1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
  2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Bacterial flagellar capping proteins adopt diverse oligomeric states

  1. Sandra Postel
  2. Daniel Deredge
  3. Daniel A Bonsor
  4. Xiong Yu
  5. Kay Diederichs
  6. Saskia Helmsing
  7. Aviv Vromen
  8. Assaf Friedler
  9. Michael Hust
  10. Edward H Egelman
  11. Dorothy Beckett
  12. Patrick L Wintrode
  13. Eric J Sundberg  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States
  2. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, United States
  3. University of Virginia, United States
  4. University of Konstanz, Germany
  5. Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany
  6. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
  7. University of Maryland College Park, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Sandra Postel
  2. Daniel Deredge
  3. Daniel A Bonsor
  4. Xiong Yu
  5. Kay Diederichs
  6. Saskia Helmsing
  7. Aviv Vromen
  8. Assaf Friedler
  9. Michael Hust
  10. Edward H Egelman
  11. Dorothy Beckett
  12. Patrick L Wintrode
  13. Eric J Sundberg
(2016)
Bacterial flagellar capping proteins adopt diverse oligomeric states
eLife 5:e18857.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Flagella are crucial for bacterial motility and pathogenesis. The flagellar capping protein (FliD) regulates filament assembly by chaperoning and sorting flagellin (FliC) proteins after they traverse the hollow filament and exit the growing flagellum tip. In the absence of FliD, flagella are not formed, resulting in impaired motility and infectivity. Here, we report the 2.2 Å resolution X-ray crystal structure of FliD from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the first high-resolution structure of any FliD protein from any bacterium. Using this evidence in combination with a multitude of biophysical and functional analyses, we find that Pseudomonas FliD exhibits unexpected structural similarity to other flagellar proteins at the domain level, adopts a unique hexameric oligomeric state, and depends on flexible determinants for oligomerization. Considering that the flagellin filaments on which FliD oligomers are affixed vary in protofilament number between bacteria, our results suggest that FliD oligomer stoichiometries vary across bacteria to complement their filament assemblies.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.001

eLife digest

Many bacteria, including several that cause diseases in people, have long whip-like appendages called flagella that extend well beyond their cell walls. Flagella can rotate and propel the bacteria through liquids, such as water or blood, and they are constructed primarily from thousands of copies of a single protein called flagellin. When flagella are built, the flagellin proteins are placed in their proper positions by another protein called FliD, several copies of which form a cap on the end of flagella. Without FliD, bacteria cannot properly assemble flagella and, thus, can no longer swim; this also hinders their ability to cause disease.

Determining the three-dimensional structure of a protein, down to the level of its individual atoms, can provide unique insights into how the protein operates. However, no one had resolved the structure of a FliD protein from any bacterium to this level of detail before.

Now, Postel et al. report the high-resolution structure of a large fragment of FliD from the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The structure reveals that parts of this FliD protein are shaped like parts of other proteins from which flagella are constructed, including the flagellin protein that FliD places into position. Some parts of the FliD protein are also very flexible and these parts of the protein are responsible for holding numerous FliD proteins together as a cap. Finally, Postel et al. saw that six copies of FliD bind to one another to form a protein complex on the end of flagella. This last finding was particularly unexpected since it was thought that all FliD proteins formed five-membered cap complexes, an assumption that was based largely on studies of FliD from another bacterium called Salmonella.

The current structure covers about half of the FliD protein, and so the next challenge is to determine the structure of the full-length protein. An improved understanding of the structure of FliD may, in future, help researchers to design drugs that stop bacteria from building flagella and, therefore, from swimming and causing disease.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.002

Introduction

Pathogenic bacteria cause a multitude of deadly human diseases. Many of these microbes possess flagella, molecular machines responsible for cell motility, adherence to host cells, and pathogenicity (Duan et al., 2013; Haiko and Westerlund-Wikstrom, 2013). Flagella are helix-shaped hollow attachments formed predominantly by thousands of copies of the protein flagellin (also called FliC), anchored in the bacterial membrane by a hook (or joint) that is attached to the basal body and that is composed of rotary motor proteins (Arora et al., 1998). A proton motive force typically drives the propeller motion of flagella (Berg, 2003), resulting in swimming motility. A FliD (also called HAP2) oligomer forms the cap protein complex that is located at the tip of the flagellar filament (Yonekura et al., 2000). This complex controls the distal growth of the filament by regulating the assembly of FliC molecules, which are transported through the hollow filament from the cytoplasm to the tip of the flagellum.

The dynamic movement of FliD in this assembly was modeled based on low (~26 Å)-resolution cryo-electron microscopic (EM) structures of the Salmonella serovar Typhimurium flagellum-cap complex (Maki-Yonekura et al., 2003; Yonekura et al., 2000, 2003), which adopts the shape of a five-legged stool with flexible leg domains that regulate the assembly of new FliC molecules onto the tip of the growing flagellum (Maki-Yonekura et al., 2003). It has been suggested that the plate of the stool is formed by core regions of the FliD molecule, and that disordered/flexible regions form the five leg structures (Vonderviszt et al., 1998) that are known to interact with the FliC filament. FliD exhibits low sequence similarity to the flagellar hook proteins and to FliC. Nevertheless, it shares the disordered terminal regions of these flagellar proteins, a common structural characteristic that is thought to control the polymerization of flagellar proteins and to play an important role in interaction with the FliC filament (Vonderviszt et al., 1998). These regions are the most conserved in FliD sequences across bacteria. Flagellum-mediated motility is crucial for the virulence and pathogenicity of numerous bacteria, including Campylobacter jejuni (Black et al., 1988), Salmonella (Allen-Vercoe and Woodward, 1999; Marchetti et al., 2004), Escherichia coli (La Ragione et al., 2000), Vibrio cholera (Krukonis and DiRita, 2003), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Arora et al., 2005), as well as the major causative agent of gastric cancer Helicobacter pylori (Kim et al., 1999). To date, however, no high-resolution structure of any FliD protein exists. To better define the roles of FliD in bacterial motility and pathogenesis, we determined the first X-ray crystal structure of FliD at 2.2 Å resolution, and assessed the structural contributions of its flexible regions using a multitude of complementary biophysical and functional analyses.

Results

Crystal structure of the FliD protein from P. aeruginosa PAO1

To facilitate crystallization of FliD from the P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain, we deleted the predicted coiled-coil domains on both the N- and C-termini of full length FliD, which has 474 residues (FliD1–474), to generate the truncated FliD78-405 (Figure 1a, Figure 1—source data 1). We expressed FliD78–405 in E. coli with an N-terminal His6-tag and purified it to homogeneity by Ni2+-NTA, size exclusion and anion exchange chromatography. We improved initially weakly diffracting crystals of FliD78–405 by random matrix microseed screening (Bergfors, 2003), yielding crystals that diffracted to 2.2 Å resolution. In the absence of any homologous protein that could be used as a model for molecular replacement, we crystallized a seleno-methionine derivative of FliD78–405 that included four leucine-to-methionine mutations (FliD78–405/L4–M4). This crystal provided phase information sufficient to build an initial model, which we used subsequently for molecular replacement with the native FliD78–405 dataset (Figure 1—source data 1). We modeled residues 80–273 into clear electron density, including all side chains, but observed density of increasingly poor quality in the C-terminus beyond residue 273 (Figure 1—figure supplement 2a). Thus, we were able to model with confidence only a single α helix in this region, corresponding to residues 274–308, with incomplete side chain structures. To determine whether the remaining region of the protein actually existed in the crystals and not just in the protein preparation used for crystallization, we analyzed crystals using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and SDS-PAGE. Both analyses indicated that the crystals consisted of an approximate 50:50 mixture of the FliD78–405 protein used for crystallization and a further proteolyzed version with a molecular weight of about 27 kDa. The N-terminal His6-tag is still detectable by Western blot (Figure 1—figure supplement 2b). Thus, the proteolyzed form corresponds approximately to residues 78–319 of FliD. The 86 residues absent from the C-terminus in a population of FliD proteins are clearly not required for crystal packing, suggesting that they are highly flexible even in a crystalline environment.

