	Alsos et al., 2021
4	Stóra Viðarvatn	Iceland	66.24	–15.84	This study
5	Jodavannet	Svalbard	77.34	16.02	Voldstad et al., 2020
6	Lake Skartjørna	Svalbard	77.96	13.82	Alsos et al., 2016b
7	Langfjordvannet	Norway	70.15	20.54	Alsos et al., 2022
8	Eaštorjávri South	Norway	70.43	27.33	Alsos et al., 2022
9	Nordvivatnet	Norway	70.13	29.01	Alsos et al., 2022
10	Lake Ljøgottjern	Norway	60.15	11.14	ter Schure et al., 2021

Samples for sedaDNA analysis were taken from 75 equi-spaced depths throughout core 20SVID-02. Of these, 73 yielded amplifiable vascular plant DNA using the trnL P6 loop primer set. The two samples that failed (810 and 856.5 cm depth) were sampled within thick tephra layers with low organic content. Following data filtering (see ‘Materials and methods’), the trnL dataset yields 15,738,794 total assigned reads, with an average of 209,851 reads per sample. qPCR cycle threshold (C_T) values, which reflect PCR efficiency and the quantity of suitable target sequences for amplification, average 32.1 across samples. While there is inter-sample variation in DNA reads and C_T values, linear regressions show nearly stable temporal trends (Figure 3), which indicates that the availability of DNA to PCR amplification is consistent throughout the record. Metabarcoding technical quality (MTQ) and analytical quality (MAQ) scores are below suggested thresholds for low quality (0.75 and 0.1, respectively, Rijal et al., 2021) only in some samples during the Early Holocene (Figure 3). However, given that the scores correlate with species richness due to the latter values all falling below 30 (Figure 3), the low MTQ and MAQ scores are likely an artifact of the requirement that the 10 best represented barcode sequences are required for calculation (Rijal et al., 2021), and not an indication of low-quality DNA. As PCR amplification results in sequence read abundances that may not reflect original relative abundances in a sample (Nichols et al., 2018), we focus our discussion on taxa presence/absence, with a greater number of replicates (five maximum) representing a higher likelihood of taxa presence. We identified 53 taxa throughout Stóra Viðarvatn’s lake sediment record (Figure 4—source data 1). Of the key woody shrub taxa, Salicaceae is present at the base of the core (892.5 cm depth, 10,850 BP) and is present nearly continuously through the core. Betulaceae first appears ~2300 y later (701.5 cm depth, 8560 BP), and has a sporadic presence until the Middle Holocene at ~5500 BP (Figure 4A).

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

DNA quality assessment for Stóra Viðarvatn’s entire Holocene record plotted against depth (cm).

Total raw DNA reads, C_T values, proportion raw terrestrial reads, metabarcoding technical quality (MTQ), metabarcoding analytical quality (MAQ), and species richness.

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Comparison of paleoclimate and lake sedimentary ancient DNA (*sed*aDNA) records from Iceland.

(A) Presence/absence *sed*aDNA record from Stóra Viðarvatn (green) and Torfdalsvatn (red) for Betulaceae and Salicaceae, where light gray markers denote that no taxa was detected. For Stóra Viðarvatn *sed*aDNA, the bubble size is proportional to the number of PCR replicates, and vertical dark gray lines denote the timing of each lake’s deglaciation. (B) Biomarker-proxy record of sea ice from the North Iceland Shelf (inverted), where greater concentrations of IP₂₅ correspond to more sea ice (Xiao et al., 2017). (C) Diatom-based SST record from the North Iceland Shelf (Sha et al., 2022).

Figure 4—source data 1 Processed sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA) data (number of replicates and reads) for all taxa identified in the Stóra Viðarvatn lake sediment record.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/87749/elife-87749-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx
Download elife-87749-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx

Torfdalsvatn, Iceland

Torfdalsvatn (#3, Table 1, Figure 1) is a small lake (surface area: 0.41 km², depth: 5.8 m) in north Iceland from which sediment cores have been analyzed since the early 1990s to create paleoecological records from pollen and macrofossils (Björck et al., 1992; Rundgren, 1995; Rundgren, 1998), and sedaDNA (Alsos et al., 2021). The paleovegetation records derived from pollen/macrofossils and sedaDNA were constructed from separate sediment cores that have independent age models derived from radiocarbon and tephra layers of known age. To temporally compare the two sediment records, radiocarbon ages need to be calibrated using the same calibration curve, correlative tephra layer ages must agree, and age model construction requires a common method (i.e., linear interpolation vs. Bayesian). For the pollen/macrofossil records (Rundgren, 1995; Rundgren, 1998), this required calibrating the radiocarbon ages using IntCal20 (Reimer et al., 2020) and application of a Bayesian age modeling approach that informs sediment rate changes with prior information (Blaauw and Christen, 2011; Figure 2B, Geirsdóttir et al., 2020). For the sedaDNA record (Alsos et al., 2021), we revised the tephra ages previously used to establish a more reliable Bayesian age model (see ‘Materials and methods’). In doing so, the sedaDNA and pollen records feature similar linear sedimentation rates and are now synchronized by the G10ka Series tephra layers (Figure 2C). The revised age model for the Early Holocene portion of the pollen/macrofossil record (Figure 2B, Geirsdóttir et al., 2020) sets the timing of deglaciation, inferred from the onset of organic sedimentation at 801 cm depth, to 11,800 BP.

Differences on the order of centuries between the pollen/macrofossil and sedaDNA records may be artifacts of chronological uncertainty. This is because although the revised age models for the pollen/macrofossil and sedaDNA records feature common tephra layers, variable levels of proxy data resolution between the two records increase uncertainty when comparing the timing of inferred changes. Pollen of both Salicaceae (Salix spp.) and Betulaceae (Betula spp.) first appear by ~11,800 BP (Figure 5). The oldest B. nana macrofossil dates to ~9300 BP, similar to macrofossils of S. herbacea (~9400 BP) and S. phylicifolia (~9300 BP) (Figure 5). The trnL primed sedaDNA data indicate that Salicaceae did not colonize Torfdalsvatn’s catchment until ~10,300 BP, whereas Betulaceae arrived later at ~9500 BP (Figure 5).

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Simplified paleovegetation records from Torfdalsvatn for two taxa: *Salix* spp. and *Betula* spp.

Shown are pollen counts (bold red lines), where shaded regions indicate values above the mean (Rundgren, 1995), first occurrence of taxa macrofossils (black leaves, Rundgren, 1998), and DNA presence (red bubbles, Alsos et al., 2021).

Resolving Icelandic records of woody taxa colonization

Based on the original age model, Torfdalsvatn pollen records were interpreted to capture ecological changes associated with the abrupt climate oscillations between the Bølling-Allerød (14,700–12,900 BP) and Younger Dryas (12,900–11,700 BP) periods (Björck et al., 1992; Rundgren, 1995). However, recent calibration of the radiocarbon ages in the Torfdalsvatn cores from Björck et al., 1992 and Rundgren, 1995 suggests that the organic-rich portion of the record began less than 11,800 y ago (Figure 2B, Geirsdóttir et al., 2020). While there is sediment at deeper levels, it is described as silty clay (Björck et al., 1992) with sand and gravel (Rundgren, 1995). These characteristics suggest that the sediment likely originates from a rapidly deglaciating environment, perhaps with lingering ice sheet meltwater in the catchment and a rapid sediment accumulation rate that is difficult to constrain without secure age control. Therefore, we suggest that the maximum age for the final retreat of the Icelandic Ice Sheet from Torfdalsvatn’s catchment, when organic-rich sedimentation began, is ~11,800 BP, several thousand years younger than previously proposed (Björck et al., 1992; Rundgren, 1995). We use the updated age models to reconstruct the history of plant colonization in Iceland.

Differences in taxa presence/absence between the sedaDNA and pollen records from Torfdalsvatn likely reflect different mechanisms of transport for DNA and pollen. SedaDNA for both Salicaceae and Betulaceae from Torfdalsvatn shows a colonization delay relative to deglaciation, whereas pollen from both taxa is present, albeit in low abundance, in the oldest sediment samples (Figure 5). This is most likely explained by the local catchment origin of sedaDNA (Sjögren et al., 2017) versus pollen, which can be transported by wind from thousands of kilometers away (Caseldine et al., 2006; Eddudóttir et al., 2015). Therefore, the occurrence of low pollen counts prior to the corresponding identification with sedaDNA (Alsos et al., 2021) likely reflects long-distance transport from sources outside of Iceland rather than local establishment in the catchment – an inference supported by a lack of Salix and Betula macrofossils during this interval (Figure 5, Rundgren, 1998). While poor DNA preservation could explain the delay in sedaDNA, other vascular plants are identified before Salicaceae and Betulaceae DNA appear, suggesting adequate DNA preservation for PCR amplification (Alsos et al., 2021). Moreover, the corresponding sediment is rich in clay (Rundgren, 1995), which preferentially binds with and stabilizes DNA (Kanbar et al., 2020), making poor preservation unlikely. Therefore, we conclude that the colonization of Salicaceae and Betulaceae were delayed by 1500 and 2300 y, respectively, after local deglaciation of Torfdalsvatn’s catchment.

