Bacterial Growth: The SagA of E. faecium
Bacteria and other microbes residing in our intestinal tract – known as gut microbiota – are important for maintaining health and normal immunity. Among these is a group of lactic acid-producing bacteria called Enterococcus that inhibit the growth of harmful pathogens and aid digestion. As a result, these species are routinely found in probiotic supplements and fermented foods that attempt to improve gut health.
Enterococci can also become opportunistic pathogens capable of causing infections. Indeed, two of the most frequently identified species of Enterococci – E. faecium and E. faecalis – are both known to acquire antibiotic resistance. However, some strains of E. faecium have also been found to positively impact human health. For example, enrichment of E. faecium has been associated with an improved response to various types of cancer immunotherapy (Matson et al., 2018; Routy et al., 2018). Presence of these bacteria has also been shown to help prevent infections in the gut, and E. faecium are widely used as safe probiotics (Bhardwaj et al., 2010; Ishibashi et al., 2012).
E. faecium protects the gut from infections by releasing a hydrolase enzyme called secreted antigen A (SagA), which is involved in remodeling its cell wall. SagA breaks down peptidoglycans, the main component of the E. faecium cell wall, to produce small fragments called muramyldipeptides (MDPs; Kim et al., 2019). These MDPs activate receptors known as NOD2 in the host’s immune cells, leading to improved immunity in the gut.
Recent studies in mouse models showed that the MDPs generated by SagA could also increase anti-tumor immunity and improve cancer immunotherapy outcomes (Griffin et al., 2021). However, the role SagA plays in the bacteria itself remained unknown as it was believed that E. faecium needed this protein to survive. Now, in eLife, Howard Hang and colleagues – including Steven Klupt, Kyong Tkhe Fam and Xing Zhang as joint first authors – report that SagA does not affect the viability of E. faecium, but is required for cell wall remodeling and cell separation during replication (Klupt et al., 2024).
The team (who are based at Scripps Research) genetically modified E. faecium to generate a strain in which the gene for SagA was deleted. The growth of this bacterial strain was then compared to: (i) a wild-type strain, (ii) a mutant strain with inactive SagA, and (iii) a ‘complementation’ strain in which the gene for SagA had first been deleted and then re-expressed. Bacteria that lacked the gene for SagA or had an inactive version of the enzyme grew more slowly in liquid culture than wild-type E. faecium; but this was restored in the complementation strain. Experiments also showed that deleting the gene for SagA made E. faecium more sensitive to various antibiotics that target the bacterial cell wall. These exciting results raise the possibility of targeting SagA and other peptidoglycan hydrolase enzymes to overcome antibiotic resistance.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) – which uses a beam of electrons to generate images with ultrahigh resolution – revealed that E. faecium strains lacking the gene for SagA had more difficulty separating during replication. This caused the bacteria to cluster together, which could impair their growth. Cryo-electron tomography – a modification of TEM which can create three dimensional images of cells – was then used to quantify cell morphology parameters such as thickness of the cell wall and septum (a transient structure which helps to separate dividing cells). This revealed that deleting the gene for SagA alters the placement and projection angle of the new cell wall; however, this morphology was restored in the complementation strain.
To investigate the functional implications of deleting the gene for SagA, Klupt et al. used mass spectrometry to analyze specific components of the cell wall. They found that the strain in which the gene for SagA has been deleted generated fewer MDPs than wild-type E. faecium, which led to poor NOD2 signaling. Mouse models of cancer also did not respond to immunotherapy when they were colonized with the deficient strain. Finally, Klupt et al. demonstrated that deleting the gene for SagA reduced the population of cancer-targeting immune cells within the tumor.
Taken together, the findings show that catalytically active SagA is required for cell wall remodeling and cell separation in E. faecium, and its production of MDPs is required to mount an effective anti-tumor immune response (Figure 1). Furthermore, deleting the gene that codes for SagA impairs bacterial growth and increases sensitivity to antibiotics. Similar observations have been made in other bacteria that express peptidoglycan hydrolase enzymes, albeit via different mechanisms (Frirdich and Gaynor, 2013). This suggests that these enzymes could potentially be important antibacterial targets.
Notably, hydrolases from other immunotherapy-promoting Enterococcus species share more than 90% sequence homology in their catalytic domain. Future studies investigating how bacteria regulate the activity of these hydrolases could lead to better treatments for cancer and combating antibiotic resistance.
References
-
Safety assessment and evaluation of probiotic potential of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium KH 24 strain under in vitro and in vivo conditionsInternational Journal of Food Microbiology 141:156–164.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.05.001
-
Peptidoglycan hydrolases, bacterial shape, and pathogenesisCurrent Opinion in Microbiology 16:767–778.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2013.09.005
-
Purification and characterization of multiple bacteriocins and an inducing peptide produced by Enterococcus faecium NKR-5-3 from Thai fermented fishBioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 76:947–953.https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.110972
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Prasad and Jenq
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 694
- views
-
- 81
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Immunology and Inflammation
Excessive elevation or reduction of soluble uric acid (sUA) levels has been linked to some of pathological states, raising another subject that sUA at physiological levels may be essential for the maintenance of health. Yet, the fundamental physiological functions and molecular targets of sUA remain largely unknown. Using enzyme assays and in vitro and in vivo metabolic assays, we demonstrate that sUA directly inhibits the hydrolase and cyclase activities of CD38 via a reversible non-competitive mechanism, thereby limiting nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) degradation. CD38 inhibition is restricted to sUA in purine metabolism, and a structural comparison using methyl analogs of sUA such as caffeine metabolites shows that 1,3-dihydroimidazol-2-one is the main functional group. Moreover, sUA at physiological levels prevents crude lipopolysaccharide (cLPS)-induced systemic inflammation and monosodium urate (MSU) crystal-induced peritonitis in mice by interacting with CD38. Together, this study unveils an unexpected physiological role for sUA in controlling NAD+ availability and innate immunity through CD38 inhibition, providing a new perspective on sUA homeostasis and purine metabolism.
-
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Previous studies demonstrated that Leptospira biflexa, a saprophytic species, triggers innate immune responses in the host during early infection. This raised the question of whether these responses could suppress a subsequent challenge with pathogenic Leptospira. We inoculated C3H/HeJ mice with a single or a double dose of L. biflexa before challenge with a pathogenic serovar, Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni FioCruz (LIC). Pre-challenge exposure to L. biflexa did not prevent LIC dissemination and colonization of the kidney. However, it rescued weight loss and mouse survival thereby mitigating disease severity. Unexpectedly, there was correlation between rescue of overall health (weight gain, higher survival, lower kidney fibrosis marker ColA1) and higher shedding of LIC in urine. This stood in contrast to the L. biflexa unexposed LIC challenged control. Immune responses were dominated by increased frequency of effector T helper (CD4+) cells in spleen, as well as significant increases in serologic IgG2a. Our findings suggest that exposure to live saprophytic Leptospira primes the host to develop Th1 biased immune responses that prevent severe disease induced by a subsequent challenge with a pathogenic species. Thus, mice exposed to live saprophytic Leptospira before facing a pathogenic serovar may withstand infection with far better outcomes. Furthermore, a status of homeostasis may have been reached after kidney colonization that helps LIC complete its enzootic cycle.