Cells need to allow various molecules to pass through the plasma membrane on their surface. Some molecules have to enter the cell, whereas others have to leave. Cells rely on a process called endocytosis to move large molecules into the cell. This involves part of the membrane engulfing the molecule to form a ‘bubble’ around it. This bubble, which is called an endosome, then moves the molecule to final destination inside the cell.

A protein called Rab5 controls how a new endosome is produced. However, before this can happen, various other molecules—including two proteins called Rabex-5 and Rabaptin-5—must activate the Rab5 protein. Exactly how these three proteins interact with each other was unknown.

Zhang et al. used X-ray crystallography to examine the structures of the complexes formed when Rabex-5 and Rabaptin-5 bind to each other, both when Rab5 is present, and also when it is absent. Biochemical and biophysical experiments confirmed that the Rabex-5/Rabaptin-5 complex is able to activate Rab5.

Zhang et al. also found that Rabex-5, on its own, folds so that the site that normally binds to Rab5 instead binds to a different part of Rabex-5, thus preventing endocytosis. However, when Rabaptin-5 forms a complex with Rabex-5, the Rab5 binding site is freed up.

The Rabex-5/Rabaptin-5 complex can switch between a V shape and a linear structure. Binding to Rab5 stabilizes the linear form of the complex, which then helps activate Rab5, and subsequently the activated Rab5 can interact with other downstream molecules, triggering endocytosis.

Endocytosis is a major process which eukaryotic cells use to absorb extracellular materials (Doherty and McMahon, 2009; Grant and Donaldson, 2009; Huotari and Helenius, 2011). In this process, small GTPase Rab5 functions as a master regulator of the early endosomal biogenesis (Stenmark, 2009; Mizuno-Yamasaki et al., 2012; Zeigerer et al., 2012). Rab5 is localized to early endosomal membrane via its isoprenylated C-terminus and regulates early endosomal fusion through interactions with an array of effectors including Rabaptin-5 (Stenmark et al., 1995), Rabenosyn-5 (Nielsen et al., 2000), EEA1 (Mills et al., 1998; Simonsen et al., 1998), PI3Ks (Li et al., 1995; Christoforidis et al., 1999), and APPLs (Miaczynska et al., 2004). Like other small GTPases, Rab5 exists mainly in two states, the GTP-bound active state and the GDP-bound inactive state, and requires guanosine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for activation and GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for inactivation.

Rabex-5 is a specific GEF for Rab5, Rab17, and Rab21 (Horiuchi et al., 1997; Delprato et al., 2004; Delprato and Lambright, 2007; Mori et al., 2013). The GEF domain is located in the middle and consists of a helical bundle (HB) domain and a Vps9 domain (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Besides, the N-terminal region comprises two distinct ubiquitin-binding domains, a zinc finger domain and a motif interacting with ubiquitin domain, which can interact with ubiquitinated cargoes or adaptors to recruit Rabex-5 to early endosomal membrane (Lee et al., 2006; Mattera et al., 2006; Penengo et al., 2006; Mattera and Bonifacino, 2008) and function as an E3 ligase for Ras ubiquitination to promote Ras endosomal localization (Xu et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2010). The following membrane binding motif domain and the HB domain together compose an early endosomal targeting domain that can direct Rabex-5 to early endosomal membrane (Zhu et al., 2007). The C-terminal region consists of a coiled-coil (CC) domain and a proline rich region; the CC domain is involved in autoinhibition of the GEF activity and binding of Rabaptin-5 (Lippe et al., 2001; Mattera et al., 2006; Delprato and Lambright, 2007). Rabaptin-5 is a key effector of Rab5 and plays an important role in both homotypic and heterotypic fusions of early endosomes (Stenmark et al., 1995; Stenmark, 2009). It is a scaffold protein consisting of primarily four coiled-coil domains, namely C1-1, C1-2, C2-1, and C2-2 domains (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). The C2-1 domain is responsible for interaction with and recruitment of Rabex-5 to early endosomal membrane to activate Rab5 (Lippe et al., 2001; Mattera et al., 2006; Delprato and Lambright, 2007). Besides, the N-terminal region can mediate interactions with Rab4 and Rab8 (Vitale et al., 1998; Omori et al., 2008); the middle region can interact with the GAE and GAT domains of GGAs that function as effectors of the Arf family small GTPases in the tethering and fusion of trans Golgi network (TGN) (Mattera et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2003; Zhu et al., 2004a); and the C-terminal region can interact with the GTP-bound Rab5 that recruits Rabaptin-5 to early endosomal membrane (Vitale et al., 1998; Zhu et al., 2004b). In addition, Rabex-5 and Rabaptin-5 have been shown to function as neoplastic tumor suppressors and are implicated in human cancers (Magnusson et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2009; Christoforides et al., 2012; Thomas and Strutt, 2014), and Rabex-5 has also been shown to determine the neurite localization of its substrate Rab proteins and thus plays an important role in the development of hippocampal neurons (Mori and Fukuda, 2013; Mori et al., 2013).