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Crystal structure of Pseudomonas FliD reveals structural similarity to other flagellar proteins.

(a) Schematic representation of the FliD proteins used in these studies. Protein domain/region boundaries are labeled and are drawn approximately to scale. (b) Crystal structure of the Pseudomonas FliD78–405 monomer subunit with spectrum coloring from the N-terminus (blue) to the C-terminus (red). Head domain 1, head domain 2 and the leg region are indicated. (c) Superposition of the FliD78–405 crystal structure (domain coloring as in panel (a)) and Burkholderia FlgK/HAP1/hook filament capping protein (cyan). (d) Superposition of the FliD78–405 crystal structure (domain coloring as in panel (a)) and Pseudomonas flagellin/FliC (magenta).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.003
Figure 1—source data 1

Crystallographic data collection, phasing and refinement statistics.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.004

FliD is structurally similar on the domain level to FliC and FlgK

Our crystal structure of FliD78–405 reveals that it consists of two discreet regions with distinct conformational properties, corresponding to a stable head region and a flexible and/or disordered leg region (Figure 1b). The head region is itself comprised of two separate, but entwined, protein domains. Residues 80–101 form two β strands that belong to the first domain (Head 1), the second domain (Head 2) is formed in its entirety by the contiguous residues 104–230, and residues 231–273 then complete the first domain. The second domain is, thus, a loop insertion of the first domain. We searched for structural homologs of these domains in the Protein Data Bank and found that the first domain of the head region (Head 1) exhibits high structural similarity (RMSD=2.5 Å), despite low sequence identity (14%), to the FlgK/HAP1/hook filament capping protein of Burkholderia pseudomallei (PDB code 4UT1; Figure 1c). Likewise, the second head region domain (Head 2) exhibits high structural similarity (RMSD=2.7 Å), despite low sequence identity (17%), to the FliC/flagellin protein of P. aeruginosa (PDB code 4NX9; Figure 1d). In contrast to the head region, the leg region of FliD is highly flexible, as indicated by the paucity of electron density corresponding to residues 274–405 (Figure 1—figure supplement 2a). Despite this, we were able to model the initial α helical structural element, corresponding to residues 274–308, of this region. This helix extends from the axis of the head region at a nearly perpendicular angle, resulting in an L-shaped monomer subunit structure (Figure 1b).

FliD from P. aeruginosa PAO1 forms a hexamer

In the crystal, FliD78–405 monomer subunits are arranged in hexamers, resulting in a shape akin to a six-pointed star when viewed from the top of the FliD oligomer (Figure 2a), which corresponds to the distal end of the growing flagellum. This star shape has a minimum inner diameter of 48 Å and a maximal outer diameter of 136 Å. When viewed from the side (Figure 2b), the FliD hexamer appears as a six-legged stool, the legs of which extend 55 Å below the bottom of the head region. Additional crystallographic symmetry results in the stacking of hexamers in alternating head-to-head and leg-to-leg orientations (Figure 2c). The leg-to-leg stacking forms dodecamers, resulting from the helix–helix interaction of the residues 274–302 of stacked molecules and the interaction of residues 303–308 of one FliD78–405 molecule with Head 1 domain of a stacked molecule, burying a surface area of 1362 Å2. The formation of dodecamers may be unique to the FliD78–405 fragment, as this strand could potentially be replaced by additional N-terminal residues in the full-length FliD1–474 protein. All of the morphologies observed for Pseudomonas FliD are highly reminiscent of the pentamer/decamer oligomeric organization of Salmonella FliD as determined by low-resolution cryo-EM analysis (Maki-Yonekura et al., 2003) (Figure 2d). Indeed, despite the difference in the stoichiometries of the Pseudomonas and Salmonella FliD oligomers, the gross measurements are nearly identical for these two proteins of similar molecular weight. In our crystal structure, Pseudomonas FliD measures 136 Å in diameter with a head region that is 30 Å deep and a leg region that is 55 Å long; whereas, in the cryo-EM structure, Salmonella FliD measures 145 Å in diameter with a head region that is 30 Å deep and a leg region that is 55 Å long (Maki-Yonekura et al., 2003).

Figure 2
Download asset Open asset
Pseudomonas FliD forms hexamers in crystals.

(a) Top view, cartoon representation of the FliD78–405 hexamer. Each monomer subunit is colored distinctly and inner diameter dimension is indicated. (b) Side view, cartoon representation of the FliD78–405 hexamer. Each monomer subunit is colored distinctly. Outer dimensions are indicated. (c) FliD78–405 hexamers as arranged in the crystal are stacked head-to-head and leg-to-leg (shown) in an alternating fashion, with residues 303–308 assembling in the Head 1 domain of an opposing molecule (close-up views) leading to a dodecameric crystal packing. (d) Cryo-EM structure of Salmonella FliD from (Maki-Yonekura et al., 2003) for comparison.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.007

The stoichiometry of Pseudomonas FliD differs from that of Salmonella FliD and our Pseudomonas FliD crystals belong to the P6 space group, which could possibly force a non-physiological oligomeric organization of subunits. Thus, we confirmed that the hexameric assembly of FliD78–405 occurs not only in the crystalline environment but also in solution using negative stain EM class averaging (Tang et al., 2007), resulting in an image that clearly exhibits a hexameric assembly (Figure 3a). These data are consistent with the oligomerization state that we detected in the crystal structure, in which a view looking down the α-helices of the leg reveals a six-membered ring organization. We also verified that both FliD78–405 and full-length FliD1–474 form oligomers by both analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) and crosslinking analyses. We found that the FliD78–405 fragment that we crystallized oligomerizes up to a dodecameric state (Figure 3b,c), similar to the crystallographic assembly (Figure 2c). Additionally, we collected small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data of FliD78–405, for which the calculated radial distribution function (Figure 3d) is characteristic of an oligomeric assembly forming a hollow sphere (Svergun and Koch, 2003). These data produce a molecular envelope that superimposes well with our dodecameric FliD78–405 X-ray crystal structure (Figure 3d). Full-length FliD1–474, by contrast, forms up to hexamers in solution (Figure 3e,f), which are likely to represent the physiologically relevant oligomerization state of this protein on the tip of the flagellum. The predominant tetrameric species in solution identified by AUC may be a stable intermediate on the path to hexamer formation (Figure 3e).

Figure 3
Download asset Open asset
Pseudomonas FliD oligomerization.