Relative to Torfdalsvatn, the catchment of Stóra Viðarvatn deglaciated ~1000 y later at ~10,850 BP (Figure 4A). Based on our new sedaDNA record, Salicaceae colonized the catchment rapidly, as it was identified in the lowermost sample at ~10,850 BP, whereas Betulaceae does not appear in the record until 8560 BP, more than 2000 y later. Considering C_T values are relatively stable throughout the entire Holocene record (Figure 3), the delayed appearance of Betulaceae does not likely result from preservation bias. While Stóra Viðarvatn does not have any independent paleovegetation records, a pollen record from a nearby peat section Ytra-Áland in Thistilfjörður (Karlsdóttir et al., 2014), ~12 km to the east, provides a useful cross-examination of woody shrub colonization patterns. In the Ytra-Áland record, Salix pollen is found in high counts well above the mean in the lowermost sample dated to 10,400 BP, suggesting bona fide early colonization (Figure 6). For Betula, there is limited to no pollen present until ~8000 BP, after which there is sporadic presence as we observe with sedaDNA (Figure 6). The Betula pollen-limited period at Ytra-Áland is followed by the first peak of Betula presence in the total land pollen during ~7700–6800 BP. According to size differentiation between the two Betula species in Iceland (Karlsdóttir et al., 2007), the pollen recovered in this peak period is mostly from the dwarf birch B. nana, but with a fair amount of pollen from the shrub-like B. pubescens, suggesting arctic-alpine heath with stands of downy birch in the region (Karlsdóttir et al., 2014). Despite the coarser resolution of Ytra-Áland’s age model, which only has two tephra layer dates bounding the timing of the first appearance of these taxa (10,400 BP and 7050 BP, Karlsdóttir et al., 2014), there is reasonable agreement between lake and peat records for the timing of arrival and subsequent Early Holocene establishment of Salicaceae and Betulaceae in northeast Iceland.

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

Simplified paleovegetation records from northeast Iceland for two taxa: *Salix* spp. and *Betula* spp.

Shown are Ytra-Áland pollen counts (bold green lines), where shaded regions indicate values above the mean (Karlsdóttir et al., 2014) and DNA presence from Stóra Viðarvatn (green bubbles, this study), where the bubble size is proportional to the number of PCR replicates.

Based on the sedaDNA records from Torfdalsvatn and Stóra Viðarvatn, we find that as the Icelandic Ice Sheet receded and exposed new land Salicaceae colonized the landscape. This occurred 0–1700 y after inferred deglaciation, whereas Betulaceae colonization was further delayed by a few thousand years (~2300 y in both cases). As Torfdalsvatn is the oldest dated terrestrial site of deglaciation in Iceland, this implies that ~1700 y was required for Salicaceae to establish a viable population on the island. By the time Stóra Viðarvatn deglaciated, it is likely that other portions of north Iceland had also deglaciated allowing Salicaceae to more efficiently colonize new regions of Iceland. The similar timing of Betulaceae colonization relative to deglaciation in the two catchments (~2300 y) but different times of deglaciation (11,800 and 10,850 BP) suggests that the evolution of catchment conditions for Torfdalsvatn and Stóra Viðarvatn may be additional factors controlling the local colonization of this taxon on Iceland. The earlier presence of low concentrations of Salicaceae and Betulaceae pollen in Torfdalsvatn is most likely derived from long-distance wind dispersal from outside Iceland.

Discussion

Postglacial sedaDNA records from the circum North Atlantic

Eight additional records of vascular plant sedaDNA from lake sediments located around the North Atlantic that were glaciated during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) are available to compare with the Icelandic data (see ‘Materials and methods’ for details). These include records from Baffin Island (n = 1, Crump et al., 2019), northern Greenland (n = 1, Epp et al., 2015), Svalbard (n = 2, Alsos et al., 2016b; Voldstad et al., 2020), northern Norway (n = 3, Rijal et al., 2021; Alsos et al., 2022), and southern Norway (n = 1, ter Schure et al., 2021; Figure 1). All eight records have age control derived from calibrated radiocarbon ages. Except for Baffin Island, we infer minimum ages of deglaciation based on the age of the oldest sediment.

Baffin Island

Lake Qaupat (#1, Figure 1) is a small lake (surface area: 0.08 km², depth: 9.2 m) situated at 35 m asl on southern Baffin Island. Cosmogenic ¹⁰Be exposure dating of Lake Qaupat’s impounding moraine constrains the timing of deglaciation to 9100 ± 700 BP (Crump et al., 2019). Lake Qaupat and most of its catchment were below sea level until 7700 ± 300 BP when postglacial isostatic recovery raised the basin above the ocean and its catchment was available for vascular plant colonization. Salicaceae is present in the record shortly after isolation from the ocean at 7400 BP, but no vascular plants are documented by sedaDNA in the older marine sediment. The first appearance of Betulaceae sedaDNA occurred at 5900 BP, more than 1000 y after Salicaceae and 2000 y after the lake and its catchment were above sea level (Crump et al., 2019).

Greenland

Bliss Lake (#2, Figure 1) is a small lake (depth: 9.8 m) situated at 17 m asl on the northern coastline of Greenland (Peary Land). Bliss Lake initially deglaciated 11,000 BP (Olsen et al., 2012) and the first appearance of Salicaceae sedaDNA is found in low read counts (<100) in sediment dated to 10,800 BP but only in higher read counts beginning at 7400 BP (Epp et al., 2015). As the lake was inundated by marine water between 10,480 and 7220 BP (Olsen et al., 2012), 7400 BP is interpreted to be the most reliable date for Salicaceae colonization in the catchment as sea level regressed and isolated the lake from the ocean (Epp et al., 2015).

Svalbard

Jodavannet (#5, Figure 1) is a small lake (depth: 6.4 m) situated at 140 m asl on the east coast of Wijdefjorden on northern Spitsbergen. Regional cosmogenic exposure dating suggests the area began to deglaciate between 14,600 and 13,800 BP (Hormes et al., 2013), although the base of Jodavannet’s sediment record suggests a minimum timing of lake deglaciation by 11,900 BP (Voldstad et al., 2020). Salicaceae sedaDNA was first found at 9800 BP in Jodavannet, whereas Betulaceae was not detected with sedaDNA metabarcoding (Voldstad et al., 2020). Lake Skartjørna (#6, Figure 1) is a small lake (surface area: 0.10 km², depth: 7.5 m) situated at 65 m asl on the west coast of Spitsbergen. As sea level fell due to glacial isostatic adjustment, Lake Skartjørna likely became isolated from the sea at ~13,000 BP (Landvik et al., 1987), although the base of the recovered sediment record, which provides a minimum deglaciation age, is dated to 8600 BP (Alsos et al., 2016b). Salicaceae sedaDNA is identified in Lake Skartjørna’s basal sample at 8600 BP and Betulaceae is first identified at 7000 BP (Alsos et al., 2016b).

Norway

Langfjordvannet (#7, Figure 1) is a small lake (surface area: 0.55 km², depth: 34.8 m) situated at 66 m asl on the coast of northern Norway (Rijal et al., 2021). Langfjordvannet deglaciated by 16,150 BP, Salicaceae is first identified in sedaDNA by 15,500 BP, and Betulaceae by 10,000 BP (Alsos et al., 2022). Eaštorjávri South (#8, Figure 1) is a small lake (surface area: 0.06 km², depth: 5.4 m) situated at 260 m asl near the coast of northern Norway (Rijal et al., 2021). Eaštorjávri South deglaciated by 11,060 BP, with Salicaceae sedaDNA identified in the basal sample at 11,060 BP and consistently present above that level. Betulaceae is identified, albeit with low read counts, in the basal sample as well, but not identified in the overlying sample. Since Betulaceae sedaDNA is not present with substantial read counts until 9950 BP (Alsos et al., 2022), we conservatively set this as Betulaceae’s first appearance in Eaštorjávri South. Nordvivatnet (#9, Figure 1) is a small lake (surface area: 0.05 km², depth: 13.3 m) situated at 82 m asl on the coastline of northern Norway (Rijal et al., 2021). Nordvivatnet deglaciated by 12,880 BP, with Salicaceae sedaDNA identified in the basal sample. Betulaceae sedaDNA is identified in the basal sample as well but below our cutoff for taxa presence (see ‘Materials and methods’). The first sample with high read counts indicative of Betulaceae presence is at 12,080 BP (Alsos et al., 2022), which we conservatively set as the timing of the taxa’s first appearance in Nordvivatnet. Finally, Lake Ljøgottjern (#10, Figure 1) is a small lake (surface area: 0.02 km², depth: 18 m) situated at 185 m asl in southeastern Norway. Lake Ljøgottjern deglaciated by 9300 BP and both Salicaceae and Betulaceae sedaDNA were first detected by 7900 BP (ter Schure et al., 2021).