Previous structural, biochemical, and biological data have demonstrated that Rabex-5 and Rabaptin-5 function together to activate Rab5 in endocytosis; the GEF activity of Rabex-5 could be autoinhibited by its CC domain and activated by binding of the Rabaptin-5 C2-1 domain (Rabaptin-5C21) to the CC domain (Lippe et al., 2001; Delprato and Lambright, 2007; Zhu et al., 2007, 2010). However, the underlying molecular mechanism is unclear. We report here the crystal structures of a Rabex-5 variant in complex with the dimeric Rabaptin-5C21 (Rabaptin-5C21₂) and in complex with Rabaptin-5C21₂ and Rab5. The structural data together with the in vitro functional data reveal the molecular mechanism for the regulation of the Rabex-5 GEF activity.

The previous biochemical and biological data showed that Rabex-5 functions together with Rabaptin-5 to activate Rab5 and then to promote the fusion of early endosomes in endocytosis (Lippe et al., 2001; Delprato and Lambright, 2007; Zhu et al., 2007). The GEF activity of Rabex-5 is autoinhibited by its CC domain and is activated by the binding of Rabaptin-5 via its C2-1 domain. However, the molecular mechanism is unknown. In this work, we determined the crystal structures of Rabex-5Δ in complex with Rabaptin-5C21 and in complex with Rabaptin-5C21 and Rab5, which are validated by biophysical and biochemical analyses.

Our structural data show that at the substrate-binding site of the Rabex-5 GEF domain, there is a surface groove composed of largely nonpolar residues. Rabex-5CC forms a stable amphipathic α-helix that tends to bury its nonpolar surface via oligomerization or interaction with the C-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂. The nonpolar surface of Rabex-5CC has good chemical and geometrical complementarities with the nonpolar surface groove of the GEF domain and thus might be able to bind there to block the substrate binding and hence autoinhibit the GEF activity as proposed by Delprato and Lambright (2007). Nonetheless, our structural and biochemical data show that although Rabex-5CC alone exists as a stable helix in both solution and crystal structure, it cannot form a stable complex with the GEF domain as shown by both GST pull-down assay and ITC analysis (data not shown). In addition, Rabex-5 and Rabex-5Δ cannot be crystallized alone and Rabex-5 can be easily proteolyzed in the linker region (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). These results suggest that the CC domain and the linker have high flexibility. Moreover, Rabex-5 itself has a basal GEF activity which is slightly weaker (about 1/3) than that of the constitutively active GEF domain (Figure 4A,B) but is not so weak compared with some other GEFs including DSS4 (a GEF for Ypt1p) (Esters et al., 2001) and MSS4 (a GEF for Rab8) (Zhu et al., 2001; Itzen et al., 2006). Mutations of the residues on the nonpolar surface of Rabex-5CC can enhance the GEF activity by 1.4–1.9 folds (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). These results together indicate that the binding of Rabex5CC to the GEF domain is not tight, and Rabex-5 alone is not completely autoinhibited.

