Membrane Fusion: A matter of timing

A change in the electric charge of autophagosome membranes controls the recruitment of SNARE proteins to ensure that membrane fusion occurs at the right time during autophagy.
  1. Zhiqi Tian
  2. Jiajie Diao  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, United States

Organelles perform a wide range of roles within cells, and many of these involve two organelles merging to form a single structure. Since most organelles are enclosed within a membrane, these mergers usually involve a complicated process called membrane fusion. A family of proteins known as SNARE proteins start the process of fusion by acting like a zip and pulling the two membranes together (Sutton et al., 1998).

Membrane fusion is important for a process called autophagy, which is used to recycle old, damaged or unneeded cellular components. Specifically, double membranes surround the material to be recycled, forming a closed ‘autophagosome’ that can fuse with an organelle called a lysosome. This allows digestive enzymes from the lysosome to enter the autophagosome and break down the contents, which can then be reused elsewhere in the cell.

Autophagy fusion is mediated by three members of the SNARE protein family; syntaxin17 and SNAP29 are initially found in the cytosol before being recruited to the membrane of the autophagosome to form a complex with VAMP7/8 on the lysosome (Itakura et al., 2012). The SNARE proteins then spontaneously zip together from their N-terminus (on the cytoplasm side of the membrane) to the C-terminus within the membrane. However, it is important that this process only occurs on mature, closed autophagosomes, and not on intermediate ‘open’ stages, otherwise the contents of the lysosome might leak into the cytosol. Accurately directing the different SNARE proteins to their target membranes at the right time is therefore crucial.

The leading candidates for directing syntaxin17 – the SNARE protein that is inserted into mature autophagosomes – are proteins known as RGM and LC3/GABARAP (Kumar et al., 2018). Additionally, a protein called filamin A has been shown to interact with and help recruit phosphorylated syntaxin17 to autophagosomes (Wang et al., 2023). However, these protein-protein interactions do not explain how syntaxin17 recruitment is precisely controlled in time. Now, in eLife, Noboru Mizushima (University of Tokyo) and colleagues – including Saori Shinoda (Tokyo and Kyoto Sangyo University) as first author – report that electric charges play a role in ensuring that syntaxin17 is recruited to autophagosomes at the right time (Figure 1; Shinoda et al., 2024).

Regulating the recruitment of syntaxin17 to mature autophagosomes.

When the membrane of an autophagosome (red circles with black lines) becomes enriched with PI4P (yellow circles), it becomes negatively charged. This negative charge recruits the positively charged C-terminus of a SNARE protein called syntaxin17 to the membrane. Syntaxin17 can also be recruited through interactions with chaperone proteins (green). PI4P: phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate. SNARE: soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors.

The team – who are also based at Tokyo, Kyoto University, Nippon Medical School and Cornell University – first showed that syntaxin17 recruitment to mature autophagosomes relies on its C-terminus being positively charged. Monitoring the membrane charges of autophagosomes at different stages of the formation process showed that, compared to an unclosed intermediate structure, mature autophagosomes are more negatively charged. This is mainly due to a phospholipid called PI4P accumulating in the membrane of the autophagosome as it matures. When PI4P was disrupted, syntaxin17 did not associate with the membrane. Moreover, computer simulations indicated that PI4P is also required for the insertion of syntaxin17 into the membrane. This suggests that the difference in the electric charge on a mature autophagosome and the charge on the C-terminal region of syntaxin17 drives the recruitment and insertion of syntaxin17 to the membrane. Collectively, these findings present a new model for how syntaxin17 is recruited to mature autophagosomes, which is also supported by a recent study from an independent group (Laczkó-Dobos et al., 2024).