(a) Negative stain EM image of FliD78–405: left, single particles (scale bar=1000 Å); right, class-averaged particle (scale bar=50 Å). (b) AUC analysis of FliD78–405 proteins at pH 8.0 (upper panel) and pH 5.0 (lowel panel) indicates that it forms dodecamers in solution. (c) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE after chemical crosslinking of FliD78–405. (d) SAXS analysis of FliD78–405. Kratky plot (I*q2 versus q) and radial distribution function calculated by GNOM, and SAXS envelopes calculated by DAMMIF, with superimposed crystal structures are shown for FliD78–405 at 10.7 mg/mL (red, used to calculate envelope), 5.4 mg/mL (blue) and 2.7 mg/mL (grey). (e) AUC analysis of full length FliD1–474 proteins at pH 8.0 (upper panel) and pH 5.0 (lower panel) indicates a mixture of oligomers, including tetramers and hexamers. (f) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE after chemical crosslinking of FliD1–474.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.008

As the hexameric assembly of full-length Pseudomonas FliD1–474 proved to be unstable in solution in the absence of the flagellar filament, we sought to stabilize it using our newfound understanding of its structure. We used our crystal structure of FliD78–405, as input to Disulfide by Design 2.0 (Craig and Dombkowski, 2013), to identify cysteine mutations that would lead to a stable, disulfide-bridged hexameric FliD1–474. We found that when two residues within neighboring head domain subunits, I167 and D253, were each mutated to a cysteine residue (Figure 4a) a stable, hexameric full-length FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) resulted under non-reducing conditions, as shown by SDS-PAGE (Figure 4b) and SAXS (Figure 4c) analyses. We also confirmed that the cysteine bridges resulted in the expected interfaces between head domains by employing mass spectrometry to compare the peptide coverage under reducing and non-reducing conditions (Figure 4—figure supplement 1a) and by successfully detecting the correct cysteine bridges (C167–C253) while ruling out non-specific cysteine bridging (C167–C167 and C253–C253) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1b–e).

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Stable hexameric DM1-FliD1–474 complements P. aeruginosa PAO1 dFliD transposon strain.

(a) Location of residues I167 and D253, which were predicted by the web server Disulfide by Design 2.0 (Craig and Dombkowski, 2013) to form stable disulfide bridges after mutation to cysteines. (b) FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) analyzed under reducing (lane 1) and non-reducing (lane 2) conditions by SDS-PAGE. (c) SAXS analysis of FliD1–474(I167C/D253C). Kratky plot (I*q2 versus q) and radial distribution function calculated by GNOM for 9.75 mg/mL (blue, used to calculate envelope), 4.88 mg/mL (red) and 2.44 mg/mL (grey). SAXS envelope calculated by DAMMIF with superimposed FliD78–405 crystal structure. (d) Swimming motility assay of wildtype PAO1 (WT), FliD transposon strain PW2975 (ΔfliD), ΔfliD complemented with FliD1–474 (ΔfliD/fliD1–474) or FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) (ΔfliD/fliD1–474(I167C/D253C)), respectively. (e) Western blot using anti-FliD scFv-Fc SH1579-B7 showing purified protein FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) under reducing (lane 1) and under non-reducing (lane 2) conditions. The presence of FliD in flagella preparations from wildtype PAO1 (lane 4), ΔfliD (lane 5), ΔfliD/fliD1–474(lane 6) and ΔfliD/fliD1–474(I167C/D253C) (lane 7) was analyzed under non-reducing conditions. The molecular weight standard is shown in lane 3 and the corresponding molecular weights are indicated on the right side of the blot. The 50 kDa and the 300 kDa bands representing FliD1–474 or hexameric FliD1–474(I167C/D253C), respectively, are indicated by red arrows.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.009

To show that the hexameric form of Pseudomonas FliD is functional in vivo, we complemented the fliD transposon strain PW2975 (ΔfliD) with wildtype fliD1–474 and hexamer-stabilized fliD1–474(I167C/D253C), resulting in Pseudomonas PAO1 strains ΔfliD/fliD1–474 and ΔfliD/fliD1–474(I167C/D253C), respectively. We found that swimming motility that was lost in the ΔfliD strain was restored in both ΔfliD/fliD1–474 and ΔfliD/fliD1–474(I167C/D253C) complementation strains, similar to our observations in the wildtype Pseudomonas PAO1 strain (Figure 4d). Using antibodies that we generated by phage display to Pseudomonas PAO1 FliD, we confirmed the expression of full-length FliD proteins by Western blot analysis from preparations of flagella isolated from live bacteria from both ΔfliD/fliD1–474 and ΔfliD/fliD1–474(I167C/D253C) complementation strains (Figure 4e). In flagella preparations from the ΔfliD/fliD1–474(I167C/D253C) complementation strain, the FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) protein produced by Pseudomonas maintains its hexameric oligomeric state (Figure 4e). In contrast, subsequent to flagella isolation from live bacteria, FliD1–474 does not maintain a stable hexameric complex in either the wildtype Pseudomonas PAO1 strain or in the ΔfliD/fliD1–474 complementation strain (Figure 4e). The ΔfliD transposon strain does not form flagella, as indicated by the lack of FliC in the analyzed flagella preparations (lane 5 on the stained Western blot membrane, Figure 4—figure supplement 2). In comparison, the wildtype and all complementation strains form flagella as indicated by the presence of flagellin/FliC in the purified flagella samples (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). Together, these data indicate that FliD that is covalently locked in its hexameric assembly can form functional flagella that allow Pseudomonas bacteria to swim like Pseudomonas with wildtype FliD. Thus, the hexamer oligomeric state of Pseudomonas FliD is functional in vivo.

We also tested whether Salmonella FliD, which is known to form pentamers when capping the flagellar filament, could function as a capping protein for Pseudomonas flagella. In contrast to the in vivo functional hexameric forms of P. aeruginosa FliD–474, complementation of the PAO1 PW2975 transposon strain with fliD from Salmonella typhimurium (ΔfliD/fliDStyFliDe) did not restore swimming motility (Figure 4—figure supplement 3). As this clone was codon-optimized for expression in Escherichia coli, we also confirmed that a wildtype PAO1 full-length FliD1–474 encoded by a similarly codon-optimized gene did restore swimming motility in the ΔfliD strain (ΔfliD/fliDPAOfliDe; Figure 4—figure supplement 3). Although there exist many possible reasons other than oligomeric state that could explain the inability of Salmonella FliD to functionally complement Pseudomonas, these data suggest that Pseudomonas flagella may prefer FliD proteins that adopt hexameric rather than pentameric states.