On the other hand, in the structure of the R2Δ complex, Rabaptin-5C21₂ forms 2 two-helix bundles with a V-shaped conformation, and Rabex-5CC interacts via the nonpolar surface with the C-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂ to form a tight three-helix bundle. Meanwhile, the GEF domain folds along the three-helix bundle with a partially occupied substrate-binding site, suggesting that further conformational change is required to completely expose the substrate-binding site for Rab5 binding and activation. Indeed, in the structure of the R3Δ complex, although Rabex-5CC still forms a tight three-helix bundle with the C-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂, Rabaptin-5C21₂ forms a linear two-helix bundle which is different from the V-shaped conformation but similar to that in the Rabex-5CC-Rabaptin-5C21₂ complex and the GAT-Rabaptin-5C21₂ complex (Zhu et al., 2004a). The GEF domain is dislodged from the three-helix bundle and interacts with the N-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂, and the substrate-binding site is completely exposed to bind Rab5. Meanwhile, our SAXS analysis results indicate that the R2 and R2Δ complexes mainly assume the V-shaped conformation as observed in the R2Δ structure but have some flexibility in solution, and our biochemical data show that the R2 and R2Δ complexes have full GEF activities as the constitutively active GEF domain and the N-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂ are required for the function of the R2 complex in the activation of Rab5.

Based on the structural and biological data in this work and those reported previously, we can propose the molecular mechanism for the regulation of the Rabex-5 GEF activity despite the lack of an intact Rabex-5 structure (Figure 5). In the free-form Rabex-5, Rabex-5CC may bind weakly via the nonpolar surface to the substrate-binding site of the GEF domain, leading to the blockage of the substrate-binding site and thus a weak autoinhibition of the GEF activity (Figure 5, State I). As the binding of Rabex-5CC to the GEF domain is not tight, it might assume alternative conformations. The linker between the GEF and CC domains might help to modulate the conformational flexibility and/or the relative conformations of the two domains and thus plays a minor role in the autoinhibition. One plausible alternative conformation of Rabex-5CC might be similar to that observed in the R2Δ structure with a largely exposed substrate-binding site of the GEF domain. As the interaction of Rabex-5CC with the GEF domain via the nonpolar surface is much tighter than that via the adjacent surface, Rabex-5CC might exist mainly in the autoinhibitory conformational state and partially in the alternative conformational state. This may explain why the free-form Rabex5 exhibits some basal GEF activity. Rabaptin-5C21 might bind to the C-terminal region of the nonpolar surface of Rabex-5CC in the autoinhibitory conformational state and induce conformational change of the α-helix to transform into the conformational state as observed in the R2Δ structure, or directly to the exposed nonpolar surface of Rabex-5CC in the alternative conformational state, leading to the relief of the autoinhibition and the release of the GEF activity (Figure 5, State II).

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

When the Rabex-5-Rabaptin-5 complex is recruited to the early endosomal membrane via the interaction of the C-terminal region of Rabaptin-5 with the GTP-bound Rab5, Rabex-5 can activate Rab5 locally in a very efficient way. The binding of the GDP-bound Rab5 to Rabex-5 induces further conformational changes of the Rabex-5-Rabaptin-5 complex such that Rabaptin-5C21₂ transforms from the V-shaped to the linear conformation, the GEF domain is dislodged from Rabex-5CC and the C-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂, and the substrate-binding site is completely exposed to the solvent to bind Rab5 as observed in the R3Δ structure (Figure 5, State III). In this conformational state, the Rabex-5-Rabaptin-5 complex can facilitate the exchange of GDP- to GTP-bound Rab5. The not-so-tight interaction of the Rabex-5 GEF domain with Rabex-5CC and Rabaptin-5C21₂ as observed in the R2Δ structure allows the conformational changes easily during the substrate binding. The conformational changes of the Rabex-5-Rabaptin-5 complex induced by the binding of Rab5 leading to the full activation of the Rabex-5 GEF activity may provide another leverage to ensure the high substrate specificity.

In the context of the early endosomal membrane, Rabex-5 can directly target to the early endosomes either through the interaction of the N-terminal ubiquitin binding domain (UBD) with the ubiquitinated cargoes or through the early endosomal targeting domain (EET) (Zhu et al., 2007; Mattera and Bonifacino, 2008). In this case, as the GEF activity of Rabex-5 is autoinhibited by Rabex-5CC, Rabex-5 can only activate Rab5 at the basal level. In the cells, most Rabex-5 forms a stable complex with Rabaptin-5 which can be recruited to early endosomes via the binding of Rabaptin-5 through the C-terminal region to GTP-bound Rab5 (Lippe et al., 2001; Zhu et al., 2010). In this case, Rabaptin-5 not only assists the recruitment of Rabex-5 to the early endosomal membrane, but also activates the GEF activity of Rabex-5. The positive feedback loop among Rab5, its effector Rabaptin-5, and its GEF Rabex-5 can lead to a robust activation of Rab5, which then promotes the fusion of early endosomes efficiently.