Previous research has primarily focused on how membrane characteristics like charge, composition and curvature affect SNARE-mediated membrane fusion (Wickner, 2010). The pioneering findings of Shinoda et al. demonstrate the role of membrane charges in guiding the recruitment and insertion of SNARE proteins – critical steps that are initiated long before fusion occurs. Aside from protein chaperones, the findings of Shinoda et al. present a simple yet sophisticated model of SNARE recruitment based on membrane surface charges. Indeed, the observation that the surface charge of autophagosomal membranes changes during their formation represents a paradigm shift. Since PI4P is an important signaling molecule for cellular regulation (Tan and Brill, 2014), the accumulation of negatively charged PI4P on closed autophagosomes suggests a potential new regulatory mechanism for other autophagy proteins. This significant observation opens a new avenue for the future investigations on autophagy.

The work by Shinoda et al. underscores the multidisciplinary nature of contemporary cell biology research. As the factors influencing cellular processes now extend beyond traditional cell biology, studying them requires a broader array of technical tools. For instance, Shinoda et al. employed a computational technique called molecular dynamics simulation to illustrate the insertion of syntaxin17. And we have employed a combination of super-resolution imaging and biomechanical calculations in our own work on mitochondria (Chen et al., 2023). With contributions from experts in other fields such as physics, mechanics, and computer science, we can anticipate a continuing trend of significant and multidisciplinary discoveries in this area.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zhiqi Tian

    Zhiqi Tian is in the Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7027-9527
  2. Jiajie Diao

    Jiajie Diao is in the Department of Cancer Biology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, United States

    For correspondence
    diaoje@ucmail.uc.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4288-3203

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 4, 2024 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2024, Tian and Diao

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 690
    views
  • 64
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zhiqi Tian
  2. Jiajie Diao
(2024)
Membrane Fusion: A matter of timing
eLife 13:e99181.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.99181

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Elizabeth A Beath, Cynthia Bailey ... Francis J McNally
    Research Article

    Fertilization occurs before the completion of oocyte meiosis in the majority of animal species and sperm contents move long distances within the zygotes of mouse and C. elegans. If incorporated into the meiotic spindle, paternal chromosomes could be expelled into a polar body resulting in lethal monosomy. Through live imaging of fertilization in C. elegans, we found that the microtubule disassembling enzymes, katanin and kinesin-13 limit long-range movement of sperm contents and that maternal ataxin-2 maintains paternal DNA and paternal mitochondria as a cohesive unit that moves together. Depletion of katanin or double depletion of kinesin-13 and ataxin-2 resulted in the capture of the sperm contents by the meiotic spindle. Thus limiting movement of sperm contents and maintaining cohesion of sperm contents within the zygote both contribute to preventing premature interaction between maternal and paternal genomes.

    1. Cell Biology
    Joanne Tung, Lei Huang ... Adriana Ordonez
    Research Article

    Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) is one of three endoplasmic reticulum (ER) transmembrane stress sensors that mediate the unfolded protein response (UPR). Despite its crucial role in long-term ER stress adaptation, regulation of ATF6 alpha (α) signalling remains poorly understood, possibly because its activation involves ER-to-Golgi and nuclear trafficking. Here, we generated an ATF6α/Inositol-requiring kinase 1 (IRE1) dual UPR reporter CHO-K1 cell line and performed an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screen to systematically profile genetic factors that specifically contribute to ATF6α signalling in the presence and absence of ER stress. The screen identified both anticipated and new candidate genes that regulate ATF6α activation. Among these, calreticulin (CRT), a key ER luminal chaperone, selectively repressed ATF6α signalling: Cells lacking CRT constitutively activated a BiP::sfGFP ATF6α-dependent reporter, had higher BiP levels and an increased rate of trafficking and processing of ATF6α. Purified CRT interacted with the luminal domain of ATF6α in vitro and the two proteins co-immunoprecipitated from cell lysates. CRT depletion exposed a negative feedback loop implicating ATF6α in repressing IRE1 activity basally and overexpression of CRT reversed this repression. Our findings indicate that CRT, beyond its known role as a chaperone, also serves as an ER repressor of ATF6α to selectively regulate one arm of the UPR.