Spatiotemporal changes in Netrin/Dscam1 signaling dictate axonal projection direction in Drosophila small ventral lateral clock neurons

eLife assessment

This study provides insights into the mechanism of axonal directional changes, utilizing the pacemaker neurons of the circadian clock, the sLNVs, as a model system. The data were collected and analysed using solid methodology, resulting in valuable data on the interplay of signalling pathways and the growth of the axon. The study holds potential interest for neurobiologists focusing on axonal growth and development.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96041.3.sa0

Significance of the findings:

Valuable: Findings that have theoretical or practical implications for a subfield

Landmark
Fundamental
Important
Valuable
Useful

Strength of evidence:

Solid: Methods, data and analyses broadly support the claims with only minor weaknesses

Exceptional
Compelling
Convincing
Solid
Incomplete
Inadequate

During the peer-review process the editor and reviewers write an eLife Assessment that summarises the significance of the findings reported in the article (on a scale ranging from landmark to useful) and the strength of the evidence (on a scale ranging from exceptional to inadequate). Learn more about eLife Assessments

Abstract
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Axon projection is a spatial- and temporal-specific process in which the growth cone receives environmental signals guiding axons to their final destination. However, the mechanisms underlying changes in axonal projection direction without well-defined landmarks remain elusive. Here, we present evidence showcasing the dynamic nature of axonal projections in Drosophila’s small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs). Our findings reveal that these axons undergo an initial vertical projection in the early larval stage, followed by a subsequent transition to a horizontal projection in the early-to-mid third instar larvae. The vertical projection of s-LNv axons correlates with mushroom body calyx expansion, while the s-LNv-expressed Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam1) interacts with Netrins to regulate the horizontal projection. During a specific temporal window, locally newborn dorsal clock neurons secrete Netrins, facilitating the transition of axonal projection direction in s-LNvs. Our study establishes a compelling in vivo model to probe the mechanisms of axonal projection direction switching in the absence of clear landmarks. These findings underscore the significance of dynamic local microenvironments in the complementary regulation of axonal projection direction transitions.

Introduction

During nervous system development, neurons extend axons to reach their targets in order to build functional neural circuits (Bentley and Caudy, 1983; Klose and Bentley, 1989; Mann et al., 2002; Shi et al., 2023). The growth cone, which is specialized at the tip of the extending axon, is critical for receiving multiple guidance signals from the external environment to guide axon projection (Agi et al., 2024; Lowery and Van Vactor, 2009). Guidance cues regulate cytoskeletal dynamics through growth cone-specific receptors, steering axons via attractive or repulsive signals (Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996; Araújo and Tear, 2003; Koch et al., 2012; Kolodkin and Tessier-Lavigne, 2011; Stoeckli, 2018; Zang et al., 2021). Over the last 30 years, several guidance cues have been identified and divided into four classical families: Semaphorins (Kolodkin et al., 1992; Luo et al., 1993; Pasterkamp, 2012; Raper, 2000; Winberg et al., 1998), Ephrins (Cheng et al., 1995; Kania and Klein, 2016; Sperry, 1963; Wilkinson, 2001), Netrins (Colamarino and Tessier-Lavigne, 1995; Hong et al., 1999; Kennedy et al., 1994; Meijers et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2023; Serafini et al., 1994), and Slits (Agi et al., 2024; Battye et al., 1999; Kidd et al., 1999; Seeger et al., 1993; Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996). The emergence of other kinds of guidance cues, including morphogens (Charron et al., 2003; Ciani et al., 2004; Colavita et al., 1998; Wen et al., 2007; Yoshikawa et al., 2003), growth factors (Barde et al., 1982; Berkemeier et al., 1991; Leibrock et al., 1989; Maisonpierre et al., 1990; Short et al., 2021), and cell adhesion molecules (Rader et al., 1996; Rader et al., 1993; Williams et al., 1994; Wong et al., 1995), increases the complexity of axon pathfinding.

When going through a long-distance pathfinding process in the complex and highly dynamic in vivo environment, axons frequently undergo multiple changes in their projection directions (Chitnis and Kuwada, 1991; Hidalgo and Brand, 1997; Hutter, 2003; Isbister et al., 1999; McConnell et al., 1989). Crucially, intermediate targets play a pivotal role by providing vital guiding information that enables axons to transition their projection directions and embark upon the subsequent stages of their journey, ultimately leading them to their final destination (Bartoe et al., 2006; de Ramon Francàs et al., 2017; Stoeckli, 2018; Timofeev et al., 2012; Timofeev et al., 2012). Certain intermediate targets can respond to the growth cone’s signaling to maintain a dynamic balance between attractive and repulsive forces (Bron et al., 2007; Martins et al., 2022). One of the well-studied intermediate target projection types is the midline cross model (Bernhardt et al., 1992; Evans et al., 2015; Holley, 1982). As a clear landmark, axons need to project to the midline first and then leave it immediately (Bovolenta and Dodd, 1990; Moreno-Bravo et al., 2019; Pignata et al., 2016; Tulloch et al., 2019). In vertebrates, the midline floor plate cells secrete long-range attractive signals to attract commissural axons toward them (Kennedy et al., 1994; Serafini et al., 1996). Once there, these cells emit signals of rejection to prevent excessive closeness of axons, thus aiding the axon in departing the floor plate to reach its intended destination (Kidd et al., 1998; Long et al., 2004; Stoeckli et al., 1997). Comparatively, the typical axonal projection process within the in vivo milieu undergoes multiple transitions in projection direction without a distinct landmark, such as the midline (Garel and López-Bendito, 2014; Gezelius and López-Bendito, 2017; López-Bendito and Molnár, 2003; Molnár et al., 2012). Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms underlying the alteration of axonal projection direction in the absence of distinct landmarks remain to be fully elucidated.

Drosophila small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs) exhibit the typical tangential projection pattern in the central brain (Agrawal and Hardin, 2016; Gummadova et al., 2009; Hardin, 2017; Helfrich-Förster, 1997). The s-LNv axons originate from the ventrolateral soma and project to the dorsolateral area of the brain, and subsequently undergo a axon projection direction shift, projecting horizontally toward the midline with a short dorsal extension (Helfrich-Förster et al., 2007). Several studies have reported the impact of various factors, including the Slit–Robo signal (Oliva et al., 2016), Unc5 (Fernandez et al., 2020), Lar (leukocyte-antigen-related) (Agrawal and Hardin, 2016), dfmr1 (Okray et al., 2015), dTip60 (Pirooznia et al., 2012), and Dscam1 long 3′ UTR (Zhang et al., 2019), on the axon outgrowth of s-LNvs in the adult flies’ dorsal projection. However, the mechanism underlying the projection direction switch of s-LNv axons remains largely unknown. Here, we show that s-LNvs and newborn dorsal clock neurons (DNs) generate spatiotemporal-specific guidance cues to precisely regulate the transition of projection direction in s-LNv axons. This regulation uncovers unexpected interdependencies between axons and local microenvironment dynamics during the navigation process, enabling accurate control over axon projection.

Results

s-LNvs axons change their projection direction in the early-to-mid third instar larvae

The stereotypical trajectory of the s-LNvs axon projection can be succinctly characterized as an initial vertical extension originating from the ventrolateral brain, followed by a directional pivot at the dorsolateral protocerebrum, ultimately leading to a horizontal projection toward the midline. Immunoreactivity for pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) (Cyran et al., 2005), representing the pattern of LNv neurons, is initially detected in the brains of first-instar larvae 4–5 hr after larval hatching (ALH) (Helfrich-Förster, 1997). To elucidate the intricate axon pathfinding process during development, we employed a dual-copy Pdf-GAL4 to drive the expression of double-copy UAS-mCD8::GFP, visualizing the s-LNvs at the larval stage (Figure 1A). We first tested whether Pdf-Gal4 could effectively label s-LNv, and tracked the s-LNv projection in early larvae after embryo hatching. At 8 hr ALH, the green fluorescent protein (GFP) signal strongly co-localized with the PDF signal within the axons (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). This remarkable co-localization continued throughout the larval stage, particularly concentrated at the axon’s terminal end (Figure 1A).

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs) axon projection dynamics during the larval stage.

(A) Images showing the growth process of s-LNvs during larval development. Larval brains were stained with anti-PDF (white) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP, blue) antibodies. Different time points indicate the hours after larval hatching (ALH). (B) Left panel: schematic diagram illustrating the method used to measure the degree of vertical projection. One hemisphere of the larvae brain is depicted. Larval neuropil (gray), s-LNvs (green), and optic lobe (blue). Right panel: graphs showing the average vertical projection length at different developmental stages, presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). (C) Left panel: schematic diagram illustrating the method used to measure the degree of horizontal projection. Right panel: graphs showing the average horizontal projection (A.U.: arbitrary unit) at different developmental stages, presented as mean ± SD. The red line segment indicates the stage at which the axonal projection undergoes a directional transition. (D) Schematic representation of s-LNvs vertical to horizontal projection directional shift during 72–96 hr ALH. One hemisphere of the larvae brain (gray), larval neuropil (white), and s-LNvs (green). For (**B, C**), 8 hr (n = 7), 24 hr (n = 10), 48 hr (n = 14), 72 hr (n = 16), 96 hr (n = 13), 120 hr (n = 16).