Regions outside of the head domains drive FliD oligomerization

Although the FliD78–405 crystal structure exhibits intermolecular contacts between the head regions of FliD78–405 subunits comprising the hexamer, each of these interfaces is small, with a buried surface area of only 665 Å2, and contains few intermolecular contacts (Figure 5a) relative to typical protein–protein interactions (Jones and Thornton, 1996). To determine whether these interactions were sufficient to drive oligomerization of FliD, we expressed and purified the head region only, FliD78–273. By AUC (Figure 5b), chemical crosslinking (Figure 5c) and SAXS analysis (Figure 5d), we observed that when FliD lacks the leg region and the N- and C-terminal coiled-coil domains, it is present predominantly in the form of monomers (and dimers to a lesser extent) in solution, but fails to form higher-order oligomers as do the longer versions of FliD that we analyzed. Because different buffer conditions, including changes in pH, have been shown to affect the polymerization states of flagellar filaments (Shibata et al., 2005) and capping proteins (Imada et al., 1998), we performed additional AUC experiments and found that FliD78–273 is entirely monomeric at pH 8.0 and becomes approximately one-third dimeric at pH 5.0; we observed no higher-order oligomers of FliD78–273 regardless of buffer conditions (Figure 5b). We also assessed, by chemical cross-linking, the oligomerization states of FliD variants lacking only the N-terminal coiled-coil domain (FliD78–474; Figure 5e) or the C-terminal coiled-coil domain (FliD1–405; Figure 5f). We found them to be mainly monomeric with a minority of species appearing to dimerize, although the latter exhibit weak higher-order oligomerization potential. Kratky plots and radial distribution functions calculated from SAXS data of the variants lacking either the N- or C-terminal coiled-coil domain, FliD78–474 or FliD1–405 respectively, reveal that these proteins adopt extended shapes with flexible regions that are clearly represented in the resulting molecular envelopes (Figure 6a,b). These data indicate that the driving force for hexamerization of Pseudomonas FliD resides in molecular determinants outside of the head region and, at a minimum, involves residues in the N-terminal and C-terminal coiled-coil domains. FliD78–405 is lacking the C-terminal and N-terminal coiled-coil domain but still assembles into dodecamers, as shown in the crystal structure, cross-linking experiments and AUC, which is likely caused by strand replacement in the head region domain 1 and helix–helix (residues 274–308) interaction of stacked molecules (Figure 2c).

Figure 5
Download asset Open asset
Molecular determinants of Pseudomonas FliD oligomerization reside outside of the stable head region.

(a) Intermolecular interface formed between head region monomer subunits, with an 'open book' rendering of the interface expanded below. Head domain 1 is yellow; domain 2 is orange; interface oxygen and nitrogen atoms are red and blue, respectively. (b) AUC analysis of the head region alone, FliD78–273, at pH 8.0 (upper panel) and pH 5.0 (lower panel) reveals a monomeric species at pH 8.0 and the additional minor presence of a dimeric species at pH 5.0. (c) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE after chemical crosslinking of FliD78–273. (d) SAXS analysis of FliD78–273. Kratky plot (I*q2 versus q) and radial distribution function calculated by GNOM and SAXS envelopes calculated by DAMMIF with superimposed crystal structures are shown for FliD7–273 at 1.34 mg/mL (blue), 0.67 mg/mL (red, used to calculate the envelope) and 0.335 mg/mL (green). (e) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE after chemical crosslinking of FliD78–474. (f) Silver-stained SDS-PAGE after chemical crosslinking of FliD1–405.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.013
Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data of FliD1–405, FliD78–474 and FliD1–474.

Log-scale intensity SAXS profiles, Kratky Plot (I × q2 versus q), radial distribution function calculated by GNOM and SAXS envelopes calculated by DAMMIF are shown for: (a) FliD1–405 at 10.4 mg/mL (blue), 5.2 mg/mL (red) and 2.6 mg/mL (grey); (b) FliD78–474 at 9.9 mg/mL (blue), 4.95 mg/mL (red) and 2.5 mg/mL (grey); and (c) FliD1–474 at 11 mg/mL (blue), 5.5 mg/mL (red), 2.7 mg/mL (grey), 1.38 mg/mL (green) and 0.69 mg/mL (yellow).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.014

The N- and C-terminal regions of FliD are highly flexible

A large extent of FliD sequence currently remains inaccessible to high-resolution structural analysis, including Pseudomonas FliD residues 1–79 and 309–474. Consequently, we performed hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange-mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) experiments with FliD78–405 to define its solvent accessible regions and to evaluate its dynamic behavior. We subjected FliD78–405 to H/D exchange for 10 s to 2 hr and observed that the head region (residues 80–273) of FliD78–405 adopts a largely stable exchange-protected fold with greater stability observed for domain 2 relative to that of domain 1. The leg region, particularly residues C-terminal to the α helix observed in the crystal structure, is more disordered or less stable (Figure 7a). Residues linking head domain 1 to the leg helix display cooperative unfolding behavior as indicated by EX1 kinetics (Weis et al., 2006) that result in double isotopic envelopes (Figure 7b). The FliD78–405 protein used in these experiments was folded properly as shown by circular dichroism, as were all other FliD protein fragments that we produced (Figure 7—figure supplement 1). When mapped to our crystal structure of FliD78–405, the degree of H/D exchange over time on the peptide level corresponds to the degree of conformational stability on the residue level (Figure 7c). When we used a difference plot to compare the extent of H/D exchange of full length FliD1–474 with that of FliD78–405, we observed that residues 165–225 exhibit relatively greater stability in FliD78–405 (Figure 8a). Within this stretch of residues in head domain 2 are those residues, 165–171, which form the interface between the two head region domains in the hexameric complex (Figure 8b). We observed an additional region of relative stabilization for residues 298–324, part of which, residues 300–308, correspond to the β strand replacement in the opposing head region domain 1 that drives dodecamer formation of FliD78–405 (Figure 8a). Kratky plots calculated from SAXS data of full-length FliD1–474 at pH 11, which is monomeric under these conditions (Figure 6—figure supplement 1), confirms the overall flexible nature of this protein. Accordingly, heterogeneous molecular envelopes calculated from SAXS data collected at different concentrations of FliD1–474 also exhibit significant conformational flexibility (Figure 6c).

Figure 7 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Regions of Pseudomonas FliD outside of the head domains and initial leg helix are highly dynamic.

(a) Hydrogen/deuterium exchange analysis of FliD78–405. Percent deuteration (%D) heat map is shown. Peptides exhibiting EX1 kinetics are indicated. (b) Mass spectra of four FliD peptides exhibit double isotopic envelopes characteristic of EX1 kinetics (below). Three of these peptides are mapped to the crystal structure (above; FliD hexamers are in green and gold). (c) Conformational stability as determined by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mapped to the crystal structure of FliD78–405 using the same color coding for %D as shown in (a).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.016
Figure 8 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Interaction of Pseudomonas FliD regions.

(a) Difference plot of hydrogen/deuterium exchange data from full length FliD1–474 and the crystallized fragment, FliD78–405. (b) Hydrogen/deuterium exchange for peptides corresponding to residues 166–176 (top, marked by + in (a) and (b)) and residues 225–239 (bottom, marked by * in (a) and (b)). Positions of peptides 166–176 and 225–239 in the FliD78–405 crystal structure (right). (c) Difference plots of hydrogen/deuterium exchange data from full length FliD1–474 and the fragments missing only the C-terminal coiled coil, FliD1–405, only the N-terminal coiled coil, FliD78–474, or both the N- and C-terminal coiled coils and the leg domain, FliD78–273 (top, middle and bottom, respectively). (d) Schematic model of the FliD monomeric subunit showing the N-terminal coiled coil stabilizing the head 1 and foot domains and also interacting with the C-terminal coiled coil.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857.018

Multiple regions of FliD interact with one another

To gain further insight to the dynamics and interactions of the different regions of FliD, we performed HDX-MS experiments with the remaining Pseudomonas FliD fragments that we had generated (Figure 1a, Figure 1—figure supplement 1). HDX-MS heat maps show the overall high degree of flexibility of FliD regions outside the head domain (Figure 8—figure supplement 1), and difference plots of FliD truncations in comparison to the full length FliD1–474 indicate that the head region, and more specifically head region domain 1, is stabilized by FliD regions outside of the head region (Figure 8c). Indeed, the N-terminal coiled coil is responsible for this stabilization of head region domain 1, in addition to stabilization of residues between the leg region α helix and the C-terminal coiled coil (Figure 8c). Finally, the C-terminal coiled coil predominantly stabilizes residues in the N-terminal coiled coil (Figure 8c). The stabilization of one FliD region by another is most likely to be direct and intramolecular, rather than allosteric and intermolecular, as the full-length protein FliD1–474 adopts predominantly monomeric species under the conditions that we used for HDX-MS analysis (Figure 8—figure supplement 2). This leads to a transient structural model of the entire FliD monomer subunit (Figure 8d) in which the N-terminal coiled coil bridges the head and foot regions and is itself pinned to these structural elements by the C-terminal coiled coil. Notably, none of the flexible regions of FliD, save the C-terminal 20 residues, are consistently predicted by sequence analysis to be intrinsically disordered (Figure 8—figure supplement 3); rather, they are inherently capable of adopting a limited number of conformations required to be in an 'on-state' (actively chaperoning and sorting a FliC protein) or an 'off-state' (engaging only structured and previously positioned FliC proteins).