As a scaffold protein, Rabaptin-5 comprises several coiled-coil regions which can mediate interactions with different proteins to exert different functions. In addition to acting as the effector of Rab5 to function in the fusion of early endosomes, Rabaptin-5 can interact with Rab4 via the N-terminal region and thus may serve as the effector of Rab4 to function in the endocytic recyling process (Vitale et al., 1998). As the C2-1 domain of Rabaptin-5 can interact with the CC domain of Rabex5 and the GAT domain of GGA1, and Rabaptin-5 is the effector of Rab5 and GGA1 is the effector of Arf1, this dual interaction might mediate the crosstalk between Rab and Arf GTPases to promote the tethering and fusion of early endosomes and trans-Golgi network-derived vesicles (Mattera et al., 2003; Zhu et al., 2004a; Kawasaki et al., 2005).

In the GAT-Rabaptin-5C21₂ structure, Rabaptin-5C21₂ assumes a linear conformation, the N-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂ bind one GAT, and two symmetry-related Rabaptin-5C21₂ dimerize through the C-terminal regions (Zhu et al., 2004a), which are the binding site for Rabex-5CC. Interestingly, Rabaptin-5C21₂ assumes a linear conformation in the Rabex-5CC-Rabaptin-5C21₂ structure but a V-shaped conformation in the R2Δ structure, and in both structures, the C-terminal regions of Rabaptin-5C21₂ bind one Rabex-5CC and two symmetry-related Rabaptin-5C21₂ dimerize through the N-terminal regions which are the binding site for GAT. Moreover, in the R3Δ structure, Rabaptin-5C21₂ also assumes a linear conformation but two Rabaptin-5C21₂ dimerize through the middle regions (residues 590–600) between the GAT-binding site and the Rabex-5CC-binding site. As the GAT-binding site is unoccupied, Rabaptin-5 may bind Rabex-5 and GGA1 simultaneously. These results demonstrate that Rabaptin-5C21 always forms a dimer which can assume either a V-shaped or a linear conformation and can bind other proteins via different regions. In addition, the dimeric Rabaptin-5C21₂ prefers to further dimerize to form a dimer of dimers via the regions that are not involved in the interactions with other proteins. In the context of full-length Rabaptin-5, it is possible that Rabaptin-5C21₂ might exist in either the V-shaped or the linear conformation depending on the functional state. The dimerization of Rabaptin-5C21₂ might not only avoid exposure of the hydrophobic surface and minimize the overall energy of the protein in aqueous environment, but also play some functional roles in the tethering and fusion of early endosomes and/or with other vesicles.

1. 1. Zhang Z
   2. Zhang T
   3. Ding J

   (2013) Crystal structure of Rabex-5 CC domain

   ID 4N3X. Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).

   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4N3X
2. 1. Zhang Z
   2. Zhang T
   3. Ding J

   (2013) Crystal structure of Rabex-5CC and Rabaptin-5C21 complex

   ID 4N3Y. Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).

   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4N3Y
3. 1. Zhang Z
   2. Zhang T
   3. Ding J

   (2013) Crystal structure of Rabex-5delta and Rabaptin-5C21 complex

   ID 4N3Z. Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).

   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4N3Z
4. 1. Zhang Z
   2. Zhang T
   3. Ding J

   (2014) Crystal structure of the Rab5, Rabex-5delta and Rabaptin-5C21 complex

   ID 4Q9U. Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).

   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4Q9U

1. 1. Delprato A
   2. Merithew E
   3. Lambright DG

   (2004) Crystal Structure of the Vps9 Domain of Rabex-5

   ID 1TXU. Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).

   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do;jsessionid=696B7B648E345F4C30FD67B32F1FA992?structureId=1TXU
2. 1. Delprato A
   2. Lambright DG

   (2007) Crystal structure of rabex-5 VPS9 domain in complex with nucleotide free RAB21

   ID 2OT3. Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).