We then quantified the process of s-LNvs axonal projection. The vertical projection distance of the s-LNvs axon was ascertained by measuring the vertical span between the lowest point of the optical lobe and the highest point of the axon’s projection terminal. Statistical analyses revealed a steadfast linear increase in the vertical projection distance of the s-LNvs axon as larval development progressed (Figure 1A, B). To determine the horizontal projection distance of the s-LNvs axon, we applied the methodology employed by Olive for measuring adult flies (Oliva et al., 2016). A tangent line is drawn precisely at the pivotal juncture where the s-LNvs axon undergoes a shift in its projection direction. We define the arbitrary unit (A.U.) as the ratio between the horizontal distances from this point to both the end of the axon projection and the midline (Figure 1A, C). Remarkably, at the time points of 8, 24, 48, and 72 hr ALH, the A.U. value for s-LNvs axon projection in the horizontal direction remained relatively stable at approximately 0.13. However, at 96 and 120 hr ALH, a significant and striking increase in the A.U. value ensued, eventually reaching approximately 0.25 (Figure 1C). These findings suggest that the precise transition of s-LNv axon projection from vertical toward the horizontal direction occurs in the early-to-mid third instar larvae, specifically during 72–96 hr ALH (Figure 1D).

Vertical projection of s-LNvs axons correlate with mushroom body calyx expansion

The axons of s-LNv project dorsally, coming in close proximity to the dendritic tree of the mushroom body (MB), specifically the calyx (Figure 2A, C). This spatial arrangement facilitates potential interactions between the s-LNvs axon and the MB. MB predominantly comprises 2500 intrinsic neurons, known as Kenyon Cells (KCs) (Puñal et al., 2021). The development of the MB is a dynamic process characterized by three primary types of KCs: α/β, α′/β′, and γ, each following distinct temporal schedules of birth. The γ cells emerge from the embryonic stage until early third-instar larval phase, while the α′/β′ cells are born during the latter half of larval life, and the α/β cells appear in the post-larval stage (Lee et al., 1999; Puñal et al., 2021). We noticed that s-LNv axons exhibit only vertical growth before early third-instar larval stage, which coincides with the emergence of γ KCs. Consequently, we have contemplated the potential correlation between the vertical projection of s-LNv axons and the growth of the MB.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Development of vertical projection process alongside mushroom body (MB) growth.

(A) Spatial position relationship between calyx and small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs). Top: *OK107-GAL4* labels the calyx of MB γ and α′β′ neurons, while s-LNvs are labeled by the pigment-dispersing factor (PDF) antibody. Bottom: *Tab2–201Y-GAL4* labels calyx of MB γ neurons, with s-LNvs labeled by the PDF antibody. Larvae brains were stained with anti-PDF (green) and GFP (magenta) antibodies. Different time indicated hours after larval hatching (ALH). The white dotted line indicates the calyx region. (B) Graphs showing the MB calyx’s area and vertical projection length averaged over different development stage are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *OK107*: 24 hr (n = 10), 48 hr (n = 8), 72 hr (n = 12), 96 hr (n = 12), 120 hr (n = 9). Pearson’s r = 0.9987, p < 0.0001. *Tab2-201Y*: 24 hr (n = 6), 48 hr (n = 12), 72 hr (n = 13), 96 hr (n = 13), 120 hr (n = 11). Pearson’s r = 0.9963, p = 0.0003. (C) Schematic representation of complementary development of s-LNvs vertical projection and MB calyx. MB (purple), s-LNvs (green). (D) Images of MB ablation in the developing larval stages. Larvae brains were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies. Different time indicated hours ALH. (E) Quantification of vertical projection length in Control (*Tab2-201Y >GFP*) and Ablation (*Tab2-201Y >GFP,rpr,hid*) flies. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Control: 24 hr (n = 6), 48 hr (n = 14), 72 hr (n = 13), Ablation: 24 hr (n = 6), 48 hr (n = 12), 72 hr (n = 12). Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used. ns, p > 0.05; ****p < 0.0001.

Next, we closely monitored the spatial relationship between the calyx and the axon projections of the s-LNvs throughout different larval developmental stages (Figure 2A). We used OK107-GAL4 and Tab2-201Y-GAL4 to drive the expression of mCD8::GFP in all KC subtypes or specifically in γ KCs (Pauls et al., 2010), respectively, to visualize MB KCs. As development progressed, the calyx area defined by both GAL4 drivers exhibited a consistent expansion. Statistical analyses further confirmed that the calyx area increased proportionally with the advancement of developmental time, demonstrating a linear relationship (Figure 2B, C). Additionally, Pearson correlation analysis unveiled a robust positive correlation between the calyx area and the vertical projection distance of s-LNvs axon (r = 0.9987, p < 0.0001 for OK107-GAL4; r = 0.9963, p = 0.0003 for Tab2-201Y-GAL4) (Figure 2B, C). These compelling observations suggest that the MB calyx, and potentially specifically the calyx of γ KCs, exert significant influence on the vertical projection of the s-LNvs axon.

To validate our idea, we employed a straightforward approach to evaluate any changes in s-LNvs axon projection after ablating γ KCs using the essential Drosophila cell death activators Reaper (Rpr) and Head involution defective (Hid) driven by the Tab2-201Y GAL4. Initially, we confirmed the effectiveness of our approach. In the control group, the GFP signal in γ KCs remained unchanged, while the ablation group showed a significant reduction or complete absence of the signal (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Subsequently, we examined the axon projection of s-LNvs under these conditions. In the non-ablated group, the vertical distance increased linearly during development, following the expected pattern (Figure 2D, E). However, in the ablation group, although the initial vertical projection of s-LNvs appeared normal, there was a noticeable decrease in vertical projection distance at 48 hr ALH. This vertical development trend ceased thereafter, with the vertical projection distance measuring only 20–30 µm at 72 hr ALH (Figure 2D, E). Importantly, in later larval stages, we observed that s-LNvs in certain larvae became undetectable (data not shown), suggesting the potential occurrence of apoptosis in these neurons following MB ablation. These results underscore a significant association between MB development, specifically the γ KCs, and the vertical projection dynamics of s-LNv axons.

s-LNv-expressed Dscam1 mediate s-LNv axons horizontal projection

To decipher the signaling pathways governing s-LNvs axon horizontal projection, we performed a screening with a total of 285 targets by using the RNA-interfering (RNAi) approach (Supplementary file 2). To optimize efficiency, we chose Clk856-GAL4, which is expressed in s-LNv from the embryonic stage (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A, B), although it is also expressed in other clock neuron subsets (Gummadova et al., 2009). Significantly, the knockdown of Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (Dscam1) resulted in a notable decrease in the horizontal projection distance of s-LNv axons in late third instar larvae and adults (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C–F). In adults, knockdown of Dscam1-L (including the exon 19 isoform) in s-LNvs results in the failure of axon terminals to form normally (Zhang et al., 2019). To validate the role of s-LNv-expressed Dscam1 in governing axon horizontal projection, we employed the Pdf-GAL4, which specifically targeted s-LNvs during the larval stage. At 96 hr ALH, vertical projection showed no significant changes in Pdf-GAL4;UAS-Dscam1-RNAi flies, but a noticeable deficit was observed in the horizontal projection of the s-LNvs axon (Figure 3A–C). These observations strongly indicate that Dscam1 specifically regulates the horizontal projection of s-LNvs axon.

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Critical role of Dscam1 in small ventral lateral clock neuron (s-LNv) axonal horizontal projection.

(A) Images of s-LNvs in *Pdf >GFP* and *Pdf >GFP, Dscam1^RNAi* fly. White line segment represents the horizontal projection distance of s-LNvs. Larvae brains were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies at 96 hr after larval hatching (ALH). *Pdf >GFP* (n = 13), *Pdf >GFP, Dscam1^RNAi* (n = 15). (B) Quantification of vertical projection length in *Pdf >GFP* and *Pdf >GFP, Dscam1^RNAi* flies. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Two-tailed Student’s t tests, ns, p > 0.05. (C) Quantification of horizontal A.U. in *Pdf >GFP* and *Pdf >GFP, Dscam1^RNAi* flies. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed Student’s t tests, ****p < 0.0001. (D) Images of *Dscam1* mutant s-LNvs projection phenotype. Larvae brains were collected at late third larvae. Heads were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies. (E) Quantification of horizontal A.U. in *Dscam1* mutant flies. Data are presented as mean ± SD. w¹¹¹⁸ (n = 22) *Dscam1²¹/+* (n = 5), *Dscam1¹/+* (n = 8), *Dscam1⁰⁵⁵¹⁸/+* (n = 10), *Dscam1²¹/Dscam1⁰⁵⁵¹⁸* (n = 6), *Dscam1²¹/Dscam1¹* (n = 10), *Dscam1⁰⁵⁵¹⁸* (n = 14). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc, ns, p > 0.05, ****p < 0.0001. (F) Endogenous Dscam1 co-localizes with the s-LNvs axon terminal. *Pdf >GFP* fly heads were collected at 120 hr ALH and stained with anti-Dscam1 (red). The white dotted line indicates the s-LNvs axon.

We further checked s-LNvs axon projection in several well-defined Dscam1 mutants, including Dscam1²¹, Dscam1¹, and Dscam1⁰⁵⁵¹⁸ (Hummel et al., 2003; Schmucker et al., 2000). While all heterozygous mutants displayed normal horizontal axon projection in s-LNvs, trans-heterozygous mutants and homozygotes exhibited shortened horizontal axon projection (Figure 3D, E). Additionally, our immunostaining results indicated concentrated Dscam1 expression at the growth cone of s-LNv axons in third-instar larvae (Figure 3F). Taken together, these data demonstrate that Dscam1 controls the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs in a cell-autonomous manner.