Discussion

At the gross structural level, our studies show that the oligomeric states differ between FliD protein assemblies in diverse bacteria. Salmonella has long served as the model for bacterial flagellum structure and function. Since Salmonella FliD performs its native flagellar capping function as a pentamer (Imada et al., 1998; Maki et al., 1998; Vonderviszt et al., 1998; Yonekura et al., 2000), it could reasonably be assumed that all FliD proteins form pentamers at the distal ends of all bacterial flagella. We found that Pseudomonas FliD instead forms hexamers both in crystals and in solution. Additionally, we showed that Pseudomonas FliD constrained to its hexameric state by inter-subunit disulfide bonds is functional in vivo, resulting in the formation of flagella and swimming motility. Conversely, Salmonella FliD that assembles as pentamers does not allow flagellar formation and swimming motility in Pseudomonas bacteria.

Much like cryo-EM studies of flagellar filaments from diverse bacteria unequivocally showed that the number of protofilaments ranges, at least, from 11 in Salmonella (Yonekura et al., 2003) to seven in Campylobacter (Galkin et al., 2008), our structural analyses show that the proteins that cap these filaments also vary in their oligomeric states. The end of the Salmonella filament exhibits a non-planar surface with five indentations (Yonekura et al., 2000) into which the five legs of the corresponding FliD pentamer have been modeled (Maki-Yonekura et al., 2003). Although no structure of the Pseudomonas filament has been determined even at low resolution, our hexameric FliD structure suggests that it may incorporate an even greater number of protofilaments than does the Salmonella filament. This would allow the formation of an additional molecular cavity on the distal end of FliD that accommodates its unique capping protein hexamer. Indeed, Pseudomonas flagellar filaments have been found to be macroscopically different from those of Salmonella (Shibata et al., 2005).

At 2.2 Å resolution, our crystal structure reveals several previously unknown structural features of FliD that are likely to be critical to its function. First, each one of the six FliD head regions that appear as discreet lobes when visualized by EM analysis is actually composed of the first and second domains of neighboring monomer subunits, as opposed to both domains belonging to the same subunit. This is likely the case for FliD oligomers from diverse bacteria, including Salmonella FliD for which cryo-EM analyses showed five head region lobes (Maki-Yonekura et al., 2003; Yonekura et al., 2000, 2003). Second, despite vanishingly low sequence similarity, each domain within the head region exhibits high structural similarity to the corresponding domains of other flagellar proteins, including the hook-filament junction protein/FlgK and flagellin/FliC. Thus, at least one protein domain from the proteins that occupy the distal ends of the hook (FlgK) and the cap (FliD) adopts a common structural fold, which may be required for and unique to their function at these related positions within the flagellum. This domain conservation among flagellar proteins confirms a previous study proposing a structural relationship of FliD to other flagellar proteins despite their low sequence similarities (Vonderviszt et al., 1998). This structural conservation suggests that a structurally similar cap complex may form at both hook and on the distal end. It also suggests that FliD may play a functional role earlier in the flagellar assembly process, prior to its known FliC sorting function. Notably, in mutants of Salmonella that lack filaments, FlgK (HAP1), FliD (HAP2) and FlgL (HAP3) form a layered structure at the distal end of the hook-basal body (Homma and Iino, 1985). In addition, the shared domain structure of portions of FliC and FliD suggests that the chaperoning activity of FliD could derive, at least in part, from its presentation of a like-structured template against which FliC subunits may fold prior to being positioned into the growing filament.

Owing to the conformational flexibility of FliD necessitated by its FliC sorting function, we still lack high-resolution structural information for certain regions of this protein. However, using a number of biophysical methods, we found that molecular determinants outside of the conformationally stable head regions control FliD oligomerization. Previous analysis of a trypsinized fragment of Salmonella FliD that lacks the N-terminal 42 residues and C-terminal 51 residues, which is similar to the Pseudomonas FliD78–405 protein that we crystallized, showed that this fragment can form pentamers but not decamers in solution and dissociates into smaller oligomers at low temperatures (Vonderviszt et al., 1998). This suggests that determinants outside of the head regions of FliD proteins of diverse bacteria control their oligomeric states. Accordingly, we showed that FliD, when constrained to its hexameric state by disulfide bonds formed between neighboring head domain subunits, is fully functional in vivo. Thus,conformational flexibility in or relative repositioning of the head regions are not functional requirements of FliD but flexibility in regions outside of the head regions undoubtedly is. Considering that inhibiting protein–protein interfaces with small molecules remains a major technical challenge (Arkin et al., 2014), the dependence of FliD oligomeric assembly on its flexible regions enhances the prospects of developing small molecule inhibitors of FliD oligomerization, and consequently of flagellar function, as a novel class of antibiotic agents.

Materials and methods

Plasmids

For crystallization, the coding sequence optimized for expression in E. coli of FliD78–405 from the PAO1 strain of P. aeruginosa was synthesized and cloned into the pET-28b vector (Novagen) with the inclusion of an N-terminal His6-tag followed by a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease recognition site. A FliD78–405 mutant encoding four leucine to methionine mutations at positions L135, L239, L347 and L350 (FliD78–405/L4-M4) was synthesized and likewise cloned into the pET-28b vector with an N-terminal His6-tag. For all other experiments, FliD78–405, full-length FliD (FliD1–474), head domain-only FliD (FliD78–273), and FliD lacking the N-terminal (FliD78–474) or C-terminal (FliD1–405) coiled-coil domains were codon-optimized for expression in E. coli and cloned into pGEX5x2 in frame with an N-terminal GST-tag followed by a TEV protease site. To obtain a stable hexameric full-length FliD mutant (FliD1–474(I167C/D253C)), two residues (I167 and D253) located at the interface between neighboring head domains were mutated to cysteine residues in wildtype FliD1–474.

