Genetics: A colourful duplication

A genetic duplication event during evolution allowed male wood tiger moths to have either yellow or white patterns on their wings.
  • Download
  • Cite
  • CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).
  1. Violaine Llaurens  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), France
  2. Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, France

The beautiful patterns found on the wings of moths and butterflies can provide important insights into adaptive evolution (Orteu and Jiggins, 2020). Natural selection exerted by predators, and sexual selection exerted by females, have led to the emergence of an incredible diversity of new colours and patterns (Briolat et al., 2019; Robertson and Monteiro, 2005). While some of the genes involved in this diversification have recently been identified (Van’t Hof et al., 2016; Livraghi et al., 2021), it is still unclear whether the emergence of new colours and patterns is generally driven by similar sets of genes or by the evolution of new ones.

Within some species, individuals can have strikingly different colour patterns on their wings. For instance, male wood tiger moths can have either yellow or white hindwings, with both types of males usually occurring within the same geographical location (Figure 1A). Understanding the genetic mechanisms that allow different coloured individuals to co-exist within a population – a phenomenon called colour polymorphism – can help identify how new traits emerged over the course of evolution (Llaurens et al., 2017). Now, in eLife, Chris Jiggins, Johanna Mappes and co-workers – including Melanie Brien (University of Helsinki) and Anna Orteu (University of Cambridge) as joint first authors – report which genes determine whether a male wood tiger moth will develop white or yellow hindwings (Brien et al., 2023).

Finding the gene responsible for colour polymorphism in wood tiger moths.

(A) The proportion of male wood tiger moths that have yellow or white hindwings varies between geographical locations. For instance, 40–70% of males living in Finland and 97% of males living in …

Like detectives working on a complex case, the team patiently gathered several lines of evidence to find the genetic variations responsible for this colour polymorphism. By crossing yellow females with white males, they were able to identify a region of the genome that is associated with colour differences in male offspring. This region contains 21 genes, including four from the yellow gene family, and is a different size in yellow and white males. In white males, this part of the genome consists of a large duplicated area which contains both a full-length copy and truncated copy of the yellow-e gene. Brien et al. hypothesized that the truncated gene is responsible for the white phenotype in the wood tiger moth, and named the suspected gene valkea, the Finnish word for white.

Next, Brien et al. studied the genes expressed in the wings of caterpillars and pupae before they grow into adult wood tiger moths. Several genes were found to be differentially expressed in the white and yellow moths: as expected, valkea was only turned on in white males. Interestingly, the full-length copy of the yellow-e gene was also overexpressed in the wings of the white males during this phase of development.

To confirm that valkea controls wing colour, Brien et al. introduced a ‘guide’ that allowed the gene editing tool CRISPR-Cas9 to specifically modify the DNA sequence of the valkea gene. More than 1000 eggs from white moths were injected with the valkea-specific guide, but only six individuals reached adulthood, with four out of five male adults developing partially yellow hindwings (Figure 1B). Unfortunately, the guide also targeted the full-length copy of the yellow-e gene in addition to valkea, making it difficult to determine the respective role each of these genes play in colour polymorphism.

The findings of Brien et al. suggest that the hindwing colour of male wood tiger moths is determined by genes from the yellow family, which are known to regulate wing colour in other insects (Wittkopp et al., 2002). This highlights how the diverse range of colour patterns seen in winged insects are determined by only a small number of genes (Zhang et al., 2017). The results also confirm the important role of gene duplication in driving the evolution of new traits (Martin and Reed, 2010).

The re-use and duplication of the yellow-e gene can be interpreted as evolutionary tinkering (Jacob, 1977). The tinkering of such a small set of genes demonstrates how a few genetic variations can generate such a striking diversity of phenotypes. Nevertheless, the small set of genetic variations that can be targeted by selection also exert strong constraints on adaptive evolution, potentially limiting the range of colours and patterns that can emerge over the course of evolution.

Distinguishing the respective roles of similar genes is challenging. The work of Brien et al. is a promising step in investigating the exact changes within and among gene copies that led to individual members of a species developing one trait or another. This type of work on polymorphism could be combined with research investigating how gene duplications impact the evolution of phenotypes between different species. The results of these studies could highlight the different evolutionary paths responsible for the diverse colours and patterns seen on the wings of moths and butterflies.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Violaine Llaurens

    Violaine Llaurens is at the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), Paris, France, and the Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France

    For correspondence
    llaurens@mnhn.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1962-7391

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2023, Llaurens

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 410
    views
  • 23
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Vendula Bohlen Šlechtová, Tomáš Dvořák ... Joerg Bohlen
    Research Article

    Eurasia has undergone substantial tectonic, geological, and climatic changes throughout the Cenozoic, primarily associated with tectonic plate collisions and a global cooling trend. The evolution of present-day biodiversity unfolded in this dynamic environment, characterised by intricate interactions of abiotic factors. However, comprehensive, large-scale reconstructions illustrating the extent of these influences are lacking. We reconstructed the evolutionary history of the freshwater fish family Nemacheilidae across Eurasia and spanning most of the Cenozoic on the base of 471 specimens representing 279 species and 37 genera plus outgroup samples. Molecular phylogeny using six genes uncovered six major clades within the family, along with numerous unresolved taxonomic issues. Dating of cladogenetic events and ancestral range estimation traced the origin of Nemacheilidae to Indochina around 48 mya. Subsequently, one branch of Nemacheilidae colonised eastern, central, and northern Asia, as well as Europe, while another branch expanded into the Burmese region, the Indian subcontinent, the Near East, and northeast Africa. These expansions were facilitated by tectonic connections, favourable climatic conditions, and orogenic processes. Conversely, aridification emerged as the primary cause of extinction events. Our study marks the first comprehensive reconstruction of the evolution of Eurasian freshwater biodiversity on a continental scale and across deep geological time.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Ljiljana Mihajlovic, Bharat Ravi Iyengar ... Yolanda Schaerli
    Research Article

    Gene duplication drives evolution by providing raw material for proteins with novel functions. An influential hypothesis by Ohno (1970) posits that gene duplication helps genes tolerate new mutations and thus facilitates the evolution of new phenotypes. Competing hypotheses argue that deleterious mutations will usually inactivate gene duplicates too rapidly for Ohno’s hypothesis to work. We experimentally tested Ohno’s hypothesis by evolving one or exactly two copies of a gene encoding a fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli through several rounds of mutation and selection. We analyzed the genotypic and phenotypic evolutionary dynamics of the evolving populations through high-throughput DNA sequencing, biochemical assays, and engineering of selected variants. In support of Ohno’s hypothesis, populations carrying two gene copies displayed higher mutational robustness than those carrying a single gene copy. Consequently, the double-copy populations experienced relaxed purifying selection, evolved higher phenotypic and genetic diversity, carried more mutations and accumulated combinations of key beneficial mutations earlier. However, their phenotypic evolution was not accelerated, possibly because one gene copy rapidly became inactivated by deleterious mutations. Our work provides an experimental platform to test models of evolution by gene duplication, and it supports alternatives to Ohno’s hypothesis that point to the importance of gene dosage.