Dscam1 is a well-recognized cell adhesion molecule that plays a crucial role in axon guidance (Chen et al., 2006; Hummel et al., 2003; Zhan et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2019). The receptors present on growth cones senses the extracellular axon guidance molecules to initiate the reorganization of the cellular cytoskeleton, leading to the facilitation of axonal projection. Convincingly, knockdown of the cytoskeletal molecules tsr (the Drosophila homolog of cofilin) (Sudarsanam et al., 2020) and chic (the Drosophila homolog of profilin) (Shields et al., 2014) in s-LNvs recaptured the horizontal axon projection deficits in Dscam1 knockdown flies or Dscam1 mutants (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C, D). Consistently, knockdown of Dock and Pak, the guidance receptor partners of Dscam1 (Schmucker et al., 2000), or SH3PX1, the critical linker between Dscam1 and the cytoskeleton (Worby et al., 2001), phenocopied Dscam1 knockdown flies or Dscam1 mutants (Figure 3—figure supplement 2A, B). Taken together, these findings provide solid evidence to support that Dscam1 signaling as a crucial regulator of s-LNvs axon horizontal projection (Figure 3—figure supplement 2C).

Neuronal-derived Netrins act upstream of Dscam1 to govern the horizontal projection of s-LNvs axon

Two classical guidance molecules, Slit and Netrin, have been shown to specifically bind to the extracellular domain of Dscam1 (Alavi et al., 2016; Andrews et al., 2008). The Drosophila genome contains the sole slit gene and two Netrin genes: Netrin-A (NetA) and Netrin-B (NetB) (Harris et al., 1996; Mitchell et al., 1996). Notably, ubiquitous knockdown of both NetA and NetB (hereafter referred to as Netrins), rather than slit, resulted in the defective horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs. Convincingly, NetA,NetB double mutant (Brankatschk and Dickson, 2006), but not NetA or NetB single mutant, exhibited the defective horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs (Figure 4A, B and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). These results imply that two Netrin molecules function redundantly in regulating horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Neuron-derived Netrin guides small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs) horizontal projection.

(A) Images of immunostained in *w¹¹¹⁸*, *NetA^Δ*, *NetB^Δ*, and *NetAB^Δ* fly. Larvae brains were collected at late third larvae. Heads were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies. (B) Quantification of horizontal A.U. *w¹¹¹⁸, NetA^Δ*, *NetB^Δ*, and *NetAB^Δ* fly. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), *w¹¹¹⁸* (n = 17), *NetA^Δ* (n = 15), *NetB^Δ* (n = 24), *NetAB^Δ* (n = 23). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s post hoc, ns, p > 0.05, ***p < 0.001. (C) Images of immunostained in *nSyb-GAL4* and *repo-GAL4* knockdown *Netrins*. Larvae brains were collected at late third larvae heads were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies. (D) Quantification of horizontal A.U. in *nSyb-GAL4* and *repo-GAL4* knockdown *Netrins* fly. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *nSyb-GAL4/+* (n = 13), *nSyb-GAL4 >Netrins^RNAi* (n = 16), *repo-GAL4/+* (n = 34), *repo-GAL4 >Netrins^RNAi* (n = 20). Two-tailed Student’s t tests, ns, p > 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

To determine the source of Netrins, which are known to be secreted axon guidance molecules, we conducted experiments using pan-neuronal (nsyb-GAL4) and pan-glial (repo-GAL4) drivers to selectively knock down Netrins (Figure 4C, D). Strikingly, when Netrins were knocked down in neurons but not in glia, we observed severe defects in the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs. These findings reveal that neuron-secreted Netrins serve as ligands for Dscam1, controlling the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs.

DN-secreted Netrins mediate the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs

To further identify the source of Netrins, we focused on the neurons located in the dorsolateral protocerebrum, where the s-LNvs axons change their projection direction. We first excluded the possibility that MB-secreted Netrins mediate the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs, as knockdown of Netrins with OK107-GAL4 showed normal horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs (Figure 5A, B).

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Netrin secreted by dorsal clock neurons (DNs) guides time-specific horizontal projection of small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs).

(A) Images of immunostained in *OK107-GAL4* and *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80* knockdown *Netrins.* Larvae brains were collected at late third larvae. Heads were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies. (B) Quantification of horizontal A.U. in *OK107-GAL4* and *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80* knockdown *Netrins* fly. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *OK107-GAL4/+* (n = 20), *OK107-GAL4>Netrins^RNAi* (n = 13). *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80/+* (n = 18), *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80 >Netrins^RNAi* (n = 16). Two-tailed Student’s t tests for *OK107-GAL4* knockdown *Netrins*, ns, p > 0.05. Mann–Whitney test for *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80* knockdown *Netrins*, ****p < 0.0001. (C) Images of DN ablation in the developing larval stages. Larvae brains were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies. Different time indicated hours ALH. (D) Quantification of horizontal A.U. in Control (*per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80 >GFP*) and Ablation (*per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80 >GFP,rpr,hid*) flies. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Control: 72 hr (n = 5), 96 hr (n = 12), Ablation: 72 hr (n = 5), 96 hr (n = 10). Two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to compare conditions. ns, p > 0.05, ****p < 0.0001. (E) Images of immunostained in *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80* overexpress *NetB* in *NetAB^Δ*. Larvae brains were collected at late third larvae. Heads were stained with anti-PDF (white) and HRP (blue) antibodies. (F) Quantification of horizontal A.U. in *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80* overexpress *NetB* in *NetAB^Δ*. Data are presented as mean ± SD. *NetAB^Δ, UAS-NetB* (n = 12), *NetAB^Δ, per-GAL4,Pdf-GAL80 /+* (n = 5), *NetAB^Δ,per-GAL4,Pdf-GAL80 >UAS* NetB (n = 9). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc, ns, p > 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

The DNs, a subset of clock neurons, also situate in the dorsolateral protocerebrum. DNs are categorized into three types, DN1, DN2, and DN3 (Reinhard et al., 2022), and previous studies have shown that both DN2 and DN1 form synaptic connections with s-LNvs axon terminals at the adult stage (Schlichting et al., 2022). Interestingly, knockdown of Netrins in a substantial portion of DN2, DN3, and DN1 (Kaneko et al., 1997) (Per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80;UAS-Netrins-RNAi) resulted in the defective horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs (Figure 5A, B). To further validate the involvement of DNs in mediating the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs, we conducted cell ablation experiments. Notably, the impairments in the horizontal axonal projection of s-LNvs due to DNs ablation were exclusively observed at 96 hr ALH, which is after the occurrence of horizontal projection (Figure 5C, D). In contrast, ablating crz⁺ neurons, which occupy a similar location to DNs, had no significant effects on the horizontal axon projection of the s-LNvs (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Moreover, by expressing NetB in DNs in NetA,NetB double mutants, we successfully restored the defective horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs (NetAB^Δ;Per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80;UAS-NetB) (Figure 5E, F). These results demonstrate that DNs secrete Netrins to guide the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs.

Newborn DNs secrete Netrins to regulate the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs

Finally, we wonder which population of DNs secrete Netrins to regulate the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs. Therefore, we monitored the number and location of DNs during the s-LNvs axon projection and found that the number of DNs significantly increased during this process. Per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80; UAS-mCD8::GFP only labeled 4–5 cells at 48 hr ALH, and raise to 10–15 by 72 hr, and subsequently increased to approximately 25 by 96 hr ALH (Figure 6A, B). It is worth noting that the location of these newly formed DNs resides lateral to the transition point of axon projection direction of the s-LNvs, while maintaining a basic parallelism with the horizontal axon projection of the s-LNvs (Figure 6A). The sharp increase in the number of DNs coincides remarkably with the timing of the switch in axon projection direction of the s-LNvs.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Dynamic changes in dorsal clock neurons (DNs) coordinated with small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs) axonal targeting.

(A) Top: images of s-LNvs axon and DNs growth process in the developing larval stages. Larvae brains were stained with anti-PDF (white) and GFP (green) antibodies. Different time indicated hours after larval hatching (ALH) are shown. Bottom: schematic diagram of s-LNvs horizontal projection and the corresponding increase in the number of DN neurons. s-LNvs axon (gray), DN neurons (green). (B) Quantification of the number of DN neurons labeled by *per-GAL4, Pdf-GAL80* at different developmental stages. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). (C) Images of newborn DN neurons were co-localized with *Netrin-B* at different developmental times. Larvae brains were stained with anti-GFP (green), mcherry (red), and PDF (white) antibodies. Different time indicated hours ALH. The white arrow demarcates the co-localization of red and green signals. (D) Schematic representation s-LNvs projection directional transition and the corresponding increase in the number of DN neurons. s-LNvs axon (gray), DN neurons (green), and newborn DN neurons (light green at 72 hr, orange at 96 hr).

Next, we asked whether these newly generated DNs expressed Netrins. To visualize the expression of endogenous NetB, we uesd the fly strains that insert either GFP or myc tag in NetB gene. At 72 hr ALH, we were unable to detect any NetB signals within the DNs. In contrast, at 96 hr ALH, we easily detected prominent NetB signals in approximately six to eight newborn DNs (Figure 6C, D, Figure 6—figure supplement 1A).

Previous studies have shown that DSCAM is involved in Netrin-1-mediated axonal attraction (Andrews et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2009; Ly et al., 2008). In addition, DSCAM also functions as a repulsive receptor, associating with Uncoordinated-5C (UNC5C) to mediate Netrin-1-induced axon growth cone collapse (Fernandez et al., 2020; Purohit et al., 2012). To dissect the role of Netrin signaling, we ectopically expressed Netrins in neurons marked by R78G02-GAL4 (Jenett et al., 2012; Suzuki et al., 2022), located in front of the horizontal projection of s-LNv axons, closer to the midline (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B). Expression of either NetA or NetB in R78G02-GAL4-labeled neurons significantly suppressed the horizontal axon projection of s-LNvs (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B, C). Taken together, these findings reveal that newborn DNs secrete Netrins to orchestrate the transition of axon projection in s-LNvs from a vertical to a horizontal direction (Figure 7).