Betulaceae colonization is delayed relative to Salicaceae in the circum North Atlantic

The timing of postglacial Salicaceae and Betulaceae colonization varies across the North Atlantic regions, with first appearance dates ranging from 15,500 BP in Norway to 5900 BP on Baffin Island (Figure 7). Salicaceae appears immediately after inferred deglaciation at 4 out of 10 sites, while colonization dates for the other 6 locations range from 200 to 2100 y after deglaciation and exhibit no clear spatio-temporal pattern (Figure 8). For Betulaceae, colonization times range from 800 to 6150 y after deglaciation, with sites closest to source refugia south of the ice sheets (Figure 1) having generally shorter colonization delays (Figure 8), consistent with seedling viability having a higher probability of success with shorter distance from source (Nathan, 2006). The one exception is Langfjordvannet, in northern Norway (site #7, Figure 1, Alsos et al., 2022), which deglaciated at 16,150 BP (Figure 7). Considering that Betulaceae only arrives during the Holocene Epoch (last 11,700 y) across all North Atlantic sites, the anomalously long delay of Betulaceae to Langfjordvannet suggests that this taxon may have required the Holocene’s relatively stable climate, as reflected by Greenland oxygen isotope records (Figure 7, Seierstad et al., 2014), to successfully establish itself. Alternatively, the colonization delay of Betulaceae to Langfjordvannet may reflect the slow development of stable soils, which are required for Betulaceae establishment, due to the lake’s steep catchment (Otterå, 2012). In contrast to Betulaceae, Salicaceae appears to have been an efficient colonizer to Langfjordvannet during the colder and less stable climate of the Late Glacial period and earliest Holocene (Figure 7, Seierstad et al., 2014). Finally, except for Lake Ljøgottjern in southern Norway (site #10, Figure 1) where Betulaceae and Salicaceae apparently colonize at about the same time (ter Schure et al., 2021), all other sites show that Betulaceae colonization is delayed by 800–5500 y relative to Salicaceae colonization dates (Figure 7).

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Timing of postglacial Salicaceae and Betulaceae colonization in the circum North Atlantic at 10 locations (see Figure 1 and Table 1).

(A) GISP2 δ¹⁸O values reflective of regional North Atlantic temperature variability (Seierstad et al., 2014) and (B) lake *sed*aDNA records of vascular plants, where the brown boxes reflect the extent of sedimentary record and the red/blue circles denote the first appearance of Salicaceae/Betulaceae (Epp et al., 2015; Crump et al., 2019; Alsos et al., 2016b, Alsos et al., 2021; Alsos et al., 2022; Voldstad et al., 2020; Rijal et al., 2021; ter Schure et al., 2021; this study). Light red and blue circles denote the presence of a low number of taxa reads, which we conservatively do not interpret to reflect genuine presence (e.g., Epp et al., 2015). Gray circles denote the minimum timing of local deglaciation inferred from basal sediment core ages, and in the case of Baffin Island, cosmogenic radionuclide dating of the lake’s impounding moraine (Crump et al., 2019).

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Colonization time after deglaciation (years) versus lake distance from the closest possible source south of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) ice sheet margin (km).

For all circum North Atlantic sites, Salicaceae is shown in red and Betulaceae in blue. Data point for Langfjordvannet is open for Betulaceae.

Several possibilities may contribute to the delay in Betulaceae colonization compared to Salicaceae colonization. First, the northernmost Salicaceae species reach bioclimate subzone A (1–3°C July temperature), whereas the northernmost Betulaceae species rarely go beyond bioclimate subzone D (8–9°C July temperature) (Walker et al., 2005). The different environmental tolerances may explain why Salicaceae generally arrives earlier when regional temperatures are still climbing compared to the timing of Betulaceae colonization when warmth is more broadly established (Figure 7). In support, Alsos et al., 2022 showed that at least for Fennoscandian sedaDNA vascular plant records, temperature was one of the dominant controls on postglacial dispersal patterns. Second, species diversity is greater for the Salicaceae family compared to Betulaceae family in the North Atlantic, and conventional DNA metabarcoding techniques cannot identify sedaDNA to the species level. Iceland, for example, has four native Salicaceae taxa, that is, three dwarf, cold-tolerant arctic species (S. herbacea, S. lanata, and S. arctica) and one shrub-like species (S. phylicifolia), and only two Betulaceae (B. nana and B. pubescens) (Kristinsson, 2008). The suite of Salicaceae taxa can collectively tolerate a wider range of environments than Betulaceae, including disturbed, wet, and nutrient-limited substrate characteristic of deglacial environments (e.g., S. herbacea; Beerling, 1998). Third, the modes of reproduction for Salicaceae and Betulaceae are different. Salicaceae is clonal, meaning that plants mostly reproduce asexually by vegetative spreading, which is advantageous when colonizing new landscapes (e.g., Beerling, 1998). Betulaceae propagates instead by seed and therefore requires a larger number of founder individuals for successful establishment (Atkinson, 1992; de Groot et al., 2007). Moreover, Betulaceae seeds are generally heavier than Salicaceae seeds (dry mass, B. nana = 0.12–0.30 mg, de Groot et al., 2007; S. herbacea = 0.07–0.14 mg, Beerling, 1998). This mass difference would provide a higher probability of long-distance wind dispersal for Salicaceae compared to Betulaceae and establishment of the pioneer plants.

Finally, modern observations broadly replicate the records of delayed woody taxa colonization in the North Atlantic. Studies tracking the migration of Salicaceae and Betulaceae in the forefields of retreating glaciers and to new islands also show a rapid and faster colonization of Salicaceae compared to Betulaceae (Whittaker, 1993; Magnússon et al., 2009; Burga et al., 2010; Synan et al., 2021). As an example, following the formation of the volcanic island Surtsey in 1964 CE, Salicaceae (S. herbaceae, S. lanata, and S. phylicifolia) colonized between 1995 and 1999 CE and Betulaceae has yet to arrive (Magnússon et al., 2009). Complimentary studies tracking soil and nutrient development at proglacial sites in the North Atlantic (Vilmundardóttir et al., 2014) suggest that Salicaceae is environmentally unconstrained (Whittaker, 1993; Glausen and Tanner, 2019), whereas Betulaceae requires more developed soil for its ultimate viability (Synan et al., 2021). Collectively, these studies support the environmental constraints known for each woody taxon and reinforce the hypothesis that Salicaceae is a more efficient pioneer than Betulaceae, particularly in newly deglaciated landscapes.

Environmental dispersal mechanisms of Salicaceae and Betulaceae

Coupling the timing of postglacial woody shrub colonization in the North Atlantic with genetic approaches provides a valuable opportunity to identify probable environmental dispersal mechanisms (e.g., wind, sea ice, driftwood, and birds) for long-distance transport. Previously, Alsos et al., 2015 compared amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data from living plants from Iceland, Greenland, Svalbard, the Faroe Islands, and Jan Mayen to AFLP data from the same species from potential source regions. Genetic distances suggest that Betula (sp. nana and pubescens) and Salix herbacea populations in most locations descend from ancestors in a Western European LGM refugia (Alsos et al., 2009; Eidesen et al., 2015), and that each taxa underwent a broad-fronted and rapid migration to newly deglaciated regions (Alsos et al., 2015). B. nana on Svalbard likely descends from a northwest Russian source (Alsos et al., 2007, Alsos et al., 2015), and populations on Baffin Island and western Greenland originated from North America (Alsos et al., 2009; Eidesen et al., 2015). Molecular analysis of Icelandic Betula based on chloroplast haplotypes indicates that Betula may have postglacially immigrated to Iceland from northern Scandinavia (essentially B. nana) and northwestern Europe (B. pubescens) (Thórsson et al., 2010). However, the relative roles of wind, sea ice, driftwood, and birds as transport vectors remain an open question.

Sea ice has been suggested to be a dispersal mechanism for postglacial vascular plants in the Arctic (Alsos et al., 2016a). While seasonal sea ice persisted throughout the Holocene around Svalbard (Pieńkowski et al., 2021) and northern Greenland (Syring et al., 2020), general ocean circulation patterns require source populations of vascular plants in Arctic Siberia, the dominant source region for sea ice export to the North Atlantic, for sea ice to be a viable vector. Considering that B. nana on Svalbard likely descends from a Russian refugia (Alsos et al., 2007, Alsos et al., 2015), sea ice is a reasonable transport mechanism for this location. However, genetic data from Salicaceae (S. herbacea) on Baffin Island, Greenland, and Svalbard suggest that the modern populations from these locations descend from source populations in either mid-latitude North America (south of the Laurentide Ice Sheet) or Western Europe (Alsos et al., 2007, Alsos et al., 2009), and neither region exported sea ice in the Early Holocene. This leaves wind and birds as likely mechanisms for S. herbacea transport to Baffin Island, Greenland, and Svalbard during the Holocene. North of Iceland, proxy evidence shows that sea ice disappeared by ~11,200 BP (Figure 4B, Xiao et al., 2017) when surface ocean currents were established bringing warm Atlantic waters to the North Iceland Shelf (Figure 4C, Eirksson et al., 2000; Sha et al., 2022), nearly 500 y before the colonization of the first woody taxon on the island (Figure 4A). Thus, with the absence of sea ice around Iceland’s coastline during woody plant colonization, wind and/or birds remain the likeliest dispersal mechanisms for Iceland, similar to other Arctic regions.

