Evolution of haploid and diploid populations reveals common, strong, and variable pleiotropic effects in non-home environments

Abstract

Adaptation is driven by the selection for beneficial mutations that provide a fitness advantage in the specific environment in which a population is evolving. However, environments are rarely constant or predictable. When an organism well adapted to one environment finds itself in another, pleiotropic effects of mutations that made it well adapted to its former environment will affect its success. To better understand such pleiotropic effects, we evolved both haploid and diploid barcoded budding yeast populations in multiple environments, isolated adaptive clones, and then determined the fitness effects of adaptive mutations in “non-home” environments in which they were not selected. We find that pleiotropy is common, with most adaptive evolved lineages showing fitness effects in non-home environments. Consistent with other studies, we find that these pleiotropic effects are unpredictable: they are beneficial in some environments and deleterious in others. However, we do find that lineages with adaptive mutations in the same genes tend to show similar pleiotropic effects. We also find that ploidy influences the observed adaptive mutational spectra in a condition-specific fashion. In some conditions, haploids and diploids are selected with adaptive mutations in identical genes, while in others they accumulate mutations in almost completely disjoint sets of genes.

Data availability

All underlying sequencing data for both barcode sequencing and whole genome sequencing are available from the short read archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA912754.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vivian Chen

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0007-6205-7853
  2. Milo S Johnson

    Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0169-2494
  3. Lucas Hérissant

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0065-5608
  4. Parris T Humphrey

    Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. David C Yuan

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yuping Li

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Atish Agarwala

    Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Samuel B Hoelscher

    Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Dmitri A Petrov

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3664-9130
  10. Michael M Desai

    Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9581-1150
  11. Gavin Sherlock

    Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, United States
    For correspondence
    gsherloc@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1692-4983

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM131824)

  • Gavin Sherlock

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM118165)

  • Dmitri A Petrov

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM104239)

  • Michael M Desai

National Science Foundation (PHY-1914916)

  • Michael M Desai

National Science Foundation (DMS-1764269)

  • Michael M Desai

National Science Foundation

  • Milo S Johnson

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM110275)

  • Gavin Sherlock

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Chen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,027
    views
  • 173
    downloads
  • 4
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vivian Chen
  2. Milo S Johnson
  3. Lucas Hérissant
  4. Parris T Humphrey
  5. David C Yuan
  6. Yuping Li
  7. Atish Agarwala
  8. Samuel B Hoelscher
  9. Dmitri A Petrov
  10. Michael M Desai
  11. Gavin Sherlock
(2023)
Evolution of haploid and diploid populations reveals common, strong, and variable pleiotropic effects in non-home environments
eLife 12:e92899.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.92899

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.92899

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Mauna R Dasari, Kimberly E Roche ... Elizabeth A Archie
    Research Article

    Mammalian gut microbiomes are highly dynamic communities that shape and are shaped by host aging, including age-related changes to host immunity, metabolism, and behavior. As such, gut microbial composition may provide valuable information on host biological age. Here, we test this idea by creating a microbiome-based age predictor using 13,563 gut microbial profiles from 479 wild baboons collected over 14 years. The resulting ‘microbiome clock’ predicts host chronological age. Deviations from the clock’s predictions are linked to some demographic and socio-environmental factors that predict baboon health and survival: animals who appear old-for-age tend to be male, sampled in the dry season (for females), and have high social status (both sexes). However, an individual’s ‘microbiome age’ does not predict the attainment of developmental milestones or lifespan. Hence, in our host population, gut microbiome age largely reflects current, as opposed to past, social and environmental conditions, and does not predict the pace of host development or host mortality risk. We add to a growing understanding of how age is reflected in different host phenotypes and what forces modify biological age in primates.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Christopher S McAllester, John E Pool
    Research Article

    Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms can be common, but the causes of their persistence are often unclear. We propose a model for the maintenance of inversion polymorphism, which requires that some variants contribute antagonistically to two phenotypes, one of which has negative frequency-dependent fitness. These conditions yield a form of frequency-dependent disruptive selection, favoring two predominant haplotypes segregating alleles that favor opposing antagonistic phenotypes. An inversion associated with one haplotype can reduce the fitness load incurred by generating recombinant offspring, reinforcing its linkage to the haplotype and enabling both haplotypes to accumulate more antagonistic variants than expected otherwise. We develop and apply a forward simulator to examine these dynamics under a tradeoff between survival and male display. These simulations indeed generate inversion-associated haplotypes with opposing sex-specific fitness effects. Antagonism strengthens with time, and can ultimately yield karyotypes at surprisingly predictable frequencies, with striking genotype frequency differences between sexes and between developmental stages. To test whether this model may contribute to well-studied yet enigmatic inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster, we track inversion frequencies in laboratory crosses to test whether they influence male reproductive success or survival. We find that two of the four tested inversions show significant evidence for the tradeoff examined, with In(3 R)K favoring survival and In(3 L)Ok favoring male reproduction. In line with the apparent sex-specific fitness effects implied for both of those inversions, In(3 L)Ok was also found to be less costly to the viability and/or longevity of males than females, whereas In(3 R)K was more beneficial to female survival. Based on this work, we expect that balancing selection on antagonistically pleiotropic traits may provide a significant and underappreciated contribution to the maintenance of natural inversion polymorphism.