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Dynamic cellular molecular environment during the small ventral lateral clock neuron (s-LNv) projection directional shift.

Cartoon depicting the dynamic cellular molecular microenvironment during the axonal projection directional shift from vertical to horizontal projection in s-LNvs. 72 and 96 hr represent 72 and 96 hr after larval hatching, respectively. s-LNvs (blue), neuropile (pink), brain lobe (gray circle), dorsal clock neurons (DNs; orange and light orange circles), optic lobe (gray dotted line), Netrin (orange combination molding), and Dscam1 (purple).

Discussion

The mechanisms underlying axonal responses to intricate microenvironments and the precise development of axons within the brain have long remained enigmatic. In the past, researchers have identified a large number of axon guidance cues and receptors using different models in vivo and in vitro (Stoeckli, 2018). In addition, transient cell–cell interactions through intermediate targets play a crucial role in guiding axonal projection step by step toward its final destination (Chao et al., 2009; Garel and Rubenstein, 2004). The landmark midline, a crucial intermediate target, serves as a model in the majority of early studies exploring the directional transitions of axonal projections (Evans and Bashaw, 2010). However, so many neural projections do not cross the midline that it is challenging to understand how these axon projections are guided (Goodhill, 2016). In our study, we established an excellent model to investigate the mechanism of axonal projection direction switch by the Drosophila s-LNvs. We discovered a coordinated growth pattern between the vertical projection of s-LNvs and the MB calyx. Furthermore, the complementary interaction between Dscam1 expressed in s-LNvs and the emerging DN-secreted Netrins precisely modulates the transition of s-LNv axons from a vertical to a horizontal projection within a specific time window (Figure 7). These findings reveal the mechanism behind the transition of axonal projection direction, emphasizing the significance of developmental microenvironments in ensuring precise axon projection.

The dependence of s-LNv vertical projection on MB calyx expansion

During our monitoring of the axonal projection of s-LNvs, we observed that the axon terminals reached the dorsolateral brain area at an early stage but continued their vertical growth. This phenomenon raises the question of what drives this growth. The MB, a sophisticated central hub within the fruit fly’s brain, exhibits proximity to the projection of s-LNv axons in spatial arrangement. Upon careful examination, we found a positive correlation between the vertical length increase of s-LNv axons and the growth of the MB calyx (Figure 2). Remarkably, when we selectively removed KC cells, we observed a striking effect on the axonal projection of s-LNvs. The s-LNv axonal projections either stalled at the initial stage or even completely disappeared (Figure 2 and data not shown). Hence, the vertical projection of s-LNv axons is dependent on MB calyx expansion. Our hypothesis is supported by the findings of Helfrich-Förster who reported locomotor activity and circadian rhythm defects in some MB mutants (Helfrich-Förster et al., 2002), potentially attributed to the abnormality of s-LNvs axon. Moreover, it was observed that the MB mutants had minimal impact on the l-LNvs. This can be attributed to the fact that l-LNvs fibers emerge at a later stage during pupal development and are situated at a spatial distance from the MB.

Unfortunately, we did not identify any molecules that have a discernible impact on the vertical projection of s-LNv axons through screening. This indicates that the successful completion of the vertical projection process may play a pivotal role in determining the overall existence of s-LNv axonal projections. Furthermore, the dorsal projection of s-LNv axons intersects with the ventral projection of neurons such as DN1 in the dorsolateral region adjacent to the calyx (Keene et al., 2011), resembling the corpus callosum in mammals (Fothergill et al., 2014; Hutchins et al., 2011; Keeble et al., 2006; Piper et al., 2009; Unni et al., 2012). Thus, during early developmental stages, multiple guiding cues may redundantly function between the MB calyx and neighboring neural processes to ensure the smooth progression of neural development and establish a stable brain structure. However, to gain a more comprehensive understanding, it is worthwhile to explore whether the development of the MB calyx influences the projection of other neurons traversing the same territory and the guidance cues involved. Insights from existing single-cell sequencing data obtained from multiple stages of larval life (Brunet Avalos et al., 2019; Corrales et al., 2022), might offer some clues and indications.

Netrin/Dscam signaling specifically controls the horizontal projection of s-LNv axons

In this paper, when we specifically knockdown Dscam1 in s-LNvs, we observed a significant defect in the axonal horizontal projection. This suggests that Dscam1 autonomously regulates the horizontal axonal projection of s-LNvs (Figure 3). Our findings align with a recent study that reported abnormal horizontal axonal projection of s-LNv neurons in adult flies when Dscam1 mRNAs lack the long 3′ UTR (Zhang et al., 2019).

The extracellular domain of Dscam1 has been verified to be capable of binding to Netrin or Slit (Alavi et al., 2016). In Drosophila, at the midline of the embryonic central nervous system, Dscam1 forms a complex with Robo1 to receive the Slit signal and promote the growth of longitudinal axons (Alavi et al., 2016). In adult flies, Slit/Robo signaling restricts the medial growth of s-LNv axons (Oliva et al., 2016). However, we found that reducing Netrins levels, rather than slit, led to a decrease in the horizontal projection distance of s-LNv axons. Moreover, in the NetAB^Δ double mutant, the extent of defects in the horizontal axonal projection of s-LNv neurons is similar to that observed when knocking down Dscam1 in s-LNvs. Indeed, previous studies have provided evidence showcasing the widespread involvement of Dscam1 as a receptor for Netrin in mediating axon growth and pathfinding (Liu et al., 2009; Ly et al., 2008; Matthews and Grueber, 2011). When we disturbed the expression of Netrin signals in the axon targeting microenvironment, it was also sufficient to cause abnormal s-LNv projection (Figure 6—figure supplement 1B, C). Therefore, our findings suggest that Netrin, as a ligand for Dscam1, regulates the process of switching axon projection direction (Figure 4).

The newborn DN-secreted Netrin coordinates with s-LNv-expressed Dscam1 to switch the projection direction of s-LNv axons

While the midline serves as a prominent landmark, it presents a daunting challenge to comprehend the guidance and directional transitions of axons in many neural projections that do not actually cross this central axis (Evans and Bashaw, 2010). Segmented patterns such as the limb segment traversed by Ti1 neuron projections or neural circuits formed in a layer- or column-specific manner also serve as intrinsic ‘guideposts’ (Bentley and Caudy, 1983; Isbister et al., 1999; Kolodkin et al., 1992), offering valuable insights into axonal pathfinding processes. How axonal projections without clear landmarks are guided? Following vertical projection, the s-LNvs growth cones remain within the dorsolateral area for at least 48 hr before initiating horizontal projection (Figure 1). This phenomenon aligns harmoniously with the outcomes observed in earlier studies that the axonal growth of other types of neurons slows down at the specific choice point, the midline (Bak and Fraser, 2003; Godement et al., 1994; Li et al., 2021), indicating that the dorsolateral area serves as an intermediate targets to facilitate the subsequent phase of s-LNvs projection journey.

Extracellular cues released by the final or intermediate targets play a crucial role in guiding axonal projection. The axon terminals of s-LNvs showed close spatial associations with the somas and processes of DNs. In this study, the knockdown of Netrins specifically in per⁺,Pdf⁻ neurons, but not in the MB, resulted in axon projection defects in s-LNvs (Figure 5). Furthermore, the ablation of DNs resulted in the inhibition of horizontal growth of s-LNvs axons (Figure 5). These findings suggest that the Netrin signaling microenvironment secreted by DNs is involved in regulating the horizontal projection of s-LNv axons.

Ideas and speculation

The emergence of NetB-positive DNs and the aberrant axonal projection of s-LNv neurons caused by DN ablation occur concurrently during development (Figure 6). In Drosophila, three types of circadian oscillator neurons, including two DN1s, two DN2s, and four to five s-LNvs, can be identified as early as embryonic stage 16 (Houl et al., 2008). The DN3 group, which represents the largest contingent within the central circadian neuron network with over 35 neurons, emerges during the larval stage (Liu et al., 2015). Little is known about the function of DN3 neurons, particularly during the larval stage. Due to the lack of cell-specific labeling tools, we can only speculate about the identity of these newly generated Netrin-secreting neurons as DN3s based on their spatial distribution. Taken together, these results unveil a novel regulatory mechanism where axons, during the process of pathfinding, await guidance cues from newly born guidepost cells. This enables a switch in the direction of axon projection, facilitating the axon’s subsequent journey.