Future outlook

As the planet continues to warm, glacier and ice sheet mass loss is accelerating (Hugonnet et al., 2021), providing new territory for woody shrubs to colonize – the Greenland Ice Sheet currently occupies 1.7 million km² (Morlighem et al., 2017) with >400,000 km² more covered by glaciers elsewhere in the Arctic (RGI Consortium, 2017). Global warming will also allow woody plants to migrate poleward across unglaciated Arctic tundra (e.g., Myers-Smith et al., 2011), which occupies a substantially larger area compared to glaciated regions (5 billion km², Walker et al., 2005). In this study, we demonstrate that Salicaceae can migrate into deglaciating North Atlantic habitats rapidly, whereas Betulaceae may be delayed by millennia. However, the ability of these taxa to successfully follow the rapid pace of ongoing range shifts in non-glaciated tundra (e.g., Alaska and Siberia) remains an open question (e.g., Davis and Shaw, 2001; Thuiller et al., 2008). This is partially due to different baseline conditions of the tundra ecosystem compared to glacial regions upon deglacial warming, which already contain established ecosystems and nutrient-rich soils bound in the permafrost (e.g., Heijmans et al., 2022).

While the causes and rates of present-day climate change differ from the preceding postglacial period (e.g., Tierney et al., 2020), the factors that we identify as potentially driving the colonization patterns (i.e., environmental tolerance, modes of reproduction, and soil development) are relevant in both scenarios. As a result, circum North Atlantic shrubification in deglaciating regions may be prolonged – ultimately dampening the rate of change, at least temporarily, in regional biodiversity and food web structure, as well as high-latitude temperature amplification. An important next step for constraining future shrubification rates is developing detailed paleoecological reconstructions of plant dynamics in multiple tundra regions (e.g., Clarke et al., 2020; Huang et al., 2021), continuing these efforts in glaciated regions, and pairing plant histories with independent local records of climate, such as temperature and precipitation. The latter paleoclimate reconstructions will enable a more detailed assessment of plant colonization lags relative to climate (e.g., Crump et al., 2019). By pairing paleoecological and paleoenvironmental records from formerly glaciated and tundra regions and integrating these with predictive models (e.g., Braconnot et al., 2012), the community will be able to reduce uncertainties and better quantify future shrubification rates, which are essential to inform ecological predictions for policymakers.

Materials and methods

Lake sediment cores and age control

Request a detailed protocol

Stóra Viðarvatn (66.24°N, 15.84°W) is a large (2.4 km²), deep lake (48 m) located at 151 m asl in northeast Iceland (Figure 1, Axford et al., 2007). In winter 2020, we recovered a composite 8.93-m-long sediment core (20SVID-02) from 17.4 m water depth using lake ice as a coring platform. The sediment was collected in seven drives of ~150 cm each. The core sections were subsequently stored at 4°C before opening for sediment subsampling. The chronology of 20SVID-02 is based on five marker tephra layers (volcanic ash) of known age: Askja S, G10ka Series, Kverkfjöll/Hekla, Kverkfjöll, and Hekla 4 tephra layers, with ages of 10,830 ± 57 BP (Bronk Ramsey et al., 2015), 10,400–9900 BP (Óladóttir et al., 2020), 6200 BP (Óladóttir et al., 2011), 5200 BP (Óladóttir et al., 2011), and 4200 ± 42 BP (Dugmore et al., 1995), respectively. Each tephra layer was sampled along the vertical axis, sieved to isolate glass fragments between 125 and 500 μm, and embedded in epoxy plugs. Individual glass shards were analyzed at the University of Iceland on a JEOL JXA-8230 election microprobe using an acceleration voltage of 15 kV, beam current of 10 nA, and beam diameter of 10 μm. The international A99 standard was used to monitor for instrumental drift and maintain consistency between measurements. Tephra origin was then assessed following the systematic procedures outlined in Jennings et al., 2014 and Harning et al., 2018. Briefly, based on SiO₂ wt% vs. total alkali (Na₂O + K₂O) wt%, we determine whether the tephra volcanic source is mafic (tholeiitic or alkalic), intermediate, and/or rhyolitic. From here, we objectively discriminate the source volcanic system through a detailed series of bielemental plots produced from available compositional data on Icelandic tephra (Harning et al., 2018). The major oxide composition of each tephra layer is provided in Figure 2—source data 1. A Bayesian age model was generated using the R package rbacon and default settings (Blaauw and Christen, 2011; Figure 2A).

Torfdalsvatn (66.06°N, 20.38°W) is a small (0.4 km²), shallow (5.8 m) lake located at 52 m asl in north Iceland (Figure 1, Rundgren, 1998). Paleovegetation records from this lake are based on pollen, macrofossil assemblages (Björck et al., 1992; Rundgren, 1995; Rundgren, 1998; Rundgren and Ingólfsson, 1999), and sedaDNA (Alsos et al., 2021). Sediment cores from Torfdalsvatn were also recovered by a joint Colorado-Iceland team in 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2020. In modifying the lake sediment core chronologies, we use the recently calibrated age model (Figure 2B, Geirsdóttir et al., 2020) for the pollen/macrofossil records (Björck et al., 1992; Rundgren, 1995) that uses the IntCal20 calibration curve (Reimer et al., 2020). We note that the ~12,000 BP Vedde Ash has been previously identified in this record based on major oxide composition (Björck et al., 1992). However, the age of the Vedde Ash is stratigraphically too old for the radiocarbon-based chronology, suggesting that this tephra layer likely represents ash from a separate and subsequent volcanic eruption that produced the Vedde Ash, of which several possible correlations have been identified in Iceland and mainland Europe (e.g., Pilcher et al., 2005; Kristjánsdóttir et al., 2007; Matthews et al., 2011; Geirsdóttir et al., 2022). For the sedaDNA record, the Early Holocene portion of lake sediment core (Alsos et al., 2021) features two age control points, the so-called ‘Saksunarvatn Ash’ (10,267 ± 89 BP) and a graminoid radiocarbon age (6620 ± 120 BP, Alsos et al., 2021). To better compare with the pollen/macrofossil record, we generated a new age model for the sedaDNA record (Alsos et al., 2021) using the lowermost radiocarbon age and the upper and lower limits of the main ~20-cm-thick G10ka Series/Saksunarvatn tephra unit (10,400–9900 BP) following the recent recognition of multiple associated tephra layers and dating of these layers in Iceland (Harning et al., 2018; Harning et al., 2019; Óladóttir et al., 2020). The new Bayesian age model was generated using the R package rbacon and default settings (Blaauw and Christen, 2011) with the IntCal20 calibration curve (Reimer et al., 2020; Figure 2C).

DNA metabarcoding

Request a detailed protocol

We subsampled the Stóra Viðarvatn sediment core halves immediately upon splitting in a dedicated clean lab facility with no PCR products in the Trace Metal Lab, University of Colorado Boulder. All surfaces and tools were treated with 10% bleach and 70% ethanol before use. Personnel wearing complete PPE took a total of 75 samples for sedaDNA analysis using clean metal spatulas. Samples were then stored in sterile Falcon tubes at 4°C until DNA extraction and metabarcoding. Sampling resolution was based upon a preliminary age model with a sample estimated every 150 y.

We performed DNA extraction and metabarcoding library generation in a dedicated ancient DNA laboratory at the Paleogenomics Lab, University of California Santa Cruz. While working in this laboratory, we followed commonly used practices for minimizing contamination of ancient and degraded samples described previously (Fulton and Shapiro, 2019). We initially cleaned all instruments and surfaces using 10% bleach and 70% ethanol before UV irradiation for at least 1 hr. From each homogenized sample of the core, we aliquoted two 50 mg subsamples and isolated DNA following the column purification method described in Rohland et al., 2018 using Binding Buffer D and eluting 50 µl volumes. We pooled extraction eluates derived from the same original core sample prior to subsequent experiments and included one extraction control (containing no sample) for every 12 samples processed to assess the presence of external contaminants or cross-contamination.

We performed quantitative PCR (qPCR) to determine the ideal dilution of extract to add to the metabarcoding PCR, as well as the ideal number of PCR cycles. We added 2 µl of neat or diluted extract to wells containing 1× QIAGEN Multiplex master mix, as well as a final concentration of 0.16 µm of the forward and reverse trnL primer and 0.12× SYBR Green I Dye. Cycling conditions were as follows: a 15 min 95°C activation, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s. We tested 1:10 and 1:100 dilutions of extract to water alongside neat extract. We used cycle threshold (C_T) values to compare PCR efficiency between dilutions and determined the ideal cycle number for the metabarcoding PCR as the number of cycles at which the PCR curve reached the plateau phase.

We performed metabarcoding PCR on each extract using the best dilution as determined by qPCR and versions of the chloroplast trnL primer set (Taberlet et al., 2007) that contained attached truseq adapters (Table 2). We used five replicate PCRs for each primer set and for each sample, with reaction conditions as follows: 2 µl of diluted or undiluted extract in 1× QIAGEN Multiplex Mix and a 0.16 µM concentration of each primer at a total volume of 25 µl. Thermocycling began with 15 min at 95°C, followed by a number of cycles (as determined by qPCR) at 94°C for 30 s, 50–57°C for 90 s, 72°C for 60 s. We used one negative control PCR (no sample) alongside every 16 samples to assess the possibility of contamination during the PCR set up. Extraction controls also underwent metabarcoding. We cleaned reactions using SPRI select beads and eluted them into a final volume of 20 µl.

Table 2

Primer sequences used in metabarcoding and qPCR experiments.