   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do;jsessionid=696B7B648E345F4C30FD67B32F1FA992?structureId=2OT3
3. 1. Zhu G
   2. Zhai P
   3. He X
   4. Wakeham N
   5. Rodgers K
   6. Li G
   7. Tang J
   8. Zhang XC

   (2004) Crystal structure of human GGA1 GAT domain complexed with the GAT-binding domain of Rabaptin5

   ID 1X79. Publicly available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/).

   http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do;jsessionid=696B7B648E345F4C30FD67B32F1FA992?structureId=1X79

1. 1. Adams PD
   2. Afonine PV
   3. Bunkóczi G
   4. Chen VB
   5. Davis IW
   6. Echols N
   7. Headd JJ
   8. Hung LW
   9. Kapral GJ
   10. Grosse-Kunstleve RW
   11. McCoy AJ
   12. Moriarty NW
   13. Oeffner R
   14. Read RJ
   15. Richardson DC
   16. Richardson JS
   17. Terwilliger TC
   18. Zwart PH

   (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution

   Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography 66:213–221.

   https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444909052925

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Brunger AT

   (2007) Version 1.2 of the Crystallography and NMR system

   Nature Protocols 2:2728–2733.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.406

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Christoforides C
   2. Rainero E
   3. Brown KK
   4. Norman JC
   5. Toker A

   (2012) PKD controls alphavbeta3 integrin recycling and tumor cell invasive migration through its substrate Rabaptin-5

   Developmental Cell 23:560–572.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2012.08.008

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Christoforidis S
   2. Miaczynska M
   3. Ashman K
   4. Wilm M
   5. Zhao L
   6. Yip SC
   7. Waterfield MD
   8. Backer JM
   9. Zerial M

   (1999) Phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinases are Rab5 effectors

   Nature Cell Biology 1:249–252.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/12075

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Case TAD DA
   2. Cheatham III TE
   3. Simmerling CL
   4. Wang J
   5. Duke RE
   6. Luo RCW R
   7. Zhang W
   8. Merz KM
   9. Roberts B
   10. Hayik S
   11. Roitberg A
   12. Seabra G
   13. Swails AWG J
   14. Kolossváry I
   15. Wong KF
   16. Paesani F
   17. Vanicek J
   18. Wolf RM
   19. Liu J
   20. Wu SRB X
   21. Steinbrecher T
   22. Gohlke H
   23. Cai Q
   24. Ye X
   25. Wang J
   26. Hsieh MJ
   27. Cui DRR G
   28. Mathews DH
   29. Seetin MG
   30. Salomon-Ferrer R
   31. Sagui C
   32. Babin V
   33. Luchko SG T
   34. Kovalenko A
   35. Kollman PA

   (2012)

   AMBER 12

   AMBER 12, University of California, San Francisco.

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Delprato A
   2. Lambright DG

   (2007) Structural basis for Rab GTPase activation by VPS9 domain exchange factors

   Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 14:406–412.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1232

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Delprato A
   2. Merithew E
   3. Lambright DG

   (2004) Structure, exchange determinants, and family-wide rab specificity of the tandem helical bundle and Vps9 domains of Rabex-5

   Cell 118:607–617.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.009

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Doherty GJ
   2. McMahon HT

   (2009) Mechanisms of endocytosis

   Annual Review of Biochemistry 78:857–902.

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081307.110540

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Emsley P
   2. Cowtan K

   (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics

   Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography 60:2126–2132.

   https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Esters H
    2. Alexandrov K
    3. Iakovenko A
    4. Ivanova T
    5. Thomä N
    6. Rybin V
    7. Zerial M
    8. Scheidig AJ
    9. Goody RS

    (2001) Vps9, Rabex-5 and DSS4: proteins with weak but distinct nucleotide-exchange activities for Rab proteins

    Journal of Molecular Biology 310:141–156.

    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2001.4735

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Grant BD
    2. Donaldson JG

    (2009) Pathways and mechanisms of endocytic recycling

    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10:597–608.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2755

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Horiuchi H
    2. Lippé R
    3. McBride HM
    4. Rubino M
    5. Woodman P
    6. Stenmark H
    7. Rybin V
    8. Wilm M
    9. Ashman K
    10. Mann M
    11. Zerial M

    (1997) A novel Rab5 GDP/GTP exchange factor complexed to Rabaptin-5 links nucleotide exchange to effector recruitment and function

    Cell 90:1149–1159.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80380-3

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Huotari J
    2. Helenius A

    (2011) Endosome maturation

    The EMBO Journal 30:3481–3500.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.286