Recombinant protein expression and purification

Request a detailed protocol

All FliD constructs from the P. aeruginosa PAO1 strain were expressed in LB medium for 4 hr at 37°C in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS cells after induction with 1 mM IPTG at an OD600nm of 0.6. Seleno-methionine (SeMet)-labeled FliD78–405/L4-M4 was produced using metabolic inhibition of methionine biosynthesis (Van Duyne et al., 1993) and growth in M9 medium containing 60 mg/L SeMet as the sole source of methionine for 6 hr after induction with 1 mM IPTG. Cells were harvested (5000 g for 15 min) and lysed in PBS including 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol by sonication. For crystallization of His-tagged FliD78–405 and His-tagged FliD78–405/L4-M4,the soluble fraction was purified using HisPur NiNTA Resin (Thermo Scientific). The protein was further purified by size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 10/300 GL, GE Healthcare) in PBS followed by anion exchange chromatography (MonoQ 5/50 GL, GE Healthcare). For crystallization the protein was dialyzed into 30 mM Tris pH 8.0, 80 mM sodium chloride and concentrated to approximately 13 mg/mL. FliD-GST-fusion constructs were purified using a Glutathione Sepharose (BioVision) column. Following 16 hr digestion with TEV protease, the GST tag was removed by Glutathione Sepharose and TEV was removed by NiNTA (Thermo Scientific) chromatography. Cleaved FliD constructs were further purified using size exclusion (Superdex 200 10/300 GL, GE Healthcare) in PBS followed by anion exchange chromatography (MonoQ 5/50 GL, GE Healthcare) using 20 mM CHES pH 9.0 and a linear salt gradient from 0 to 1 M NaCl over 12 min.

Protein crystallization

Request a detailed protocol

Crystals of FliD78–405 obtained in 0.25 M L-Arginine, 0.1 M Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 8% PGA diffracted poorly and were subsequently used for random microseeding matrix screening (rMMS) (D'Arcy et al., 2007). Improved crystals of FliD78–405 were grown in 0.8 M NaK Tartrate, 0.1 M Hepes pH 7.5 and diffracted to 2.2 Å. Crystals of SeMet-labeled FliD78–405/L4-M4 were also obtained by employing rMMS with the initial, poorly diffracting crystals of FliD78–405, which resulted in FliD78–405/L4-M4 crystals grown in 1.5 M ammonium sulfate, 0.1 M Tris pH 8.5, 10% glycerol diffracting to 3.6 Å (anomalous signal cuttoff). Crystals were harvested and flash cooled in liquid nitrogen in mother liquor supplemented with 25% to 30% glycerol as cryo-protectant.

X-ray diffraction data processing, structure determination and refinement

Request a detailed protocol

X-ray diffraction data for the SeMet-labeled FliD78–405/L4-M4 crystal were collected using a Dectris 6M PILATUS detector on the 12–2 beamline at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SSRL, processed using XDS (Kabsch, 2010b), scaled in AIMLESS (Evans and Murshudov, 2013; Winn et al., 2011), and phases obtained using the SSRL multi-wavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) script by A. Gonzalez with SHELX options based on a script by Qingping Xu, including the programs SHELX (Schneider and Sheldrick, 2002), SOLVE (Terwilliger and Berendzen, 1999) and RESOLV (Terwilliger, 2000). The initial FliD78–405/L4-M4 model was improved manually by rebuilding the peptide chain backbone in Coot (Emsley and Cowtan, 2004) and refining using Phenix (Adams et al., 2010). Diffraction data for native, wildtype FliD78–405 were collected using a MARmosaic 300 CCD detector on the 23ID-B beamline at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, APS, and processed using XDS (Kabsch, 2010b) and XSCALE (Kabsch, 2010a). The partially built and refined SeMet-FliD78–405/L4-M4 model was used as a molecular replacement model for phasing the native FliD78–405 data using Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007). The initial native FliD78–405 model was build using Autobuild and improved by manual model rebuilding in Coot (Emsley and Cowtan, 2004) and by iterative rounds of refinement using Phenix (Adams et al., 2010).

Mass spectrometry

Request a detailed protocol

FliD78–405 crystals were crosslinked using 2% formaldehyde, harvested and washed in mother liquor, dissolved in water and the crosslinking reversed by heating the samples to 95°C for 20 min. The samples were analyzed by liquid chromatography (LC)-electrospray ionization (ESI)-mass spectrometry (MS) using a gradient of mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) increasing from 0% B to 90% B in 20 min. The Accela LC System was attached to a LXQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Raw MS data were analyzed using Xcalibus Qual Browser (Thermo Scientific) and deconvoluted using BioWorks (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).

Circular dichroism

Request a detailed protocol

10 μM FliD protein in 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0 was used to record a spectrum ranging from 190 nm to 260 nm at 15°C. CD melting curves were analyzed at 222 nm or 205 nm by increasing the temperature by 1°C per minute starting at 15°C using a JASCO J810 CD instrument according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Electron microscopy

Request a detailed protocol

An aliquot of a FliD78–405 protein sample was negatively stained with 2% (weight/volume) uranyl acetate and imaged using a Tecnai F20 (FEI) electron microscope operating at 120 keV. Approximately 3500 particles were selected from 70 micrographs and used to generate class averages in EMAN2 (Tang et al., 2007). Six classes were generated, and Figure 3a shows the single largest class.

Small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

Request a detailed protocol

Small angel x-ray scattering data were collected using a dual Pilatus 100K-S SAXS/WAXS detector at beamline G-1 of the Macromolecular Diffraction Facility at the Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (MacCHESS). Scattering was measured in 30 mM Tris pH 8.0, 80 mM NaCl of FliD78–405 at 10.7 mg/mL, 5.4 mg/mL and 2.7 mg/mL, of FliD78–273 at 1.34 mg/mL, 0.67 mg/mL and 0.335 mg/mL, of FliD1–405 at 10.4 mg/mL, 5.2 mg/mL and 2.6 mg/mL, of FliD78–474 at 9.9 mg/mL, 4.95 mg/mL and 2.6 mg/mL and of FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) at 9.75 mg/ml, 4.88 mg/ml and 2.44 mg/ml. Scattering of monomeric full-length FliD1–474 at 11 mg/mL, 5.5 mg/mL, 2.75 mg/mL, 1.38 mg/mL and 0.69 mg/mL was measured in 20 mM CAPS pH 11.0, 80 mM NaCl. The SAXS data were processed using the BioXTAS RAW software (Nielsen et al., 2009) and radial distribution functions calculated using GNOM (Svergun, 1992). Molecular envelopes were generated using GASBOR (Svergun et al., 2001) and DAMMIF (Lammie et al., 2007). FoXS (Schneidman-Duhovny et al., 2010) was used to verify the calculated intensity plots of the structures of the head domain FliD78–273 and the dodecameric FliD78–405. The X-ray crystal structures of FliD78–273 and FliD78–405 were superimposed onto the envelopes.

Hydrogen/deuterium exchange-mass spectrometry

Request a detailed protocol

The coverage maps for FliD1–474 and FliD78–405 were obtained from undeuterated controls as follows: 3.5 µL of ~40 µM FliD in 30 mM TrisHCl, 150 mM NaCl pH 8.0 was diluted with 31.5 µL of the same buffer at room temperature followed by the addition of 100 µL of ice cold quench (100 mM Phosphate buffer, 1.5 M Guanidine-HCl, pH 2.4). The quenched samples were injected into a Waters HDX nanoAcquity UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA) with in-line pepsin digestion (Waters Enzymate BEH pepsin column). Peptic fragments were trapped on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 peptide trap and separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column. A 7 min, 5% to 35% acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid) gradient was used to elute peptides directly into a Waters Synapt G2 mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA). MSE data were acquired with a 20 to 30 V ramp trap CE for high energy acquisition of product ions as well as continuous lock mass (Leu-Enk) for mass accuracy correction. Peptides were identified using the ProteinLynx Global Server 2.5.1 (PLGS) from Waters. Further filtering of 0.3 fragments per residues was applied in DynamX.