Primer	Sequence 5′–3′
truseq_trnL_g	ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTGGGCAATCCTGAGCCAA
truseq_trnL_h	GTGACTGGAGTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCGATCT TTGAGTCTCTGCACCTATC

We then used indexing PCR to attach the full truseq adapter and unique identifier. We added 5 µl of cleaned PCR product from the metabarcoding PCR to 1× Kapa Hifi master mix and dual-unique truseq style indices at a concentration of 0.4 µM. Thermocycling began with an activation step at 98°C for 3 min, followed by 8 cycles of 98°C for 20 s, 65°C for 30 s, 72°C for 40 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 2 min. We cleaned reactions using SPRI select beads and quantified DNA concentration using the NanoDrop 8000 Spectrophotometer. We pooled PCR replicates from all samples in equimass ratios and sequenced the pools on an Illumina Nextseq 550 platform. Sequencing was performed using Illuminas v3 chemistry and a 150-cycle mid-output sequencing kit with paired end reads of 76 base pair length.

We processed raw fastq files and performed taxonomic assignment using the Anacapa Toolkit (Curd et al., 2019) and the ArcBorBryo library, which contains 2280 sequences of Arctic and boreal vascular plants and bryophytes (Sønstebø et al., 2010). Briefly, we removed adapter sequences from the raw fastq data using cutadapt and trimmed low-quality bases using FastX-toolkit before reads were separated into paired and unpaired files (Hannon, 2010; Martin, 2011). We then used dada2 for further filtering of chimeric sequences and for merging of paired reads (Callahan et al., 2016.). We dereplicated identical sequences present in the data using dada2 and generated ASV (amplicon sequence variant) tables and fastq files for each of the read types (paired merged, paired unmerged, unpaired forward, and unpaired reverse). ASVs were assigned taxonomy by globally aligning to a CRUX database generated from the ArcBorBryo library using Bowtie2 before assignment with Anacapa’s custom BLCA algorithm (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). Outputted taxonomy site frequency tables containing taxonomic assignments and read counts were subsequently analyzed using R. ASV sequences for Salicaceae and Betulaceae identified in our samples are included in Table 3.

Table 3

ASV (amplicon sequence variant) sequences identified in our samples for Salicaceae and Betulaceae.

Taxon	ASV sequence
Salicaceae	ATCCTATTTTTCGAAAACAAACAAAGGTTCATAAAGACAGAATAAGAATACAAAAG
Betulaceae	ATCCTGTTTTCCGAAAACAAATAAAACAAATTTAAGGGTTCATAAAGTGAGAATAAAAAAG

To minimize the chance of false positives, we retained only sequences that (1) were not detected in negative controls, (2) had 100% match to sequences in the library, (3) had a minimum of 10 reads per PCR replicate and occurred in a minimum of two of five PCR replicates, and (4) had a minimum of 100 reads across all PCR replicates (Table 4). We verified non-native taxa identified by this pipeline via comparison with the NCBI nucleotide database using BLAST (Sayers et al., 2022) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/) and removed these due to the low likelihood of correct taxonomic assignment. Finally, DNA quality scores were calculated following Rijal et al., 2021.

Table 4

Total read data remaining after each data filtering step.

Step	Total read data remaining
Raw	18,653,132
Minimum 10 reads per PCR replicate, occurred in 2 out of 5 PCR replicates, and minimum 100 reads across PCR replicates	17,303,887
Non-native taxa and blank contaminants	15,909,615

Published sedaDNA datasets

Request a detailed protocol

To place the Icelandic plant sedaDNA datasets in the context of the circum North Atlantic, we compiled all existing lake sedaDNA records of vascular plants from this region that were formally glaciated during the LGM (Figure 1, Table 1). These include records from Baffin Island (n = 1, Crump et al., 2019), northern Greenland (n = 1, Epp et al., 2015), Svalbard (n = 2, Voldstad et al., 2020 Alsos et al., 2016b; Voldstad et al., 2020), northern Norway (n = 3, Rijal et al., 2021; Alsos et al., 2022), and southern Norway (n = 1, ter Schure et al., 2021). To ensure that all records were comparable, we excluded seven records from northern Norway: Sandfjorddalen, Horntjernet, Gauptjern, Jøkelvatnet, Kuutsjärvi, Nesservatnet, Sierravannet (Rijal et al., 2021; Alsos et al., 2022). Nesservatnet and Sierravannet contained only Late Holocene records and thus do not capture local postglacial colonization patterns. A lack of supporting proxy records (e.g., carbon content) for Sandfjorddalen and Horntjernet meant it was unclear whether these two records capture the complete postglacial period. For Gauptjern, the inferred basal age (8776 BP) is inconsistent with the reconstructed timing of deglaciation (~11,000 BP, Hughes et al., 2016), which suggests the initial postglacial interval may be missing. Finally, both Jøkelvatnet and Kuutsjärvi were impacted by glacial meltwater during the Early Holocene when woody taxa were first identified (Wittmeier et al., 2015; Bogren, 2019), and thus the inferred timing of plant colonization is probably confounded in this unstable landscape by periodic pulses of terrestrial detritus. Unless otherwise specified, the timing of deglaciation at each site is inferred from the basal age of the sediment record.

Data availability

Data associated with this study is publicly available in the manuscript and Figure 2—source data 1 and Figure 4—source data 1.

References

1. Alsos IG
2. Eidesen PB
3. Ehrich D
4. Skrede I
5. Westergaard K
6. Jacobsen GH
7. Landvik JY
8. Taberlet P
9. Brochmann C
(2007) Frequent long-distance plant colonization in the changing Arctic
Science 316:1606–1609.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139178
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Alsos IG
2. Alm T
3. Normand S
4. Brochmann C
(2009) Past and future range shifts and loss of diversity in dwarf willow (Salix herbacea L) inferred from genetics, fossils and modelling
Global Ecology and Biogeography 18:223–239.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00439.x
- Google Scholar
1. Alsos IG
2. Ehrich D
3. Eidesen PB
4. Solstad H
5. Westergaard KB
6. Schönswetter P
7. Tribsch A
8. Birkeland S
9. Elven R
10. Brochmann C
(2015) Long-distance plant dispersal to North Atlantic islands: colonization routes and founder effect
AoB PLANTS 7:1–19.

https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv036
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2016a) The role of sea ice for vascular plant dispersal in the Arctic
Biology Letters 12:20160264.

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2016.0264
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Alsos IG
2. Sjögren P
3. Edwards ME
4. Landvik JY
5. Gielly L
6. Forwick M
7. Coissac E
8. Brown AG
9. Jakobsen LV
10. Føreid MK
11. Pedersen MW
(2016b) Sedimentary ancient DNA from Lake Skartjørna, Svalbard: Assessing the resilience of arctic flora to Holocene climate change
The Holocene 26:627–642.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615612563
- Google Scholar
1. Alsos IG
2. Lammers Y
3. Yoccoz NG
4. Jørgensen T
5. Sjögren P
6. Gielly L
7. Edwards ME
(2018) Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: how does it represent the contemporary vegetation
PLOS ONE 13:e0195403.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195403
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Ancient sedimentary DNA shows rapid post-glacial colonisation of Iceland followed by relatively stable vegetation until the Norse settlement (Landnám) AD 870
Quaternary Science Reviews 259:106903.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106903
- Google Scholar
1. Alsos IG
2. Rijal DP
3. Ehrich D
4. Karger DN
5. Yoccoz NG
6. Heintzman PD
7. Brown AG
8. Lammers Y
9. Pellissier L
10. Alm T
11. Bråthen KA
12. Coissac E
13. Merkel MKF
14. Alberti A
15. Denoeud F
16. Bakke J
17. PhyloNorway Consortium
(2022) Postglacial species arrival and diversity buildup of northern ecosystems took millennia
Science Advances 8:eabo7434.

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo7434
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Atkinson MD
(1992) Betula Pendula Roth (B. Verrucosa Ehrh.) and B. Pubescens Ehrh
The Journal of Ecology 80:837.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2260870
- Google Scholar
(2007) Holocene temperature history of northern Iceland inferred from subfossil midges
Quaternary Science Reviews 26:3344–3358.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2007.09.003
- Google Scholar
1. Batchelor CL
2. Margold M
3. Krapp M
4. Murton DK
5. Dalton AS
6. Gibbard PL
7. Stokes CR
8. Murton JB
9. Manica A
(2019) The configuration of northern hemisphere ice sheets through the quaternary
Nature Communications 10:3713.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11601-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Beerling DJ
(1998) Salix herbacea L.*
Journal of Ecology 86:872–895.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.8650872.x
- Google Scholar
1. Birks HH
(2003) The importance of plant macrofossils in the reconstruction of Lateglacial vegetation and climate: examples from Scotland, western Norway, and Minnesota, USA
Quaternary Science Reviews 22:453–473.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00248-2
- Google Scholar
1. Birks HJB
(2019) Contributions of Quaternary botany to modern ecology and biogeography
Plant Ecology & Diversity 12:189–385.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2019.1646831
- Google Scholar
(1992) Lake Torfadalsvatn: a high resolution record of the North Atlantic ash zone I and the last glacial‐interglacial environmental changes in Iceland
Boreas 21:15–22.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1992.tb00009.x
- Google Scholar
1. Blaauw M
2. Christen JA
(2011) Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process
Bayesian Analysis 6:457–474.