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Itzen A
    2. Pylypenko O
    3. Goody RS
    4. Alexandrov K
    5. Rak A

    (2006) Nucleotide exchange via local protein unfolding–structure of Rab8 in complex with MSS4

    The EMBO Journal 25:1445–1455.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601044

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Kawasaki M
    2. Nakayama K
    3. Wakatsuki S

    (2005) Membrane recruitment of effector proteins by Arf and Rab GTPases

    Current Opinion in Structural Biology 15:681–689.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2005.10.015

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Konarev PV
    2. Volkov VV
    3. Sokolova AV
    4. Koch MHJ
    5. Svergun DI

    (2003) PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 36:1277–1282.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889803012779

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Krissinel E
    2. Henrick K

    (2007) Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state

    Journal of Molecular Biology 372:774–797.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Langemeyer L
    2. Nunes Bastos R
    3. Cai Y
    4. Itzen A
    5. Reinisch KM
    6. Barr FA

    (2014) Diversity and plasticity in Rab GTPase nucleotide release mechanism has consequences for Rab activation and inactivation

    eLife 3:e01623.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01623

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Laskowski RA
    2. Macarthur MW
    3. Moss DS
    4. Thornton JM

    (1993) Procheck - a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 26:283–291.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889892009944

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Lee S
    2. Tsai YC
    3. Mattera R
    4. Smith WJ
    5. Kostelansky MS
    6. Weissman AM
    7. Bonifacino JS
    8. Hurley JH

    (2006) Structural basis for ubiquitin recognition and autoubiquitination by Rabex-5

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 13:264–271.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1064

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Li G
    2. D'Souza-Schorey C
    3. Barbieri MA
    4. Roberts RL
    5. Klippel A
    6. Williams LT
    7. Stahl PD

    (1995) Evidence for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase as a regulator of endocytosis via activation of Rab5

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92:10207–10211.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.22.10207

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Lippe R
    2. Miaczynska M
    3. Rybin V
    4. Runge A
    5. Zerial M

    (2001) Functional synergy between Rab5 effector Rabaptin-5 and exchange factor Rabex-5 when physically associated in a complex

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 12:2219–2228.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.12.7.2219

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Magnusson MK
    2. Meade KE
    3. Brown KE
    4. Arthur DC
    5. Krueger LA
    6. Barrett AJ
    7. Dunbar CE

    (2001) Rabaptin-5 is a novel fusion partner to platelet-derived growth factor beta receptor in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

    Blood 98:2518–2525.

    https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V98.8.2518

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Mattera R
    2. Arighi CN
    3. Lodge R
    4. Zerial M
    5. Bonifacino JS

    (2003) Divalent interaction of the GGAs with the Rabaptin-5-Rabex-5 complex

    The EMBO Journal 22:78–88.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg015

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Mattera R
    2. Bonifacino JS

    (2008) Ubiquitin binding and conjugation regulate the recruitment of Rabex-5 to early endosomes

    The EMBO Journal 27:2484–2494.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.177

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Mattera R
    2. Tsai YC
    3. Weissman AM
    4. Bonifacino JS

    (2006) The Rab5 guanine nucleotide exchange factor Rabex-5 binds ubiquitin (Ub) and functions as a Ub ligase through an atypical Ub-interacting motif and a zinc finger domain

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 281:6874–6883.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509939200

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Merithew E
    2. Hatherly S
    3. Dumas JJ
    4. Lawe DC
    5. Heller-Harrison R
    6. Lambright DG

    (2001) Structural plasticity of an invariant hydrophobic triad in the switch regions of Rab GTPases is a determinant of effector recognition

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:13982–13988.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M009771200

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Miaczynska M
    2. Christoforidis S
    3. Giner A
    4. Shevchenko A
    5. Uttenweiler-Joseph S
    6. Habermann B
    7. Wilm M
    8. Parton RG
    9. Zerial M

    (2004) APPL proteins link Rab5 to nuclear signal transduction via an endosomal compartment

    Cell 116:445–456.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00117-5

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Miller GJ
    2. Mattera R
    3. Bonifacino JS
    4. Hurley JH

    (2003) Recognition of accessory protein motifs by the gamma-adaptin ear domain of GGA3

    Nature Structural Biology 10:599–606.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb953

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Mills IG
    2. Jones AT
    3. Clague MJ