For each construct, the HD exchange reactions were performed as follows: 3.5 µL of ~40 µM FliD in 30 mM TrisHCl, 150 mM NaCl pH 8.0 was incubated in 31.5 µL of 30 mM TrisDCl, 99.99% D2O, pD 8.0, 150 mM NaCl. All reactions were performed at 25°C. Prior to injection, deuteration reactions were quenched at various times (10 s, 1 min, 10 min, 1 hr and 2 hr) with 100 µL of 100 mM Phosphate buffer, 1.5 Guanidine-HCl, pH 2.4. Back exchange correction was performed against fully deuterated controls acquired by incubating 3.5 µL of 40 µM FliD1–474 in 31.5 µL 30 mM TrisDCl, 99.99% D2O, pD 8.0, 150 mM NaCl containing 6 M deuterated Guanidine DCl for 2 hr at 25°C prior to quenching (without guanidine HCl). All deuteration time points and controls were acquired in triplicates.

The deuterium uptake by the identified peptides through increasing deuteration time and for the fully deuterated control was determined using Water’s DynamX 2.0 software. The normalized percentage of deuterium uptake (%D) at an incubation time t for a given peptide was calculated as follows:

%D=100⋅(mt−m0)mf−m0

With mt the centroid mass at incubation time t,m0 the centroid mass of the undeuterated control, and mf the centroid mass of the fully deuterated control. Heat maps and percent deuteration difference plots (Δ%D) were generated using the percent deuteration calculated. Confidence intervals for the Δ%D plots were determined using the method outlined by Houde et al. (2011), adjusted to percent deuteration using the fully deuterated controls. Confidence intervals (98%) were plotted on the Δ%D plots as horizontal dashed lines. EX1 type cooperative unfolding was analyzed using HX-Express2 (Guttman et al., 2013).

Determination of peptide coverage of FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) under reducing and non-reducing conditions

Request a detailed protocol

Coverage maps of FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) in the presence and absence of reducing agent were obtained similarly as above except for the following: 3 μL of 66 μM FliD1–474(I167C/D253C) were incubated for 2 hr with 15 μL of 8 M Guanidine-HCl and 2 μL of 1 M TCEP (reducing conditions) or 2 μL H2O (non-reducing conditions). Subsequently, 180 μL of quench buffer (100 mM potassium buffer, pH 2.4) was added and the mixture immediately injected into the Waters HDX nanoAcquity UPLC. The remainder of the workflow, MS method, peptide identification and coverage map determination was unchanged. In addition, Biopharmalynx 1.3.5 (Waters) was used to search for and to identify disulfide-bridged peptides. A filter of 15% b/y ions identified was applied. The search was performed both in the context of the expected C167–C253 disulfide bridge and forthe C167–C167 and C253–C253 disulfide bridges as negative controls.

Analytical ultracentrifugation

Request a detailed protocol

The oligomeric states of FliD78–405, FliD78–273 and FliD1–474 in buffers containing 30 mM Tris, 80 mM NaCl, pH 8.0 or 20 mM sodium citrate, 80 mM NaCl, pH 5.0 respectively, were analyzed by sedimentation velocity using a Beckman-Coulter XL-I analytical ultracentrifuge equipped with a 4- or 8-hole An-60Ti Rotor at 20°C. SedenTerp (http://sednterp.unh.edu) was used to calculate protein partial specific volumes and solvent densities and viscosities from the protein amino acid sequences and buffer compositions. For sedimentation velocity measurements, samples of 295 μM (pH 8.0) or 325 μM (pH 5.0) FliD78–405, 124 μM FliD78–273, and 168 μM FliD1–474 were prepared in each buffer. FliD1–474 was also analyzed by AUC at a low concentration of 4 μM in 30 mM Tris, 80 mM NaCl, pH 8.0 and at a concentration of 43 μM at high pH in 20 mM CAPS, 80 mM NaCl, pH 11.0. After exhaustive dialysis to ensure chemical equilibrium, the samples were loaded into cells equipped with 2-hole charcoal-filled epon centerpieces (either 1.2 or 0.3 mm path length) with sapphire windows. Prior to centrifugation, samples were equilibrated in the rotor for at least 2 hr at the desired experimental temperature. Centrifugation was performed at 50,000 (FliD78–273), 40,000 (FliD1–474) or 30,000 (FliD78–273) rpm and scans were acquired at 280 nm. The resulting data were analyzed using DCDT+ version 2.2.1 (Philo, 2006; Stafford, 1997, 1992) to determine the number of species, their sedimentation coefficients, and their fractional contributions to the species populations. All sedimentation coefficients were corrected to s20,w values.

Chemical crosslinking

Request a detailed protocol

Approximately 0.4 mg/mL of protein in 20 mM Hepes pH 8.0, 10 mM sodium chloride was crosslinked using 20 mM 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) and 20 mM N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) in 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl for various time points. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.5 M Tris-HCl pH 8.0 to a final concentration of 0.25 M. The products were analyzed on NuPAGE 3–8% Tris-Acetate gels (Life Technologies, Carlsabd, CA) or an Any kD Mini-PROTEAN TGX gels (BioRad) using a silver-staining kit (Thermo Scientific).

Complementation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1

Request a detailed protocol

Wildtype fliD1474 and fliD1474(I167C/D253C) were cloned into pUCP20 and transformed by electroporation (Cadoret et al., 2014) into the ΔfliD transposon strain PW2975 (obtained from the Manoil Lab at the University of Washington), resulting in the strains ΔfliD/fliD1–474 and ΔfliD/fliD1–474(I167C/D253C), respectively. Wildtype fliD1–474 (fliD1–474e) and full-length fliD from Salmonella typhimurium (fliDStyFliDe) both with genes codon-optimized for E. coli expression were also transformed into PW2975 resulting in ΔfliD/fliD1–474e and ΔfliD/fliDStyFliDe, respectively.

Swimming motility assays

Request a detailed protocol

Swimming motility assays of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were performed as described by Ha et al. (2014).

Isolation of flagella and FliD detection

Request a detailed protocol

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 was grown overnight in LB liquid culture, cells were spun down and resuspended in PBS. Flagella were sheared off the cells by passing the suspension through a 23 gauge needle approximately 25 times. After centrifugation, the supernatant containing flagella was concentrated, proteins separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by Western blot using anti-FliD scFv-Fc SH1579-B7 and an anti-human-IgG-HRP conjugate secondary antibody.

Generation of anti-FliD antibodies

Request a detailed protocol

Human antibodies were generated as described by Frenzel et al. (2014). In brief, recombinant head region only FliD78–273 was immobilized on Costar High Binding plates and incubated with the Hyperphage packaged human antibody gene libraries HAL9/10 (Kügler et al., 2015) for negative selection. The non-binding scFv phages were incubated with recombinant full-length FliD1–474 to select binders specific for the leg region of FliD. In total, three panning rounds were performed and monoclonal antibodies were identified as described by Frenzel et al. (2014). The antibody SH1579-B7 was recloned as an scFv-Fc (Yumab) with a human IgG1 Fc region and produced in mammalian cell culture as described by Jäger et al. (2013).