https://doi.org/10.1214/ba/1339616472
- Google Scholar
Book
1. Bogren F
(2019)
Evidence for Birch Forests and a Highly Productive Environment near the Margin of the Fennoscandian Ice Sheet in the Värriötunturit Area, Northeastern Finland

Stockholm University.
- Google Scholar
(2012) Evaluation of climate models using palaeoclimatic data
Nature Climate Change 2:417–424.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1456
- Google Scholar
1. Bronk Ramsey C
2. Albert PG
3. Blockley SPE
4. Hardiman M
5. Housley RA
6. Lane CS
7. Lee S
8. Matthews IP
9. Smith VC
10. Lowe JJ
(2015) Improved age estimates for key Late Quaternary European tephra horizons in the RESET lattice
Quaternary Science Reviews 118:18–32.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.11.007
- Google Scholar
1. Burga CA
2. Krüsi B
3. Egli M
4. Wernli M
5. Elsener S
6. Ziefle M
7. Fischer T
8. Mavris C
(2010) Plant succession and soil development on the foreland of the Morteratsch glacier (Pontresina, Switzerland): Straight forward or chaotic?
Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants 205:561–576.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2009.10.001
- Google Scholar
1. Callahan BJ
2. McMurdie PJ
3. Rosen MJ
4. Han AW
5. Johnson AJA
6. Holmes SP
(2016) DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
Nature Methods 13:581–583.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Capo E
2. Giguet-Covex C
3. Rouillard A
4. Nota K
5. Heintzman PD
6. Vuillemin A
7. Ariztegui D
8. Arnaud F
9. Belle S
10. Bertilsson S
11. Bigler C
12. Bindler R
13. Brown AG
14. Clarke CL
15. Crump SE
16. Debroas D
17. Englund G
18. Ficetola GF
19. Garner RE
20. Gauthier J
21. Gregory-Eaves I
22. Heinecke L
23. Herzschuh U
24. Ibrahim A
25. Kisand V
26. Kjær KH
27. Lammers Y
28. Littlefair J
29. Messager E
30. Monchamp M-E
31. Olajos F
32. Orsi W
33. Pedersen MW
34. Rijal DP
35. Rydberg J
36. Spanbauer T
37. Stoof-Leichsenring KR
38. Taberlet P
39. Talas L
40. Thomas C
41. Walsh DA
42. Wang Y
43. Willerslev E
44. van Woerkom A
45. Zimmermann HH
46. Coolen MJL
47. Epp LS
48. Domaizon I
49. G. Alsos I
50. Parducci L
(2021) Lake sedimentary DNA research on past terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity: overview and recommendations
Quaternary 4:6.

https://doi.org/10.3390/quat4010006
- Google Scholar
(2006) Early Holocene climate variability and the timing and extent of the Holocene thermal maximum (HTM) in northern Iceland
Quaternary Science Reviews 25:2314–2331.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2006.02.003
- Google Scholar
1. Clarke CL
2. Alsos IG
3. Edwards ME
4. Paus A
5. Gielly L
6. Haflidason H
7. Mangerud J
8. Regnéll C
9. Hughes PDM
10. Svendsen JI
11. Bjune AE
(2020) A 24,000-year ancient DNA and pollen record from the Polar Urals reveals temporal dynamics of arctic and boreal plant communities
Quaternary Science Reviews 247:106564.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106564
- Google Scholar
1. Collins CG
2. Stajich JE
3. Weber SE
4. Pombubpa N
5. Diez JM
(2018) Shrub range expansion alters diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities across an alpine elevation gradient
Molecular Ecology 27:2461–2476.

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14694
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Crump SE
2. Miller GH
3. Power M
4. Sepúlveda J
5. Dildar N
6. Coghlan M
7. Bunce M
(2019) Arctic shrub colonization lagged peak postglacial warmth: Molecular evidence in lake sediment from Arctic Canada
Global Change Biology 25:4244–4256.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14836
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Crump SE
2. Fréchette B
3. Power M
4. Cutler S
5. de Wet G
6. Raynolds MK
7. Raberg JH
8. Briner JP
9. Thomas EK
10. Sepúlveda J
11. Shapiro B
12. Bunce M
13. Miller GH
(2021) Ancient plant DNA reveals High Arctic greening during the last interglacial
PNAS 118:1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2019069118
- Google Scholar
1. Curd EE
2. Gold Z
3. Kandlikar GS
4. Gomer J
5. Ogden M
6. O’Connell T
7. Pipes L
8. Schweizer TM
9. Rabichow L
10. Lin M
11. Shi B
12. Barber PH
13. Kraft N
14. Wayne R
15. Meyer RS
16. Yu D
(2019) Anacapa Toolkit: An environmental DNA toolkit for processing multilocus metabarcode datasets
Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10:1469–1475.

https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13214
- Google Scholar
1. Davis MB
2. Shaw RG
(2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change
Science 292:673–679.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.292.5517.673
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) Betula Nana L. and Betula Glandulosa Michx
The Journal of Ecology 85:241.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2960655
- Google Scholar
(2011)
Late Cainozoic Floras of Iceland

555–645, The Pleistocene Floras (2.4–0.8 ma) – shaping the modern vegetation of Iceland, Late Cainozoic Floras of Iceland, Springer, 10.1007/978-94-007-0372-8.
- Google Scholar
(2011)
Late Cainozoic Floras of Iceland

415–449, A Lakeland area in the late Miocene, Late Cainozoic Floras of Iceland, Springer, 10.1007/978-94-007-0372-8.
- Google Scholar
1. Dugmore AJ
2. Cook GT
3. Shore JS
4. Newton AJ
5. Edwards KJ
6. Larsen G
(1995) Radiocarbon dating tephra layers in britain and iceland
Radiocarbon 37:379–388.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S003382220003085X
- Google Scholar
(2015) Life on the periphery is tough: Vegetation in Northwest Iceland and its responses to early-Holocene warmth and later climate fluctuations
The Holocene 25:1437–1453.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615585839
- Google Scholar
(2015) Comparative analyses of plastid and AFLP data suggest different colonization history and asymmetric hybridization between Betula pubescens and B. nana
Molecular Ecology 24:3993–4009.

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13289
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2000) Late-glacial and Holocene palaeoceanography of the North Icelandic shelf
Journal of Quaternary Science 15:23–42.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1417(200001)15:1<23::AID-JQS476>3.0.CO;2-8
- Google Scholar
1. Elmendorf SC
2. Henry GHR
3. Hollister RD
4. Björk RG
5. Boulanger-Lapointe N
6. Cooper EJ
7. Cornelissen JHC
8. Day TA
9. Dorrepaal E
10. Elumeeva TG
11. Gill M
12. Gould WA
13. Harte J
14. Hik DS
15. Hofgaard A
16. Johnson DR
17. Johnstone JF
18. Jónsdóttir IS
19. Jorgenson JC
20. Klanderud K
21. Klein JA
22. Koh S
23. Kudo G
24. Lara M
25. Lévesque E
26. Magnússon B
27. May JL
28. Mercado-Dı´az JA
29. Michelsen A
30. Molau U
31. Myers-Smith IH
32. Oberbauer SF
33. Onipchenko VG
34. Rixen C
35. Martin Schmidt N
36. Shaver GR
37. Spasojevic MJ
38. Þórhallsdóttir ÞE
39. Tolvanen A
40. Troxler T
41. Tweedie CE
42. Villareal S
43. Wahren C-H
44. Walker X
45. Webber PJ
46. Welker JM
47. Wipf S
(2012) Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming
Nature Climate Change 2:453–457.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1465
- Google Scholar
1. Epp LS
2. Gussarova G
3. Boessenkool S
4. Olsen J
5. Haile J
6. Schrøder-Nielsen A
7. Ludikova A
8. Hassel K
9. Stenøien HK
10. Funder S
11. Willerslev E
12. Kjær K
13. Brochmann C
(2015) Lake sediment multi-taxon DNA from North Greenland records early post-glacial appearance of vascular plants and accurately tracks environmental changes
Quaternary Science Reviews 117:152–163.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.03.027
- Google Scholar
(2017) Arctic greening from warming promotes declines in caribou populations
Science Advances 3:e1601365.