Materials and methods

Key resources table

Reagent type (species) or resource	Designation	Source or reference	Identifiers	Additional information
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Pdf-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC_6900
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	nSyb-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC_51941
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	repo-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-7415
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	OK107-GAL4	Kyoto Stock Center	DGRC-106098
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Tab2-201Y-G AL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-4440
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Tubulin-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-5138
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	per-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-7127
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	MB247-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-50742
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Crz-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-51976
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Pdf-GAL80	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-80940
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS--mCD8-GFP	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-5137
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS--mCD8-GFP	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-5130
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS--mCD8-RFP	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-27392
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	lexAop-mCD8-GFP	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-32207
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Clk856-GAL4	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-93198
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-rprC;;UAS-hid	Gifted from Yufeng Pan	N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Dscam1¹	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-5934
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Dscam1²¹	Gifted from Haihuai He	N/A
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	Dscam1⁰⁵⁵¹⁸	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-11412
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	NetA^Δ	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-66878
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	NetB^Δ	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-66879
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	NetAB^Δ	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-66877
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	NetB-GFP	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-67644
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	NetB^tm	Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center	RRID:BDSC-66880
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-Dscam1^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	THU3896
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-NetA^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	THU1972
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-NetB^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	TH201500623.S
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-slit^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	THU1910
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-pak^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	TH201500668.S
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-Dock^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	THU2815
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-SH3PX1^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	THU2738
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-tsr^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	THU0972
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)	UAS-chic^RNAi	Tsinghua Fly Center	THU0986
Antibody	anti-PDF (mouse monoclonal)	DSHB	C7; RRID:AB_760350	IF(1:300)
Antibody	anti-HRP (rabbit monoclonal)	Jackson Immuno Research	Cat# 323-005-021, RRID:AB_2314648	IF(1:500)
Antibody	anti-GFP FLUR 488 (rabbit polyclonal)	Invirtrogen	Cat# A-21311, RRID:AB_221477	IF(1:200)
Antibody	anti-RFP (rabbit polyclonal)	Rockland	Cat# 600-401-379, RRID:AB_2209751	IF(1:500)
Antibody	anti-GFP (chicken polyclonal)	Invirtrogen	Cat# A10262, RRID:AB_2534023	IF(1:2000)
Antibody	anti-Myc (rabbit polyclonal)	Cell Signaling Technology	Cat# 9402, RRID:AB_2151827	IF(1:200)
Antibody	Anti-Dscam1 18 mAb (mouse monoclonal)	Gift from Tzumin Lee (Yu et al., 2009)	N/A	IF(1:20)
Antibody	Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 555)	Abcam	Cat# ab150078; RRID:AB_2722519	IF(1:200)
Antibody	Goat Anti-Mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 647)	Abcam	Cat# ab150115, RRID:AB_2687948	IF(1:200)
Antibody	Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 488) preadsorbed	Abcam	Cat# ab150081; RRID:AB_2734747	IF(1:200)
Antibody	Goat Anti-Mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 488)	Abcam	Cat# ab150113; RRID:AB_2576208	IF(1:200)
Antibody	Goat Anti-Chicken IgY H&L (Alexa Fluor 488)	Abcam	Cat# ab150169; RRID:AB_2636803	IF(1:200)
Recombinant DNA reagent	pUAST-HA-NetA (plasmid)	Gift from Duan R	N/A
Recombinant DNA reagent	pUAST-HA-NetB (plasmid)	Gift from Duan R	N/A
Software, algorithm	GraphPad Prism 8.0.2	GraphPad	RRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithm	Zeiss LSM Image Browser	Zeiss	https://www.zeiss.com/microscopy/int/downloads/lsm-5-series.html
Software, algorithm	fiji	ImageJ	RRID:SCR_002285

Fly genetics

Request a detailed protocol

The flies were maintained on standard medium at 25°C with 60–80% relative humidity. The wild-type flies used in this study were w¹¹¹⁸. The Dscam1 (CG17800) null mutant allele, Dscam1²¹, was obtained from Haihuai He’s laboratory. UAS-rpr.C;;UAS-hid fly were kindly provided by Yufeng Pan’s laboratory. The RNAi lines used in these studies were purchased from Tsinghua University; other flies were obtained from Bloomington Stock Center. Full genotypes of the flies shown in the main figures and figure supplements are listed in Supplementary file 2.

Generation of transgenic flies

Request a detailed protocol

To generate the NetA and NetB transgenes, the full-length NetA cDNAs and the the full-length NetB cDNAs were subcloned into the pUAST vectors and injected into w¹¹¹⁸ flies.

Antibodies

Antibodies were obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (anti-PDF, anti-FasII), Jackson Immuno Research (anti-HRP), Invitrogen (anti-GFP Alexa-488 goat anti-chicken IgY), Rockland (anti-RFP), and Abcam (Alexa-555 goat anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa-647 goat anti-mouse IgG, Alexa 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG, and Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse IgG), gifted from Tzumin Lee’s Lab (anti-Dscam1).

Collection embryo and larvae

Request a detailed protocol

~100 females lay eggs on the collecting medium (1% agar and 30% juice) in Petri dishes for a 4-hr period. To obtain larvae of defined ages, freshly emerged larvae were selected at 2-hr intervals. They were then allowed to grow on the cornmeal medium until they reached the desired age, and they were dissected at 0.5-hr intervals.

Immunostaining

Request a detailed protocol

The embryos were dechorionated using 50% bleach and then fixed with 1 volume of heptane and 1 volume of 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min at room temperature. The vitelline membrane was removed by shaking the embryos in 100% methanol for 1 min. The embryos were washed with methanol for 5 min, followed by a 5-min wash with a 1:1 mixture of methanol and PBST (1× phosphate-buffered saline, PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100), and then washed twice with PBST for 5 min each. The embryos were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBST for 30 min at room temperature. They were then treated with properly diluted primary antibody with 5% BSA in PBST at 4°C overnight. The embryos were washed three times with 1 ml PBST at room temperature for 30 min each. Subsequently, the embryos were treated with properly diluted fluorescent secondary antibody with 5% BSA in PBST and shaken at room temperature for 2–4 hr. The embryos were washed three times with 1 ml PBST at room temperature for 30 min each. After three washes, brains were mounted for microscopy in vectashield without 4’,6-Diamidino-2’-phenylindole (DAPI) (Vector Laboratories).

Brain were dissected in PBS and fixed with 4% PFA for 25 min at room temperature. After fixation and three washes with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS. Brains were blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 at 4°C 1 hr and were incubated with primary antibodies in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 at 4°C overnight. After four washes, brains were incubated with secondary antibodies in PBS with 0.3% Triton X-100 at room temperature for 2–3 hr. After four washes, brains were mounted for microscopy in vectashield without DAPI (Vector Laboratories).

Primary antibodies were mouse anti-PDF (1:300), mouse anti-FasII (1:50), Rabbit anti-HRP (1:500), mouse anti-Dscam1-18mAb (1:20), rabbit anti-GFP (1:200), rabbit anti-RFP (1:500), chicken anti-GFP (1:2000), rabbit anti-Myc (1:200), Secondary antibodies were Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-Rabbit IgG (1:200), Alexa Fluor 647 goat anti-mouse IgG (1:200), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200), and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-chicken IgY (1:200). Samples were imaged on an LSM 700 confocal microscope (Zeiss).

ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health) was used for the quantification vertical and horizontal axonal length of PDF immunostaining in s-LNvs. For s-LNvs horizontal measurements, results are presented as A.U. representing the fraction between the lengths of the horizontal projections divided by the distance between cell bodies and midline. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) from examined brains.

RNAi screening

Request a detailed protocol

The UAS-RNAi line were obtained from Tsinghua Fly Center, and Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. The RNAi screen fly was generated as follows: recombine Pdf-GAL4 with UAS-mCD8-GFP or use Clk856-GAL4 directly, which has a broader expression pattern. UAS-RNAi males were crossed to this two screening lines, and the resulting flies were kept at 25°C, and dissected at desired age.

Neuron ablation

Request a detailed protocol

Tab2-201Y-GAL4 which is expressed in larval MB γ neuron and per-GAL4,Pdf-GAL80 which is expressed in DN neurons was used to drive the expression of reaper (rpr) and hid.The GAL4 flies integrated UAS-GFP, and the efficiency of ablation was confirmed by GFP signals in MB and DN neurons. Animals were raised at 25°C to desired time.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Request a detailed protocol

All samples were obtained randomly and included in the statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism V8.0.2 software. Data are presented as means ± SD. Shapiro–Wilk test was used to verify whether the data conformed to the normal distribution. F test was used to verify homogenous variances between two groups. Bartlett test was used to verify homogenous variances three or more conditions and genotypes. Statistical significance was set as: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, ns, no significance, p > 0.05. Statistical details of the experiments are found in the figure legends.

Data availability

The raw data has been included as supplements to the corresponding figures. Data from all experiments has been deposited at Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gf1vhhmxj).

The following data sets were generated

1. Liu J
2. Wang Y
3. Liu X
4. Han J
5. Tian Y
(2024) Dryad Digital Repository
Data from: Spatiotemporal changes in Netrin/DSCAM1 signaling dictate axonal projection direction in Drosophila small ventral lateral clock neurons.

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gf1vhhmxj

References

1. Agi E
2. Reifenstein ET
3. Wit C
4. Schneider T
5. Kauer M
6. Kehribar M
7. Kulkarni A
8. von Kleist M
9. Hiesinger PR
(2024) Axonal self-sorting without target guidance in Drosophila visual map formation
Science 383:1084–1092.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk3043
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Agrawal P
2. Hardin PE
(2016) The Drosophila receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase LAR is required for development of circadian pacemaker neuron processes that support rhythmic activity in constant darkness but not during light/dark cycles
The Journal of Neuroscience 36:3860–3870.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4523-15.2016
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Alavi M
2. Song M
3. King GLA
4. Gillis T
5. Propst R
6. Lamanuzzi M
7. Bousum A
8. Miller A
9. Allen R
10. Kidd T
(2016) Dscam1 forms a complex with robo1 and the N-terminal fragment of slit to promote the growth of longitudinal axons
PLOS Biology 14:e1002560.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002560
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Andrews GL
2. Tanglao S
3. Farmer WT
4. Morin S
5. Brotman S
6. Berberoglu MA
7. Price H
8. Fernandez GC
9. Mastick GS
10. Charron F
11. Kidd T
(2008) Dscam guides embryonic axons by Netrin-dependent and -independent functions
Development 135:3839–3848.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.023739
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Araújo SJ
2. Tear G
(2003) Axon guidance mechanisms and molecules: lessons from invertebrates
Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 4:910–922.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1243
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bak M
2. Fraser SE
(2003) Axon fasciculation and differences in midline kinetics between pioneer and follower axons within commissural fascicles
Development 130:4999–5008.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00713
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1982) Purification of a new neurotrophic factor from mammalian brain
The EMBO Journal 1:549–553.