Intrinsic disorder

Request a detailed protocol

The sequence of the full-length FliD was submitted to twelve publicly available servers implementing different algorithms for protein disorder prediction. In all cases, we used the default parameters. The servers used were as follows: disEMBL (Linding et al., 2003a), GlobProt (Linding et al., 2003b), IUPred (Dosztanyi et al., 2005), RONN (Yang et al., 2005), DisPro (Cheng et al., 2005), PONDR (Romero et al., 2001), Spine-D (Zhang et al., 2012), OnD-CRF (Wang and Sauer, 2008), Foldindex (Prilusky et al., 2005), MFDp (Mizianty et al., 2010), MFDp2 (Mizianty et al., 2010), and MD2 (Kozlowski and Bujnicki, 2012). Averaging of the results gave all servers equal weight.

Accession code

Request a detailed protocol

Coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 5FHY.

Data availability

The following data sets were generated

References

    1. Arora SK
    2. Ritchings BW
    3. Almira EC
    4. Lory S
    5. Ramphal R
    (1998)
    The Pseudomonas aeruginosa flagellar cap protein, FliD, is responsible for mucin adhesion
    Infection and Immunity 66:1000–1007.
    1. Emsley P
    2. Cowtan K
    (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics
    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 60:2126–2132.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444904019158
    1. Evans PR
    2. Murshudov GN
    (2013) How good are my data and what is the resolution?
    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 69:1204–1214.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444913000061
    1. Homma M
    2. Iino T
    (1985)
    Locations of hook-associated proteins in flagellar structures of Salmonella typhimurium
    Journal of Bacteriology 162:183–189.
    1. Kabsch W
    (2010b) Xds
    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 66:125–132.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/s0907444909047337
    1. Kim JS
    2. Chang JH
    3. Chung SI
    4. Yum JS
    (1999)
    Molecular cloning and characterization of the Helicobacter pylori fliD gene, an essential factor in flagellar structure and motility
    Journal of Bacteriology 181:6969–6976.
    1. Schneider TR
    2. Sheldrick GM
    (2002) Substructure solution with SHELXD
    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 58:1772–1779.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444902011678
    1. Terwilliger TC
    2. Berendzen J
    (1999) Automated MAD and MIR structure solution
    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 55:849–861.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444999000839
    1. Terwilliger TC
    (2000) Maximum-likelihood density modification
    Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 56:965–972.
    https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444900005072

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sandra Postel

    Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    SP, Designed the project, Performed experiments, Analysis of data, Writing the manuscript, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6717-1870

  2. Daniel Deredge

    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    DD, Performed experiments, Analysis of data, Reviewed the manuscript, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  3. Daniel A Bonsor

    Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    DAB, Analysis of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Xiong Yu

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Contribution
    XY, Performed experiments, Analysis of data, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Kay Diederichs

    Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
    Contribution
    KD, Analysis of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  6. Saskia Helmsing

    Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Contribution
    SH, Performing experiments, Acquisition of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  7. Aviv Vromen

    Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
    Contribution
    AV, Intrinsic disorder prediction, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  8. Assaf Friedler

    Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
    Contribution
    AF, Intrinsic disorder prediction, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  9. Michael Hust

    Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
    Contribution
    MH, Performed experiments, Analysis of data, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  10. Edward H Egelman

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Contribution
    EHE, Performed experiments, Analysis of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    EHE: Reviewing editor, eLife
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4844-5212

  11. Dorothy Beckett

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland College Park, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    DB, Performed experiments, Analysis of data, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  12. Patrick L Wintrode

    Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    PLW, Analysis of data, Analysis and interpretation of data
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  13. Eric J Sundberg

    1. Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    2. Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    3. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Contribution
    EJS, Designed the project, Analysis of data, Writing the manuscript, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article
    For correspondence
    esundberg@ihv.umaryland.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0478-3033

Funding

National Center for Research Resources (NIH S10 RR15899)

  • Dorothy Beckett

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL) beamline 12-2, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, San Francisco, USA, of the Advanced Photon Source (APS) GM/CA CAT beamline 23-ID-B, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, USA and of the beamline G-1 of the Macromolecular Diffraction facility at Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (MacCHESS), Ithaca, USA for their support. This work is supported in part by the University of Maryland Baltimore, School of Pharmacy Mass Spectrometry Center (SOP1841-IQB2014).

Copyright

© 2016, Postel et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,434
    views
  • 536
    downloads
  • 41
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sandra Postel
  2. Daniel Deredge
  3. Daniel A Bonsor
  4. Xiong Yu
  5. Kay Diederichs
  6. Saskia Helmsing
  7. Aviv Vromen
  8. Assaf Friedler
  9. Michael Hust
  10. Edward H Egelman
  11. Dorothy Beckett
  12. Patrick L Wintrode
  13. Eric J Sundberg
(2016)
Bacterial flagellar capping proteins adopt diverse oligomeric states
eLife 5:e18857.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18857

Categories and tags

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Unanticipated mechanisms of covalent inhibitor and synthetic ligand cobinding to PPARγ

    Jinsai Shang, Douglas J Kojetin
    Research Advance

    Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor transcription factor that regulates gene expression programs in response to ligand binding. Endogenous and synthetic ligands, including covalent antagonist inhibitors GW9662 and T0070907, are thought to compete for the orthosteric pocket in the ligand-binding domain (LBD). However, we previously showed that synthetic PPARγ ligands can cooperatively cobind with and reposition a bound endogenous orthosteric ligand to an alternate site, synergistically regulating PPARγ structure and function (Shang et al., 2018). Here, we reveal the structural mechanism of cobinding between a synthetic covalent antagonist inhibitor with other synthetic ligands. Biochemical and NMR data show that covalent inhibitors weaken—but do not prevent—the binding of other ligands via an allosteric mechanism, rather than direct ligand clashing, by shifting the LBD ensemble toward a transcriptionally repressive conformation, which structurally clashes with orthosteric ligand binding. Crystal structures reveal different cobinding mechanisms including alternate site binding to unexpectedly adopting an orthosteric binding mode by altering the covalent inhibitor binding pose. Our findings highlight the significant flexibility of the PPARγ orthosteric pocket, its ability to accommodate multiple ligands, and demonstrate that GW9662 and T0070907 should not be used as chemical tools to inhibit ligand binding to PPARγ.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Isobaric crosslinking mass spectrometry technology for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and complexes

    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Structure of scavenger receptor SCARF1 and its interaction with lipoproteins

    Yuanyuan Wang, Fan Xu ... Yongning He
    Research Article

    SCARF1 (scavenger receptor class F member 1, SREC-1 or SR-F1) is a type I transmembrane protein that recognizes multiple endogenous and exogenous ligands such as modified low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) and is important for maintaining homeostasis and immunity. But the structural information and the mechanisms of ligand recognition of SCARF1 are largely unavailable. Here, we solve the crystal structures of the N-terminal fragments of human SCARF1, which show that SCARF1 forms homodimers and its epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domains adopt a long-curved conformation. Then, we examine the interactions of SCARF1 with lipoproteins and are able to identify a region on SCARF1 for recognizing modified LDLs. The mutagenesis data show that the positively charged residues in the region are crucial for the interaction of SCARF1 with modified LDLs, which is confirmed by making chimeric molecules of SCARF1 and SCARF2. In addition, teichoic acids, a cell wall polymer expressed on the surface of gram-positive bacteria, are able to inhibit the interactions of modified LDLs with SCARF1, suggesting the ligand binding sites of SCARF1 might be shared for some of its scavenging targets. Overall, these results provide mechanistic insights into SCARF1 and its interactions with the ligands, which are important for understanding its physiological roles in homeostasis and the related diseases.