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601365
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Fulton TL
2. Shapiro B
(2019) Setting Up an Ancient DNA Laboratory
Methods in Molecular Biology 1963:1–13.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9176-1_1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) Holocene history of landscape instability in Iceland: Can we deconvolve the impacts of climate, volcanism and human activity?
Quaternary Science Reviews 249:106633.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106633
- Google Scholar
(2022) Recurrent outburst floods and explosive volcanism during the Younger Dryas–Early Holocene deglaciation in south Iceland: evidence from a lacustrine record
Journal of Quaternary Science 37:1006–1023.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.3344
- Google Scholar
1. Glausen TG
2. Tanner LH
(2019) Successional trends and processes on a glacial foreland in Southern Iceland studied by repeated species counts
Ecological Processes 8:11.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-019-0165-9
- Google Scholar
Software
1. Hannon GJ
(2010) FASTX-Toolkit
Toolkit.

http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit
(2018) Provenance, stratigraphy and chronology of Holocene tephra from Vestfirðir, Iceland
Quaternary Geochronology 46:59–76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2018.03.007
- Google Scholar
(2019) Marker tephra in Haukadalsvatn lake sediment: A key to the Holocene tephra stratigraphy of northwest Iceland
Quaternary Science Reviews 219:154–170.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.07.019
- Google Scholar
(2022) Tundra vegetation change and impacts on permafrost
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment 3:68–84.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00233-0
- Google Scholar
(2013) From mountain top to the deep sea – Deglaciation in 4D of the northwestern Barents Sea ice sheet
Quaternary Science Reviews 75:78–99.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.04.009
- Google Scholar
(2021) Plant sedimentary ancient DNA from far east russia covering the last 28,000 years reveals different assembly rules in cold and warm climates
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9:763747.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.763747
- Google Scholar
(2016) The last Eurasian ice sheets – a chronological database and time‐slice reconstruction, DATED‐1
Boreas 45:1–45.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12142
- Google Scholar
1. Hugonnet R
2. McNabb R
3. Berthier E
4. Menounos B
5. Nuth C
6. Girod L
7. Farinotti D
8. Huss M
9. Dussaillant I
10. Brun F
11. Kääb A
(2021) Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century
Nature 592:726–731.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03436-z
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hyvärinen H
(1970) Flandrian pollen diagrams from svalbard
Geografiska Annaler 52:213–222.

https://doi.org/10.1080/04353676.1970.11879826
- Google Scholar
(2014) Holocene tephra from Iceland and Alaska in SE Greenland Shelf Sediments
Geological Society, London, Special Publications 398:157–193.

https://doi.org/10.1144/SP398.6
- Google Scholar
(2020) Geochemical identification of potential DNA-hotspots and DNA-infrared fingerprints in lake sediments
Applied Geochemistry 122:104728.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104728
- Google Scholar
(2007) Differentiating pollen of Betula species from Iceland
Grana 46:78–84.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00173130701237832
- Google Scholar
(2014)
Birch hybridization in thistilfjördur, north-east iceland during the holocene

Icelandic Agricultural Sciences 27:95–109.
- Google Scholar
1. Kristinsson H
(2008)
Íslenskt plöntutal, blómplöntur og byrkningar

Fjölrit Náttúrufræðistofnunar 51:1–58.
- Google Scholar
(2007) Geochemistry of Holocene cryptotephras from the North Iceland Shelf (MD99-2269): intercalibration with radiocarbon and palaeomagnetic chronostratigraphies
The Holocene 17:155–176.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683607075829
- Google Scholar
(1987) The Late Weichselian and Holocene shoreline displacement on the west-central coast of Svalbard
Polar Research 5:29–44.

https://doi.org/10.3402/polar.v5i1.6866
- Google Scholar
1. Langmead B
2. Salzberg SL
(2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Nature Methods 9:357–359.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Developments in plant colonization and succession on Surtsey during 1999–2008
Surtsey Research 12:57–76.

https://doi.org/10.33112/surtsey.12.7
- Google Scholar
1. Martin M
(2011) Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads
EMBnet.Journal 17:10.

https://doi.org/10.14806/ej.17.1.200
- Google Scholar
(2011) New age estimates and climatostratigraphic correlations for the borrobol and penifiler tephras: evidence from abernethy forest, scotland
Journal of Quaternary Science 26:247–252.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.1498
- Google Scholar
1. Morlighem M
2. Williams CN
3. Rignot E
4. An L
5. Arndt JE
6. Bamber JL
7. Catania G
8. Chauché N
9. Dowdeswell JA
10. Dorschel B
11. Fenty I
12. Hogan K
13. Howat I
14. Hubbard A
15. Jakobsson M
16. Jordan TM
17. Kjeldsen KK
18. Millan R
19. Mayer L
20. Mouginot J
21. Noël BPY
22. O’Cofaigh C
23. Palmer S
24. Rysgaard S
25. Seroussi H
26. Siegert MJ
27. Slabon P
28. Straneo F
29. van den Broeke MR
30. Weinrebe W
31. Wood M
32. Zinglersen KB
(2017) BedMachine v3: complete bed topography and ocean bathymetry mapping of greenland from multibeam echo sounding combined with mass conservation
Geophysical Research Letters 44:11051–11061.

https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074954
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Myers-Smith IH
2. Forbes BC
3. Wilmking M
4. Hallinger M
5. Lantz T
6. Blok D
7. Tape KD
8. Macias-Fauria M
9. Sass-Klaassen U
10. Lévesque E
11. Boudreau S
12. Ropars P
13. Hermanutz L
14. Trant A
15. Collier LS
16. Weijers S
17. Rozema J
18. Rayback SA
19. Schmidt NM
20. Schaepman-Strub G
21. Wipf S
22. Rixen C
23. Ménard CB
24. Venn S
25. Goetz S
26. Andreu-Hayles L
27. Elmendorf S
28. Ravolainen V
29. Welker J
30. Grogan P
31. Epstein HE
32. Hik DS
(2011) Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities
Environmental Research Letters 6:045509.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045509
- Google Scholar
1. Nathan R
(2006) Long-distance dispersal of plants
Science 313:786–788.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124975
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Nichols RV
2. Vollmers C
3. Newsom LA
4. Wang Y
5. Heintzman PD
6. Leighton M
7. Green RE
8. Shapiro B
(2018) Minimizing polymerase biases in metabarcoding
Molecular Ecology Resources 18:927–939.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12895
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2011) Holocene volcanic activity at Grímsvötn, Bárdarbunga and Kverkfjöll subglacial centres beneath Vatnajökull, Iceland
Bulletin of Volcanology 73:1187–1208.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0461-4
- Google Scholar
(2020) The Saksunarvatn Ash and the G10ka series tephra
Review and Current State of Knowledge. Quaternary Geochronology 56:101041.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quageo.2019.101041
- Google Scholar
1. Olsen J
2. Kjær KH
3. Funder S
4. Larsen NK
5. Ludikova A
(2012) High‐Arctic climate conditions for the last 7000 years inferred from multi‐proxy analysis of the Bliss Lake record, North Greenland
Journal of Quaternary Science 27:318–327.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.1548
- Google Scholar
Thesis
1. Otterå SM
(2012)
Rekonstruksjon av skredaktiviteten rundt Langfjordvatnet på Arnøy, Nord-Troms (MSc Thesis

University of Bergen.
- Google Scholar
1. Pearson RG
2. Phillips SJ
3. Loranty MM
4. Beck PSA
5. Damoulas T
6. Knight SJ
7. Goetz SJ
(2013) Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change
Nature Climate Change 3:673–677.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1858
- Google Scholar
1. Pieńkowski AJ
2. Husum K
3. Belt ST
4. Ninnemann U
5. Köseoğlu D
6. Divine DV
7. Smik L
8. Knies J
9. Hogan K
10. Noormets R
(2021) Seasonal sea ice persisted through the Holocene Thermal Maximum at 80°N
Communications Earth & Environment 2:191.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00191-x
- Google Scholar
(2005) A Holocene tephra record from the Lofoten Islands, Arctic Norway
Boreas 34:136–156.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03009480510012935
- Google Scholar
(2022) The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979
Communications Earth & Environment 3:168.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3
- Google Scholar
1. Reimer PJ
2. Austin WEN
3. Bard E
4. Bayliss A
5. Blackwell PG
6. Bronk Ramsey C
7. Butzin M
8. Cheng H
9. Edwards RL
10. Friedrich M
11. Grootes PM
12. Guilderson TP
13. Hajdas I
14. Heaton TJ
15. Hogg AG
16. Hughen KA
17. Kromer B
18. Manning SW
19. Muscheler R
20. Palmer JG
21. Pearson C
22. van der Plicht J
23. Reimer RW
24. Richards DA
25. Scott EM
26. Southon JR
27. Turney CSM
28. Wacker L
29. Adolphi F
30. Büntgen U
31. Capano M
32. Fahrni SM
33. Fogtmann-Schulz A
34. Friedrich R
35. Köhler P
36. Kudsk S
37. Miyake F
38. Olsen J
39. Reinig F
40. Sakamoto M
41. Sookdeo A
42. Talamo S
(2020) The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve (0–55 cal kBP)
Radiocarbon 62:725–757.

https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2020.41
- Google Scholar
Software
1. RGI Consortium
(2017)
Randolph glacier inventory (RGI) – A Dataset of global glacier outlines: version 6.0

Technical Report, Global Land Ice Measurements from Space.
1. Rijal DP
2. Heintzman PD
3. Lammers Y
4. Yoccoz NG
5. Lorberau KE
6. Pitelkova I
7. Goslar T
8. Murguzur FJA
9. Salonen JS
10. Helmens KF
11. Bakke J
12. Edwards ME
13. Alm T
14. Bråthen KA
15. Brown AG
16. Alsos IG
(2021) Sedimentary ancient DNA shows terrestrial plant richness continuously increased over the Holocene in northern Fennoscandia
Science Advances 7:1–16.