https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01207.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bartoe JL
2. McKenna WL
3. Quan TK
4. Stafford BK
5. Moore JA
6. Xia J
7. Takamiya K
8. Huganir RL
9. Hinck L
(2006) Protein interacting with C-kinase 1/protein kinase Calpha-mediated endocytosis converts netrin-1-mediated repulsion to attraction
The Journal of Neuroscience 26:3192–3205.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3469-05.2006
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1999) Axon repulsion from the midline of the Drosophila CNS requires slit function
Development 126:2475–2481.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.11.2475
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bentley D
2. Caudy M
(1983) Pioneer axons lose directed growth after selective killing of guidepost cells
Nature 304:62–65.

https://doi.org/10.1038/304062a0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1991) Neurotrophin-5: a novel neurotrophic factor that activates trk and trkB
Neuron 7:857–866.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(91)90287-a
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1992) Axonal trajectories and distribution of GABAergic spinal neurons in wildtype and mutant zebrafish lacking floor plate cells
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 326:263–272.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903260208
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bovolenta P
2. Dodd J
(1990) Guidance of commissural growth cones at the floor plate in embryonic rat spinal cord
Development 109:435–447.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.109.2.435
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Brankatschk M
2. Dickson BJ
(2006) Netrins guide Drosophila commissural axons at short range
Nature Neuroscience 9:188–194.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1625
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Bron R
2. Vermeren M
3. Kokot N
4. Andrews W
5. Little GE
6. Mitchell KJ
7. Cohen J
(2007) Boundary cap cells constrain spinal motor neuron somal migration at motor exit points by a semaphorin-plexin mechanism
Neural Development 2:21.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-2-21
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Single cell transcriptome atlas of the Drosophila larval brain
eLife 8:e50354.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.50354
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Chao DL
2. Ma L
3. Shen K
(2009) Transient cell-cell interactions in neural circuit formation
Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 10:262–271.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2594
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) The morphogen sonic hedgehog is an axonal chemoattractant that collaborates with netrin-1 in midline axon guidance
Cell 113:11–23.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00199-5
- Google Scholar
(2006) The molecular diversity of dscam is functionally required for neuronal wiring specificity in Drosophila
Cell 125:607–620.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034
- Google Scholar
(1995) Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map
Cell 82:371–381.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90426-3
- Google Scholar
1. Chitnis AB
2. Kuwada JY
(1991) Elimination of a brain tract increases errors in pathfinding by follower growth cones in the zebrafish embryo
Neuron 7:277–285.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(91)90266-3
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Ciani L
2. Krylova O
3. Smalley MJ
4. Dale TC
5. Salinas PC
(2004) A divergent canonical WNT-signaling pathway regulates microtubule dynamics: dishevelled signals locally to stabilize microtubules
The Journal of Cell Biology 164:243–253.

https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200309096
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Colamarino SA
2. Tessier-Lavigne M
(1995) The axonal chemoattractant netrin-1 is also a chemorepellent for trochlear motor axons
Cell 81:621–629.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90083-7
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1998) Pioneer axon guidance by UNC-129, a C. elegans TGF-beta
Science 281:706–709.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5377.706
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Corrales M
2. Cocanougher BT
3. Kohn AB
4. Wittenbach JD
5. Long XS
6. Lemire A
7. Cardona A
8. Singer RH
9. Moroz LL
10. Zlatic M
(2022) A single-cell transcriptomic atlas of complete insect nervous systems across multiple life stages
Neural Development 17:8.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13064-022-00164-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Cyran SA
2. Yiannoulos G
3. Buchsbaum AM
4. Saez L
5. Young MW
6. Blau J
(2005) The double-time protein kinase regulates the subcellular localization of the Drosophila clock protein period
The Journal of Neuroscience 25:5430–5437.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0263-05.2005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2017) The spinal cord shows the way - How axons navigate intermediate targets
Developmental Biology 432:43–52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.12.002
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Evans TA
2. Bashaw GJ
(2010) Axon guidance at the midline: of mice and flies
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 20:79–85.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2009.12.006
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2015) Robo2 acts in trans to inhibit Slit-Robo1 repulsion in pre-crossing commissural axons
eLife 4:e08407.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08407
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Fernandez MP
2. Pettibone HL
3. Bogart JT
4. Roell CJ
5. Davey CE
6. Pranevicius A
7. Huynh KV
8. Lennox SM
9. Kostadinov BS
10. Shafer OT
(2020) Sites of circadian clock neuron plasticity mediate sensory integration and entrainment
Current Biology 30:2225–2237.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.025
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Fothergill T
2. Donahoo ALS
3. Douglass A
4. Zalucki O
5. Yuan J
6. Shu T
7. Goodhill GJ
8. Richards LJ
(2014) Netrin-DCC signaling regulates corpus callosum formation through attraction of pioneering axons and by modulating Slit2-mediated repulsion
Cerebral Cortex 24:1138–1151.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs395
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Garel S
2. Rubenstein JLR
(2004) Intermediate targets in formation of topographic projections: inputs from the thalamocortical system
Trends in Neurosciences 27:533–539.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.06.014
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Garel S
2. López-Bendito G
(2014) Inputs from the thalamocortical system on axon pathfinding mechanisms
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 27:143–150.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.03.013
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Gezelius H
2. López-Bendito G
(2017) Thalamic neuronal specification and early circuit formation
Developmental Neurobiology 77:830–843.

https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22460
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1994) Retinal axon divergence in the optic chiasm: dynamics of growth cone behavior at the midline
The Journal of Neuroscience 14:7024–7039.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-07024.1994
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Goodhill GJ
(2016) Can molecular gradients wire the brain?
Trends in Neurosciences 39:202–211.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2016.01.009
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2009) Analysis of the Drosophila clock promoter reveals heterogeneity in expression between subgroups of central oscillator cells and identifies a novel enhancer region
Journal of Biological Rhythms 24:353–367.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730409343890
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hardin PE
(2017) VRILLE controls PDF neuropeptide accumulation and arborization rhythms in small ventrolateral neurons to drive rhythmic behavior in Drosophila
Current Biology 27:3442–3453.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.010
- Google Scholar
(1996) Guidance cues at the Drosophila CNS midline: identification and characterization of two Drosophila Netrin/UNC-6 homologs
Neuron 17:217–228.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80154-3
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Helfrich-Förster C
(1997) Development of pigment-dispersing hormone-immunoreactive neurons in the nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 380:335–354.

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19970414)380:3<335::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-3
- Google Scholar
(2002) Mushroom body influence on locomotor activity and circadian rhythms in Drosophila melanogaster
Journal of Neurogenetics 16:73–109.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01677060213158
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2007) Development and morphology of the clock-gene-expressing lateral neurons of Drosophila melanogaster
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 500:47–70.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.21146
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hidalgo A
2. Brand AH
(1997) Targeted neuronal ablation: the role of pioneer neurons in guidance and fasciculation in the CNS of Drosophila
Development 124:3253–3262.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.124.17.3253
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Holley JA
(1982) Early development of the circumferential axonal pathway in mouse and chick spinal cord
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 205:371–382.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902050406
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hong K
2. Hinck L
3. Nishiyama M
4. Poo MM
5. Tessier-Lavigne M
6. Stein E
(1999) A ligand-gated association between cytoplasmic domains of UNC5 and DCC family receptors converts netrin-induced growth cone attraction to repulsion
Cell 97:927–941.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80804-1
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Houl JH
2. Ng F
3. Taylor P
4. Hardin PE
(2008) CLOCK expression identifies developing circadian oscillator neurons in the brains of Drosophila embryos
BMC Neuroscience 9:119.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-9-119
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) Axonal targeting of olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila is controlled by Dscam
Neuron 37:221–231.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01183-2
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hutchins BI
2. Li L
3. Kalil K
(2011) Wnt/calcium signaling mediates axon growth and guidance in the developing corpus callosum
Developmental Neurobiology 71:269–283.