    (1998) Involvement of the endosomal autoantigen EEA1 in homotypic fusion of early endosomes

    Current Biology 8:881–884.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00351-X

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Mizuno-Yamasaki E
    2. Rivera-Molina F
    3. Novick P

    (2012) GTPase networks in membrane traffic

    Annual Review of Biochemistry 81:637–659.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-052810-093700

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Mori Y
    2. Fukuda M

    (2013) Rabex-5 determines the neurite localization of its downstream Rab proteins in hippocampal neurons

    Communicative & Integrative Biology 6:e25433.

    https://doi.org/10.4161/cib.25433

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Mori Y
    2. Matsui T
    3. Fukuda M

    (2013) Rabex-5 protein regulates dendritic localization of small GTPase Rab17 and neurite morphogenesis in hippocampal neurons

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:9835–9847.

    https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.427591

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Murshudov GN
    2. Vagin AA
    3. Dodson EJ

    (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method

    Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography 53:240–255.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444996012255

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Nielsen E
    2. Christoforidis S
    3. Uttenweiler-Joseph S
    4. Miaczynska M
    5. Dewitte F
    6. Wilm M
    7. Hoflack B
    8. Zerial M

    (2000) Rabenosyn-5, a novel Rab5 effector, is complexed with hVPS45 and recruited to endosomes through a FYVE finger domain

    The Journal of Cell Biology 151:601–612.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.3.601

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Omori Y
    2. Zhao C
    3. Saras A
    4. Mukhopadhyay S
    5. Kim W
    6. Furukawa T
    7. Sengupta P
    8. Veraksa A
    9. Malicki J

    (2008) Elipsa is an early determinant of ciliogenesis that links the IFT particle to membrane-associated small GTPase Rab8

    Nature Cell Biology 10:437–444.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1706

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Otwinowski Z
    2. Minor W

    (1997) Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode

    Method in Enzymology 276:307–326.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Penengo L
    2. Mapelli M
    3. Murachelli AG
    4. Confalonieri S
    5. Magri L
    6. Musacchio A
    7. Di Fiore PP
    8. Polo S
    9. Schneider TR

    (2006) Crystal structure of the ubiquitin binding domains of rabex-5 reveals two modes of interaction with ubiquitin

    Cell 124:1183–1195.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.020

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Schroder GF
    2. Levitt M
    3. Brunger AT

    (2010) Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data

    Nature 464:1218–1222.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08892

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Schwieters CD
    2. Kuszewski JJ
    3. Clore GM

    (2006) Using Xplor-NIH for NMR molecular structure determination

    Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 48:47–62.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2005.10.001

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Simonsen A
    2. Lippé R
    3. Christoforidis S
    4. Gaullier JM
    5. Brech A
    6. Callaghan J
    7. Toh BH
    8. Murphy C
    9. Zerial M
    10. Stenmark H

    (1998) EEA1 links PI(3)K function to Rab5 regulation of endosome fusion

    Nature 394:494–498.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/28879

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Stenmark H

    (2009) Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic

    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10:513–525.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2728

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Stenmark H
    2. Vitale G
    3. Ullrich O
    4. Zerial M

    (1995) Rabaptin-5 is a direct effector of the small GTPase Rab5 in endocytic membrane fusion

    Cell 83:423–432.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90120-5

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Svergun D
    2. Barberato C
    3. Koch MHJ

    (1995) CRYSOL - a program to evaluate x-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates

    Journal of Applied Crystallography 28:768–773.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889895007047

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Thomas C
    2. Strutt D

    (2014) Rabaptin-5 and Rabex-5 are neoplastic tumour suppressor genes that interact to modulate Rab5 dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster

    Developmental Biology 385:107–121.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.09.029

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Vitale G
    2. Rybin V
    3. Christoforidis S
    4. Thornqvist P
    5. McCaffrey M
    6. Stenmark H
    7. Zerial M

    (1998) Distinct Rab-binding domains mediate the interaction of Rabaptin-5 with GTP-bound Rab4 and Rab5

    The EMBO Journal 17:1941–1951.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.7.1941

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Wang Y
    2. Roche O
    3. Yan MS
    4. Finak G
    5. Evans AJ
    6. Metcalf JL
    7. Hast BE
    8. Hanna SC
    9. Wondergem B
    10. Furge KA
    11. Irwin MS
    12. Kim WY
    13. Teh BT
    14. Grinstein S
    15. Park M
    16. Marsden PA
    17. Ohh M