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf9557
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2018) Extraction of highly degraded DNA from ancient bones, teeth and sediments for high-throughput sequencing
Nature Protocols 13:2447–2461.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-018-0050-5
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Rundgren M
(1995) Biostratigraphic evidence of the allerød-younger dryas-preboreal oscillation in northern iceland
Quaternary Research 44:405–416.

https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1995.1085
- Google Scholar
1. Rundgren M
(1998) Early-Holocene vegetation of northern Iceland: pollen and plant macrofossil evidence from the Skagi peninsula
The Holocene 8:553–564.

https://doi.org/10.1191/095968398669995117
- Google Scholar
1. Rundgren M
2. Ingólfsson Ó
(1999) Plant survival in Iceland during periods of glaciation?
Journal of Biogeography 26:387–396.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1999.00296.x
- Google Scholar
1. Sayers EW
2. Bolton EE
3. Brister JR
4. Canese K
5. Chan J
6. Comeau DC
7. Connor R
8. Funk K
9. Kelly C
10. Kim S
11. Madej T
12. Marchler-Bauer A
13. Lanczycki C
14. Lathrop S
15. Lu Z
16. Thibaud-Nissen F
17. Murphy T
18. Phan L
19. Skripchenko Y
20. Tse T
21. Wang J
22. Williams R
23. Trawick BW
24. Pruitt KD
25. Sherry ST
(2022) Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information
Nucleic Acids Research 50:D20–D26.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkab1112
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Seierstad IK
2. Abbott PM
3. Bigler M
4. Blunier T
5. Bourne AJ
6. Brook E
7. Buchardt SL
8. Buizert C
9. Clausen HB
10. Cook E
11. Dahl-Jensen D
12. Davies SM
13. Guillevic M
14. Johnsen SJ
15. Pedersen DS
16. Popp TJ
17. Rasmussen SO
18. Severinghaus JP
19. Svensson A
20. Vinther BM
(2014) Consistently dated records from the Greenland GRIP, GISP2 and NGRIP ice cores for the past 104 ka reveal regional millennial-scale δ18O gradients with possible Heinrich event imprint
Quaternary Science Reviews 106:29–46.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.10.032
- Google Scholar
1. Sha L
2. Knudsen KL
3. Eiríksson J
4. Björck S
5. Jiang H
6. Yang X
7. Yu X
8. Li D
(2022) Diatom-reconstructed summer sea-surface temperatures and climatic events off Norh Iceland during the last deglaciation and Holocene
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 602:111154.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.111154
- Google Scholar
1. Sjögren P
2. Edwards ME
3. Gielly L
4. Langdon CT
5. Croudace IW
6. Merkel MKF
7. Fonville T
8. Alsos IG
(2017) Lake sedimentary DNA accurately records 20^th Century introductions of exotic conifers in Scotland
The New Phytologist 213:929–941.

https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14199
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sønstebø JH
2. Gielly L
3. Brysting AK
4. Elven R
5. Edwards M
6. Haile J
7. Willerslev E
8. Coissac E
9. Rioux D
10. Sannier J
11. Taberlet P
12. Brochmann C
(2010) Using next-generation sequencing for molecular reconstruction of past Arctic vegetation and climate
Molecular Ecology Resources 10:1009–1018.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02855.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Sturm M
2. Douglas T
3. Racine C
4. Liston GE
(2005) Changing snow and shrub conditions affect albedo with global implications
Journal of Geophysical Research 110:1–13.

https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JG000013
- Google Scholar
1. Sweet SK
2. Griffin KL
3. Steltzer H
4. Gough L
5. Boelman NT
(2015) Greater deciduous shrub abundance extends tundra peak season and increases modeled net CO2 uptake
Global Change Biology 21:2394–2409.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12852
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Spatial and temporal dynamics of growth of woody plant species (birch and willows) on the foreland of a retreating glacier in southern Iceland
Ecological Processes 10:1–11.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00282-9
- Google Scholar
1. Syring N
2. Stein R
3. Fahl K
4. Vahlenkamp M
5. Zehnich M
6. Spielhagen RF
7. Niessen F
(2020) Holocene changes in sea-ice cover and polynya formation along the eastern North Greenland shelf: New insights from biomarker records
Quaternary Science Reviews 231:106173.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106173
- Google Scholar
1. Taberlet P
2. Coissac E
3. Pompanon F
4. Gielly L
5. Miquel C
6. Valentini A
7. Vermat T
8. Corthier G
9. Brochmann C
10. Willerslev E
(2007) Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding
Nucleic Acids Research 35:e14.

https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl938
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tape K
2. Sturm M
3. Racine C
(2006) The evidence for shrub expansion in Northern Alaska and the Pan‐Arctic
Global Change Biology 12:686–702.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01128.x
- Google Scholar
1. ter Schure ATM
2. Bajard M
3. Loftsgarden K
4. Høeg HI
5. Ballo E
6. Bakke J
7. Støren EWN
8. Iversen F
9. Kool A
10. Brysting AK
11. Krüger K
12. Boessenkool S
(2021) Anthropogenic and environmental drivers of vegetation change in southeastern Norway during the Holocene
Quaternary Science Reviews 270:107175.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.107175
- Google Scholar
(2022) Northern Hemisphere vegetation change drives a Holocene thermal maximum
Science Advances 8:eabj6535.

https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abj6535
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2010) Introgression and phylogeography of Betula nana (diploid), B. pubescens (tetraploid) and their triploid hybrids in Iceland inferred from cpDNA haplotype variation
Journal of Biogeography 37:2098–2110.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02353.x
- Google Scholar
1. Thuiller W
2. Albert C
3. Araújo MB
4. Berry PM
5. Cabeza M
6. Guisan A
7. Hickler T
8. Midgley GF
9. Paterson J
10. Schurr FM
11. Sykes MT
12. Zimmermann NE
(2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: Future challenges
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 9:137–152.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2007.09.004
- Google Scholar
1. Tierney JE
2. Poulsen CJ
3. Montañez IP
4. Bhattacharya T
5. Feng R
6. Ford HL
7. Hönisch B
8. Inglis GN
9. Petersen SV
10. Sagoo N
11. Tabor CR
12. Thirumalai K
13. Zhu J
14. Burls NJ
15. Foster GL
16. Goddéris Y
17. Huber BT
18. Ivany LC
19. Kirtland Turner S
20. Lunt DJ
21. McElwain JC
22. Mills BJW
23. Otto-Bliesner BL
24. Ridgwell A
25. Zhang YG
(2020) Past climates inform our future
Science 370:1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3701
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2014) Early stage development of selected soil properties along the proglacial moraines of Skaftafellsjökull glacier, SE-Iceland
CATENA 121:142–150.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.04.020
- Google Scholar
(2020) A complete Holocene lake sediment ancient DNA record reveals long-standing high Arctic plant diversity hotspot in northern Svalbard
Quaternary Science Reviews 234:106207.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106207
- Google Scholar
1. Walker DA
2. Raynolds MK
3. Daniëls FJA
4. Einarsson E
5. Elvebakk A
6. Gould WA
7. Katenin AE
8. Kholod SS
9. Markon CJ
10. Melnikov ES
11. Moskalenko NG
12. Talbot SS
13. Yurtsev BA
(2005) The circumpolar arctic vegetation map
Journal of Vegetation Science 16:267–282.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02365.x
- Google Scholar
1. Whittaker RJ
(1993) Plant population patterns in a glacier foreland succession: pioneer herbs and later‐colonizing shrubs
Ecography 16:117–136.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1993.tb00064.x
- Google Scholar
(2015) Reconstructing Holocene glacier activity at Langfjordjøkelen, Arctic Norway, using multi-proxy fingerprinting of distal glacier-fed lake sediments
Quaternary Science Reviews 114:78–99.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.02.007
- Google Scholar
1. Xiao X
2. Zhao M
3. Knudsen KL
4. Sha L
5. Eiríksson J
6. Gudmundsdóttir E
7. Jiang H
8. Guo Z
(2017) Deglacial and Holocene sea–ice variability north of Iceland and response to ocean circulation changes
Earth and Planetary Science Letters 472:14–24.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.05.006
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

David J Harning

Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States

Contribution
Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

For correspondence
david.harning@colorado.edu

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2648-1346
Samuel Sacco

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States

Contribution
Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Kesara Anamthawat-Jónsson

Institute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

Contribution
Investigation, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3133-2185
Nicolò Ardenghi

Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States

Contribution
Investigation, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6305-0588
Thor Thordarson

Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

Contribution
Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Jonathan H Raberg

Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States

Contribution
Investigation

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Julio Sepúlveda
1. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
2. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
Contribution
Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Áslaug Geirsdóttir

Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland

Contribution
Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3125-0195
Beth Shapiro

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States

Contribution
Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2733-7776
Gifford H Miller
1. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
2. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States
Contribution
Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

Funding

National Science Foundation (1836981)

Gifford H Miller
Áslaug Geirsdóttir
Julio Sepúlveda

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by NSF ARCSS #1836981. We kindly thank Sveinbjörn Steinþórsson and Þór Blöndahl for lake coring assistance at Stóra Viðarvatn, Mats Rundgren for sharing Torfdalsvatn’s pollen datasets, Thomas Marchitto for access to the Trace Metal Lab at the University of Colorado Boulder, and Martha Raynolds and Helga Bültmann for valuable discussion. Publication of this article was funded by the University of Colorado Boulder Libraries Open Access Fund. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments that improved the final version of our manuscript.

Version history

Preprint posted: March 14, 2023
Sent for peer review: April 7, 2023
Reviewed Preprint version 1: July 12, 2023
Reviewed Preprint version 2: October 30, 2023
Version of Record published: November 13, 2023

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87749. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.