https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.20846
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Hutter H
(2003) Extracellular cues and pioneers act together to guide axons in the ventral cord of C. elegans
Development 130:5307–5318.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00727
- Google Scholar
(1999) Discrete roles for secreted and transmembrane semaphorins in neuronal growth cone guidance in vivo
Development 126:2007–2019.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.9.2007
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Jenett A
2. Rubin GM
3. Ngo T-TB
4. Shepherd D
5. Murphy C
6. Dionne H
7. Pfeiffer BD
8. Cavallaro A
9. Hall D
10. Jeter J
11. Iyer N
12. Fetter D
13. Hausenfluck JH
14. Peng H
15. Trautman ET
16. Svirskas RR
17. Myers EW
18. Iwinski ZR
19. Aso Y
20. DePasquale GM
21. Enos A
22. Hulamm P
23. Lam SCB
24. Li H-H
25. Laverty TR
26. Long F
27. Qu L
28. Murphy SD
29. Rokicki K
30. Safford T
31. Shaw K
32. Simpson JH
33. Sowell A
34. Tae S
35. Yu Y
36. Zugates CT
(2012) A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology
Cell Reports 2:991–1001.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2012.09.011
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1997) Spatial and temporal expression of the period and timeless genes in the developing nervous system of Drosophila: newly identified pacemaker candidates and novel features of clock gene product cycling
The Journal of Neuroscience 17:6745–6760.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-17-06745.1997
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kania A
2. Klein R
(2016) Mechanisms of ephrin-Eph signalling in development, physiology and disease
Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 17:240–256.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2015.16
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Keeble TR
2. Halford MM
3. Seaman C
4. Kee N
5. Macheda M
6. Anderson RB
7. Stacker SA
8. Cooper HM
(2006) The Wnt receptor Ryk is required for Wnt5a-mediated axon guidance on the contralateral side of the corpus callosum
The Journal of Neuroscience 26:5840–5848.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1175-06.2006
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Keene AC
2. Mazzoni EO
3. Zhen J
4. Younger MA
5. Yamaguchi S
6. Blau J
7. Desplan C
8. Sprecher SG
(2011) Distinct visual pathways mediate Drosophila larval light avoidance and circadian clock entrainment
The Journal of Neuroscience 31:6527–6534.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6165-10.2011
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1994) Netrins are diffusible chemotropic factors for commissural axons in the embryonic spinal cord
Cell 78:425–435.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90421-9
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kidd T
2. Brose K
3. Mitchell KJ
4. Fetter RD
5. Tessier-Lavigne M
6. Goodman CS
7. Tear G
(1998) Roundabout controls axon crossing of the CNS midline and defines a novel subfamily of evolutionarily conserved guidance receptors
Cell 92:205–215.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80915-0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1999) Slit is the midline repellent for the robo receptor in Drosophila
Cell 96:785–794.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80589-9
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Klose M
2. Bentley D
(1989) Transient pioneer neurons are essential for formation of an embryonic peripheral nerve
Science 245:982–984.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2772651
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Koch D
2. Rosoff WJ
3. Jiang J
4. Geller HM
5. Urbach JS
(2012) Strength in the periphery: growth cone biomechanics and substrate rigidity response in peripheral and central nervous system neurons
Biophysical Journal 102:452–460.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.025
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Kolodkin AL
2. Matthes DJ
3. O’Connor TP
4. Patel NH
5. Admon A
6. Bentley D
7. Goodman CS
(1992) Fasciclin IV: Sequence, expression, and function during growth cone guidance in the grasshopper embryo
Neuron 9:831–845.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(92)90237-8
- Google Scholar
1. Kolodkin AL
2. Tessier-Lavigne M
(2011) Mechanisms and molecules of neuronal wiring: a primer
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 3:a001727.

https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001727
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Lee T
2. Lee A
3. Luo L
(1999) Development of the Drosophila mushroom bodies: sequential generation of three distinct types of neurons from a neuroblast
Development 126:4065–4076.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.126.18.4065
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Leibrock J
2. Lottspeich F
3. Hohn A
4. Hofer M
5. Hengerer B
6. Masiakowski P
7. Thoenen H
8. Barde YA
(1989) Molecular cloning and expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor
Nature 341:149–152.

https://doi.org/10.1038/341149a0
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Li T
2. Fu TM
3. Wong KKL
4. Li H
5. Xie Q
6. Luginbuhl DJ
7. Wagner MJ
8. Betzig E
9. Luo L
(2021) Cellular bases of olfactory circuit assembly revealed by systematic time-lapse imaging
Cell 184:5107–5121.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.030
- Google Scholar
1. Liu G
2. Li W
3. Wang L
4. Kar A
5. Guan KL
6. Rao Y
7. Wu JY
(2009) DSCAM functions as a netrin receptor in commissural axon pathfinding
PNAS 106:2951–2956.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811083106
- Google Scholar
1. Liu T
2. Mahesh G
3. Houl JH
4. Hardin PE
(2015) Circadian activators are expressed days before they initiate clock function in late pacemaker neurons from Drosophila
The Journal of Neuroscience 35:8662–8671.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0250-15.2015
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Long H
2. Sabatier C
3. Plump A
4. Yuan W
5. Ornitz DM
6. Tamada A
7. Murakami F
8. Goodman CS
9. Tessier-Lavigne M
(2004) Conserved roles for slit and robo proteins in midline commissural axon guidance
Neuron 42:213–223.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00179-5
- Google Scholar
1. López-Bendito G
2. Molnár Z
(2003) Thalamocortical development: how are we going to get there?
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4:276–289.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1075
- Google Scholar
1. Lowery LA
2. Van Vactor D
(2009) The trip of the tip: understanding the growth cone machinery
Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology 10:332–343.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2679
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Luo Y
2. Raible D
3. Raper JA
(1993) Collapsin: A protein in brain that induces the collapse and paralysis of neuronal growth cones
Cell 75:217–227.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)80064-L
- Google Scholar
1. Ly A
2. Nikolaev A
3. Suresh G
4. Zheng Y
5. Tessier-Lavigne M
6. Stein E
(2008) DSCAM is a netrin receptor that collaborates with DCC in mediating turning responses to netrin-1
Cell 133:1241–1254.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.030
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1990) Neurotrophin-3: a neurotrophic factor related to NGF and BDNF
Science 247:1446–1451.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4949.1446
- Google Scholar
1. Mann F
2. Ray S
3. Harris WA
4. Holt CE
(2002) Topographic mapping in dorsoventral axis of the Xenopus retinotectal system depends on signaling through ephrin-B ligands
Neuron 35:461–473.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00786-9
- Google Scholar
1. Martins LF
2. Brambilla I
3. Motta A
4. de Pretis S
5. Bhat GP
6. Badaloni A
7. Malpighi C
8. Amin ND
9. Imai F
10. Almeida RD
11. Yoshida Y
12. Pfaff SL
13. Bonanomi D
(2022) Motor neurons use push-pull signals to direct vascular remodeling critical for their connectivity
Neuron 110:4090–4107.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.021
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Matthews BJ
2. Grueber WB
(2011) Dscam1-mediated self-avoidance counters netrin-dependent targeting of dendrites in Drosophila
Current Biology 21:1480–1487.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.040
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1989) Subplate neurons pioneer the first axon pathway from the cerebral cortex
Science 245:978–982.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2475909
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Meijers R
2. Smock RG
3. Zhang Y
4. Wang JH
(2020) Netrin synergizes signaling and adhesion through DCC
Trends in Biochemical Sciences 45:6–12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2019.10.005
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1996) Genetic analysis of netrin genes in Drosophila: netrins guide CNS commissural axons and peripheral motor axons
Neuron 17:203–215.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80153-1
- Google Scholar
(2012) Mechanisms controlling the guidance of thalamocortical axons through the embryonic forebrain
The European Journal of Neuroscience 35:1573–1585.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08119.x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Synergistic activity of floor-plate- and ventricular-zone-derived netrin-1 in spinal cord commissural axon guidance
Neuron 101:625–634.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.024
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Okray Z
2. de Esch CE
3. Van Esch H
4. Devriendt K
5. Claeys A
6. Yan J
7. Verbeeck J
8. Froyen G
9. Willemsen R
10. de Vrij FM
11. Hassan BA
(2015) A novel fragile X syndrome mutation reveals a conserved role for the carboxy‐terminus inFMRPlocalization and function
EMBO Molecular Medicine 7:423–437.

https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201404576
- Google Scholar
1. Oliva C
2. Soldano A
3. Mora N
4. De Geest N
5. Claeys A
6. Erfurth M-L
7. Sierralta J
8. Ramaekers A
9. Dascenco D
10. Ejsmont RK
11. Schmucker D
12. Sanchez-Soriano N
13. Hassan BA
(2016) Regulation of Drosophila brain wiring by neuropil interactions via a slit-robo-RPTP signaling complex
Developmental Cell 39:267–278.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.09.028
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Pan W
2. Huang X
3. Yu Z
4. Ding Q
5. Xia L
6. Hua J
7. Gu B
8. Xiong Q
9. Yu H
10. Wang J
11. Xu Z
12. Zeng L
13. Bai G
14. Liu H
(2023) Netrin-3 suppresses diabetic neuropathic pain by gating the intra-epidermal sprouting of sensory axons
Neuroscience Bulletin 39:745–758.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-01011-8
- Google Scholar
1. Pasterkamp RJ
(2012) Getting neural circuits into shape with semaphorins
Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 13:605–618.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3302
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Pauls D
2. Selcho M
3. Gendre N
4. Stocker RF
5. Thum AS
(2010) Drosophila larvae establish appetitive olfactory memories via mushroom body neurons of embryonic origin
The Journal of Neuroscience 30:10655–10666.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1281-10.2010
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2016) Commissural axon navigation: Control of midline crossing in the vertebrate spinal cord by the semaphorin 3B signaling
Cell Adhesion & Migration 10:604–617.

https://doi.org/10.1080/19336918.2016.1212804
- Google Scholar
1. Piper M
2. Plachez C
3. Zalucki O
4. Fothergill T
5. Goudreau G
6. Erzurumlu R
7. Gu C
8. Richards LJ
(2009) Neuropilin 1-Sema signaling regulates crossing of cingulate pioneering axons during development of the corpus callosum
Cerebral Cortex 19 Suppl 1:i11–i21.

https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp027
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2012) Epigenetic regulation of axonal growth of Drosophila pacemaker cells by histone acetyltransferase tip60 controls sleep
Genetics 192:1327–1345.

https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.112.144667
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) Untangling the wires: development of sparse, distributed connectivity in the mushroom body calyx
Cell and Tissue Research 383:91–112.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-020-03386-4
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Purohit AA
2. Li W
3. Qu C
4. Dwyer T
5. Shao Q
6. Guan KL
7. Liu G
(2012) Down syndrome cell adhesion molecule (DSCAM) associates with uncoordinated-5C (UNC5C) in Netrin-1-mediated growth cone collapse
Journal of Biological Chemistry 287:27126–27138.

https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.340174
- Google Scholar
(1993) Cell‐cell adhesion by homophilic interaction of the neuronal recognition molecule axonin‐1
European Journal of Biochemistry 215:133–141.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18015.x
- Google Scholar
1. Rader C
2. Kunz B
3. Lierheimer R
4. Giger RJ
5. Berger P
6. Tittmann P
7. Gross H
8. Sonderegger P
(1996)
Implications for the domain arrangement of axonin-1 derived from the mapping of its NgCAM binding site