    (2009) Regulation of endocytosis via the oxygen-sensing pathway

    Nature Medicine 15:319–324.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1922

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Winn MD
    2. Ballard CC
    3. Cowtan KD
    4. Dodson EJ
    5. Emsley P
    6. Evans PR
    7. Keegan RM
    8. Krissinel EB
    9. Leslie AG
    10. McCoy A
    11. McNicholas SJ
    12. Murshudov GN
    13. Pannu NS
    14. Potterton EA
    15. Powell HR
    16. Read RJ
    17. Vagin A
    18. Wilson KS

    (2011) Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments

    Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography 67:235–242.

    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910045749

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Xu L
    2. Lubkov V
    3. Taylor LJ
    4. Bar-Sagi D

    (2010) Feedback regulation of Ras signaling by Rabex-5-mediated ubiquitination

    Current Biology 20:1372–1377.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.051

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Yan H
    2. Jahanshahi M
    3. Horvath EA
    4. Liu HY
    5. Pfleger CM

    (2010) Rabex-5 ubiquitin ligase activity restricts Ras signaling to establish pathway homeostasis in Drosophila

    Current Biology 20:1378–1382.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.058

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Zeigerer A
    2. Gilleron J
    3. Bogorad RL
    4. Marsico G
    5. Nonaka H
    6. Seifert S
    7. Epstein-Barash H
    8. Kuchimanchi S
    9. Peng CG
    10. Ruda VM
    11. Del Conte-Zerial P
    12. Hengstler JG
    13. Kalaidzidis Y
    14. Koteliansky V
    15. Zerial M

    (2012) Rab5 is necessary for the biogenesis of the endolysosomal system in vivo

    Nature 485:465–470.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11133

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Zhu G
    2. Zhai P
    3. He X
    4. Wakeham N
    5. Rodgers K
    6. Li G
    7. Tang J
    8. Zhang XC

    (2004a) Crystal structure of human GGA1 GAT domain complexed with the GAT-binding domain of Rabaptin5

    The EMBO Journal 23:3909–3917.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600411

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Zhu G
    2. Zhai P
    3. Liu J
    4. Terzyan S
    5. Li G
    6. Zhang XC

    (2004b) Structural basis of Rab5-Rabaptin5 interaction in endocytosis

    Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 11:975–983.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb832

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Zhu H
    2. Qian H
    3. Li G

    (2010) Delayed onset of positive feedback activation of Rab5 by Rabex-5 and Rabaptin-5 in endocytosis

    PLOS ONE 5:e9226.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009226

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Zhu H
    2. Zhu G
    3. Liu J
    4. Liang Z
    5. Zhang XC
    6. Li G

    (2007) Rabaptin-5-independent membrane targeting and Rab5 activation by Rabex-5 in the cell

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 18:4119–4128.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0100

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Zhu Z
    2. Dumas JJ
    3. Lietzke SE
    4. Lambright DG

    (2001) A helical turn motif in Mss4 is a critical determinant of Rab binding and nucleotide release

    Biochemistry 40:3027–3036.

    https://doi.org/10.1021/bi002680o

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Zhe Zhang

   State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

   Contribution

   ZZ, Carried out the cloning, protein purification, crystallization, structure determination and analyses, biophysical and biochemical studies, and drafted and revised the manuscript

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Tianlong Zhang

   State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

   Contribution

   TZ, Participated in the structure determination and analyses

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

3. Shanshan Wang

   State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

   Contribution

   SW, Participated in the cloning and protein purification

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Zhou Gong

   State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

   Contribution

   ZG, Participated in the design, analysis and discussion of the SAXS study

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

5. Chun Tang

   State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China

   Contribution

   CT, Participated in the design, analysis and discussion of the SAXS study, and revised the manuscript

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

6. Jiangye Chen

   State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

   Contribution

   JC, Participated in the design, analysis and discussion of the biochemical studies

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

7. Jianping Ding

   State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China

   Contribution

   JD, Conceived the study, participated in the designs and data analyses of all experiments, and wrote and revised the manuscript

   For correspondence

   jpding@sibcb.ac.cn

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

• 3,441

  views

• 465

  downloads

• 50

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.