The EMBO Journal 15:2056–2068.
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Raper JA
(2000) Semaphorins and their receptors in vertebrates and invertebrates
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 10:88–94.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00057-4
- Google Scholar
(2022) The neuronal circuit of the dorsal circadian clock neurons in Drosophila melanogaster
Frontiers in Physiology 13:886432.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.886432
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Schlichting M
2. Richhariya S
3. Herndon N
4. Ma D
5. Xin J
6. Lenh W
7. Abruzzi K
8. Rosbash M
(2022) Dopamine and GPCR-mediated modulation of DN1 clock neurons gates the circadian timing of sleep
PNAS 119:e2206066119.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2206066119
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Schmucker D
2. Clemens JC
3. Shu H
4. Worby CA
5. Xiao J
6. Muda M
7. Dixon JE
8. Zipursky SL
(2000) Drosophila Dscam is an axon guidance receptor exhibiting extraordinary molecular diversity
Cell 101:671–684.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80878-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1993) Mutations affecting growth cone guidance in Drosophila: Genes necessary for guidance toward or away from the midline
Neuron 10:409–426.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(93)90330-T
- Google Scholar
(1994) The netrins define a family of axon outgrowth-promoting proteins homologous to C. elegans UNC-6
Cell 78:409–424.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90420-0
- Google Scholar
(1996) Netrin-1 is required for commissural axon guidance in the developing vertebrate nervous system
Cell 87:1001–1014.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81795-x
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Shi DQ
2. Xu F
3. Bi GQ
4. Lau PM
(2023) Conserved spatiotemporal dynamics with millisecond precision during reverberatory activity in a self-organized neuronal network
Neuroscience Bulletin 39:808–812.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-023-01033-w
- Google Scholar
(2014) The actin-binding protein profilin is required for germline stem cell maintenance and germ cell enclosure by somatic cyst cells
Development 141:73–82.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.101931
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Short CA
2. Onesto MM
3. Rempel SK
4. Catlett TS
5. Gomez TM
(2021) Familiar growth factors have diverse roles in neural network assembly
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 66:233–239.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.12.016
- Google Scholar
1. Sperry RW
(1963) Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fiber patterns and connections
PNAS 50:703–710.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.50.4.703
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(1997) Interference with Axonin-1 and NrCAM interactions unmasks a floor-plate activity inhibitory for commissural axons
Neuron 18:209–221.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80262-7
- Google Scholar
1. Stoeckli ET
(2018) Understanding axon guidance: are we nearly there yet?
Development 145:dev151415.

https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.151415
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2020) Cofilin regulates axon growth and branching of Drosophila γ-neurons
Journal of Cell Science 133:jcs232595.

https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.232595
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2022) Dorsal-lateral clock neurons modulate consolidation and maintenance of long-term memory in Drosophila
Genes to Cells 27:266–279.

https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12923
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Tessier-Lavigne M
2. Goodman CS
(1996) The molecular biology of axon guidance
Science 274:1123–1133.

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5290.1123
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2012) Localized netrins act as positional cues to control layer-specific targeting of photoreceptor axons in Drosophila
Neuron 75:80–93.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.037
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2019) Diverse spinal commissural neuron populations revealed by fate mapping and molecular profiling using a novel Robo3^Cre mouse
The Journal of Comparative Neurology 527:2948–2972.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24720
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Unni DK
2. Piper M
3. Moldrich RX
4. Gobius I
5. Liu S
6. Fothergill T
7. Donahoo ALS
8. Baisden JM
9. Cooper HM
10. Richards LJ
(2012) Multiple Slits regulate the development of midline glial populations and the corpus callosum
Developmental Biology 365:36–49.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.02.004
- Google Scholar
1. Wen Z
2. Han L
3. Bamburg JR
4. Shim S
5. Ming G
6. Zheng JQ
(2007) BMP gradients steer nerve growth cones by a balancing act of LIM kinase and Slingshot phosphatase on ADF/cofilin
The Journal of Cell Biology 178:107–119.

https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200703055
- Google Scholar
1. Wilkinson DG
(2001) Multiple roles of EPH receptors and ephrins in neural development
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2:155–164.

https://doi.org/10.1038/35058515
- Google Scholar
(1994) Activation of the FGF receptor underlies neurite outgrowth stimulated by L1, N-CAM, and N-cadherin
Neuron 13:583–594.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(94)90027-2
- Google Scholar
(1998) Plexin A is A neuronal semaphorin receptor that controls axon guidance
Cell 95:903–916.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81715-8
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Wong EV
2. Kenwrick S
3. Willems P
4. Lemmon V
(1995) Mutations in the cell adhesion molecule L1 cause mental retardation
Trends in Neurosciences 18:168–172.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(95)93896-6
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Worby CA
2. Simonson-Leff N
3. Clemens JC
4. Kruger RP
5. Muda M
6. Dixon JE
(2001) The sorting nexin, DSH3PX1, connects the axonal guidance receptor, Dscam, to the actin cytoskeleton
The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:41782–41789.

https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M107080200
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2003) Wnt-mediated axon guidance via the Drosophila derailed receptor
Nature 422:583–588.

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01522
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Yu H-H
2. Yang JS
3. Wang J
4. Huang Y
5. Lee T
(2009) Endodomain diversity in the Drosophila Dscam and its roles in neuronal morphogenesis
The Journal of Neuroscience 29:1904–1914.

https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5743-08.2009
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
(2021) New insights into the molecular mechanisms of axon guidance receptor regulation and signaling
Current Topics in Developmental Biology 142:147–196.

https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.11.008
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Zhan XL
2. Clemens JC
3. Neves G
4. Hattori D
5. Flanagan JJ
6. Hummel T
7. Vasconcelos ML
8. Chess A
9. Zipursky SL
(2004) Analysis of Dscam diversity in regulating axon guidance in Drosophila mushroom bodies
Neuron 43:673–686.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.07.020
- PubMed
- Google Scholar
1. Zhang Z
2. So K
3. Peterson R
4. Bauer M
5. Ng H
6. Zhang Y
7. Kim JH
8. Kidd T
9. Miura P
(2019) Elav-mediated exon skipping and alternative polyadenylation of the Dscam1 gene are required for axon outgrowth
Cell Reports 27:3808–3817.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.083
- PubMed
- Google Scholar

Article and author information

Author details

Jingjing Liu

School of Life Science and Technology, the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Disease, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Contribution
Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0004-0780-2345
Yuedong Wang

School of Life Science and Technology, the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Disease, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Contribution
Investigation, Assisted with the RNAi screening

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Xian Liu

School of Life Science and Technology, the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Disease, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Contribution
Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing - review and editing

Competing interests
No competing interests declared
Junhai Han
1. School of Life Science and Technology, the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Disease, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
2. Co-innovation Center of Neuroregeneration, Nantong University, Nantong, China
Contribution
Supervision, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

For correspondence
junhaihan@seu.edu.cn

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8941-2578
Yao Tian

School of Life Science and Technology, the Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Disease, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Contribution
Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Writing - review and editing

For correspondence
yaotian@seu.edu.cn

Competing interests
No competing interests declared

"This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0367-6239

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (STI2030-Major Projects 2021ZD0202500)

Junhai Han

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170970)

Yao Tian

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32230039)

Junhai Han

National Natural Science Foundation of China (32100788)

Xian Liu

Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Key Project 2018B030335001)

Junhai Han

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Haihuai He for providing Dscam1 mutant flies; Dr. Yufeng Pan for the fly line used in cell ablation; Dr. Renjun Tu for the NetB-GFP fly; Dr. Xuan Guo for collecting the tool flies; the Bloomington stock center and Tsinghua fly center for providing flies; Dr. Tzumin Lee for Dscam1 antibodies; Dr. Ranhui Duan HA-NetA and HA-NetB plasmids. This work was supported by the STI2030-Major Projects (2021ZD0202500 to J.H.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170970 to Y.T., 32230039 to J.H., and 32100788 to X.L.), and the Guangdong Key Project-2018B030335001 to J.H.

Version history

Sent for peer review: February 15, 2024
Preprint posted: February 17, 2024
Reviewed Preprint version 1: May 14, 2024
Reviewed Preprint version 2: July 2, 2024
Version of Record published: July 25, 2024

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96041. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

563

views
106

downloads
0

citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Mendeley

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Jingjing Liu
Yuedong Wang
Xian Liu
Junhai Han
Yao Tian

(2024)

Spatiotemporal changes in Netrin/Dscam1 signaling dictate axonal projection direction in Drosophila small ventral lateral clock neurons

eLife 13:RP96041.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96041.3

Categories and tags

Research organism

D. melanogaster

Share this article

Cite this article

Small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs) axon projection dynamics during the larval stage.

Development of vertical projection process alongside mushroom body (MB) growth.

Critical role of Dscam1 in small ventral lateral clock neuron (s-LNv) axonal horizontal projection.

Neuron-derived Netrin guides small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs) horizontal projection.

Netrin secreted by dorsal clock neurons (DNs) guides time-specific horizontal projection of small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs).

Dynamic changes in dorsal clock neurons (DNs) coordinated with small ventral lateral clock neurons (s-LNvs) axonal targeting.

Dynamic cellular molecular environment during the small ventral lateral clock neuron (s-LNv) projection directional shift.

Author details

Jingjing Liu

Contribution

Competing interests

Yuedong Wang

Contribution

Competing interests

Xian Liu

Contribution

Competing interests

Junhai Han

Contribution

For correspondence

Competing interests

Yao Tian

Contribution

For correspondence

Competing interests

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading